IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v251y2022ics0925527322001359.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The bright side of dependence asymmetry: Mitigating power use and facilitating relational ties

Author

Listed:
  • Huo, Baofeng
  • Liu, Ruolei
  • Tian, Min

Abstract

Dependence asymmetry may trigger firms' common-interest orientation and suppress their self-interest seeking, thus generating positive effects on firms' behaviors in buyer–supplier relationships (BSRs). To further demonstrate the positive role and influencing mechanism of dependence asymmetry, we examine the impact of dependence asymmetry on buyer's use of power and relational ties. We also explore the moderating role of buyer's psychological contract fulfillment (PCF). We test the proposed relationships using polynomial regression and the response surface analysis based on data collected from 200 Chinese manufacturers. The results indicate that dependence asymmetry negatively affects buyer's use of power and positively influences relational ties directly and indirectly through decreasing buyer's use of power. Moreover, buyer's PCF negatively moderates the effect of dependence asymmetry on buyer's use of power and the indirect effect of dependence asymmetry on relational ties. This study contributes to dependence literature by identifying the bright side of dependence asymmetry and validating the mechanism of how dependence asymmetry influences behavioral outcome and relational factor. This study also enriches the literature on psychological contract by demonstrating the significant role of PCF in the context of interfirm relationships. Our findings provide insightful guidelines for firms to better understand interdependence structure and take appropriate actions when facing different interdependence structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Huo, Baofeng & Liu, Ruolei & Tian, Min, 2022. "The bright side of dependence asymmetry: Mitigating power use and facilitating relational ties," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:251:y:2022:i:c:s0925527322001359
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108542
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527322001359
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108542?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Verónica H. Villena & Christopher W. Craighead, 2017. "On the Same Page? How Asymmetric Buyer–Supplier Relationships Affect Opportunism and Performance," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(3), pages 491-508, March.
    2. Armstrong, J. Scott & Overton, Terry S., 1977. "Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys," MPRA Paper 81694, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Akbar Zaheer & Bill McEvily & Vincenzo Perrone, 1998. "Does Trust Matter? Exploring the Effects of Interorganizational and Interpersonal Trust on Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(2), pages 141-159, April.
    4. Saif Mir & John A. Aloysius & Stephanie Eckerd, 2017. "Understanding Supplier Switching Behavior: The Role of Psychological Contracts in a Competitive Setting," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 53(3), pages 3-18, July.
    5. Isaac Elking & John-Patrick Paraskevas & Curtis Grimm & Thomas Corsi & Adams Steven, 2017. "Financial Dependence, Lean Inventory Strategy, and Firm Performance," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 53(2), pages 22-38, April.
    6. Ryu, Sungmin & Park, Jeong Eun & Min, Soonhong, 2007. "Factors of determining long-term orientation in interfirm relationships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(12), pages 1225-1233, December.
    7. Maggie Chuoyan Dong & Zhiqiang Liu & Yimin Yu & Jin-Hui Zheng, 2015. "Opportunism in Distribution Networks: The Role of Network Embeddedness and Dependence," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(10), pages 1657-1670, October.
    8. Stephanie Eckerd & Kenneth K. Boyer & Yinan Qi & Adam Eckerd & James A. Hill, 2016. "Supply Chain Psychological Contract Breach: An Experimental Study across National Cultures," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 52(3), pages 68-82, July.
    9. Shou, Yongyi & Feng, Yi & Zheng, Jingjing & Wang, Guofeng & Yeboah, Nyamah Edmond, 2013. "Power source and its effect on customer–supplier relationships: An empirical study in Yangtze River Delta," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 118-128.
    10. He, Qile & Ghobadian, Abby & Gallear, David, 2013. "Knowledge acquisition in supply chain partnerships: The role of power," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(2), pages 605-618.
    11. Knoppen, Desirée & Sáenz, María Jesús, 2017. "Interorganizational teams in low-versus high-dependence contexts," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 15-25.
    12. Mottner, Sandra & Smith, Steve, 2009. "Wal-Mart: Supplier performance and market power," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(5), pages 535-541, May.
    13. Seung-Hyun Lee & Hee Jin Mun & Kyung Min Park, 2015. "When is dependence on other organizations burdensome? The effect of asymmetric dependence on internet firm failure," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(13), pages 2058-2074, December.
    14. Dong-Young Kim & Bruce Fortado, 2021. "Outcomes of supply chain dependence asymmetry: a systematic review of the statistical evidence," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(19), pages 5844-5866, October.
    15. Wu, Ing-Long & Chuang, Cheng-Hung & Hsu, Chien-Hua, 2014. "Information sharing and collaborative behaviors in enabling supply chain performance: A social exchange perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 122-132.
    16. Erin Anderson & Barton Weitz, 1989. "Determinants of Continuity in Conventional Industrial Channel Dyads," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(4), pages 310-323.
    17. Jens Esslinger & Stephanie Eckerd & Lutz Kaufmann & Craig Carter, 2019. "Who Cares? Supplier Reactions to Buyer Claims after Psychological Contract Over‐Fulfillments," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 55(4), pages 98-128, October.
    18. Rawwas, Mohammed Y. A. & Vitell, Scott J. & Barnes, James H., 1997. "Management of Conflict Using Individual Power Sources: A Retailers' Perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 49-64, September.
    19. Hallikas, Jukka & Lintukangas, Katrina, 2016. "Purchasing and supply: An investigation of risk management performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P4), pages 487-494.
    20. Regis Terpend & Daniel R. Krause, 2015. "Competition or Cooperation? Promoting Supplier Performance with Incentives Under Varying Conditions of Dependence," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 51(4), pages 29-53, October.
    21. Baofeng Huo & Barbara B. Flynn & Xiande Zhao, 2017. "Supply Chain Power Configurations and Their Relationship with Performance," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 53(2), pages 88-111, April.
    22. Sean M. Handley & Jurriaan de Jong & W. C. Benton, 2019. "How Service Provider Dependence Perceptions Moderate the Power–Opportunism Relationship with Professional Services," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(7), pages 1692-1715, July.
    23. Yang, Jie & Wang, Jinjun & Wong, Christina W.Y. & Lai, Kee-Hung, 2008. "Relational stability and alliance performance in supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 600-608, August.
    24. Niels J. Pulles & Jasper Veldman & Holger Schiele & Henk Sierksma, 2014. "Pressure or Pamper? The Effects of Power and Trust Dimensions on Supplier Resource Allocation," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 50(3), pages 16-36, July.
    25. Tsan-Ming Choi & T. C. E. Cheng & Xiande Zhao & Jie Chen & Xiande Zhao & Mike Lewis & Brian Squire, 2016. "A Multi-Method Investigation of Buyer Power and Supplier Motivation to Share Knowledge," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 25(3), pages 417-431, March.
    26. Felix Reimann & David J. Ketchen Jr., 2017. "Power in Supply Chain Management," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 53(2), pages 3-9, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huang, Kerry & Wang, Kedi & Lee, Peter K.C. & Yeung, Andy C.L., 2023. "The impact of industry 4.0 on supply chain capability and supply chain resilience: A dynamic resource-based view," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    2. Meena, Purushottam L. & Kumar, Gopal & Ramkumar, M., 2023. "Supply chain sustainability in emerging economy: A negative relationship conditions’ perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Felix Reimann & David J. Ketchen Jr., 2017. "Power in Supply Chain Management," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 53(2), pages 3-9, April.
    2. Lutz Kaufmann & Jens Esslinger & Craig R. Carter, 2018. "Toward Relationship Resilience: Managing Buyer‐Induced Breaches of Psychological Contracts During Joint Buyer–Supplier Projects," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 54(4), pages 62-85, October.
    3. Hao, Bin & Feng, Yanan, 2018. "Leveraging learning forces in asymmetric alliances: Small firms’ perceived power imbalance in driving exploration and exploitation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 27-39.
    4. Wang, Yonggui & Zhang, Lu, 2021. "How customer entitlement influences supplier performance in B2B relationships in emerging economy? A moderated mediation model of institutional environments," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 689-700.
    5. Vos, F.G.S. & Van der Lelij, R. & Schiele, H. & Praas, N.H.J., 2021. "Mediating the impact of power on supplier satisfaction: Do buyer status and relational conflict matter?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    6. Ha Ta & Terry L. Esper & Kenneth Ford & Sebastian Garcia‐Dastuge, 2018. "Trustworthiness Change and Relationship Continuity after Contract Breach in Financial Supply Chains," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 54(4), pages 42-61, October.
    7. Stephanie Eckerd & Sean Handley & Fabrice Lumineau, 2022. "Trust violations in buyer–supplier relationships: Spillovers and the contingent role of governance structures," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 58(3), pages 47-70, July.
    8. Else, Tim & Choudhary, Sonal & Genovese, Andrea, 2022. "Uncovering sustainability storylines from dairy supply chain discourse," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 858-874.
    9. Niels J. Pulles & Raymond P.A. Loohuis, 2020. "Managing Buyer‐Supplier Conflicts: The Effect of Buyer Openness And Directness On A Supplier's Willingness to Adapt," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 56(4), pages 65-81, October.
    10. Paul A. Pavlou & David Gefen, 2004. "Building Effective Online Marketplaces with Institution-Based Trust," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 15(1), pages 37-59, March.
    11. Ludwig Bstieler & Martin Hemmert, 2010. "Trust formation in Korean new product alliances: How important are pre-existing social ties?," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 299-319, June.
    12. Zhu, Minghao & Yeung, Andy C.L. & Zhou, Honggeng, 2021. "Diversify or concentrate: The impact of customer concentration on corporate social responsibility," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    13. Abdurrezzak Sener & Mehmet Barut & Ali Dag & Mehmet Bayram Yildirim, 2021. "Impact of commitment, information sharing, and information usage on supplier performance: a Bayesian belief network approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 303(1), pages 125-158, August.
    14. Liu, Yi & Li, Yuan & Zhang, Leinan, 2010. "Control mechanisms across a buyer-supplier relationship quality matrix," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 3-12, January.
    15. Juan Manuel Ramon-Jeronimo & Raquel Florez-Lopez & Maria Angeles Ramon-Jeronimo, 2017. "Understanding the Generation of Value along Supply Chains: Balancing Control Information and Relational Governance Mechanisms in Downstream and Upstream Relationships," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-31, August.
    16. Vijayasarathy, Leo R., 2010. "Supply integration: An investigation of its multi-dimensionality and relational antecedents," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 489-505, April.
    17. Overstreet, Robert E. & Morgan, Tyler R. & Laczniak, Russell N. & Daugherty, Patricia J., 2022. "Stemming the tide of increasing retail returns: Implications of targeted returns policies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 551-562.
    18. Aslam, Haris & Wanke, Peter & Khalid, Amna & Roubaud, David & Waseem, Maimoona & Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel Jose & Grebinevych, Oksana & Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz, 2022. "A scenario-based experimental study of buyer supplier relationship commitment in the context of a psychological contract breach: Implications for supply chain management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    19. Laura Poppo & Kevin Zheng Zhou & Sungmin Ryu, 2008. "Alternative Origins to Interorganizational Trust: An Interdependence Perspective on the Shadow of the Past and the Shadow of the Future," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 39-55, February.
    20. Verónica H. Villena & Thomas Y. Choi & Elena Revilla, 2021. "Mitigating Mechanisms for the Dark Side of Collaborative Buyer–Supplier Relationships: A Mixed‐Method Study," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 57(4), pages 86-116, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:251:y:2022:i:c:s0925527322001359. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.