IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i15p5908-d388177.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Economy, Environmental Proactivity, Eco-Innovation and Performance in the Spanish Wine Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Félix Calle

    (Faculty of Economics, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 02080 Albacete, Spain)

  • Ángela González-Moreno

    (Faculty of Economics, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 02080 Albacete, Spain)

  • Inmaculada Carrasco

    (Faculty of Economics, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 02080 Albacete, Spain)

  • Manuel Vargas-Vargas

    (Faculty of Economics, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 02080 Albacete, Spain)

Abstract

Concerned about climate change, cooperatives in the wine sector are beginning to adapt their strategies, guided by cooperative principles that encompass high social responsibility and the pursuit of community values. In this context and focused on the analysis of the decisions that drive firms to be more environmentally sustainable, our goal is twofold. On the one hand, we wish to examine whether there exist differences between cooperative and non-cooperative firms as regards their environmental proactivity. On the other hand, we hope to demonstrate the diversity of behaviors within the category of cooperative firms, identifying the possible patterns of environmental proactivity in Spanish cooperatives in the wine sector. We first conducted a difference of means t -test for independent samples ( n = 251; sampled in 2017)—cooperatives (51) vs. non cooperative firms (200)- and then a two-stage cluster analysis and a subsequent variance analysis, using SPSS 24. Our results show no significant differences between cooperative and non-cooperative firms concerning their environmental behavior and underlines the diversity within the cooperatives in the wine sector as regards their environmental proactivity, revealing the existence of proactive, preventive and activist patterns of behavior. These patterns also show differences in the motivations for their environmental behaviors and their assessment of financial performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Félix Calle & Ángela González-Moreno & Inmaculada Carrasco & Manuel Vargas-Vargas, 2020. "Social Economy, Environmental Proactivity, Eco-Innovation and Performance in the Spanish Wine Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-26, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:15:p:5908-:d:388177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/15/5908/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/15/5908/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eva Fernández & James Simpson, 2017. "Product quality or market regulation? Explaining the slow growth of Europe's wine cooperatives, 1880–1980," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 70(1), pages 122-142, February.
    2. Richard Castaldi & Susan Cholette & Mahmood Hussain, 2006. "A Country-Level Analysis of Competitive Advantage in the Wine Industry," DEIAgra Working Papers 6002, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Department of Agricultural Economics and Engineering, revised Jul 2006.
    3. Konstantinos Giannakas & Murray Fulton, 2005. "Process Innovation Activity in a Mixed Oligopoly: The Role of Cooperatives," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 87(2), pages 406-422.
    4. Gregory G. Dess & Richard B. Robinson, 1984. "Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately‐held firm and conglomerate business unit," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(3), pages 265-273, July.
    5. Sexton, Richard J. & Iskow, Julie, 1993. "What Do We Know About the Economic Efficiency of Cooperatives: An Evaluative Survey," Journal of Agricultural Cooperation, National Council of Farmer Cooperatives, vol. 8, pages 1-13.
    6. R. Scott Marshall & Mark Cordano & Murray Silverman, 2005. "Exploring individual and institutional drivers of proactive environmentalism in the US Wine industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(2), pages 92-109, March.
    7. Paul Lanoie & Jérémy Laurent‐Lucchetti & Nick Johnstone & Stefan Ambec, 2011. "Environmental Policy, Innovation and Performance: New Insights on the Porter Hypothesis," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(3), pages 803-842, September.
    8. Imanol BASTERRETXEA & Ricardo MARTÍNEZ, 2012. "Impact Of Management And Innovation Capabilities On Performance: Are Cooperatives Different?," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 83(3), pages 357-381, September.
    9. Francisco J. Medina-Albaladejo, 2015. "Co-operative wineries: Temporal solution or efficient firms? The Spanish case during late Francoism, 1970-1981," Business History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(4), pages 589-613, June.
    10. Castaldi, Richard & Cholette, Susan & Hussain, Mahmood, 2006. "A Country-Level Analysis of Competitive Advantage in the Wine Industry," DEIAgra Working Papers 14859, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Department of Agricultural Economics and Agricultural Engineering.
    11. MAREK HUDON & BENJAMIN HUYBRECHTS & Bonno PEL & Tom BAULER, 2017. "A Transitions Studies Perspective On The Social Economy; Exploring Institutionalization And Capture In Flemish ‘Insertion’ Practices," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 88(2), pages 279-298, June.
    12. Duchin, Faye & Lange, Glenn-Marie & Kell, Georg, 1995. "Technological change, trade and the environment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 185-193, September.
    13. Cristina Santini & Alessio Cavicchi & Leonardo Casini, 2013. "Sustainability in the wine industry: key questions and research trends a," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 1(1), pages 1-14, December.
    14. MAREK HUDON & BENJAMIN HUYBRECHTS & Martine VÉZINA & Marie-Claire MALO & Majdi BEN SELMA, 2017. "Mature Social Economy Enterprise And Social Innovation: The Case Of The Desjardins Environmental Fund," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 88(2), pages 257-278, June.
    15. Faucheux, Sylvie & Nicolai, Isabelle, 1998. "Environmental technological change and governance in sustainable development policy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 243-256, December.
    16. Borgen, Svein Ole & Aarset, Bernt, 2016. "Participatory Innovation: Lessons from breeding cooperatives," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 99-105.
    17. Ben-ner, Avner, 1988. "The life cycle of worker-owned firms in market economies : A theoretical analysis," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 287-313, October.
    18. Hans De Steur & Hélène Temmerman & Xavier Gellynck & Maurizio Canavari, 2020. "Drivers, adoption, and evaluation of sustainability practices in Italian wine SMEs," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 744-762, February.
    19. Linda F. Bisson & Andrew L. Waterhouse & Susan E. Ebeler & M. Andrew Walker & James T. Lapsley, 2002. "The present and future of the international wine industry," Nature, Nature, vol. 418(6898), pages 696-699, August.
    20. Mazzanti, Massimiliano & Zoboli, Roberto, 2009. "Environmental efficiency and labour productivity: Trade-off or joint dynamics? A theoretical investigation and empirical evidence from Italy using NAMEA," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(4), pages 1182-1194, February.
    21. Guinnane, Timothy W., 2001. "Cooperatives As Information Machines: German Rural Credit Cooperatives, 1883–1914," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 61(2), pages 366-389, June.
    22. Horbach, Jens, 2008. "Determinants of environmental innovation--New evidence from German panel data sources," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 163-173, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stanley Y. B. Huang & Chih-Wen Ting & Ming-Way Li, 2021. "The Effects of Green Transformational Leadership on Adoption of Environmentally Proactive Strategies: The Mediating Role of Green Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-11, March.
    2. Burcu Özgül & Cemal Zehir, 2023. "How Managers’ Green Transformational Leadership Affects a Firm’s Environmental Strategy, Green Innovation, and Performance: The Moderating Impact of Differentiation Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    3. Stanley Y. B. Huang & Chih-Wen Ting & Yu-Ming Fei, 2021. "A Multilevel Model of Environmentally Specific Social Identity in Predicting Environmental Strategies: Evidence from Technology Manufacturing Businesses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-13, April.
    4. Stanley Y. B. Huang & Shih-Chin Lee & Yue-Shi Lee, 2021. "Constructing an Adoption Model of Proactive Environmental Strategy: A Novel Quantitative Method of the Multi-Level Growth Curve Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(16), pages 1-9, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicolò Barbieri & Claudia Ghisetti & Marianna Gilli & Giovanni Marin & Francesco Nicolli, 2016. "A Survey Of The Literature On Environmental Innovation Based On Main Path Analysis," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 596-623, July.
    2. Katharina Spraul & Annegret Höfert, 2021. "Governance for Sustainability: Patterns of Regulation and Self-Regulation in the German Wine Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-25, March.
    3. repec:hal:wpaper:hal-00860045 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Böhringer, Christoph & Moslener, Ulf & Oberndorfer, Ulrich & Ziegler, Andreas, 2012. "Clean and productive? Empirical evidence from the German manufacturing industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 442-451.
    5. María Carmen García-Cortijo & Juan R. Ferrer & Juan Sebastián Castillo-Valero & Vicente Pinilla, 2021. "The Drivers of the Sustainability of Spanish Wineries: Resources and Capabilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-12, September.
    6. Jesús López-Santiago & Amelia Md Som & Fahmi Asyadi Bin Md Yusof & Fernando R. Mazarrón & María Teresa Gómez-Villarino, 2024. "Exploring Sustainability in Wineries: Evaluating Food Safety and Environmental Management Aligning with the Farm to Fork Strategy," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-35, February.
    7. Yogesh Bhatt & Karminder Ghuman, 2023. "Corporate environmental responsiveness: a bibliometric and content analysis," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 1303-1350, September.
    8. Claudia Ghisetti & Francesco Quatraro, 2013. "Beyond inducement in climate change: Does environmental performance spur environmental technologies?," Post-Print hal-00860045, HAL.
    9. Vitaliy Roud & Thomas Wolfgang Thurner, 2018. "The Influence of State‐Ownership on Eco‐Innovations in Russian Manufacturing Firms," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(5), pages 1213-1227, October.
    10. Castilla-Polo, Francisca & Sánchez-Hernández, María Isabel & Gallardo-Vázquez, Dolores & Ruiz Rodríguez, María del Consuelo, 2016. "Diseño de un modelo de reputación para cooperativas oleícolas," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 154-167.
    11. Giovanni Marin & Francesca Lotti, 2017. "Productivity effects of eco-innovations using data on eco-patents," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 26(1), pages 125-148.
    12. Yu, Wantao & Ramanathan, Ramakrishnan & Nath, Prithwiraj, 2017. "Environmental pressures and performance: An analysis of the roles of environmental innovation strategy and marketing capability," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 160-169.
    13. Grazia Cecere & Massimiliano Mazzanti, 2015. "Green jobs, innovation and environmentally oriented strategies in European SMEs," SEEDS Working Papers 2115, SEEDS, Sustainability Environmental Economics and Dynamics Studies, revised Dec 2015.
    14. Zhang, Yijun & Li, Xiaoping & Song, Yi & Jiang, Feitao, 2021. "Can green industrial policy improve total factor productivity? Firm-level evidence from China," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 51-62.
    15. Cusmano, Lucia & Morrison, Andrea & Rabellotti, Roberta, 2010. "Catching up Trajectories in the Wine Sector: A Comparative Study of Chile, Italy, and South Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 38(11), pages 1588-1602, November.
    16. Marc Dressler, 2023. "Generic strategic profiling of entrepreneurial SMEs – environmentalism as hygiene factor," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 121-150, March.
    17. Hueth, Brent & Marcoul, Philippe, 2007. "The Cooperative Firm as Monitored Credit," Staff Paper Series 508, University of Wisconsin, Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    18. Alessandra Colombelli & Jackie Krafft & Francesco Quatraro, 2021. "Firms’ growth, green gazelles and eco-innovation: evidence from a sample of European firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1721-1738, April.
    19. Albert Folch & Jordi Planas, 2019. "Cooperation, Fair Trade, and the Development of Organic Coffee Growing in Chiapas (1980–2015)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-22, January.
    20. Giulio Guarini & Giuseppe Garofalo & Alessandro Federici, 2014. "A Virtuous Cumulative Growth Circle among Innovation, Inclusion and Sustainability? A Structuralist-Keynesian Analysis with an Application on Europe," GREDEG Working Papers 2014-39, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    21. Zhongju Liao, 2018. "Corporate culture, environmental innovation and financial performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1368-1375, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:15:p:5908-:d:388177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.