IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v215y2025ics0040162525001477.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A multi-criterion decision making method for renewable energy storage technology selection with incomplete evaluation information

Author

Listed:
  • Liao, Huchang
  • Li, Xiaofang

Abstract

Selecting renewable energy storage technologies (RESTs) requires experts with knowledge in different fields to evaluate RESTs under different criteria. However, specialists are usually proficient in a particular field and thus are difficult to provide complete evaluation information of alternatives on all criteria. Besides, different decision makers (DMs) have different risk attitudes on potential risks and benefits. This study proposes a multi-criterion decision making model that considers the causality between criteria, the incomplete evaluation information from specialists, and different risk attitudes of DMs. First, the DEMATEL is used to analyze the causality between criteria and elicit criteria weights, and the interpretive structural modeling is utilized to construct the hierarchical relationship diagram of criteria. Based on the causality of criteria, a Bayesian network is constructed to infer the missing evaluation information of alternatives under the criteria unfamiliar to specialists. Alternatives are then ranked by combining the improved cumulative prospect theory and the combined compromise solution method. An illustrative example is given to validate the applicability of the proposed model. Sensitivity analysis and simulation experiment are given to explore the influence of DMs' risk attitudes to loss and gain on the ranking of alternatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Liao, Huchang & Li, Xiaofang, 2025. "A multi-criterion decision making method for renewable energy storage technology selection with incomplete evaluation information," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:215:y:2025:i:c:s0040162525001477
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162525001477
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124116?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:215:y:2025:i:c:s0040162525001477. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.