IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jpolmo/v48y2026i1p178-195.html

Environmental innovation policy and SDGs in Europe: Interplay of patents, policy and R&D expenditures

Author

Listed:
  • Göçoğlu, Volkan
  • Göksu, Serkan

Abstract

The European Union's (EU) environmental innovation policy mainly adopts an incremental approach, with a superficial emphasis on sustainable development, lacking a specific focus on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Although the SDGs present a window of opportunity for a broader approach to innovative solutions to global environmental problems, their neglect also emerges in scholarly research on environmental innovation. Aiming to fill this gap, this study presents a novel and holistic incremental approach to the EU's environmental innovation policy by adopting the SDGs as the key framework and forming a comprehensive empirical model on 14 member countries with prominent variables consistent with the EU's official policies. The results suggest that governments should increase environmental policy stringency (EPS) and policymakers should foster research and development (R&D) expenditures and bolster environmental innovation to align with existing initiatives, particularly within SDGs 7, 9, and 13. Finally, indicators 9.4.1 for SDG9 and 13.2.1 for SDG13 can serve as essential reference points in strengthening the legal framework for EPS.

Suggested Citation

  • Göçoğlu, Volkan & Göksu, Serkan, 2026. "Environmental innovation policy and SDGs in Europe: Interplay of patents, policy and R&D expenditures," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 178-195.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jpolmo:v:48:y:2026:i:1:p:178-195
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2025.04.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161893825000353
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2025.04.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baltagi, Badi H. & Feng, Qu & Kao, Chihwa, 2012. "A Lagrange Multiplier test for cross-sectional dependence in a fixed effects panel data model," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 170(1), pages 164-177.
    2. Tobias Kruse & Antoine Dechezleprêtre & Rudy Saffar & Leo Robert, 2022. "Measuring environmental policy stringency in OECD countries: An update of the OECD composite EPS indicator," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1703, OECD Publishing.
    3. Fabrizio Fusillo & Francesco Quatraro & Stefano Usai, 2022. "Going green: the dynamics of green technological alliances," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(5), pages 362-386, July.
    4. Hyundo Choi & Donggyu Yi, 2018. "Environmental innovation inertia: Analyzing the business circumstances for environmental process and product innovations," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1623-1634, December.
    5. Hsu, Chia-Wen & Lien, Yung-Chih & Chen, Homin, 2015. "R&D internationalization and innovation performance," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 187-195.
    6. Poyago-Theotoky, J.A., 2010. "Corrigendum to "The Organization of R&D and Environmental Policy" [J. Econ. Behav. Org. 62 (2007) 63-75]," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 449-449, November.
    7. Hashem Pesaran, M. & Yamagata, Takashi, 2008. "Testing slope homogeneity in large panels," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 142(1), pages 50-93, January.
    8. Xi Yang & Xiang Yu, 2020. "Preventing Patent Risks in Artificial Intelligence Industry for Sustainable Development: A Multi-Level Network Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-21, October.
    9. Gunnar Pippel, 2015. "R&D Collaboration For Environmental Innovation," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(01), pages 1-22.
    10. Eun Kyung Jang & Mi Sun Park & Tae Woo Roh & Ki Joo Han, 2015. "Policy Instruments for Eco-Innovation in Asian Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-29, September.
    11. Carrión-Flores, Carmen E. & Innes, Robert, 2010. "Environmental innovation and environmental performance," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 27-42, January.
    12. T. S. Breusch & A. R. Pagan, 1980. "The Lagrange Multiplier Test and its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 47(1), pages 239-253.
    13. Ghisetti, Claudia & Pontoni, Federico, 2015. "Investigating policy and R&D effects on environmental innovation: A meta-analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 57-66.
    14. Rogge, Nicky, 2019. "EU countries’ progress towards ‘Europe 2020 strategy targets’," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 255-272.
    15. Jerry Hausman, 2015. "Specification tests in econometrics," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 38(2), pages 112-134.
    16. M. Hashem Pesaran, 2021. "General diagnostic tests for cross-sectional dependence in panels," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 13-50, January.
    17. James R Brown & Gustav Martinsson & Christian Thomann, 2022. "Can Environmental Policy Encourage Technical Change? Emissions Taxes and R&D Investment in Polluting Firms," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 35(10), pages 4518-4560.
    18. Kasper Ampe & Erik Paredis & Lotte Asveld & Patricia Osseweijer & Thomas Block, 2021. "Power struggles in policy feedback processes: incremental steps towards a circular economy within Dutch wastewater policy," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(3), pages 579-607, September.
    19. Martínez-Zarzoso, Inmaculada & Bengochea-Morancho, Aurelia & Morales-Lage, Rafael, 2019. "Does environmental policy stringency foster innovation and productivity in OECD countries?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    20. Baumann, Julian & Kritikos, Alexander S., 2016. "The link between R&D, innovation and productivity: Are micro firms different?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(6), pages 1263-1274.
    21. Pesaran, M. Hashem & Vanessa Smith, L. & Yamagata, Takashi, 2013. "Panel unit root tests in the presence of a multifactor error structure," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 175(2), pages 94-115.
    22. Zhang, Hong-Zhen & He, Ling-Yun & Zhang, ZhongXiang, 2024. "Can policy achieve environmental fairness and environmental improvement? Evidence from the Xin’an River project in China," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 212-234.
    23. M. Hashem Pesaran, 2007. "A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(2), pages 265-312.
    24. Mahmoud Hassan & Damien Rousselière, 2022. "Does increasing environmental policy stringency lead to accelerated environmental innovation? A research note," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(17), pages 1989-1998, April.
    25. Yemane Wolde-Rufael & Eyob Mulat-weldemeskel, 2023. "Effectiveness of environmental taxes and environmental stringent policies on CO2 emissions: the European experience," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 5211-5239, June.
    26. Michael Blakeney, 2022. "Agricultural Innovation and Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-6, February.
    27. Chen, Chao & Gu, Junjian & Luo, Rongxi, 2022. "Corporate innovation and R&D expenditure disclosures," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    28. Marques, António Cardoso & Caetano, Rafaela Vital, 2022. "Do greater amounts of FDI cause higher pollution levels? Evidence from OECD countries," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 147-162.
    29. Bigerna, Simona & Bollino, Carlo Andrea & Polinori, Paolo, 2022. "Convergence of ecological footprint and sustainable policy options," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 564-577.
    30. Sahar Milani, 2017. "The Impact of Environmental Policy Stringency on Industrial R&D Conditional on Pollution Intensity and Relocation Costs," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 68(3), pages 595-620, November.
    31. Laffont, Jean-Jacques & Tirole, Jean, 1996. "Pollution permits and environmental innovation," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1-2), pages 127-140, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Seçkin Kabak & Tuğçe Dallı, 2023. "Gibson Paradox: Panel Data Analysis on ASEAN-T Countries," International Econometric Review (IER), Economic Research Association, vol. 15(1), pages 12-27, March.
    2. Hassan, Mahmoud & Lee, Ji-Yong & Rouge, Luc & Kouzez, Marc, 2025. "The impact of green public finance and green taxes on environmental and non-environmental innovation," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    3. Aladejare, Samson Adeniyi, 2022. "Natural resource rents, globalisation and environmental degradation: New insight from 5 richest African economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    4. Saboori, Behnaz & Gholipour, Hassan F. & Rasoulinezhad, Ehsan & Ranjbar, Omid, 2022. "Renewable energy sources and unemployment rate: Evidence from the US states," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    5. Muhammad Azam & Zia Ur Rehman & Yusnidah Ibrahim, 2022. "Causal nexus in industrialization, urbanization, trade openness, and carbon emissions: empirical evidence from OPEC economies," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(12), pages 13990-14010, December.
    6. Lu, Yin & Tian, Tian & Ge, Chen, 2023. "Asymmetric effects of renewable energy, fintech development, natural resources, and environmental regulations on the climate change in the post-covid era," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    7. Fikru, Mahelet G. & Kilinc-Ata, Nurcan & Belaïd, Fateh, 2024. "Climate policy stringency and trade in energy transition minerals: An analysis of response patterns," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    8. Mahmut Unsal Sasmaz & Aysun Karamıklı & Ulas Akkucuk, 2021. "The relationship between renewable energy use and health expenditures in EU countries," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 22(7), pages 1129-1139, September.
    9. Clement Olalekan Olaniyi & Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh Al‐Faryan & Eyitayo Oyewunmi Ogbaro, 2025. "Do institutional quality and its threshold matter in the sensitivity of the renewable energy transition to financial development? New empirical perspectives," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 5-43, January.
    10. Clement Olalekan Olaniyi & Nicholas Mbaya Odhiambo, 2025. "Do natural resource rents aid renewable energy transition in resource‐rich African countries? The roles of institutional quality and its threshold," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 49(2), pages 1330-1375, May.
    11. Dilawar Khan & Nihal Ahmed & Bahtiyar Mehmed & Ihtisham ul Haq, 2021. "Assessing the Impact of Policy Measures in Reducing the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of South Asia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-12, October.
    12. Mariam Camarero & Sergi Moliner & Cecilio Tamarit, 2025. "Which are the long-run determinants of US outward FDI? Evidence using large long-memory panels," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(2), pages 259-290, February.
    13. Omed Rafiq Fatah & Hatem Hatef Abdulkadhim Altaee, 2024. "The Role of Political Stability in Nine Arab Natural Resource-Abundant Countries (ANRAC) Toward Environmental Sustainability through CO2 Mitigation," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(3), pages 28-37, May.
    14. Laeeq Razzak Janjua & Orhan Sanli & Mirela Panait & Mirela Cristea & Atteeq Razzak, 2024. "Impact of energy security and economic growth on poverty: sample of Sub-Saharan Africa," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(10), pages 25459-25484, October.
    15. Umaima Arif & Maryam Latif & Asma Arif, 2024. "Assessing the triple deficit hypothesis in G-7 and D-8 countries: an evidence from heterogeneous panel methods," International Journal of Economic Policy Studies, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 497-527, August.
    16. Mahmoud Hassan & Marc Kouzez & Ji-Yong Lee & Badreddine Msolli & Hatem Rjiba, 2025. "Can increasing environmental policy stringency promote financial development? Evidence from developed economies," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 347(1), pages 197-216, April.
    17. Hamza Çeştepe & Murat Çetin & Pınar Avcı & Bersu Bahtiyar, 2024. "The link between technological innovation and financial development: Evidence from selected OECD countries," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(2), pages 1219-1235, April.
    18. Kostakis, Ioannis & Arauzo-Carod, Josep-Maria, 2023. "The key roles of renewable energy and economic growth in disaggregated environmental degradation: Evidence from highly developed, heterogeneous and cross-correlated countries," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1315-1325.
    19. Liton Chandra Voumik & Mohammad Iqbal Hossain & Md. Hasanur Rahman & Raziya Sultana & Rahi Dey & Miguel Angel Esquivias, 2023. "Impact of Renewable and Non-Renewable Energy on EKC in SAARC Countries: Augmented Mean Group Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-19, March.
    20. Nicholas M. Odhiambo & Talknice Saungweme, "undated". "Does International Tourism Spur International Trade In Ssa Countries? A Dynamic Panel Data Analysis," Working Papers AESRI07, African Economic and Social Research Institute (AESRI).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jpolmo:v:48:y:2026:i:1:p:178-195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505735 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.