IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v361y2024ics0277953624006336.html

The effect of public tolerance towards corruptive behaviour on healthcare efficiency and equity – The case of the UK's COVID-19 vaccination programme

Author

Listed:
  • Sohns, Franziska
  • Ghinoi, Stefano
  • Langosch, Magdalena

Abstract

Over the past four years, the COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant uncertainty, suffering, and economic disruption on a global scale. In response, governments have been under pressure to ensure equitable vaccine access while meeting vaccination targets quickly. These challenging circumstances created opportunities for nepotism and bribery, increasing attention to corruption risks associated with the pandemic response. This study investigates the relationship between public attitudes towards corruptive behaviour and the efficiency and equity of the UK's COVID-19 vaccination programme. It integrates primary data on public tolerance towards corruptive behaviour with secondary data on the efficiency of the vaccination program at the local authority level in England and Scotland. Employing a survival analysis approach, we estimate Cox Proportional Hazards Models to examine the time required to reach vaccination targets. Our findings suggest moderate tolerance towards corruptive behaviour among the British public, with 28% of survey participants considering monetary bribery and 34% considering nepotism/favouritism as acceptable means to secure early vaccination access. Notably, while public tolerance towards corruptive behaviour generally had a negative impact on the efficiency of the local rollout of the vaccination programme, it appeared to have accelerated its rollout in politically aligned local authorities governed by the Conservative and Unionist Party. However, this increase in efficiency seems to have come at the cost of reduced equity in vaccine distribution. These findings suggest a trade-off between efficiency and equity in vaccine distribution during public health crises, emphasising the need for balanced health policies that ensure fair and effective distribution of vaccines in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Sohns, Franziska & Ghinoi, Stefano & Langosch, Magdalena, 2024. "The effect of public tolerance towards corruptive behaviour on healthcare efficiency and equity – The case of the UK's COVID-19 vaccination programme," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 361(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:361:y:2024:i:c:s0277953624006336
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953624006336
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117180?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or

    for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vian, Taryn & Grybosk, Kristina & Sinoimeri, Zamira & Hall, Rachel, 2006. "Informal payments in government health facilities in Albania: Results of a qualitative study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(4), pages 877-887, February.
    2. Andrés Rodríguez‐Pose & Min Zhang, 2019. "Government institutions and the dynamics of urban growth in China," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(4), pages 633-668, September.
    3. Danilo Lučić & Mladen Radišić & Dušan Dobromirov, 2016. "Causality between corruption and the level of GDP," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 360-379, January.
    4. G. C. Montes & P. C. Paschoal, 2016. "Corruption: what are the effects on government effectiveness? Empirical evidence considering developed and developing countries," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 146-150, February.
    5. O'Neill, Stephen & Grieve, Richard & Singh, Kultar & Dutt, Varun & Powell-Jackson, Timothy, 2024. "Persistence and heterogeneity of the effects of educating mothers to improve child immunisation uptake: Experimental evidence from Uttar Pradesh in India," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    6. Adrian V. Horodnic & Colin C. Williams & Răzvan Ionuț Drugă & Cristian Incaltarau, 2021. "Informal Payments by Patients in Central and Eastern Europe during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Institutional Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-17, October.
    7. Corstange, Daniel, 2009. "Sensitive Questions, Truthful Answers? Modeling the List Experiment with LISTIT," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(1), pages 45-63, January.
    8. Raymond Duch & Thomas S. Robinson & Philip M. Clarke & Laurence S. J. Roope & Mara Violato, 2022. "Reply to Spreco et al.: Perceived corruption and preferences for COVID-19 vaccine allocations," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 119(19), pages 2201847119-, May.
    9. Habibov, Nazim & Cheung, Alex, 2017. "Revisiting informal payments in 29 transitional countries: The scale and socio-economic correlates," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 28-37.
    10. Sanjeev Gupta & Hamid Davoodi & Rosa Alonso-Terme, 2002. "Does corruption affect income inequality and poverty?," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 23-45, March.
    11. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Marco Di Cataldo, 2015. "Quality of government and innovative performance in the regions of Europe," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 15(4), pages 673-706.
    12. Cherecheş, Răzvan M. & Ungureanu, Marius I. & Sandu, Petru & Rus, Ioana A., 2013. "Defining informal payments in healthcare: A systematic review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(2), pages 105-114.
    13. Mitchell, Andrew David & Bossert, Thomas J., 2007. "Measuring dimensions of social capital: Evidence from surveys in poor communities in Nicaragua," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 50-63, January.
    14. Marco Migueis, 2013. "The Effect of Political Alignment on Transfers to Portuguese Municipalities," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(1), pages 110-133, March.
    15. Borgonovi, Francesca & Andrieu, Elodie, 2020. "Bowling together by bowling alone: Social capital and COVID-19," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    16. Jamie Murphy & Frédérique Vallières & Richard P. Bentall & Mark Shevlin & Orla McBride & Todd K. Hartman & Ryan McKay & Kate Bennett & Liam Mason & Jilly Gibson-Miller & Liat Levita & Anton P. Martine, 2021. "Psychological characteristics associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and resistance in Ireland and the United Kingdom," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
    17. Wu, Jian & Shen, Zhanlei & Li, Quanman & Tarimo, Clifford Silver & Wang, Meiyun & Gu, Jianqin & Wei, Wei & Zhang, Xinyu & Huang, Yanli & Ma, Mingze & Xu, Dongyang & Ojangba, Theodora & Miao, Yudong, 2023. "How urban versus rural residency relates to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: A large-scale national Chinese study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 320(C).
    18. Kapoor Mudit & Ravi Shamika, 2012. "Determinants of Corruption: Government Effectiveness vs. Cultural Norms," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 1-26, August.
    19. Raymond Duch & Laurence S. J. Roope & Mara Violato & Matias Fuentes Becerra & Thomas S. Robinson & Jean-Francois Bonnefon & Jorge Friedman & Peter John Loewen & Pavan Mamidi & Alessia Melegaro & Maria, 2021. "Citizens from 13 countries share similar preferences for COVID-19 vaccine allocation priorities," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 118(38), pages 2026382118-, September.
    20. Lofors, Jonas & Sundquist, Kristina, 2007. "Low-linking social capital as a predictor of mental disorders: A cohort study of 4.5 million Swedes," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 21-34, January.
    21. Johann Graf Lambsdorff, 2003. "How Corruption Affects Productivity," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(4), pages 457-474, November.
    22. Keming Yang & Ahmad Banamah, 2014. "Quota Sampling as an Alternative to Probability Sampling? An Experimental Study," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 19(1), pages 56-66, February.
    23. Lui, Francis T, 1985. "An Equilibrium Queuing Model of Bribery," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 93(4), pages 760-781, August.
    24. Daniels, Norman & Sabin, James E., 2008. "Setting Limits Fairly: Learning to share resources for health," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 2, number 9780195325959.
    25. Reddinger, J. Lucas & Charness, Gary & Levine, David, 2024. "Vaccination as personal public-good provision," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 481-499.
    26. Xiajuan Guo & Wenyan Tu, 2017. "Corruption tolerance and its influencing factors—the case of China’s civil servants," Journal of Chinese Governance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(3), pages 307-328, July.
    27. Steven F. Brown & Joshua Shackman, 2007. "Corruption and Related Socioeconomic Factors: A Time Series Study," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(3), pages 319-347, August.
    28. Armin Spreco & Thomas Schön & Toomas Timpka, 2022. "Corruption should be taken into account when considering COVID-19 vaccine allocation," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 119(19), pages 2122664119-, May.
    29. Ferraresi, Massimiliano & Gucciardi, Gianluca, 2022. "Political alignment, centralisation, and the sense of government unpreparedness during the COVID-19 pandemic," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    30. Hunt, Jennifer, 2010. "Bribery in health care in Uganda," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 699-707, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hunt, Jennifer & Laszlo, Sonia, 2012. "Is Bribery Really Regressive? Bribery’s Costs, Benefits, and Mechanisms," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 355-372.
    2. Maria Teresa Balaguer‐Coll & Isabel Narbón‐Perpiñá & Jesús Peiró‐Palomino & Emili Tortosa‐Ausina, 2022. "Quality of government and economic growth at the municipal level: Evidence from Spain," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(1), pages 96-124, January.
    3. Fhima, Fredj & Nouira, Ridha & Sekkat, Khalid, 2023. "How does corruption affect sustainable development? A threshold non-linear analysis," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 505-523.
    4. Andrew Hodge & Sriram Shankar & D. S. Prasada Rao & Alan Duhs, 2011. "Exploring the Links Between Corruption and Growth," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(3), pages 474-490, August.
    5. Egger, Peter & Winner, Hannes, 2005. "Evidence on corruption as an incentive for foreign direct investment," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 932-952, December.
    6. Jingtao Yi & Shuang Meng & Craig D. Macaulay & Mike W. Peng, 2019. "Corruption and foreign direct investment phases: The moderating role of institutions," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 2(2), pages 167-181, June.
    7. Basna, Kristyna & Pospisilova, Jaroslava & Bures, Radim, 2025. "Informal payments in Czech healthcare: The blurry line between greed, need, and gratitude," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 384(C).
    8. Maria Kravtsova & Aleksey Oshchepkov, 2019. "Market And Network Corruption," HSE Working papers WP BRP 209/EC/2019, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    9. Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés & Zhang, Min, 2020. "The cost of weak institutions for innovation in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    10. Alfredo Monte & Luca Pennacchio, 2020. "Corruption, Government Expenditure and Public Debt in OECD Countries," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 62(4), pages 739-771, December.
    11. Di Cataldo, Marco & Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés, 2016. "What drives employment growth and social inclusion in EU regions," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 68510, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Nhan Buu Phan & Shino Takayama, 2023. "A Model of Corruption and Heterogeneous Productivity: A Theoretical Approach," Discussion Papers Series 660, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    13. Andrés Rodríguez‐Pose & Roberto Ganau & Kristina Maslauskaite & Monica Brezzi, 2021. "Credit constraints, labor productivity, and the role of regional institutions: Evidence from manufacturing firms in Europe," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(2), pages 299-328, March.
    14. Omer Gokcekus & Yui Suzuki, 2014. "Is there a Corruption-effect on Conspicuous Consumption?," Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, National Council of Applied Economic Research, vol. 8(3), pages 215-235, August.
    15. Williams, Colin C. & Horodnic, Adrian V., 2017. "Rethinking informal payments by patients in Europe: An institutional approach," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(10), pages 1053-1062.
    16. Lakshmi, Geeta & Saha, Shrabani & Bhattarai, Keshab, 2021. "Does corruption matter for stock markets? The role of heterogeneous institutions," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 386-400.
    17. Arsenijevic, Jelena & Pavlova, Milena & Groot, Wim, 2015. "Out-of-pocket payments for health care in Serbia," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(10), pages 1366-1374.
    18. Peiró-Palomino, Jesús & Perugini, Francesco, 2022. "Regional innovation disparities in Italy: The role of governance," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 46(4).
    19. Dwiputri, Inayati Nuraini & Arsyad, Lincolin & Pradiptyo, Rimawan, 2018. "The corruption-income inequality trap: A study of Asian countries," Economics Discussion Papers 2018-81, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    20. Jesús Peiró-Palomino, 2019. "Government quality and regional growth in the enlarged European Union: Components, evolution and spatial spillovers," INVESTIGACIONES REGIONALES - Journal of REGIONAL RESEARCH, Asociación Española de Ciencia Regional, issue 45, pages 17-37.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:361:y:2024:i:c:s0277953624006336. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.