IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v191y2017icp15-25.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interorganizational teams in low-versus high-dependence contexts

Author

Listed:
  • Knoppen, Desirée
  • Sáenz, María Jesús

Abstract

Buyer-supplier teams constitute a vital vehicle to shape and implement the corporate supply chain agenda. However, extant research on interorganizational teams is limited and more focused on new product development teams. Consequently, this paper aims to assess the impact of key interorganizational team characteristics (psychological safety and relationalism) on various facets of supplier-relationship outcomes (innovation, efficiency, and agility) as well as the moderating role of supplier dependence. Based on a sample of 413 suppliers of a focal North-American buyer of heavy machinery parts, we analyze the projected relationships through structural equation modeling and multi-group confirmatory factor analysis. We establish measurement equivalence before performing multigroup comparisons. Our results highlight the importance of both psychological safety and relationalism for improving all facets of supplier-relationship outcomes, with the exception of the impact of psychological safety on efficiency, which is not significant. Our results also confirm the moderating role of dependence; that is, the positive impact of relationalism on innovation is weakened in high-dependence relationships. The focus on suppliers to a single buyer rules out various buyer-related differences as alternative explanations. The paper provides avenues for further research and guidelines for practitioners on how to shape interorganizational teams in relation to dependence and strategic priorities.

Suggested Citation

  • Knoppen, Desirée & Sáenz, María Jesús, 2017. "Interorganizational teams in low-versus high-dependence contexts," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 15-25.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:191:y:2017:i:c:p:15-25
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.05.011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092552731730155X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.05.011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nakano, Mikihisa & Akikawa, Takuya, 2014. "Literature review of empirical studies on SCM using the SSPP paradigm," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 35-45.
    2. Mee-Shew Cheung & Matthew B. Myers, 2008. "Managing knowledge sharing networks in global supply chains," International Journal of Management and Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(6), pages 581-599.
    3. Andreas Brinkhoff & Özalp Özer & Gökçe Sargut, 2015. "All You Need Is Trust? An Examination of Inter-organizational Supply Chain Projects," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(2), pages 181-200, February.
    4. Paul Hart & Carol Saunders, 1997. "Power and Trust: Critical Factors in the Adoption and Use of Electronic Data Interchange," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(1), pages 23-42, February.
    5. Enno Siemsen & Aleda V. Roth & Sridhar Balasubramanian & Gopesh Anand, 2009. "The Influence of Psychological Safety and Confidence in Knowledge on Employee Knowledge Sharing," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 429-447, April.
    6. Desirée Knoppen & Melek Akın Ateş & Alistair Brandon-Jones & Davide Luzzini & Erik van Raaij & Finn Wynstra, 2015. "A comprehensive assessment of measurement equivalence in operations management," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(1), pages 166-182, January.
    7. He, Qile & Ghobadian, Abby & Gallear, David, 2013. "Knowledge acquisition in supply chain partnerships: The role of power," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(2), pages 605-618.
    8. Arumugam, V. & Antony, Jiju & Kumar, Maneesh, 2013. "Linking learning and knowledge creation to project success in Six Sigma projects: An empirical investigation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 388-402.
    9. Stock, Ruth, 2006. "Interorganizational Teams as Boundary Spanners between Supplier and Customer Companies," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 60478, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    10. Paul S. Adler & Barbara Goldoftas & David I. Levine, 1999. "Flexibility Versus Efficiency? A Case Study of Model Changeovers in the Toyota Production System," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(1), pages 43-68, February.
    11. Yang, Jie & Yu, Guangsheng & Liu, Mingyu & Rui, Mingjie, 2016. "Improving learning alliance performance for manufacturers: Does knowledge sharing matter?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P2), pages 301-308.
    12. Yushan Zhao & Roger J. Calantone, 2003. "The Trend Toward Outsourcing In New Product Development: Case Studies In Six Firms," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 7(01), pages 51-66.
    13. Augustine A. Lado & Rajiv R. Dant & Amanuel G. Tekleab, 2008. "Trust‐opportunism paradox, relationalism, and performance in interfirm relationships: evidence from the retail industry," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 401-423, April.
    14. Huo, Baofeng & Ye, Yuxiao & Zhao, Xiande & Shou, Yongyi, 2016. "The impact of human capital on supply chain integration and competitive performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 132-143.
    15. Steenkamp, Jan-Benedict E M & Baumgartner, Hans, 1998. "Assessing Measurement Invariance in Cross-National Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 25(1), pages 78-90, June.
    16. Frank T. Rothaermel & Andrew M. Hess, 2007. "Building Dynamic Capabilities: Innovation Driven by Individual-, Firm-, and Network-Level Effects," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(6), pages 898-921, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huo, Baofeng & Liu, Ruolei & Tian, Min, 2022. "The bright side of dependence asymmetry: Mitigating power use and facilitating relational ties," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    2. Yang, Wei & Zhang, Yu & Zhou, Yin & Zhang, Leinan, 2021. "Performance effects of trust-dependence congruence: The mediating role of relational behaviors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 341-350.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mosch, Philipp & Schweikl, Stefan & Obermaier, Robert, 2021. "Trapped in the supply chain? Digital servitization strategies and power relations in the case of an industrial technology supplier," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    2. H. Emre Yildiz & Adis Murtic & Udo Zander & Anders Richtnér, 2019. "What Fosters Individual-Level Absorptive Capacity in MNCs? An Extended Motivation–Ability–Opportunity Framework," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 93-129, February.
    3. Lea Ruesch & Murat Tarakci & Maria Besiou & Niels Van Quaquebeke, 2022. "Orchestrating coordination among humanitarian organizations," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(5), pages 1977-1996, May.
    4. Swarup Kumar Dutta, 2013. "Ambidexterity as a Mediating Variable in the Relationship between Dynamism in the Environment, Organizational Context and Strategic Renewal," Jindal Journal of Business Research, , vol. 2(1), pages 27-41, June.
    5. Rivera, Liliana & Sheffi, Yossi & Knoppen, Desirée, 2016. "Logistics clusters: The impact of further agglomeration, training and firm size on collaboration and value added services," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 285-294.
    6. Bortolotti, Thomas & Danese, Pamela & Flynn, Barbara B. & Romano, Pietro, 2015. "Leveraging fitness and lean bundles to build the cumulative performance sand cone model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 227-241.
    7. Verghese, Anto John & Koufteros, Xenophon & Polyviou, Mikaella & Jia, Xingzhi, 2022. "In pursuit of supplier resilience: The explanatory role of customer leadership style," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    8. Ambra Galeazzo & Andrea Furlan & Andrea Vinelli, 2017. "The organizational infrastructure of continuous improvement – an empirical analysis," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 33-46, June.
    9. Yan, Tingting & Azadegan, Arash, 2017. "Comparing inter-organizational new product development strategies: Buy or ally; Supply-chain or non-supply-chain partners?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PA), pages 21-38.
    10. Arman Avadikyan & Gilles Lambert & Christophe Lerch, 2016. "A Multi-Level Perspective on Ambidexterity: The Case of a Synchrotron Research Facility," Working Papers of BETA 2016-44, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    11. Shaikh, Ibrahim A. & O'Brien, Jonathan Paul & Peters, Lois, 2018. "Inside directors and the underinvestment of financial slack towards R&D-intensity in high-technology firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 192-201.
    12. Christina Theodoraki & Karim Messeghem & Mark P. Rice, 2018. "A social capital approach to the development of sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems: an explorative study," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 153-170, June.
    13. Venugopal Gopalakrishna-Remani & Robert Paul Jones & Kerri M. Camp, 2019. "Levels of EMR Adoption in U.S. Hospitals: An Empirical Examination of Absorptive Capacity, Institutional Pressures, Top Management Beliefs, and Participation," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 1325-1344, December.
    14. Francisco Javier Forcadell & Fernando Úbeda, 2022. "Individual entrepreneurial orientation and performance: the mediating role of international entrepreneurship," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 875-900, June.
    15. Tsukasa Kato, 2021. "Measurement Invariance in the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression (CES-D) Scale among English-Speaking Whites and Asians," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-10, May.
    16. Carolina Rojas-Córdova & Amanda J. Williamson & Julio A. Pertuze & Gustavo Calvo, 2023. "Why one strategy does not fit all: a systematic review on exploration–exploitation in different organizational archetypes," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(7), pages 2251-2295, October.
    17. Rambabu Lavuri & Abhinav Jindal & Umair Akram & Bhukya Koteswara Rao Naik & Alrence Santiago Halibas, 2023. "Exploring the antecedents of sustainable consumers' purchase intentions: Evidence from emerging countries," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 280-291, February.
    18. Moriuchi, Emi & Takahashi, Ikuo, 2022. "The role of perceived value, trust and engagement in the C2C online secondary marketplace," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 76-88.
    19. Anselmsson, Johan & Burt, Steve & Tunca, Burak, 2017. "An integrated retailer image and brand equity framework: Re-examining, extending, and restructuring retailer brand equity," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 194-203.
    20. Tommaso Pucci & Mara Brumana & Tommaso Minola & Lorenzo Zanni, 2020. "Social capital and innovation in a life science cluster: the role of proximity and family involvement," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 205-227, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:191:y:2017:i:c:p:15-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.