IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i15p11488-d1201746.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Healthy or Environmentally Friendly? Meat Consumption Practices of Green Consumers in Vietnam and Switzerland

Author

Listed:
  • Evelyn Markoni

    (Food Science & Management, School of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences (BFH-HAFL), Bern University of Applied Sciences, Länggasse 85, 3052 Zollikofen, Switzerland)

  • Thanh Mai Ha

    (Faculty of Economics and Rural Development, Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Gia Lam District, Hanoi 131000, Vietnam
    Department of Economics, The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Ulls Hus, Ulls Väg 27, 756 51 Uppsala, Sweden)

  • Franziska Götze

    (Food Science & Management, School of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences (BFH-HAFL), Bern University of Applied Sciences, Länggasse 85, 3052 Zollikofen, Switzerland)

  • Isabel Häberli

    (Food Science & Management, School of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences (BFH-HAFL), Bern University of Applied Sciences, Länggasse 85, 3052 Zollikofen, Switzerland)

  • Minh Hai Ngo

    (Faculty of Economics and Rural Development, Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Gia Lam District, Hanoi 131000, Vietnam)

  • Reto Martin Huwiler

    (Food Science & Management, School of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences (BFH-HAFL), Bern University of Applied Sciences, Länggasse 85, 3052 Zollikofen, Switzerland)

  • Mathilde Delley

    (Food Science & Management, School of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences (BFH-HAFL), Bern University of Applied Sciences, Länggasse 85, 3052 Zollikofen, Switzerland)

  • Anh Duc Nguyen

    (Faculty of Economics and Rural Development, Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Gia Lam District, Hanoi 131000, Vietnam)

  • Thi Lam Bui

    (Faculty of Accounting and Business Management, Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Gia Lam District, Hanoi 131000, Vietnam)

  • Nhu Thinh Le

    (Department of Economics and Marketing, Fruit and Vegetable Research Institute, Gia Lam District, Hanoi 131000, Vietnam)

  • Bao Duong Pham

    (Faculty of Economics and Rural Development, Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Gia Lam District, Hanoi 131000, Vietnam)

  • Thomas A. Brunner

    (Food Science & Management, School of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences (BFH-HAFL), Bern University of Applied Sciences, Länggasse 85, 3052 Zollikofen, Switzerland)

Abstract

High meat consumption is a phenomenon in both developed countries such as Switzerland and emerging countries such as Vietnam. This high meat consumption is associated with environmental, social, and health consequences. Drawing upon social practice theory, this study explores the influence of social practices on the meat consumption of green consumers, as a growing number of consumers in both countries want to eat healthy and sustainably but still have different needs and face different barriers. Data were collected from online group discussions. For green consumers, meat consumption was found to convey certain meanings and depends, among other things, on the information available. The consumption decision in Vietnam is strongly influenced by health and food safety, whereas negative environmental consequences are important in Switzerland. Social and cultural aspects also play a major part in the decision to eat or abstain from meat in both countries. Meat is a non-negotiable part of any special occasion meal in Vietnam and is often eaten at social gatherings in Switzerland. We argue that meat consumption is linked to social status in both countries, but family influence is stronger in Vietnam than in Switzerland. Interventions, such as policy measures that are adapted to regional, cultural, and consumer group specificities and focus on social practices rather than individual behavior, are a promising means to promote meat reduction.

Suggested Citation

  • Evelyn Markoni & Thanh Mai Ha & Franziska Götze & Isabel Häberli & Minh Hai Ngo & Reto Martin Huwiler & Mathilde Delley & Anh Duc Nguyen & Thi Lam Bui & Nhu Thinh Le & Bao Duong Pham & Thomas A. Brunn, 2023. "Healthy or Environmentally Friendly? Meat Consumption Practices of Green Consumers in Vietnam and Switzerland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-21, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11488-:d:1201746
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11488/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11488/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bonnet, Céline & Bouamra-Mechemache, Zohra & Réquillart, Vincent & Treich, Nicolas, 2020. "Viewpoint: Regulating meat consumption to improve health, the environment and animal welfare," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    2. Thanh-Lam Nguyen & Do Huu Tai & Lam Thanh Hien & Doan Manh Quynh & Phan Ngoc Son, 2020. "A Novel Model to Predict Plant-Based Food Choice-Empirical Study in Southern Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-25, May.
    3. Raneri, Jessica E. & Kennedy, Gina & Nguyen, Trang & Wertheim-Heck, Sigrid & Do, Ha & de Haan, Stef & Nguyen, Phuong, 2019. "Determining key research areas for healthier diets and sustainable food systems in Viet Nam," IFPRI discussion papers 1872, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bogdan Nichifor & Luminita Zait & Laura Timiras, 2025. "Drivers, Barriers, and Innovations in Sustainable Food Consumption: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-44, March.
    2. Tong Hu & Abdullah Al Mamun & Mohammad Nurul Hassan Reza & Mengling Wu & Qing Yang, 2024. "Examining consumers’ willingness to pay premium price for organic food," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abele Kuipers & Agata Malak-Rawlikowska & Aldona Stalgienė & Anita Ule & Marija Klopčič, 2021. "European Dairy Farmers’ Perceptions and Responses towards Development Strategies in Years of Turbulent Market and Policy Changes," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-24, March.
    2. Jody Harris & Tabitha Hrynick & Mai Thi My Thien & Tuyen Huynh & Phuong Huynh & Phuong Nguyen & Anne-Marie Thow, 2022. "Tensions and coalitions: A new trade agreement affects the policy space for nutrition in Vietnam," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 14(5), pages 1123-1141, October.
    3. Emmanuelle Lavaine & Philippe Majerus & Nicolas Treich, 2020. "Health, air pollution, and animal agriculture," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 101(4), pages 517-528.
    4. Annika Johanna Thies & Felicitas Schneider & Josef Efken, 2021. "The Meat We Do Not Eat. A Survey of Meat Waste in German Hospitality and Food Service Businesses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, April.
    5. Bazoche, Pascale & Guinet, Nicolas & Poret, Sylvaine & Teyssier, Sabrina, 2023. "Does the provision of information increase the substitution of animal proteins with plant-based proteins? An experimental investigation into consumer choices," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    6. Mariola Garczyńska & Joanna Kostecka & Grzegorz Pączka & Anna Mazur-Pączka & Tomasz Cebulak & Kevin R. Butt, 2023. "Chemical Composition of Earthworm ( Dendrobaena veneta Rosa) Biomass Is Suitable as an Alternative Protein Source," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-11, February.
    7. Alexander Brumm & Kensuke Fukushi, 2024. "Introducing the Food Value Framework (FVF) to empower transdisciplinary research and unite stakeholders in their efforts of building a sustainable global food system," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(10), pages 25921-25943, October.
    8. Ortega, David L. & Sun, Jiayu & Lin, Wen, 2022. "Identity labels as an instrument to reduce meat demand and encourage consumption of plant based and cultured meat alternatives in China," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    9. Jody Harris & Phuong Hong Nguyen & Lan Mai Tran & Phuong Nam Huynh, 2020. "Nutrition transition in Vietnam: changing food supply, food prices, household expenditure, diet and nutrition outcomes," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 12(5), pages 1141-1155, October.
    10. Pierre Dupraz, 2020. "Policies for the ecological transition of agriculture: the livestock issue," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 101(4), pages 529-538.
    11. Funke, Franziska & Mattauch, Linus & van den Bijgaart, Inge & Godfray, Charles & Hepburn, Cameron & Klenert, David & Springmann, Marco & Treich, Nicholas, 2021. "Is Meat Too Cheap? Towards Optimal Meat Taxation," INET Oxford Working Papers 2021-08, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.
    12. Wolfgang Brozek & Christof Falkenberg, 2021. "Industrial Animal Farming and Zoonotic Risk: COVID-19 as a Gateway to Sustainable Change? A Scoping Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-30, August.
    13. Linus Mattauch & Leona Tenkhoff, 2023. "High ‘steaks’: Building support for reducing agricultural emissions," PLOS Climate, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(10), pages 1-4, October.
    14. Attila Gere & Ariola Harizi & Nick Bellissimo & Derek Roberts & Howard Moskowitz, 2020. "Creating a Mind Genomics Wiki for Non-Meat Analogs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-13, July.
    15. Di Novi, Cinzia & Marenzi, Anna, 2022. "Improving health and sustainability: Patterns of red and processed meat consumption across generations," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(12), pages 1324-1330.
    16. Nicolas Treich, 2021. "Cultured Meat: Promises and Challenges," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 79(1), pages 33-61, May.
    17. Nicolas Treich, 2022. "The Dasgupta Review and the Problem of Anthropocentrism," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 83(4), pages 973-997, December.
    18. Georgiana-Raluca Ladaru & Diana Maria Ilie & Maria Claudia Diaconeasa & Ionut Laurentiu Petre & Florian Marin & Valentin Lazar, 2020. "Influencing Factors of a Sustainable Vegetable Choice. The Romanian Consumers’ Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-20, November.
    19. Roosen, Jutta & Staudigel, Matthias & Rahbauer, Sebastian, 2022. "Demand elasticities for fresh meat and welfare effects of meat taxes in Germany," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    20. Cinzia Di Novi & Anna Marenzi & Francesca Zantomio, 2021. "Patterns of Red and Processed Meat Consumption across Generations: A Shift from the Traditional Mediterranean Diet," Working Papers 2021:01, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11488-:d:1201746. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.