IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v201y2025ics1366554525002558.html

The impact of operational leanness and resilience on managing geopolitical risks: The moderating role of demand uncertainty and betweenness centrality

Author

Listed:
  • Gu, Minhao
  • Wang, Hui
  • Zhang, Yanming
  • Wang, Ziyue

Abstract

The U.S.-China trade war significantly impacts global supply chain security and stability. This study delves into a particular policy enacted by the U.S. amid the U.S.-China trade war context, targeting foreign investment in China. Our focus is on examining its repercussions on the stock market of relevant high-tech industries in China, and we explore how operational leanness and operational resilience hedge the impact, as well as environmental and network factors moderate these effects based on the complex adaptive systems (CASs) perspective. This study adopts the event study method to analyze the impact of the U.S. investment restriction event in China on the shareholder value of Chinese listed firms. To test our model, we collected data from 812 Chinese listed firms. The U.S. investment restriction event adversely affects the shareholder value of targeted industries in China. Furthermore, we observe a negative correlation between operational leanness and cumulative abnormal returns, while operational resilience exhibits a positive association with cumulative abnormal returns. We also delve into the impact of demand uncertainty and betweenness centrality on these two moderating effects. Our findings reveal that demand uncertainty weakens the positive influence of operational resilience, whereas betweenness centrality strengthens it. However, neither demand uncertainty nor betweenness centrality influences the efficacy of operational leanness. This research enriches the geopolitical risk literature by focusing on a significant investment restriction act. Our study contributes to the different roles of operational leanness and resilience in mitigating geopolitical risks as well as their boundary conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Gu, Minhao & Wang, Hui & Zhang, Yanming & Wang, Ziyue, 2025. "The impact of operational leanness and resilience on managing geopolitical risks: The moderating role of demand uncertainty and betweenness centrality," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:201:y:2025:i:c:s1366554525002558
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2025.104214
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554525002558
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2025.104214?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruixi Long & Shuyang Jia, 2023. "Foreground or background my social responsibility: impact of the trade war on the readability of corporate social responsibility disclosures," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 79-97, March.
    2. An, Yahui & Liu, Xiukun, 2023. "Local attention to employees’ rights and firm value: Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 382-394.
    3. Howard Hao‐Chun Chuang & Rogelio Oliva & Gregory R. Heim, 2019. "Examining the Link between Retailer Inventory Leanness and Operational Efficiency: Moderating Roles of Firm Size and Demand Uncertainty," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(9), pages 2338-2364, September.
    4. Pei Sun & Kamel Mellahi & Mike Wright & Haoping Xu, 2015. "Political Tie Heterogeneity and the Impact of Adverse Shocks on Firm Value," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(8), pages 1036-1063, December.
    5. Fangfang Hou & Congshan Li, 2023. "Reverse innovation and firm value in emerging markets: Evidence from China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(1), pages 161-198, March.
    6. Xingyu Zhou & Zhisong Pan & Guyu Hu & Siqi Tang & Cheng Zhao, 2018. "Stock Market Prediction on High-Frequency Data Using Generative Adversarial Nets," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-11, April.
    7. Pengfei Han & Wei Jiang & Danqing Mei, 2024. "Mapping U.S.–China Technology Decoupling: Policies, Innovation, and Firm Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(12), pages 8386-8413, December.
    8. Antonio Capaldo, 2007. "Network structure and innovation: The leveraging of a dual network as a distinctive relational capability," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 585-608, June.
    9. Rammel, Christian & Stagl, Sigrid & Wilfing, Harald, 2007. "Managing complex adaptive systems -- A co-evolutionary perspective on natural resource management," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 9-21, June.
    10. Zeng, Ka & Xu, Yingjie & Xie, Zhenzhen, 2023. "Local sourcing embeddedness, manufacturing relocation, and firm attitudes toward the US-China trade war: A survey analysis of China-based MNC subsidiaries," Business and Politics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(2), pages 91-116, June.
    11. Yahui An & Fei Su, 2023. "Do internet stock message boards influence firm value? evidence from China," Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2), pages 327-353, March.
    12. Brian W. Jacobs & Vinod R. Singhal, 2020. "Shareholder Value Effects of the Volkswagen Emissions Scandal on the Automotive Ecosystem," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(10), pages 2230-2251, October.
    13. Jin, Yi & Zhao, Hang & Bu, Lin & Zhang, Dayong, 2023. "Geopolitical risk, climate risk and energy markets: A dynamic spillover analysis," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    14. Soliman, Marlon & Saurin, Tarcisio Abreu & Anzanello, Michel Jose, 2018. "The impacts of lean production on the complexity of socio-technical systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 342-357.
    15. Boubakri, Narjess & Cosset, Jean-Claude & Saffar, Walid, 2013. "The role of state and foreign owners in corporate risk-taking: Evidence from privatization," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(3), pages 641-658.
    16. Charpin, Remi & London, Jackie & Vincent, Nicolas, 2024. "The effect of geopolitical tensions on international research collaborations and its implications for global operations management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    17. Fons-Rosen, Christian & Kalemli-Ozcan, Sebnem & Sørensen, Bent E. & Villegas-Sanchez, Carolina & Volosovych, Vadym, 2021. "Quantifying productivity gains from foreign investment," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    18. Allen, Jeffrey S., 2021. "Do Targeted Trade Sanctions Against Chinese Technology Companies Affect US Firms? Evidence from an Event Study," Business and Politics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(3), pages 330-343, September.
    19. Mara Faccio & Maria-Teresa Marchica & Roberto Mura, 2011. "Large Shareholder Diversification and Corporate Risk-Taking," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 24(11), pages 3601-3641.
    20. Iana Shaheen & Arash Azadegan & Samuel Roscoe, 2021. "Who Takes Risks? A Framework on Organizational Risk‐Taking During Sudden‐Onset Disasters," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(11), pages 4023-4043, November.
    21. Li, Jian & Strange, Roger & Ning, Lutao & Sutherland, Dylan, 2016. "Outward foreign direct investment and domestic innovation performance: Evidence from China," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 1010-1019.
    22. Fuqiang Zhang & Xiaole Wu & Christopher S. Tang & Tianjun Feng & Yue Dai, 2020. "Evolution of Operations Management Research: from Managing Flows to Building Capabilities," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(10), pages 2219-2229, October.
    23. Kroes, James R. & Manikas, Andrew S. & Gattiker, Thomas F., 2018. "Operational leanness and retail firm performance since 1980," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 262-274.
    24. Shima Azizi & Cem Deniz Caglar Bozkir & Andrew C. Trapp & O. Erhun Kundakcioglu & Ali Kaan Kurbanzade, 2021. "Aid Allocation for Camp‐Based and Urban Refugees with Uncertain Demand and Replenishments," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(12), pages 4455-4474, December.
    25. Ben Charoenwong & Miaozhe Han & Jing Wu, 2023. "Trade and Foreign Economic Policy Uncertainty in Supply Chain Networks: Who Comes Home?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 126-147, January.
    26. Natalia Ortiz-de-Mandojana & Pratima Bansal, 2016. "The long-term benefits of organizational resilience through sustainable business practices," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(8), pages 1615-1631, August.
    27. Nihat Altintas & Feryal Erhun & Sridhar Tayur, 2008. "Quantity Discounts Under Demand Uncertainty," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(4), pages 777-792, April.
    28. Charles J. Hadlock & Joshua R. Pierce, 2010. "New Evidence on Measuring Financial Constraints: Moving Beyond the KZ Index," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 23(5), pages 1909-1940.
    29. Gu, Xin & Zhang, Weiqiang & Cheng, Sang, 2021. "How do investors in Chinese stock market react to external uncertainty? An event study to the Sino-US disputes," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    30. Linh Nguyen Khanh Duong & Josephine Chong, 2020. "Supply chain collaboration in the presence of disruptions: a literature review," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(11), pages 3488-3507, June.
    31. Arrate Llaguno & Josefa Mula & Francisco Campuzano-Bolarin, 2022. "State of the art, conceptual framework and simulation analysis of the ripple effect on supply chains," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(6), pages 2044-2066, March.
    32. Benjamin R. Tukamuhabwa & Mark Stevenson & Jerry Busby & Marta Zorzini, 2015. "Supply chain resilience: definition, review and theoretical foundations for further study," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(18), pages 5592-5623, September.
    33. Chen, Yufeng & Zhang, Shun & Miao, Jiafeng, 2023. "The negative effects of the US-China trade war on innovation: Evidence from the Chinese ICT industry," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    34. Huang, Yi & Lin, Chen & Liu, Sibo & Tang, Heiwai, 2023. "Trade networks and firm value: Evidence from the U.S.-China trade war," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    35. Peter H Egger & Jiaqing Zhu, 2020. "The US–Chinese trade war: an event study of stock-market responses," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 35(103), pages 519-559.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xu, Yang & Huang, Wei & Zhang, Cherry Yi, 2024. "Navigating international competition with ESG: Insights from the US-China trade war," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(PB).
    2. Zhao, Yonghong & Huang, Fu-Wei & Chang, Ching-Hui & Lin, Jyh-Jiuan, 2024. "Domestic and foreign cap-and-trade regulations, carbon tariffs, and product tariffs during international trade conflicts: A multiproduct cost-efficiency analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    3. Xiaoming Peng & Yihao Li & Chengxin Guo & Liang Peng & Sijin Tan, 2023. "“Risk” or “Opportunity”? The High Sensitivity of Corporate Green Innovation to Environmental Policy Uncertainty: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, June.
    4. Yang, Haiyan & Chen, Linlin & Zhang, Yuyu, 2024. "Political conformity and digital transformation: Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 1979-1997.
    5. Adeel Riaz & Assad Ullah & Bashir Muhammad, 2025. "The impact of global supply chain pressure on the stock market: A sectoral view," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
    6. Peng, Siyi & Ni, Hongfu & Zhong, Daocheng & Fan, Zijie, 2025. "Does deglobalization affect the withdrawal of foreign-invested enterprises? -Evidence from the US-China trade conflicts," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1676-1698.
    7. Xin Wang & Zhe Zhang & Ming Jia, 2025. "Taming the black swan: CEO with military experience and organizational resilience," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 803-859, June.
    8. Ding, Yibing & Sun, Yining & Zhang, Xiaoou, 2025. "Customer digital transformation and enterprise risk-taking: Evidence from Chinese supply chains," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    9. Lin, Xiaowei & Zhang, Pengdong & Yang, Zhihao & Chen, Sicen, 2025. "US sanctions and corporate innovation: Evidence from Chinese listed firms," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    10. Siamak Javadi & Abdullah‐Al Masum & Mohsen Aram & Ramesh P. Rao, 2023. "Climate change and corporate cash holdings: Global evidence," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 52(2), pages 253-295, June.
    11. Wang, Shanyong & Xu, Baolong, 2024. "Environmental protection tax policy and corporate risk-taking: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).
    12. Fei Tang & Lu Zhang, 2024. "Does politician turnover foster firm risk-taking? The moderating role of political ties heterogeneity," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 1279-1301, April.
    13. Wang, Hua & Liao, Lingtao & Wu, Ji (George), 2023. "Robot adoption and firm's capacity utilization: Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    14. Peng Cheng & Dai Xuansi & Fan Tingli & Chen Yuansheng, 2025. "Supply chain concentration and corporate OFDI risk-taking," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(2), pages 1-37, May.
    15. Lin, Boqiang & Song, Yijie, 2025. "Do coal price shocks affect the risk-taking of listed companies in China?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    16. Zhang, Minhao & Liu, Di & Shui, Xiaolong & Hu, Wenjin & Zhan, Yuanzhu, 2025. "Examining the impact of trade tariffs on semiconductor firms' environmental performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    17. Yuan, Li & Rao, Siqi & Yang, Shenggang & Dai, Pengyi, 2023. "Does equity market openness increase productivity? the dual effects of Shanghai-Hong Kong stock Connect program in China," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    18. Qi‐an Chen & Shuxiang Tang & Yuan Xu, 2022. "Do government subsidies and financing constraints play a dominant role in the effect of state ownership on corporate innovation? Evidence from China," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(8), pages 3698-3714, December.
    19. Ruixin Su & Tong Zheng & Yuzhao Zhong & Weizhou Zhong, 2023. "Role of Digital Inclusive Finance for High-Quality Business Development: A Study of China’s “Five Development Concept” Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-21, August.
    20. Syed Imran Zaman & Sharfuddin Ahmed Khan & Sahar Qabool & Himanshu Gupta, 2023. "How digitalization in banking improve service supply chain resilience of e-commerce sector? a technological adoption model approach," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 904-930, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:201:y:2025:i:c:s1366554525002558. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.