IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxviiiy2025i2p238-258.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Turnover Intentions in Manufacturing Enterprises:A Mixed Methods Study

Author

Listed:
  • Elzbieta Stolarska-Szelag
  • Aida Stepniak-Mierzejewska

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between the work atmosphere and the reasons for leaving among production workers. Additionally, the study aimed to investigate whether there was a correlation between gender and hygiene factors and the reasons for leaving. Design/methodology/approach: This is an exploratory, bespoke study. Data triangulation was used and a case study supported by a quantitative study was conducted. In the qualitative study, a manager was interviewed on the basis of a questionnaire. In the quantitative study, the motives of the employees deciding to leave their jobs were investigated, N=89. Pearson's χ2 test was used to examine the relationship. Cramer's V effect size measure was used to determine the strength of the association between qualitative variables. Findings: Qualitative research has found that difficult working conditions and a reluctance to induct new employees translates into a negative working atmosphere. Reducing staff turnover should receive more attention from decision-makers at the highest levels, and the transfer of more motivational tools to lower management levels seems to be becoming not only a good solution, but a necessity. The quantitative study showed that work atmosphere was important in relation to the reasons for leaving a job, especially when it came to leaving a job due to stress, unequal treatment of employees and poor team relations. Men were more likely to leave their jobs due to a feeling of being undervalued or due to a lack of development and promotion opportunities than women. Practical implications: Staff turnover is a natural phenomenon in companies, but it generates costs for training new staff and affects productivity and the working environment. Possible causes of staff turnover should be identified in order to avoid and reduce their impact on operations. The authors provided the author's definition of organisational climate and organisational atmosphere. There are few studies that deal directly with departures juxtaposed with the prevailing atmosphere. The results of this study can set a path for managers to retain employees. Originality/value: This study provides a novel perspective by directly linking the work atmosphere to employee turnover in the manufacturing sector, a relationship that is often overlooked in existing literature. By combining qualitative and quantitative approaches, the research offers a multidimensional view of how specific aspects of the organizational climate influence employees' decisions to leave. The inclusion of gender as a variable in the analysis of hygiene factors and motivational elements adds depth to the findings and highlights differences in departure motivations. The study also addresses challenges related to the presence of Ukrainian citizens in the Polish labor market, offering insights into integration issues and their impact on organizational climate.

Suggested Citation

  • Elzbieta Stolarska-Szelag & Aida Stepniak-Mierzejewska, 2025. "Turnover Intentions in Manufacturing Enterprises:A Mixed Methods Study," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 238-258.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxviii:y:2025:i:2:p:238-258
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/3976/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:iab:iabfme:201412(en is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Kyle Bruce, 2005. "Magnus Alexander, the Economists and the Issue of Labour Turnover," Business History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(4), pages 493-510.
    3. Peter Valet, 2023. "Perceptions of Pay Satisfaction and Pay Justice: Two Sides of the Same Coin?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 166(1), pages 157-173, February.
    4. Nachum Sicherman, 1996. "Gender Differences in Departures from a Large Firm," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 49(3), pages 484-505, April.
    5. José-Luis Rodríguez-Sánchez & Thais González-Torres & Antonio Montero-Navarro & Rocío Gallego-Losada, 2020. "Investing Time and Resources for Work–Life Balance: The Effect on Talent Retention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-14, March.
    6. Dengler, Katharina & Matthes, Britta & Paulus, Wiebke, 2014. "Occupational Tasks in the German Labour Market : an alternative measurement on the basis of an expert database," FDZ Methodenreport 201412_en, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Drew, Jacqueline & Carless, Sally A. & Thompson, Briony M., 2008. "Predicting turnover of police officers using the sixteen personality factor questionnaire," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 326-331, August.
    2. Dany Bahar & Andreas Hauptmann & Cem Özgüzel & Hillel Rapoport, 2019. "Migration and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: The Effect of Returning Refugees on Export Performance in the Former Yugoslavia," Working Papers 2019-12, CEPII research center.
    3. Emil Mihaylov, 2022. "Working from Home in the Netherlands: Looking Inside the Blackbox of Work and Occupations," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 22-096/VI, Tinbergen Institute.
    4. Edina Molnár & Asif Mahmood & Naveed Ahmad & Amir Ikram & Shah Ali Murtaza, 2021. "The Interplay between Corporate Social Responsibility at Employee Level, Ethical Leadership, Quality of Work Life and Employee Pro-Environmental Behavior: The Case of Healthcare Organizations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-16, April.
    5. Riccardo Crescenzi & Luisa Gagliardi & Enrico Orru', 2016. "Learning mobility grants and skill (mis)matching in the labour market: The case of the ‘Master and Back’ Programme," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(4), pages 693-707, November.
    6. Manning, Alan, 2011. "Imperfect Competition in the Labor Market," Handbook of Labor Economics, in: O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (ed.), Handbook of Labor Economics, edition 1, volume 4, chapter 11, pages 973-1041, Elsevier.
    7. Angel de la Fuente & Antonio Ciccone, 2003. "Human capital in a global and knowledge-based economy," UFAE and IAE Working Papers 562.03, Unitat de Fonaments de l'Anàlisi Econòmica (UAB) and Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica (CSIC).
    8. Tom Günther & Ulrich C. Schneider & Fabian Stürmer-Heiber, 2023. "Working More for Less: Part-time Penalties Across the Working Hours Distribution?," Berlin School of Economics Discussion Papers 0025, Berlin School of Economics.
    9. Knar Khachatryan & Aleksandr Grigoryan, 2024. "Multidimensional Deprivation from Labor Market Opportunities in Armenia: Evidence from 2018 and 2020," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 66(1), pages 126-165, March.
    10. Mohammad Azimi & Faraz Sadeghvaziri & Elham Ebrahimi & Amin Mozafari, 2025. "War for talent or even enemy at the gate? Investigating the role of employer brand experience in talent retention," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    11. Peichl, Andreas & Popp, Martin, 2022. "Can the Labor Demand Curve Explain Job Polarization?," IAB-Discussion Paper 202221, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    12. Abendroth, Anja‐Kristin & Lott, Yvonne & Hipp, Lena & Müller, Dana & Sauermann, Armin & Carstensen, Tanja, 2022. "Has the COVID‐19 pandemic changed gender‐ and parental‐status‐specific differences in working from home? Panel evidence from Germany," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 29(6), pages 1991-2011.
    13. Kracke, Nancy & Reichelt, Malte & Vicari, Basha, 2017. "Wage losses due to overqualification: The role of formal degrees and occupational skills," IAB-Discussion Paper 201710, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    14. Storm, Eduard, 2022. "On the measurement of tasks: Does expert data get it right?," Ruhr Economic Papers 948, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    15. Genz Sabrina & Janser Markus & Lehmer Florian, 2019. "The Impact of Investments in New Digital Technologies on Wages – Worker-Level Evidence from Germany," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 239(3), pages 483-521, June.
    16. George-Levi Gayle & Limor Golan & Robert A. Miller, 2012. "Gender Differences in Executive Compensation and Job Mobility," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 30(4), pages 829-872.
    17. Sami Napari, 2006. "The Early Career Gender Wage Gap," CEP Discussion Papers dp0738, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    18. Steven Bednar & Dora Gicheva, 2018. "Career Implications of Having a Female-Friendly Supervisor," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 71(2), pages 426-457, March.
    19. Barth, Erling & Dale-Olsen, Harald, 2009. "Monopsonistic discrimination, worker turnover, and the gender wage gap," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 589-597, October.
    20. Erling Barth & Harald Dale-Olsen, 1999. "Monopsonistic Discrimination and the Gender-Wage Gap," NBER Working Papers 7197, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Manufacturing enterprises; turnover; organizational atmosphere; human resources management.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J21 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Labor Force and Employment, Size, and Structure
    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
    • J53 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining - - - Labor-Management Relations; Industrial Jurisprudence

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxviii:y:2025:i:2:p:238-258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.