IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v63y2010i1p3-12.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Control mechanisms across a buyer-supplier relationship quality matrix

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Yi
  • Li, Yuan
  • Zhang, Leinan

Abstract

This study develops a buyer-supplier RQ matrix and explores changes in the use of selected control mechanisms, including coercive power, non-coercive power, contracts, and relational norms, across this matrix. The results indicate, under four distinct contexts of RQ, that coercive power execution is relatively low and has no significant differences in different quadrants of the matrix; that contract execution is relatively high and likewise has no significant differences; and that execution of non-coercive power and relational norms increases as the level of RQ improves. These findings reveal the important roles of contracts, the limited roles of coercive power, and the changing roles of non-coercive power and relational norms, as displayed in four distinct contexts of RQ. They make new contributions to the buyer-supplier relationship management literature and provide insightful theoretical guidance for buyer-supplier relationship managerial practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Yi & Li, Yuan & Zhang, Leinan, 2010. "Control mechanisms across a buyer-supplier relationship quality matrix," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 3-12, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:63:y:2010:i:1:p:3-12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148-2963(09)00015-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rauyruen, Papassapa & Miller, Kenneth E., 2007. "Relationship quality as a predictor of B2B customer loyalty," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 21-31, January.
    2. Oliver E. Williamson, 1993. "Contested Exchange versus the Governance of Contractual Relations," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 7(1), pages 103-108, Winter.
    3. De Cannière, Marie Hélène & De Pelsmacker, Patrick & Geuens, Maggie, 2009. "Relationship Quality and the Theory of Planned Behavior models of behavioral intentions and purchase behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 82-92, January.
    4. Akbar Zaheer & Bill McEvily & Vincenzo Perrone, 1998. "Does Trust Matter? Exploring the Effects of Interorganizational and Interpersonal Trust on Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(2), pages 141-159, April.
    5. Ryu, Sungmin & Park, Jeong Eun & Min, Soonhong, 2007. "Factors of determining long-term orientation in interfirm relationships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(12), pages 1225-1233, December.
    6. Jean L Johnson & Tomoaki Sakano & Naoto Onzo, 1990. "Behavioral Relations in Across-Culture Distribution System: Influence, Control and Conflict in U.S., Japanese Marketing Channels," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 21(4), pages 639-655, December.
    7. Akbar Zaheer & N. Venkatraman, 1995. "Relational governance as an interorganizational strategy: An empirical test of the role of trust in economic exchange," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(5), pages 373-392.
    8. Lui, Steven S. & Ngo, Hang-yue & Hon, Alice H.Y., 2006. "Coercive strategy in interfirm cooperation: Mediating roles of interpersonal and interorganizational trust," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(4), pages 466-474, April.
    9. Stickel, Eberhard, 2001. "Uncertainty reduction in a competitive environment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 169-177, March.
    10. Buvik, Arnt & Reve, Torger, 2001. "Asymmetrical deployment of specific assets and contractual safeguarding in industrial purchasing relationships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 101-113, February.
    11. Geyskens, I. & Steenkamp, J.E.B.M. & Scheer, L.K. & Kumar, N., 1996. "The effects of trust and interdependence on relationship commitment : A trans-Atlantic study," Other publications TiSEM ef7c8d6c-963d-4ee7-8576-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    12. Erin Anderson & Barton Weitz, 1989. "Determinants of Continuity in Conventional Industrial Channel Dyads," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(4), pages 310-323.
    13. Ryu, Sungmin & Kabadayi, Sertan & Chung, Christina, 2007. "The relationship between unilateral and bilateral control mechanisms:The contextual effect of long-term orientation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(7), pages 681-689, July.
    14. Cooley, Thomas F. & Dwyer, Mark, 1998. "Business cycle analysis without much theory A look at structural VARs," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 83(1-2), pages 57-88.
    15. Bejou, David & Wray, Barry & Ingram, Thomas N., 1996. "Determinants of relationship quality: An artificial neural network analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 137-143, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kam, Booi H. & Lai, Manh Khang, 2018. "Buyer-supplier exchange relationship: How do exchange partners behave across the relationship life-cycle?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 239-257.
    2. Nicola Bellantuono & Donatella Ettorre & Gregory E. Kersten & Pierpaolo Pontrandolfo, 2014. "Multi-attribute Auction and Negotiation for e-Procurement of Logistics," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 421-441, May.
    3. Nagel, Duane M. & Giunipero, Larry & Jung, Hyeyoon & Salas, Jim & Hochstein, Bryan, 2021. "Purchaser perceptions of early phase supplier relationships: The role of similarity and likeability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 174-186.
    4. Niesten, Eva & Jolink, Albert, 2012. "Incentives, opportunism and behavioral uncertainty in electricity industries," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(7), pages 1031-1039.
    5. Mitręga, Maciej & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2021. "How small-and-medium transportation companies handle asymmetric customer relationships under COVID-19 pandemic: A multi-method study," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    6. Emmanuel Kwabena Anin & Dominic Essuman & Kwame Sarpong, 2016. "The Influence of Governance Mechanism on Supply Chain Performance in Developing Economies: Insights from Ghana," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(4), pages 252-252, March.
    7. Florian Hémont & Bernard Grabot & Anne Mayère, 2010. "Cooperation in Supply Chains: from practical problems to conceptual models," Post-Print hal-00952734, HAL.
    8. Saleh, M. Abu & Ali, M. Yunus & Mavondo, Felix T., 2014. "Drivers of importer trust and commitment: Evidence from a developing country," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(12), pages 2523-2530.
    9. Ying-Pin Yeh, 2015. "Exploring the effect of relational governance on retailer-perceived performance," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 5(1), pages 1-22, June.
    10. Bellouma Meryem, 2011. "Governance Mechanisms and Buyer Supplier Relationship:Static and Dynamic Panel Data Evidence from Tunisian Exporting SMEs," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 1(3), pages 88-98, September.
    11. Luo, Yadong & Liu, Yi & Yang, Qian & Maksimov, Vladislav & Hou, Jigang, 2015. "Improving performance and reducing cost in buyer–supplier relationships: The role of justice in curtailing opportunism," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 607-615.
    12. Yang, Qian & Geng, Ruoqi & Jiang, Yisa & Feng, Taiwen, 2021. "Governance mechanisms and green customer integration in China: The joint effect of power and environmental uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    13. Kashyap, Vishal & Sivadas, Eugene, 2012. "An exploratory examination of shared values in channel relationships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(5), pages 586-593.
    14. Olsen, Per Ingvar & Prenkert, Frans & Hoholm, Thomas & Harrison, Debbie, 2014. "The dynamics of networked power in a concentrated business network," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(12), pages 2579-2589.
    15. Jiuh-Biing Sheu, 2014. "Green Supply Chain Collaboration for Fashionable Consumer Electronics Products under Third-Party Power Intervention—A Resource Dependence Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(5), pages 1-44, May.
    16. Shou, Yongyi & Feng, Yi & Zheng, Jingjing & Wang, Guofeng & Yeboah, Nyamah Edmond, 2013. "Power source and its effect on customer–supplier relationships: An empirical study in Yangtze River Delta," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 118-128.
    17. Matevž Rašković & Maja Makovec Brenčič, 2015. "The Trust-Committment-Flexibility Link in Transnational Buyer-Supplier Relationships: A Network Perspective," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 27(1), pages 7-19.
    18. Filippo Bontadini, 2019. "Power and Export Sophistication in Buyer-Supplier Relationships: Insights from Colombian Customs Data," SPRU Working Paper Series 2019-11, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    19. Matevž Rašković & Maja Makovec Brenčić & Anuška Ferligoj & Jan C. Fransoo, 2013. "Relationship learning as a dimension of relationship quality: tentative evidence from transnational buyer-supplier relationships," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 25(1), pages 37-50.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Chung-Tzer & Guo, Yi Maggie & Lee, Chia-Hui, 2011. "The effects of relationship quality and switching barriers on customer loyalty," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 71-79.
    2. repec:dgr:rugsom:03g23 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. De Vita, Glauco & Tekaya, Arafet & Wang, Catherine L., 2010. "Asset specificity's impact on outsourcing relationship performance: A disaggregated analysis by buyer-supplier asset specificity dimensions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(7), pages 657-666, July.
    4. Griessmair, Michele & Hussain, Dildar & Windsperger, Josef, 2014. "Trust and the tendency towards multi-unit franchising: A relational governance view," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(11), pages 2337-2345.
    5. Huo, Baofeng & Liu, Ruolei & Tian, Min, 2022. "The bright side of dependence asymmetry: Mitigating power use and facilitating relational ties," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    6. Vijayasarathy, Leo R., 2010. "Supply integration: An investigation of its multi-dimensionality and relational antecedents," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 489-505, April.
    7. Tomás F. Espino-Rodríguez & Juan Carlos Ramírez-Fierro, 2019. "Dimensions of behavior and proactive improvement in hotel outsourcing relationships: the role of justice," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 13(3), pages 479-508, September.
    8. Walsh, Gianfranco & Hennig-Thurau, Thorsten & Sassenberg, Kai & Bornemann, Daniel, 2010. "Does relationship quality matter in e-services? A comparison of online and offline retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 130-142.
    9. Armando Luis Vieira, 2009. "Business-To-Business Relationship Quality," Portuguese Journal of Management Studies, ISEG, Universidade de Lisboa, vol. 0(3), pages 197-216.
    10. Florian Hémont & Bernard Grabot & Anne Mayère, 2010. "Cooperation in Supply Chains: from practical problems to conceptual models," Post-Print hal-00952734, HAL.
    11. Bill McEvily & Akbar Zaheer & Darcy K. Fudge Kamal, 2017. "Mutual and Exclusive: Dyadic Sources of Trust in Interorganizational Exchange," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 74-92, February.
    12. Delbufalo, Emanuela, 2021. "Asset specificity and relationship performance: A meta-analysis over three decades," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 105-121.
    13. Bahtışen Kavak & Ayşegül E. Sertoğlu & Öznur Ö. Tektaş, 2016. "The Moderating Effect of Knowledge Transfer on Satisfaction-Performance Relationship," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 6(5), pages 49-63, May.
    14. Jie, Ferry, 2011. "Australian Lamb Supply Chain: A Conceptual Framework," 2011 Conference (55th), February 8-11, 2011, Melbourne, Australia 113738, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    15. Hualiang Lu & Shuyi Feng & Jacques H. Trienekens & S.W.F. (Onno) Omta, 2008. "Performance in vegetable supply chains: the role of Guanxi networks and buyer-seller relationships," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(2), pages 253-274.
    16. Sanjay Dhir & Sushil, 2017. "Flexibility in Modification and Termination of Cross-Border Joint Ventures," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 18(2), pages 139-151, June.
    17. Jong, Gjalt de & Nooteboom, Bart, 2003. "A cross cultural comparison of long-term supply relationships," Research Report 03G23, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    18. Pedro Cuesta-Valiño & Pablo Gutiérrez-Rodríguez & Cristina Loranca-Valle, 2021. "Sustainable Management of Sports Federations: The Indirect Effects of Perceived Service on Member’s Loyalty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-24, January.
    19. Nicholas Paparoidamis & Constantine Katsikeas & Ruben Chumpitaz, 2017. "The role of supplier performance in building customer trust and loyalty: A cross-country examination," Post-Print hal-01745331, HAL.
    20. de Jong, G. & Nooteboom, B., 2001. "The Causality of Supply Relationships," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2001-73-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    21. Judit Oláh & Attila Bai & György Karmazin & Péter Balogh & József Popp, 2017. "The Role Played by Trust and Its Effect on the Competiveness of Logistics Service Providers in Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-22, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:63:y:2010:i:1:p:3-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.