IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jpolmo/v48y2026i1p130-151.html

Building a hydrogen economy: Does France have the industrial capacity for a low-carbon transition?

Author

Listed:
  • Guionie, Raphael
  • Lemiale, Lionel
  • Loisel, Rodica

Abstract

The energy transition towards low-carbon hydrogen (H2) in France is expected to require deep industrial planning to develop electrolysis and H2 production infrastructure. This study employs an input–output method to simulate a new sector of electrolysis-produced hydrogen (e-H2) that supplies two-hydrogen intensive sectors, petroleum refining and ammonia. We construct two input–output models, a demand-driven model for e-H2 sector development (the investment phase) and a mixed model for e-H2 production (the operation phase). The results demonstrate that the e-H2 sector depends on industries such as machinery, electrical equipment, construction and metal products manufacturing in the investment phase, with strong backward linkages to the power sector in the exploitation phase. The results reveal that the energy shock (350 kt of e-H2 per year) generates significant growth (€1.3 Bn of gross domestic product) and jobs (3600), but strongly depends on industries’ capability to expand and recruit. Recommendations advise public policy development to address the need to reinforce key industries to support e-H2 production due to inter-industry dependence and the need for more attractive skilled and technician jobs in sectors that are already experiencing recruitment tensions. At much higher e-H2 shocks in the steel sector (700 kt e-H2) and other industries (415 kt e-H2), even greater amounts of domestic resources would be required. Therefore, de-carbonising the entire H2 sector require ambitious policy planning to support industrial empowerment, research programmes and labour training so that H2 becomes an enabling technology of the energy transition.

Suggested Citation

  • Guionie, Raphael & Lemiale, Lionel & Loisel, Rodica, 2026. "Building a hydrogen economy: Does France have the industrial capacity for a low-carbon transition?," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 130-151.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jpolmo:v:48:y:2026:i:1:p:130-151
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2025.11.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161893825001309
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2025.11.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Waßenhoven, Anna & Rennings, Michael & Laibach, Natalie & Bröring, Stefanie, 2023. "What constitutes a “Key Enabling Technology” for transition processes: Insights from the bioeconomy's technological landscape," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    2. Petralia, Sergio, 2020. "Mapping general purpose technologies with patent data," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(7).
    3. Sergio Petralia, 2020. "Mapping General Purpose Technologies with Patent Data," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2027, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jul 2020.
    4. Zhang, Kun & Xue, Mei-Mei & Feng, Kuishuang & Liang, Qiao-Mei, 2019. "The economic effects of carbon tax on China’s provinces," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 784-802.
    5. Jasper, James M., 1992. "Gods, Titans and mortals : Patterns of state involvement in nuclear development," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(7), pages 653-659, July.
    6. Goldfarb, Avi & Taska, Bledi & Teodoridis, Florenta, 2023. "Could machine learning be a general purpose technology? A comparison of emerging technologies using data from online job postings," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(1).
    7. Loizou, Efstratios & Karelakis, Christos & Galanopoulos, Konstantinos & Mattas, Konstadinos, 2019. "The role of agriculture as a development tool for a regional economy," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 482-490.
    8. Piirainen, Kalle A. & Tanner, Anne Nygaard & Alkærsig, Lars, 2017. "Regional foresight and dynamics of smart specialization: A typology of regional diversification patterns," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 289-300.
    9. Han, Sang-Yong & Yoo, Seung-Hoon & Kwak, Seung-Jun, 2004. "The role of the four electric power sectors in the Korean national economy: an input-output analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(13), pages 1531-1543, September.
    10. Lee, Duu-Hwa & Hsu, Shih-Shun & Tso, Chun-To & Su, Ay & Lee, Duu-Jong, 2009. "An economy-wide analysis of hydrogen economy in Taiwan," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(8), pages 1947-1954.
    11. Teece, David J., 2018. "Profiting from innovation in the digital economy: Enabling technologies, standards, and licensing models in the wireless world," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(8), pages 1367-1387.
    12. Bresnahan, Timothy, 2010. "General Purpose Technologies," Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, in: Bronwyn H. Hall & Nathan Rosenberg (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 761-791, Elsevier.
    13. Johnson, Thomas G. & Kulshreshtha, Surendra N., 1982. "Exogenizing Agriculture In An Input-Output Model To Estimate Relative Impacts Of Different Farm Types," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 7(2), pages 1-12, December.
    14. Wu, Libo & Li, Jing & Zhang, ZhongXiang, 2013. "Inflationary effect of oil-price shocks in an imperfect market: A partial transmission input–output analysis," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 354-369.
    15. Gupta, Ruchi & Guibentif, Thomas M.M. & Friedl, Markus & Parra, David & Patel, Martin Kumar, 2023. "Macroeconomic analysis of a new green hydrogen industry using Input-Output analysis: The case of Switzerland," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    16. Madsen, Anne Nygaard & Andersen, Per Dannemand, 2010. "Innovative regions and industrial clusters in hydrogen and fuel cell technology," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 5372-5381, October.
    17. Hadjilambrinos, Constantine, 2000. "Understanding technology choice in electricity industries: a comparative study of France and Denmark," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(15), pages 1111-1126, December.
    18. Blackburn, Christopher J. & Moreno-Cruz, Juan, 2021. "Energy efficiency in general equilibrium with input–output linkages," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    19. Liu, Lirong & Huang, Guohe & Baetz, Brian & Zhang, Kaiqiang, 2018. "Environmentally-extended input-output simulation for analyzing production-based and consumption-based industrial greenhouse gas mitigation policies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 69-78.
    20. Jeanne Fagnani & Jean-Paul Moatti, 1984. "The politics of french nuclear development," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 3(2), pages 264-275.
    21. Alkemade, Floortje & Suurs, Roald A.A., 2012. "Patterns of expectations for emerging sustainable technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 79(3), pages 448-456.
    22. Nikolaidis, Pavlos & Poullikkas, Andreas, 2017. "A comparative overview of hydrogen production processes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 597-611.
    23. Bae, Jeong Hwan & Cho, Gyeong-Lyeob, 2010. "A dynamic general equilibrium analysis on fostering a hydrogen economy in Korea," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(Supplemen), pages 57-66, September.
    24. Lixon, Benoit & Thomassin, Paul J. & Hamaide, Bertrand, 2008. "Industrial output restriction and the Kyoto protocol: An input-output approach with application to Canada," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1-2), pages 249-258, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heikkilä, Jussi & Rissanen, Julius & Ali-Vehmas, Timo, 2023. "Coopetition, standardization and general purpose technologies: A framework and an application," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(4).
    2. Kurz Heinz D. & Strohmaier Rita & Knell Mark, 2025. "Technological Change: History, Theory and Measurement. A Brief Account," JRC Working Papers on Labour, Education and Technology 2025-03, Joint Research Centre.
    3. Xu, Yanan & Sun, Yaowu & Zhou, Yiting, 2024. "Unpacking the intellectual structure and evolution trend of general-purpose technologies development in innovation studies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    4. Goldfarb, Avi & Taska, Bledi & Teodoridis, Florenta, 2023. "Could machine learning be a general purpose technology? A comparison of emerging technologies using data from online job postings," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(1).
    5. Zhou, Yuan & Zhang, Qintian & Xu, Guannan & Wang, Yanmeng, 2025. "Regional S&T planning and green generic technologies: A spatial differences-in-difference analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    6. Raphael Guionie & Rodica Loisel & Lionel Lemiale & Mathias Guerineau, 2023. "Industrial planning with input-output models: empirical evidence from low-carbon hydrogen in France," Working Papers hal-04011936, HAL.
    7. Waßenhoven, Anna & Rennings, Michael & Laibach, Natalie & Bröring, Stefanie, 2023. "What constitutes a “Key Enabling Technology” for transition processes: Insights from the bioeconomy's technological landscape," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    8. Dong, Feng & Zhang, Guiyang & Mei, Liang, 2025. "General purpose technology R&D specialization and supply chain cross-industry expansion: The moderation effect of technology portfolio breadth and depth," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    9. Yoruk, Esin & Radosevic, Slavo & Fischer, Bruno, 2023. "Technological profiles, upgrading and the dynamics of growth: Country-level patterns and trajectories across distinct stages of development," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(8).
    10. Deperi, Johanna & Bertrand, Olivier & Meschi, Pierre-Xavier & Nesta, Lionel, 2022. "An organizational learning approach to digital and non-digital firm acquisition behavior," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 873-882.
    11. Bojovic, Neva, 2022. "Strategic framing of enabling technologies: Insights from firms digitizing smell and taste," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(3).
    12. Simon Bruhn & Johanna Deperi, 2022. "The Contribution of Digital Firms to Productivity Growth in the Manufacturing Sector: A Decomposition Approach," GREDEG Working Papers 2022-42, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    13. Soyea Lee & Junseok Hwang & Eunsang Cho, 2025. "Dynamic patterns of AI technology diffusion: focusing on time series clustering and patent analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(4), pages 2005-2036, April.
    14. Subrahmanyam Aditya Karanam & Deepa Mani & Rajib L. Saha, 2025. "Growing Technological Relatedness to the ICT Industry and Its Impacts," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(1), pages 344-369, March.
    15. Xiang, Panwei & Wei, Muhua & Liu, Huili & Wu, Lianren & Qi, Jiayin, 2024. "How does technological value drive 6G development? Explanation from a systematic framework," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(7).
    16. Wipatkrut, Pattharaporn & Su, Hsin-Ning, 2025. "Exploring the impact of technological convergence on General-Purpose Technologies: A multi-level generality perspective," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    17. Sun, Sunny Li & Santos, Roberto S. & Qin, Lingling, 2024. "Divergent trajectories on frontier innovations: A comparison of international venture capital-invested ventures between China and the United States," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    18. Kroll, Henning & Berghäuser, Hendrik & Blind, Knut & Neuhäusler, Peter & Scheifele, Fabian & Thielmann, Axel & Wydra, Sven, 2022. "Schlüsseltechnologien," Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 7-2022, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin.
    19. Igna, Ioana & Venturini, Francesco, 2023. "The determinants of AI innovation across European firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(2).
    20. Tom Kemeny & Sergio Petralia & Michael Storper, 2025. "Disruptive innovation and spatial inequality," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(1), pages 2076824-207, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • L70 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Primary Products and Construction - - - General
    • C67 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Input-Output Models
    • O52 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Europe

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jpolmo:v:48:y:2026:i:1:p:130-151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505735 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.