IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v268y2024ics0925527323003237.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beyond the “bottom-up” and “top-down” controversy: A methodological inquiry into hybrid modeling methods for hydrogen supply chains

Author

Listed:
  • Pierre, Cayet
  • Catherine, Azzaro-Pantel
  • Sylvain, Bourjade
  • Catherine, Muller-Vibes

Abstract

Following the fast growth of the hydrogen economy, properly modeling the Hydrogen Supply Chain (HSC) becomes pivotal for a successful take-off. While recent review papers focus on the hydrogen engineering literature, this paper is the first to our knowledge to include economics approaches into a complete assessment of the models and mathematical formulations used to answer a variety of hydrogen-related research questions. Based on a thorough analysis of modeling choices and tools found in the HSC literature, we provide a refined classification of research papers through clustering and discriminant analysis. Using original measurement methods, we quantify the difficulty of associating existing modeling choices within a single methodology and identify opportunities and methodological blind spots for the hybridization of HSC-related research approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Pierre, Cayet & Catherine, Azzaro-Pantel & Sylvain, Bourjade & Catherine, Muller-Vibes, 2024. "Beyond the “bottom-up” and “top-down” controversy: A methodological inquiry into hybrid modeling methods for hydrogen supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:268:y:2024:i:c:s0925527323003237
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.109091
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527323003237
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.109091?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:268:y:2024:i:c:s0925527323003237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.