The determinants of AI innovation across European firms
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Other versions of this item:
- Igna, Ioana & Venturini, Francesco, 2023. "The determinants of AI innovation across European firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(2).
References listed on IDEAS
- Erik Brynjolfsson & Daniel Rock & Chad Syverson, 2021.
"The Productivity J-Curve: How Intangibles Complement General Purpose Technologies,"
American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 13(1), pages 333-372, January.
- Erik Brynjolfsson & Daniel Rock & Chad Syverson, 2018. "The Productivity J-Curve: How Intangibles Complement General Purpose Technologies," NBER Working Papers 25148, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Madsen, Jakob B. & Saxena, Shishir & Ang, James B., 2010.
"The Indian growth miracle and endogenous growth,"
Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 37-48, September.
- Jakob Madsen & Shishir Saxena & James Ang, 2008. "The Indian Growth Miracle And Endogenous Growth," Monash Economics Working Papers 17/08, Monash University, Department of Economics.
- Jakob B. Madsen & Shishir Saxena & James B. Ang, 2009. "The Indian Growth Miracle And Endogenous Growth," Monash Economics Working Papers 03-09, Monash University, Department of Economics.
- Jakob B. Madsen & Shishir Saxena & James B. Ang, 2008. "The Indian Growth Miracle And Endogenous Growth," CAMA Working Papers 2008-29, Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
- Sergio Petralia, 2020. "Mapping General Purpose Technologies with Patent Data," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2027, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jul 2020.
- James B. Ang & Jakob B. Madsen, 2011.
"Can Second-Generation Endogenous Growth Models Explain the Productivity Trends and Knowledge Production in the Asian Miracle Economies?,"
The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 93(4), pages 1360-1373, November.
- Ang, James & Madsen, Jakob, 2009. "Can Second-Generation Endogenous Growth Models Explain The Productivity Trends and Knowledge Production In the Asian Miracle Economies?," MPRA Paper 17543, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- James B. Ang & Jakob B. Madsen, 2010. "Can Second-Generation Endogenous Growth Models Explain The Productivity Trends and Knowledge Production In the Asian Miracle Economies?," Monash Economics Working Papers 01-10, Monash University, Department of Economics.
- James B. Ang & Jakob B. Madsen, 2010. "Can second-generation endogenous growth models explain the productivity trends and knowledge production in the Asian miracle economies?," CAMA Working Papers 2010-05, Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
- Haefner, Naomi & Wincent, Joakim & Parida, Vinit & Gassmann, Oliver, 2021. "Artificial intelligence and innovation management: A review, framework, and research agenda✰," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
- Georg Graetz & Guy Michaels, 2018.
"Robots at Work,"
The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 100(5), pages 753-768, December.
- Michaels, Guy & Graetz, Georg, 2015. "Robots at Work," CEPR Discussion Papers 10477, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Graetz, Georg & Michaels, Guy, 2018. "Robots at work," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 87218, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Graetz, Georg & Michaels, Guy, 2015. "Robots at work," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 61155, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Graetz, Georg & Michaels, Guy, 2015. "Robots at Work," IZA Discussion Papers 8938, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Georg Graetz & Guy Michaels, 2015. "Robots at Work," CEP Discussion Papers dp1335, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
- Mario Benassi & Elena Grinza & Francesco Rentocchini, 2020. "The rush for patents in the Fourth Industrial Revolution," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 47(4), pages 559-588, December.
- Benjamin Haibe-Kains & George Alexandru Adam & Ahmed Hosny & Farnoosh Khodakarami & Levi Waldron & Bo Wang & Chris McIntosh & Anna Goldenberg & Anshul Kundaje & Casey S. Greene & Tamara Broderick & Mi, 2020. "Transparency and reproducibility in artificial intelligence," Nature, Nature, vol. 586(7829), pages 14-16, October.
- Nicholas Bloom & Mark Schankerman & John Van Reenen, 2013.
"Identifying Technology Spillovers and Product Market Rivalry,"
Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 81(4), pages 1347-1393, July.
- Nick Bloom & Mark Schankerman & John Van Reenen, 2005. "Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry," Proceedings, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
- Bloom, Nick & Schankerman, Mark & Van Reenen, John, 2005. "Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 3728, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Bloom, Nick & Schankerman, Mark & Van Reenen, John, 2005. "Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 5077, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Nicholas Bloom & Mark Schankerman & John Van Reenen, 2005. "Identifying Technology Spillovers and Product Market Rivalry," CEP Discussion Papers dp0675, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
- Bloom, Nick & Schankerman, Mark & Van Reenen, John, 2007. "Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 5091, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Bloom, Nick & Schankerman, Mark & Van Reenen, John, 2013. "Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 46852, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Bloom, Nick & Schankerman, Mark & Van Reenen, John, 2005. "Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 780, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Schankerman, Mark & Van Reenen, John & Bloom, Nicholas, 2005. "Identifying Technology Spillovers and Product Market Rivalry," CEPR Discussion Papers 4912, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Nicholas Bloom & Mark Schankerman & John Van Reenen, 2007. "Identifying Technology Spillovers and Product Market Rivalry," NBER Working Papers 13060, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Nick Bloom & Mark Schankerman & John Van Reenen, 2005. "Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry," STICERD - Economics of Industry Papers 40, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE.
- Kaiser, Ulrich & Kongsted, Hans Christian & Rønde, Thomas, 2015.
"Does the mobility of R&D labor increase innovation?,"
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 91-105.
- Ulrich Kaiser & Hans Christian Kongsted & Thomas Ronde, 2013. "Does the Mobility of R & D Labor Increase Innovation?," Working Papers 336, University of Zurich, Department of Business Administration (IBW).
- Kaiser, Ulrich & Kongsted, Hans Christian & Rønde, Thomas, 2014. "Does the mobility of R&D labor increase innovation?," ZEW Discussion Papers 14-115, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
- Mario Benassi & Elena Grinza & Francesco Rentocchini, 2019.
"The Rush for Patents in the Fourth Industrial Revolution: An Exploration of Patenting Activity at the European Patent Office,"
SPRU Working Paper Series
2019-12, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
- Mario BENASSI & Elena GRINZA & Francesco RENTOCCHINI, 2019. "The Rush for Patents in the Fourth Industrial Revolution: An Exploration of Patenting Activity at the European Patent Office," Departmental Working Papers 2019-01, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
- Arianna Martinelli & Andrea Mina & Massimo Moggi, 2021.
"The enabling technologies of industry 4.0: examining the seeds of the fourth industrial revolution [Mapping innovation dynamics in the Internet of Things domain: evidence from patent analysis],"
Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 30(1), pages 161-188.
- Arianna Martinelli & Andrea Mina & Massimo Moggi, 2019. "The Enabling Technologies of Industry 4.0: Examining the Seeds of the Fourth Industrial Revolution," LEM Papers Series 2019/09, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
- David Autor & David Dorn & Lawrence F Katz & Christina Patterson & John Van Reenen, 2020.
"The Fall of the Labor Share and the Rise of Superstar Firms [“Automation and New Tasks: How Technology Displaces and Reinstates Labor”],"
The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 135(2), pages 645-709.
- David Autor & David Dorn & Lawrence F. Katz & Christina Patterson & John Van Reenen, 2017. "The fall of the labor share and the rise of superstar firms," CEP Discussion Papers dp1482, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
- Autor, David & Dorn, David & Katz, Lawrence F. & Patterson, Christina & Van Reenen, John, 2020. "The fall of the labor share and the rise of superstar firms," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 104480, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Autor, David & Dorn, David & Katz, Lawrence & Patterson, Christina & Van Reenen, John, 2017. "The Fall of the Labor Share and the Rise of Superstar Firms," IZA Discussion Papers 10756, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Autor, David & Dorn, David & Katz, Lawrence F. & Patterson, Christina & Van Reenen, John, 2017. "The fall of the Labor share and the rise of superstar firms," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 83616, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- David Autor & David Dorn & Lawrence F. Katz & Christina Patterson & John Van Reenen, 2017. "The Fall of the Labor Share and the Rise of Superstar Firms," NBER Working Papers 23396, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Van Reenen, John & Autor, David & Dorn, David & Katz, Lawrence & Patterson, Christina, 2017. "The Fall of the Labor Share and the Rise of Superstar Firms," CEPR Discussion Papers 12041, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Martin Beraja & David Y Yang & Noam Yuchtman, 2023.
"Data-intensive Innovation and the State: Evidence from AI Firms in China,"
The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 90(4), pages 1701-1723.
- Martin Beraja & David Y. Yang & Noam Yuchtman, 2020. "Data-intensive Innovation and the State: Evidence from AI Firms in China," NBER Working Papers 27723, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Martin Beraja & David Y. Yang & Noam Yuchtman, 2021. "Data-intensive innovation and the State: evidence from AI firms in China," POID Working Papers 003, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
- Beraja, Martin & Yang, David Y. & Yuchtman, Noam, 2022. "Data-intensive innovation and the state: evidence from AI firms in China," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 124859, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Martin Beraja & David Y. Yang & Noam Yuchtman, 2021. "Data-intensive innovation and the State: evidence from AI firms in China," CEP Discussion Papers dp1755, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
- Beraja, Martin & Yang, David Y. & Yuchtman, Noam Meir, 2021. "Data-intensive innovation and the State: evidence from AI firms in China," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 121854, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Beraja, Martin & Yang, David Y. & Yuchtman, Noam, 2021. "Data-intensive innovation and the State: evidence from AI firms in China," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 114425, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Sergey Lychagin & Joris Pinkse & Margaret E. Slade & John Van Reenen, 2016.
"Spillovers in Space: Does Geography Matter?,"
Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(2), pages 295-335, June.
- Sergey Lychagin & Joris Pinkse & Margaret E. Slade & John Van Reenen, 2010. "Spillovers in Space: Does Geography Matter?," CEP Discussion Papers dp0991, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
- Sergey Lychagin & Joris Pinkse & Margaret E. Slade & John Van Reenen, 2010. "Spillovers in Space: Does Geography Matter?," NBER Working Papers 16188, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Van Reenen, John & Slade, Margaret & Lychagin, Sergey & Pinkse, Joris, 2010. "Spillovers in Space: Does Geography Matter?," CEPR Discussion Papers 7928, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Lychagin, Sergey & Slade, Margaret E. & Pinkse, Joris & Van Reenen, John, 2016. "Spillovers in space: does geography matter?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 67029, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Alessandro Sterlacchini, 2022. "AI Patenting and Employment: Evidence from the World's Top R&D Investors," Working Papers 462, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
- David H. Autor & Frank Levy & Richard J. Murnane, 2003.
"The skill content of recent technological change: an empirical exploration,"
Proceedings, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, issue Nov.
- David H. Autor & Frank Levy & Richard J. Murnane, 2003. "The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 118(4), pages 1279-1333.
- David H. Autor & Frank Levy & Richard J. Murnane, 2001. "The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration," NBER Working Papers 8337, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Schettino, Francesco & Sterlacchini, Alessandro & Venturini, Francesco, 2013.
"Inventive productivity and patent quality: Evidence from Italian inventors,"
Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 1043-1056.
- Schettino, Francesco & Sterlacchini, Alessandro & Venturini, Francesco, 2008. "Inventive Productivity and Patent Quality: Evidence from Italian Inventors," MPRA Paper 7765, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Charles M. A. Clark & Aleksandr V. Gevorkyan, 2020. "Artificial Intelligence and Human Flourishing," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 79(4), pages 1307-1344, September.
- Shohei Nakazato & Mariagrazia Squicciarini, 2021. "Artificial intelligence companies, goods and services: A trademark-based analysis," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2021/06, OECD Publishing.
- de Ridder, Maarten, 2019.
"Market power and innovation in the intangible economy,"
LSE Research Online Documents on Economics
100946, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Maarten de Ridder, 2019. "Market Power and Innovation in the Intangible Economy," Discussion Papers 1907, Centre for Macroeconomics (CFM).
- De Ridder, M., 2019. "Market Power and Innovation in the Intangible Economy," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1931, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
- Rammer, Christian & Fernández, Gastón P. & Czarnitzki, Dirk, 2022. "Artificial intelligence and industrial innovation: Evidence from German firm-level data," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(7).
- Bronwyn H. Hall & Adam B. Jaffe & Manuel Trajtenberg, 2001.
"The NBER Patent Citation Data File: Lessons, Insights and Methodological Tools,"
NBER Working Papers
8498, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Hall, B. & Jaffe, A. & Trajtenberg, M., 2001. "The NBER Patent Citations Data File: Lessons, Insights and Methodological Tools," Papers 2001-29, Tel Aviv.
- Hall, Bronwyn & Trajtenberg, Manuel & Jaffe, Adam B, 2001. "The NBER Patent Citations Data File: Lessons, Insights and Methodological Tools," CEPR Discussion Papers 3094, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- P.A. Geroski, 2003. "Competition in Markets and Competition for Markets," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 3(3), pages 151-166, September.
- Carol Corrado & Chiara Criscuolo & Jonathan Haskel & Alexander Himbert & Cecilia Jona-Lasinio, 2021. "New evidence on intangibles, diffusion and productivity," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2021/10, OECD Publishing.
- Hunt, Wil & Sarkar, Sudipa & Warhurst, Chris, 2022. "Measuring the impact of AI on jobs at the organization level: Lessons from a survey of UK business leaders," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(2).
- Germán Gutiérrez & Thomas Philippon, 2019.
"Fading Stars,"
AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 109, pages 312-316, May.
- Germán Gutiérrez & Thomas Philippon, 2019. "Fading Stars," NBER Working Papers 25529, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Wendy C. Y. Li & Bronwyn H. Hall, 2020.
"Depreciation of Business R&D Capital,"
Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 66(1), pages 161-180, March.
- Wendy C.Y. Li & Bronwyn H. Hall, 2016. "Depreciation of Business R&D Capital," NBER Working Papers 22473, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Wendy C.Y. Li & Bronwyn H. Hall, 2016. "Depreciation of Business R&D Capital," BEA Working Papers 0135, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
- Wendy Li & Bronwyn Hall, 2016. "Depreciation of Business R&D Capital," Working Papers id:11156, eSocialSciences.
- Ghasemaghaei, Maryam & Calic, Goran, 2019. "Does big data enhance firm innovation competency? The mediating role of data-driven insights," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 69-84.
- Mr. Federico J Diez & Mr. Daniel Leigh & Suchanan Tambunlertchai, 2018. "Global Market Power and its Macroeconomic Implications," IMF Working Papers 2018/137, International Monetary Fund.
- Trajtenberg, Manuel, 2018.
"AI as the next GPT: a Political-Economy Perspective,"
CEPR Discussion Papers
12721, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Manuel Trajtenberg, 2018. "AI as the next GPT: a Political-Economy Perspective," NBER Working Papers 24245, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Bessen, James & Impink, Stephen Michael & Reichensperger, Lydia & Seamans, Robert, 2022. "The role of data for AI startup growth," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(5).
- Joonkyung Ha & Peter Howitt, 2007.
"Accounting for Trends in Productivity and R&D: A Schumpeterian Critique of Semi-Endogenous Growth Theory,"
Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 39(4), pages 733-774, June.
- Joonkyung Ha & Peter Howitt, 2007. "Accounting for Trends in Productivity and R&D: A Schumpeterian Critique of Semi‐Endogenous Growth Theory," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 39(4), pages 733-774, June.
- Davide Castellani, 2017. "The Changing Geography of Innovation and the Role of Multinational Enterprises," John H Dunning Centre for International Business Discussion Papers jhd-dp2017-02, Henley Business School, University of Reading.
- Corrocher, Nicoletta & Malerba, Franco & Montobbio, Fabio, 2007. "Schumpeterian patterns of innovative activity in the ICT field," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 418-432, April.
- Zoltan J. Acs & Luc Anselin & Attila Varga, 2008.
"Patents and Innovation Counts as Measures of Regional Production of New Knowledge,"
Chapters, in: Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy, chapter 11, pages 135-151,
Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Acs, Zoltan J. & Anselin, Luc & Varga, Attila, 2002. "Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(7), pages 1069-1085, September.
- Simone Vannuccini & Ekaterina Prytkova, 2021. "Artificial Intelligence’s New Clothes? From General Purpose Technology to Large Technical System," SPRU Working Paper Series 2021-02, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
- Jaana Rahko, 2014. "Market value of R&D, patents, and organizational capital: Finnish evidence," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 353-377, June.
- Hoisl, Karin & Stelzer, Tobias & Biala, Stefanie, 2015. "Forecasting technological discontinuities in the ICT industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 522-532.
- Jongho Lee & Keun Lee, 2021. "Is the fourth industrial revolution a continuation of the third industrial revolution or something new under the sun? Analyzing technological regimes using US patent data [Vertical integration and ," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 30(1), pages 137-159.
- Michael Webb & Nick Short & Nicholas Bloom & Josh Lerner, 2018. "Some Facts of High-Tech Patenting," NBER Working Papers 24793, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Hingley, Peter & Park, Walter G., 2017. "Do business cycles affect patenting? Evidence from European Patent Office filings," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 76-86.
- Maria Savona, 2019. "The Value of Data:Towards a Framework to Redistribute It," SPRU Working Paper Series 2019-21, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
- Bronwyn H. Hall & Manuel Trajtenberg, 2006. "Uncovering General Purpose Technologies with Patent Data," Chapters, in: Cristiano Antonelli & Dominique Foray & Bronwyn H. Hall & W. Edward Steinmueller (ed.), New Frontiers in the Economics of Innovation and New Technology, chapter 14, Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Bronwyn H. Hall & Manuel Trajtenberg, 2004. "Uncovering GPTS with Patent Data," NBER Working Papers 10901, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Mariagrazia Squicciarini & Heike Nachtigall, 2021. "Demand for AI skills in jobs: Evidence from online job postings," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2021/03, OECD Publishing.
- Erik Brynjolfsson & Tom Mitchell & Daniel Rock, 2018. "What Can Machines Learn, and What Does It Mean for Occupations and the Economy?," AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 108, pages 43-47, May.
- Takashi Inaba & Mariagrazia Squicciarini, 2017. "ICT: A new taxonomy based on the international patent classification," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2017/1, OECD Publishing.
- Helene Dernis & Petros Gkotsis & Nicola Grassano & Shohei Nakazato & Mariagrazia Squicciarini & Brigitte van Beuzekom & Antonio Vezzani, 2019. "World Corporate Top R&D investors: Shaping the Future of Technologies and of AI," JRC Research Reports JRC117068, Joint Research Centre.
- Arntz, Melanie & Gregory, Terry & Zierahn, Ulrich, 2017. "Revisiting the risk of automation," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 157-160.
- Stefano Baruffaldi & Brigitte van Beuzekom & Hélène Dernis & Dietmar Harhoff & Nandan Rao & David Rosenfeld & Mariagrazia Squicciarini, 2020. "Identifying and measuring developments in artificial intelligence: Making the impossible possible," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2020/05, OECD Publishing.
- Clancy, Matthew S., 2018. "Inventing by combining pre-existing technologies: Patent evidence on learning and fishing out," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 252-265.
- Breschi, Stefano & Lissoni, Francesco & Malerba, Franco, 2003. "Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 69-87, January.
- Righi, Riccardo & Samoili, Sofia & López Cobo, Montserrat & Vázquez-Prada Baillet, Miguel & Cardona, Melisande & De Prato, Giuditta, 2020. "The AI techno-economic complex System: Worldwide landscape, thematic subdomains and technological collaborations," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(6).
- Petralia, Sergio, 2020. "Mapping general purpose technologies with patent data," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(7).
- Venturini, Francesco, 2012. "Product variety, product quality, and evidence of endogenous growth," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 74-77.
- Zhen Yu & Zheng Liang & Peiyi Wu, 2021. "How data shape actor relations in artificial intelligence innovation systems: an empirical observation from China [Linking vertically related industries: entry by employee spinouts across industry ," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 30(1), pages 251-267.
- Venturini, Francesco, 2022. "Intelligent technologies and productivity spillovers: Evidence from the Fourth Industrial Revolution," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 220-243.
- Stéphane Maraut & Hélène Dernis & Colin Webb & Vincenzo Spiezia & Dominique Guellec, 2008. "The OECD REGPAT Database: A Presentation," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2008/2, OECD Publishing.
- Rinaldo Evangelista & Valentina Meliciani & Antonio Vezzani, 2015. "The Specialisation of EU Regions in Fast Growing and Key Enabling Technologies," JRC Research Reports JRC98111, Joint Research Centre.
- Richard Blundell & Rachel Griffith & John van Reenen, 1999. "Market Share, Market Value and Innovation in a Panel of British Manufacturing Firms," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 66(3), pages 529-554.
- Venturini, Francesco, 2015. "The modern drivers of productivity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 357-369.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Nicolae Istudor & Aura-Gabriela Socol & Marius-Corneliu Marinas & Cristian Socol, 2024. "Analysis of the Adequacy of Employees Skills for the Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Central and Eastern European Countries," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 26(67), pages 703-703, August.
- A. Fronzetti Colladon & B. Guardabascio & F. Venturini, 2023. "A new mapping of technological interdependence," Papers 2308.00014, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2024.
- Rathi, Sawan & Majumdar, Adrija & Chatterjee, Chirantan, 2024. "Did the COVID-19 pandemic propel usage of AI in pharmaceutical innovation? New evidence from patenting data," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
- Anabela Marques Santos & Francesco Molica & Carlos Torrecilla Salinas, 2024. "EU-funded investment in Artificial Intelligence and regional specialization," GEE Papers 181, Gabinete de Estratégia e Estudos, Ministério da Economia, revised Jul 2024.
- Katrin Hussinger & Lorenzo Palladini, 2024.
"Information accessibility and knowledge creation: the impact of Google’s withdrawal from China on scientific research,"
Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(6), pages 753-783, July.
- Hussinger, Katrin & Palladini, Lorenzo, 2024. "Information accessibility and knowledge creation: The impact of Google's withdrawal from China on scientific research," ZEW Discussion Papers 24-010, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
- Yang, Senmiao & Wang, Jianda & Dong, Kangyin & Dong, Xiucheng & Wang, Kun & Fu, Xiaowen, 2024. "Is artificial intelligence technology innovation a recipe for low-carbon energy transition? A global perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).
- Francesco Aiello & Lidia Mannarino & Valeria Pupo, 2024. "Family firm heterogeneity and patenting. Revising the role of size and age," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 105-133, June.
- Parteka, Aleksandra & Kordalska, Aleksandra, 2023.
"Artificial intelligence and productivity: global evidence from AI patent and bibliometric data,"
Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
- Aleksandra Parteka & Aleksandra Kordalska, 2022. "Artificial intelligence and productivity: global evidence from AI patent and bibliometric data," GUT FME Working Paper Series A 67, Faculty of Management and Economics, Gdansk University of Technology, revised Sep 2022.
- Alessia Lo Turco & Alessandro Sterlacchini, 2024. "Factors Enhancing Ai Adoption By Firms. Evidence From France," Working Papers 486, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
- Flavio Calvino & Luca Fontanelli, 2023. "Artificial intelligence, complementary assets and productivity: evidence from French firms," LEM Papers Series 2023/35, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Venturini, Francesco, 2022. "Intelligent technologies and productivity spillovers: Evidence from the Fourth Industrial Revolution," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 220-243.
- Mario Benassi & Elena Grinza & Francesco Rentocchini & Laura Rondi, 2022.
"Patenting in 4IR technologies and firm performance [Robots and jobs: evidence from US labor markets],"
Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 31(1), pages 112-136.
- BENASSI Mario & GRINZA Elena & RENTOCCHINI Francesco & RONDI Laura, 2021. "Patenting in 4IR Technologies and Firm Performance," JRC Working Papers on Corporate R&D and Innovation 2021-01, Joint Research Centre.
- Czarnitzki, Dirk & Fernández, Gastón P. & Rammer, Christian, 2023.
"Artificial intelligence and firm-level productivity,"
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 188-205.
- Czarnitzki, Dirk & Fernández, Gastón P. & Rammer, Christian, 2022. "Artificial intelligence and firm-level productivity," ZEW Discussion Papers 22-005, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
- Dirk Czarnitzki & Gastón P Fernández & Christian Rammer, 2022. "Artificial Intelligence and Firm-level Productivity," Working Papers of Department of Management, Strategy and Innovation, Leuven 690486, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Department of Management, Strategy and Innovation, Leuven.
- A. Minniti & F. Venturini, 2014. "R&D Policy and Schumpeterian Growth: Theory and Evidence," Working Papers wp945, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
- Venturini, Francesco, 2012.
"Looking into the black box of Schumpeterian growth theories: An empirical assessment of R&D races,"
European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(8), pages 1530-1545.
- Francesco Venturini, 2011. "Looking into the black box of Schumpeterian Growth Theories: an empirical assessment of R&D races," Quaderni del Dipartimento di Economia, Finanza e Statistica 94/2011, Università di Perugia, Dipartimento Economia.
- Heikkilä, Jussi & Rissanen, Julius & Ali-Vehmas, Timo, 2023. "Coopetition, standardization and general purpose technologies: A framework and an application," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(4).
- Kemeny, Tom & Petralia, Sergio & Storper, Michael, 2022.
"Disruptive innovation and spatial inequality,"
LSE Research Online Documents on Economics
115953, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Tom Kemeny & Sergio Petralia & Michael Storper, 2022. "Disruptive innovation and spatial inequality," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2211, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jul 2022.
- Damioli, G. & Van Roy, V. & Vertesy, D. & Vivarelli, M., 2021.
"May AI revolution be labour-friendly? Some micro evidence from the supply side,"
GLO Discussion Paper Series
823, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
- Damioli, Giacomo & Van Roy, Vincent & Vertesy, Daniel & Vivarelli, Marco, 2021. "May AI Revolution Be Labour-Friendly? Some Micro Evidence from the Supply Side," IZA Discussion Papers 14309, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Parteka, Aleksandra & Kordalska, Aleksandra, 2023.
"Artificial intelligence and productivity: global evidence from AI patent and bibliometric data,"
Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
- Aleksandra Parteka & Aleksandra Kordalska, 2022. "Artificial intelligence and productivity: global evidence from AI patent and bibliometric data," GUT FME Working Paper Series A 67, Faculty of Management and Economics, Gdansk University of Technology, revised Sep 2022.
- Neves, Pedro Cunha & Sequeira, Tiago Neves, 2018. "Spillovers in the production of knowledge: A meta-regression analysis," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(4), pages 750-767.
- Ian Goldin & Pantelis Koutroumpis & François Lafond & Julian Winkler, 2024.
"Why Is Productivity Slowing Down?,"
Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 62(1), pages 196-268, March.
- Goldin, Ian & Koutroumpis, Pantelis & Lafond, François & Winkler, Julian, 2020. "Why is productivity slowing down?," MPRA Paper 99172, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Lafond, François & Goldin, Ian & Koutroumpis, Pantelis & Winkler, Julian, 2022. "Why is productivity slowing down?," INET Oxford Working Papers 2022-08, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.
- Lafond, François & Goldin, Ian & Koutroumpis, Pantelis & Winkler, Julian, 2021. "Why is productivity slowing down?," INET Oxford Working Papers 2021-12, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.
- Damioli, Giacomo & Van Roy, Vincent & Vertesy, Daniel & Vivarelli, Marco, 2021. "Will the AI revolution be labour-friendly? Some micro evidence from the supply side," MERIT Working Papers 2021-016, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
- Minniti, Antonio & Venturini, Francesco, 2017. "The long-run growth effects of R&D policy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 316-326.
- Waßenhoven, Anna & Rennings, Michael & Laibach, Natalie & Bröring, Stefanie, 2023. "What constitutes a “Key Enabling Technology” for transition processes: Insights from the bioeconomy's technological landscape," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
- Matheus E. Leusin & Bjoern Jindra & Daniel S. Hain, 2021. "An evolutionary view on the emergence of Artificial Intelligence," Papers 2102.00233, arXiv.org.
- Giacomo Damioli & Vincent Van Roy & Daniel Vertesy & Marco Vivarelli, 2021. "Detecting the labour-friendly nature of AI product innovation," DISCE - Quaderni del Dipartimento di Politica Economica dipe0017, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimenti e Istituti di Scienze Economiche (DISCE).
- Herzer Dierk, 2022.
"Semi-endogenous Versus Schumpeterian Growth Models: A Critical Review of the Literature and New Evidence,"
Review of Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 73(1), pages 1-55, April.
- Herzer, Dierk, 2020. "Semi-endogenous versus Schumpeterian growth models: a critical review of the literature and new evidence," MPRA Paper 100383, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Herzer, Dierk, 2020. "Semi-endogenous versus Schumpeterian growth models: a critical review of the literature and new evidence," MPRA Paper 98022, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Lütkenhorst, Wilfried, 2018. "Creating wealth without labour? Emerging contours of a new techno-economic landscape," IDOS Discussion Papers 11/2018, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
- Genz, Sabrina & Gregory, Terry & Janser, Markus & Lehmer, Florian & Matthes, Britta, 2021.
"How do workers adjust when firms adopt new technologies?,"
ZEW Discussion Papers
21-073, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
- Genz, Sabrina & Gregory, Terry & Janser, Markus & Lehmer, Florian & Matthes, Britta, 2021. "How Do Workers Adjust When Firms Adopt New Technologies?," IZA Discussion Papers 14626, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Matthias Niggli & Christian Rutzer, 2023. "Digital technologies, technological improvement rates, and innovations “Made in Switzerland”," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, Springer;Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics, vol. 159(1), pages 1-31, December.
More about this item
Keywords
AI; ICT; patenting; European firms;All these keywords.
JEL classification:
- O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
- O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
- O34 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital
NEP fields
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:- NEP-BIG-2022-04-04 (Big Data)
- NEP-CSE-2022-04-04 (Economics of Strategic Management)
- NEP-EFF-2022-04-04 (Efficiency and Productivity)
- NEP-ENT-2022-04-04 (Entrepreneurship)
- NEP-ICT-2022-04-04 (Information and Communication Technologies)
- NEP-INO-2022-04-04 (Innovation)
- NEP-IPR-2022-04-04 (Intellectual Property Rights)
- NEP-SBM-2022-04-04 (Small Business Management)
- NEP-TID-2022-04-04 (Technology and Industrial Dynamics)
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhs:lucirc:2022_003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Torben Schubert (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/circlse.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.