IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i8p3347-d348106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of the Gender Digital Divide on Sustainable Development: Comparative Analysis between the European Union and the Maghreb

Author

Listed:
  • Hayet Kerras

    (Departamento de Economía de la Empresa, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, 30203 Cartagena, Spain)

  • Jorge Luis Sánchez-Navarro

    (Departamento de Economía de la Empresa, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, 30203 Cartagena, Spain)

  • Erasmo Isidro López-Becerra

    (Departamento de Economía de la Empresa, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, 30203 Cartagena, Spain)

  • María Dolores de-Miguel Gómez

    (Departamento de Economía de la Empresa, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, 30203 Cartagena, Spain)

Abstract

Today, the relationship between gender and information and communications technologies (ICTs) is a very important element in achieving sustainable development, since ICTs play a key role in attaining gender equality and empowering women by allowing access to important information and involving them as actors in social, economic and environmental development. This participation is closely linked to the degree of education, training and employability, and so women bring added value to the technology sector and not only to it, but also to all sectors associated with it, through their contribution to R&D and Innovation. The 17 goals adopted in Agenda 21 constitute a roadmap that aims to involve all actors and impose gender equality in each one of these goals. In this study, we compare the innovation and gender index of four Mediterranean countries (France, Spain, Morocco, and Algeria) and analyze how some indexes related with “the gender digital divide” affect the achievement of these sustainable development goals. It has been observed that Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9 and 10 are the most influenced by ICT and the gender digital divide, and that none of the countries in our study have achieved them, although France and Spain present a moderate trend towards their achievement by 2030, and to support this statement, a multiple linear regression has been performed at a global level for the countries that have all of the indicators’ data available. The empirical results show that the gender digital divide has a negative effect on this accomplishment and that the technology disposition has a positive effect on them.

Suggested Citation

  • Hayet Kerras & Jorge Luis Sánchez-Navarro & Erasmo Isidro López-Becerra & María Dolores de-Miguel Gómez, 2020. "The Impact of the Gender Digital Divide on Sustainable Development: Comparative Analysis between the European Union and the Maghreb," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-30, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:8:p:3347-:d:348106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/8/3347/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/8/3347/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antonio Fernández-Portillo & Manuel Almodóvar-González & José Luís Coca-Pérez & Héctor Valentín Jiménez-Naranjo, 2019. "Is Sustainable Economic Development Possible Thanks to the Deployment of ICT?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-15, November.
    2. Faucheux, S. & Nicolaï, I., 2011. "IT for green and green IT: A proposed typology of eco-innovation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(11), pages 2020-2027, September.
    3. Cristina Drumea & Bogdan Băcanu & Carmen Elena Anton & Adriana Veronica Litra & Steliana Busuioceanu & Alexandra Doroș, 2020. "Gender Parity within the Gender—Sustainability Paradigm: A Case Study on Management Structures of the Romanian Academia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-36, January.
    4. Maria José Sousa & Pere Mercadé Melé & Jesús Molina Gómez, 2020. "Technology, Governance, and a Sustainability Model for Small and Medium-Sized Towns in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, January.
    5. Florence Rodhain & Bernard Fallery, 2009. "ICT and Ecology: In favour of research based on the Responsibility principle," Post-Print hal-00777858, HAL.
    6. Toke Christensen & Mirjam Godskesen & Kirsten Gram-Hanssen & Maj-Britt Quitzau & Inge Røpke, 2007. "Greening the Danes? Experience with consumption and environment policies," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 91-116, June.
    7. Seetha Nesaratnam & Tengudzeni Nkosingiphile Mamba & Jugindar Singh Kartar Singh, 2018. "A Study on the Gender Digital Divide: Overcoming the Under-Representation of South African Women in the IT Sector," Business Management and Strategy, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(2), pages 151-168, December.
    8. Ming-te Lu, 2001. "Digital Divide in Developing Countries," Journal of Global Information Technology Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(3), pages 1-4, July.
    9. Kolk, Ans, 2016. "The social responsibility of international business: From ethics and the environment to CSR and sustainable development," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 23-34.
    10. Lykke E. Andersen & Oscar Jorge Molina Tejerina & Anna Sophia Doyle, 2016. "D - Desigualdad," INESAD book chapters, in: Lykke E. Andersen & Boris Branisa & Stefano Canelas (ed.), El ABC del desarrollo en Bolivia, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 55-60, Institute for Advanced Development Studies.
    11. Peng, Kelly Z. & Ngo, Hang-Yue & Shi, Junqi & Wong, Chi-Sum, 2009. "Gender differences in the work commitment of Chinese workers: An investigation of two alternative explanations," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 323-335, July.
    12. Gary S. Becker, 1975. "Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education, Second Edition," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number beck75-1, July.
    13. Gupta, Vishal K. & Goktan, A. Banu & Gunay, Gonca, 2014. "Gender differences in evaluation of new business opportunity: A stereotype threat perspective," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 273-288.
    14. Shen-Tsu Wang & Meng-Hua Li & Chun-Chi Lien, 2019. "An Analysis of Grey Multiattribute Decision-Making Optimization Concerning Gender and Sustainable Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-15, May.
    15. Christian Fuchs, 2008. "The implications of new information and communication technologies for sustainability," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 291-309, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gabriel Bratucu & Eliza Nichifor & Silvia Sumedrea & Ioana Bianca Chitu & Radu Constantin Lixandroiu, 2022. "Avoiding Digital Divide in European Union through European Green Deal," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 24(59), pages 1-77.
    2. Liang, Wanqi & Li, Wenying, 2023. "Impact of internet usage on the subjective well-being of urban and rural households: Evidence from Vietnam," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(3).
    3. Sonia Casillas-Martín & Marcos Cabezas-González & Ana García-Valcárcel Muñoz-Repiso, 2020. "DigiCraft: A Pedagogical Innovative Proposal for the Development of the Digital Competence in Vulnerable Children," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-15, November.
    4. Aysad Gudekli & Murat Ertan Dogan & Tulay Goru Dogan & Duygu Gudekli, 2023. "Gender, Sustainability, and Urbanism: A Systematic Review of Literature and Cross-Cluster Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-18, October.
    5. Lavinia Dovleac & Ioana Bianca Chițu & Eliza Nichifor & Gabriel Brătucu, 2023. "Shaping the Inclusivity in the New Society by Enhancing the Digitainability of Sustainable Development Goals with Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-14, February.
    6. Lythreatis, Sophie & Singh, Sanjay Kumar & El-Kassar, Abdul-Nasser, 2022. "The digital divide: A review and future research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    7. Rita Almeida & José Ángel Pérez-López & Rute Abreu, 2022. "Digital Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in the Water Industry," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(11), pages 3929-3947, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Jing & Liang, Xiong-jian, 2012. "Promoting green ICT in China: A framework based on innovation system approaches," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 997-1013.
    2. Qi Deng & Shaobo Ji, 2015. "Organizational Green IT Adoption: Concept and Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Sanaa Ait Daoud & Amélie Bohas, 2013. "Technologies de l'Information (TI) et Développement Durable (DD) : Revue de la littérature et pistes de réflexion," Post-Print hal-00813608, HAL.
    4. Asch, Beth J & Warner, John T, 2001. "A Theory of Compensation and Personnel Policy in Hierarchical Organizations with Application to the United States Military," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 19(3), pages 523-562, July.
    5. Stuth, Stefan & Schorlemmer, Julia & Hennig, Marina & Allmendinger, Jutta, 2014. "Freiwilliges Engagement: Ein Patentrezept für Wiedereinsteigerinnen?," Discussion Papers, Presidential Department P 2014-007, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    6. Charfeddine, Lanouar & Umlai, Mohamed, 2023. "ICT sector, digitization and environmental sustainability: A systematic review of the literature from 2000 to 2022," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    7. Wu Juan & Li Yaokuang, 2020. "An Exploratory Cross-Country Analysis of Female Entrepreneurial Activity: The Roles of Gendered Institutions," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 10(3), pages 1-20, July.
    8. Conlon, Gavan, 2001. "The incidence and outcomes associated with the late attainment of qualifications in the United Kingdom," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 19540, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Oswald, Yvonne & Backes-Gellner, Uschi, 2014. "Learning for a bonus: How financial incentives interact with preferences," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 52-61.
    10. Altorjai, Szilvia, 2013. "Over-qualification of immigrants in the UK," ISER Working Paper Series 2013-11, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    11. Geoff Mason & Hiroatsu Nohara, 2010. "How well-rewarded is inter-firm mobility in the labour market for scientists and engineers? New evidence from the UK and France," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(5), pages 459-480.
    12. Patrik Hultberg & David Santandreu Calonge & Seong-Hee Kim, 2017. "Education policy in South Korea: A contemporary model of human capital accumulation?," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 1389804-138, January.
    13. Bickenbach, Frank & Dohse, Dirk & Liu, Wan-Hsin, 2014. "An inquiry into the determinants of graduate entrepreneurship in Hong Kong and Guangzhou (Mainland China)," Kiel Working Papers 1940, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    14. Alberto Bayo-Moriones & Jose E. Galdon-Sanchez & Maia Güell, 2010. "Is seniority-based pay used as a motivational device? Evidence from plant-level data," Research in Labor Economics, in: Jobs, Training, and Worker Well-being, pages 155-187, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    15. Hsu, Dan K. & Burmeister-Lamp, Katrin & Simmons, Sharon A. & Foo, Maw-Der & Hong, Michelle C. & Pipes, Jesse D., 2019. "“I know I can, but I don't fit”: Perceived fit, self-efficacy, and entrepreneurial intention," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 311-326.
    16. Ehlers, Tim, 2011. "University graduation dependent on family's wealth, ability and social status," University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics 120, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics.
    17. Justin R. Hall & Selen Savas-Hall & Eric H. Shaw, 2023. "A deductive approach to a systematic review of entrepreneurship literature," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 987-1016, September.
    18. Manal Ayyad Dhif Alshammry & Saqib Muneer, 2023. "The influence of economic development, capital formation, and internet use on environmental degradation in Saudi Arabia," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, December.
    19. Lorena Para‐González & Carlos Mascaraque‐Ramírez, 2020. "The six dimensions of CSR as a driver of key results in the shipbuilding industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 576-584, March.
    20. Luis Eduardo Arango & Diana Carolina Escobar & Emma Mercedes Monsalve, 2013. "Subempleo por ingresos y funcionamiento del mercado de trabajo en Colombia," Revista Desarrollo y Sociedad, Universidad de los Andes,Facultad de Economía, CEDE, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:8:p:3347-:d:348106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.