IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/elmark/v35y2025i1d10.1007_s12525-025-00787-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does platform dependence always reduce the fairness perception of seller?

Author

Listed:
  • Chunhua Ju

    (Zhejiang Gongshang University
    Zhejiang Gongshang University
    Zhejiang Financial College)

  • Qi Guo

    (Zhejiang Gongshang University)

  • Hui Jiang

    (Tongji University)

  • Yong Wang

    (Xi’an University of Finance and Economics
    Xi’an University of Finance and Economics)

Abstract

While the adverse effects of dependence on fairness have been extensively documented, the relationship between sellers’ platform dependence and their fairness perceptions in platform-based e-commerce remains intricate and potentially non-linear. Drawing on social exchange theory and conservation of resources theory, this study examines the underlying mechanisms through which seller platform dependence influences fairness perception, along with its boundary conditions. Particular attention is given to the cooperative relationships and specific interactions between platforms and sellers. Employing survey data from 302 respondents and rigorous evaluation metrics, the study utilizes moderated path analysis to test the proposed research hypotheses. The findings reveal that both fairness perception and voice behavior exhibit U-shaped relationships with seller platform dependence. Moreover, seller voice behavior not only positively affects fairness perception but also mediates the relationship between platform dependence and fairness perception. Notably, platform incentives and seller reputation exert contrasting moderating effects: while platform incentives attenuate the mediating role of seller voice behavior, seller reputation amplifies it. Furthermore, heterogeneity analysis indicates that the U-shaped effect of seller platform dependence on fairness perception is more pronounced on emerging platforms than on traditional ones and is more significant among larger sellers compared to smaller ones. These findings contribute to the literature on enterprise dependence by revealing its dual nature and provide theoretical insights for fostering fair and sustainable platform-seller relationships in the evolving e-commerce landscape.

Suggested Citation

  • Chunhua Ju & Qi Guo & Hui Jiang & Yong Wang, 2025. "Does platform dependence always reduce the fairness perception of seller?," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 35(1), pages 1-25, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:35:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s12525-025-00787-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s12525-025-00787-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12525-025-00787-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12525-025-00787-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Platform dependence; Voice behavior; Fairness perception; Incentive; Reputation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:35:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s12525-025-00787-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.