IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v9y2019i3p60-d215850.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Farmers’ Access to Agricultural Information: Evidence from Semi-Arid Region of Rajasthan State, India

Author

Listed:
  • Ishwar S. Parmar

    (Production (SAP), Al Rawabi Dairy Co. LLC, Al Khawaneej, 50368 Dubai, UAE)

  • Peeyush Soni

    (Department of Agricultural & Food Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur 721302, India)

  • John K. M. Kuwornu

    (Department of Food, Agriculture and Bioresources, School of Environment, Resources and Development, Asian Institute of Technology, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand)

  • Krishna R. Salin

    (Department of Food, Agriculture and Bioresources, School of Environment, Resources and Development, Asian Institute of Technology, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand)

Abstract

The rural farmers in western Rajasthan State are uneducated and most of the applications of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) are demonstrated and run in the English Language. The majority of these rural farmers who are illiterates with a very low level of understanding of the English Language find it difficult to take advantage of the availability of ICT to facilitate their access to information for their farm businesses. This study examined the role of ICT in enhancing the farmers’ access to production and marketing information in western Rajasthan State in India. Primary data was collected from 133 farmers consisting of 71 ICT users and 62 Non-ICT users through questionnaire administration. The results of the Analysis of Variance test regarding the farmers’ access to different types of production and marketing information revealed that the user type (i.e., ICT versus Non-ICT user) significantly explains the differences in farmers’ access to the different types of marketing and production information. These results are consistent with the empirical results of the student’s t -test that farmers’ access to different types of production and marketing information from ICT sources is significantly higher than from Non-ICT sources. Consistently, the empirical results of the multiple regressions revealed that the percentage of production and marketing information obtained from ICT sources had positive significant influence on the farmers’ access to marketing and production information; and that the percentage of marketing and production information obtained from Non-ICT sources had negative significant influence on the farmers’ access to marketing and production information. These results suggest that ICT sources of marketing and production information play a crucial role in the farmers’ access to this information for their business operations. The implication is that proper education and training of farmers (especially the female farmers) about the utilization of ICT sources to accelerate access to information is crucial.

Suggested Citation

  • Ishwar S. Parmar & Peeyush Soni & John K. M. Kuwornu & Krishna R. Salin, 2019. "Evaluating Farmers’ Access to Agricultural Information: Evidence from Semi-Arid Region of Rajasthan State, India," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-17, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:9:y:2019:i:3:p:60-:d:215850
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/9/3/60/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/9/3/60/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel S. Putler & David Zilberman, 1988. "Computer Use in Agriculture: Evidence from Tulare County, California," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 70(4), pages 790-802.
    2. Shalendra & Gummagolmath, K.C. & Sharma, Purushottam, 2011. "ICT Initiatives in Indian Agriculture - An Overview," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 66(3), pages 1-9.
    3. Lokesh Jain & Harish Kumar & R. K. Singla, 2015. "Assessing Mobile Technology Usage for Knowledge Dissemination among Farmers in Punjab," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 668-676, October.
    4. Marvin T. Batte & Eugene Jones & Gary D. Schnitkey, 1990. "Computer Use by Ohio Commercial Farmers," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 72(4), pages 935-945.
    5. Xiaolan Fu & Shaheen Akter, 2016. "The Impact of Mobile Phone Technology on Agricultural Extension Services Delivery: Evidence from India," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(11), pages 1561-1576, November.
    6. Bonny, Sylvie, 1992. "Ongoing technical change on farm holdings in a developed country, France. A survey on its vectors, its nature and the farmers concerned," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 75-103.
    7. Jain, Rajni & Ahuja, Usha Rani & Kumar, Anjani, 2012. "ICTs and Farm Women: Access, Use and Impact," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 67(3), pages 1-10.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qianhui Ma & Shaofeng Zheng & Peng Deng, 2022. "Impact of Internet Use on Farmers’ Organic Fertilizer Application Behavior under the Climate Change Context: The Role of Social Network," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-19, September.
    2. Gershom Endelani Mwalupaso & Shangao Wang & Zhangxing Xu & Xu Tian, 2019. "Towards Auspicious Agricultural Informatization—Implication of Farmers’ Behavioral Intention Apropos of Mobile Phone Use in Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-21, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fecke, Wilm & Danne, Michael & Mußhoff, Oliver, 2018. "E-commerce in agriculture: The case of crop protection product purchases in a discrete choice experiment," DARE Discussion Papers 1803, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    2. Smith, Aaron D. & Goe, W. Richard & Kemey, Martin & Morrison Paul, Catherine J., 2004. "Computer and Internet Use by Great Plains Farmers," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 29(3), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Walton, Jonathan C. & Larson, James A. & Roberts, Roland K. & Lambert, Dayton M. & English, Burton C. & Larkin, Sherry L. & Marra, Michele C., 2008. "PDA and Handheld GPS Adoption in Precision Cotton Production," 2008 Annual Meeting, February 2-6, 2008, Dallas, Texas 6839, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    4. Carter, Bryson R. & Batte, Marvin T., 1994. "Selecting Delivery Methods for Outreach Education Programs," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(2), pages 473-484, December.
    5. Hung‐Hao Chang & David R. Just, 2009. "Internet Access and Farm Household Income – Empirical Evidence using a Semi‐parametric Assessment in Taiwan," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(2), pages 348-366, June.
    6. Ohlmer, Bo & Olson, Kent & Brehmer, Berndt, 1998. "Understanding farmers' decision making processes and improving managerial assistance," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 18(3), pages 273-290, May.
    7. Sabuhoro, Jean Bosco & Wunsch, Patti, 2003. "Computer Technology Adoption By Canadian Farm Businesses: An Analysis Based on the 2001 Census of Agriculture," Agriculture and Rural Working Paper Series 28039, Statistics Canada.
    8. Tiffin, Richard & Balcombe, Kelvin, 2011. "The determinants of technology adoption by UK farmers using Bayesian model averaging: the cases of organic production and computer usage," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 55(4), pages 1-20.
    9. Bortamuly, Alin Borah & Goswami, Kishor, 2015. "Determinants of the adoption of modern technology in the handloom industry in Assam," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 90(PB), pages 400-409.
    10. Tomaszewski, M. A. & van Asseldonk, M. A. P. M. & Dijkhuizen, A. A. & Huirne, R. B. M., 2000. "Determining farm effects attributable to the introduction and use of a dairy management information system in The Netherlands," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 23(1), pages 79-86, June.
    11. Walton, Jonathan C. & Lambert, Dayton M. & Roberts, Roland K. & Larson, James A. & English, Burton C. & Larkin, Sherry L. & Martin, Steven W. & Marra, Michele C. & Paxton, Kenneth W. & Reeves, Jeanne , 2008. "Adoption and Abandonment of Precision Soil Sampling in Cotton Production," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 33(3), pages 1-21.
    12. Caffey, Rex H. & Kazmierczak, Richard F., Jr., 1994. "Factors Influencing Technology Adoption In A Louisiana Aquaculture System," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 26(1), pages 1-11, July.
    13. Gloy, Brent A. & Akridge, Jay T., 2000. "Computer And Internet Adoption On Large U.S. Farms," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 3(3), pages 1-16.
    14. Adamides, George & Stylianou, Andreas & Kosmas, Petros C. & Apostolopoulos, Constantinos D., 2013. "Factors Affecting PC and Internet Usage by the Rural Population of Cyprus," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 14(1), pages 1-21.
    15. Baer, Alexander G. & Brown, Cheryl, 2007. "Adoption of E-Marketing by Direct-Market Farms in the Northeastern United States," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 38(2), pages 1-11, July.
    16. Lewell F. Gunter & Steven C. Turner, 1993. "Computerization in the US ornamental nursery industry," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 9(1), pages 77-90.
    17. Mishra, Ashok K. & Park, Timothy A., 2005. "An Empirical Analysis of Internet Use by U.S. Farmers," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 34(2), pages 253-264, October.
    18. Mishra, Ashok K. & Williams, Robert P., 2006. "Internet Access and Use by Farm Households," 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA 21106, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    19. Nuthall, Peter L. & Bishop-Hurley, G.J., 1995. "Farm Computer Uptake and Practices in New Zealand," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 63(02), pages 1-10, August.
    20. Baer, Alexander G. & Brown, Cheryl, 2006. "Adoption of E-Marketing by Direct Market Farms in the Northeastern U.S," 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA 21320, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:9:y:2019:i:3:p:60-:d:215850. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.