IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/popmgt/v26y2017i3p491-508.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the Same Page? How Asymmetric Buyer–Supplier Relationships Affect Opportunism and Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Verónica H. Villena
  • Christopher W. Craighead

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Verónica H. Villena & Christopher W. Craighead, 2017. "On the Same Page? How Asymmetric Buyer–Supplier Relationships Affect Opportunism and Performance," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(3), pages 491-508, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:popmgt:v:26:y:2017:i:3:p:491-508
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/poms.12648
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Katja Woelfl & Lutz Kaufmann & Craig R. Carter, 2023. "In the eye of the beholder: A configurational exploration of perceived deceptive supplier behavior in negotiations," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 59(2), pages 33-61, April.
    2. Thomas Mellewigt & Glenn Hoetker & Martina Lütkewitte, 2018. "Avoiding High Opportunism Is Easy, Achieving Low Opportunism Is Not: A QCA Study on Curbing Opportunism in Buyer–Supplier Relationships," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(6), pages 1208-1208, December.
    3. Sebastian Forkmann & Jonathan Webb & Stephan C. Henneberg & Lisa K. Scheer, 2022. "Boundary spanner corruption: a potential dark side of multi-level trust in marketing relationships," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(5), pages 889-914, September.
    4. Grewal, Dhruv & Guha, Abhijit & Satornino, Cinthia B. & Schweiger, Elisa B., 2021. "Artificial intelligence: The light and the darkness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 229-236.
    5. Zhijun Yan & Lini Kuang & Liangfei Qiu, 2022. "Prosocial behaviors and economic performance: Evidence from an online mental healthcare platform," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(10), pages 3859-3876, October.
    6. Vivek Astvansh & Niket Jindal, 2022. "Differential Effects of Received Trade Credit and Provided Trade Credit on Firm Value," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(2), pages 781-798, February.
    7. Lumineau, Fabrice & Jin, Jason Lu & Sheng, Shibin & Zhou, Kevin Zheng, 2022. "Asset specificity asymmetry and supplier opportunism in buyer–supplier exchanges," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 85-100.
    8. Klassen, Robert D. & Shafiq, Asad & Fraser Johnson, P., 2023. "Opportunism in supply chains: Dynamically building governance mechanisms to address sustainability-related challenges," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    9. Satornino, Cinthia B. & Grewal, Dhruv & Guha, Abhijit & Schweiger, Elisa B. & Goodstein, Ronald C., 2023. "The perks and perils of artificial intelligence use in lateral exchange markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    10. Zhou, Honggeng & Li, Ling, 2020. "The impact of supply chain practices and quality management on firm performance: Evidence from China's small and medium manufacturing enterprises," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    11. Alex Scott & Christopher W. Craighead & Chris Parker, 2020. "Now You See It, Now You Don't: Explicit Contract Benefits In Extralegal Exchanges," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(6), pages 1467-1486, June.
    12. Huo, Baofeng & Liu, Ruolei & Tian, Min, 2022. "The bright side of dependence asymmetry: Mitigating power use and facilitating relational ties," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    13. Verónica H. Villena & Thomas Y. Choi & Elena Revilla, 2021. "Mitigating Mechanisms for the Dark Side of Collaborative Buyer–Supplier Relationships: A Mixed‐Method Study," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 57(4), pages 86-116, October.
    14. Hao, Bin & Feng, Yanan, 2018. "Leveraging learning forces in asymmetric alliances: Small firms’ perceived power imbalance in driving exploration and exploitation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 27-39.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:popmgt:v:26:y:2017:i:3:p:491-508. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1937-5956 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.