IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/joreco/v68y2022ics0969698922001606.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using instant refunds to improve online return experiences

Author

Listed:
  • Martínez-López, Francisco J.
  • Feng, Changyuan
  • Li, Yangchun
  • López-López, David

Abstract

In the online return context, offering the consumer a satisfactory return experience is critical to an online seller's success. However, little is known about how online sellers can improve consumers' online return experience. This research examines whether an instant refund service can improve the online return experience. To obtain a comprehensive view of the outcomes of using an instant refund service, this paper also examines how the use of an instant refund affects several pivotal consumer responses. Study 1 analyzed the effects of an instant refund service on consumer responses in a post-purchase pre-return scenario, and Study 2 analyzed the effects of instant refunds on a set of key variables in a post-purchase post-return scenario, including satisfaction with the online return experience. For each study, the hypotheses of the effects of an instant refund on consumer responses were discussed, and a one-factor (instant refund service, yes vs. no) between-subject scenario experiment (with an additional related experiment in study 1) was conducted, using online panel data from Wjx.cn. One-way ANOVA was used to test the hypotheses. It is concluded that an instant refund service increases consumer satisfaction with the experience and improves other consumer responses. In terms of potential side-effects, instant refunds are not significantly associated with stronger product return intentions. These findings can help online sellers decide whether to evolve their conventional refund mode to a new instant refund mode.

Suggested Citation

  • Martínez-López, Francisco J. & Feng, Changyuan & Li, Yangchun & López-López, David, 2022. "Using instant refunds to improve online return experiences," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:68:y:2022:i:c:s0969698922001606
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103067
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698922001606
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103067?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chang, Hsiu-Hua & Yang, Ting-Shan, 2022. "Consumer rights or unethical behaviors: Exploring the impacts of retailer return policies," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    2. Martínez-López, Francisco J. & Li, Yangchun & Su, Wan & Feng, Changyuan, 2019. "To have or have not: Buy buttons on social platforms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 33-48.
    3. Gianfranco Walsh & Daniel Brylla, 2017. "Do product returns hurt relational outcomes? some evidence from online retailing," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 27(4), pages 329-339, November.
    4. Chebat, Jean-Charles & Slusarczyk, Witold, 2005. "How emotions mediate the effects of perceived justice on loyalty in service recovery situations: an empirical study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(5), pages 664-673, May.
    5. Janakiraman, Narayan & Syrdal, Holly A. & Freling, Ryan, 2016. "The Effect of Return Policy Leniency on Consumer Purchase and Return Decisions: A Meta-analytic Review," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 92(2), pages 226-235.
    6. Wenyan Zhou & Oliver Hinz, 2016. "Determining profit-optimizing return policies – a two-step approach on data from taobao.com," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 26(2), pages 103-114, May.
    7. Pei, Zhi & Paswan, Audhesh & Yan, Ruiliang, 2014. "E-tailer׳s return policy, consumer׳s perception of return policy fairness and purchase intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 249-257.
    8. Lena Steinhoff & Denni Arli & Scott Weaven & Irina V. Kozlenkova, 2019. "Online relationship marketing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 369-393, May.
    9. Dailey, Lynn C. & Ülkü, M. Ali, 2018. "Retailers beware: On denied product returns and consumer behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 202-209.
    10. Elisabeth Deutskens & Ad Jong & Ko Ruyter & Martin Wetzels, 2006. "Comparing the generalizability of online and mail surveys in cross-national service quality research," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 119-136, April.
    11. Huseyn Abdulla & James D. Abbey & Michael Ketzenberg, 2022. "How consumers value retailer's return policy leniency levers: An empirical investigation," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(4), pages 1719-1733, April.
    12. Eric T. Anderson & Karsten Hansen & Duncan Simester, 2009. "The Option Value of Returns: Theory and Empirical Evidence," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 405-423, 05-06.
    13. Ramanathan, Ramakrishnan, 2011. "An empirical analysis on the influence of risk on relationships between handling of product returns and customer loyalty in E-commerce," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(2), pages 255-261, April.
    14. Whang, Jeong Bin & Song, Ji Hee & Choi, Boreum & Lee, Jong-Ho, 2021. "The effect of Augmented Reality on purchase intention of beauty products: The roles of consumers’ control," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 275-284.
    15. Varsha Verma & Dheeraj Sharma & Jagdish Sheth, 2016. "Does relationship marketing matter in online retailing? A meta-analytic approach," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 206-217, March.
    16. Javed, Muhammad Kashif & Wu, Min, 2020. "Effects of online retailer after delivery services on repurchase intention: An empirical analysis of customers’ past experience and future confidence with the retailer," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    17. Jens Hogreve & Nicola Bilstein & Leonhard Mandl, 2017. "Unveiling the recovery time zone of tolerance: when time matters in service recovery," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(6), pages 866-883, November.
    18. Dabholkar, Pratibha A. & Sheng, Xiaojing, 2009. "The role of perceived control and gender in consumer reactions to download delays," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(7), pages 756-760, July.
    19. Serravalle, Francesca & Vannucci, Virginia & Pantano, Eleonora, 2022. "“Take it or leave it?†: Evidence on cultural differences affecting return behaviour for Gen Z," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    20. Rong Zhang & Jiatong Li & Zongsheng Huang & Bin Liu, 2019. "Return Strategies and Online Product Customization in a Dual-Channel Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-17, June.
    21. Walsh, Gianfranco & Hennig-Thurau, Thorsten & Sassenberg, Kai & Bornemann, Daniel, 2010. "Does relationship quality matter in e-services? A comparison of online and offline retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 130-142.
    22. Pham, Thi Song Hanh & Ahammad, Mohammad Faisal, 2017. "Antecedents and consequences of online customer satisfaction: A holistic process perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 332-342.
    23. Nick Hajli & Xiaolin Lin, 2016. "Exploring the Security of Information Sharing on Social Networking Sites: The Role of Perceived Control of Information," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(1), pages 111-123, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rokonuzzaman, Md & Iyer, Pramod & Harun, Ahasan, 2021. "Return policy, No joke: An investigation into the impact of a retailer's return policy on consumers' decision making," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    2. Xu, Xun & Jackson, Jonathan E., 2019. "Investigating the influential factors of return channel loyalty in omni-channel retailing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 118-132.
    3. Al-Adwan, Ahmad Samed & Al-Debei, Mutaz M. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2022. "E-commerce in high uncertainty avoidance cultures: The driving forces of repurchase and word-of-mouth intentions," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    4. Chen, Jing & Yu, Bo & Chen, Bintong & Liu, Zhuojun, 2023. "Lenient vs. stringent returns policies in the presence of fraudulent returns: The role of customers’ fairness perceptions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    5. Javed, Muhammad Kashif & Wu, Min, 2020. "Effects of online retailer after delivery services on repurchase intention: An empirical analysis of customers’ past experience and future confidence with the retailer," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    6. Chen, Hao-Wei, 2023. "Improving supply quality through the store-initiated returns in wholesale supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    7. Ülkü, M. Ali & Gürler, Ülkü, 2018. "The impact of abusing return policies: A newsvendor model with opportunistic consumers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 124-133.
    8. Duong, Quang Huy & Zhou, Li & Meng, Meng & Nguyen, Truong Van & Ieromonachou, Petros & Nguyen, Duy Tiep, 2022. "Understanding product returns: A systematic literature review using machine learning and bibliometric analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    9. Jeng, Shih-Ping, 2017. "Increasing customer purchase intention through product return policies: The pivotal impacts of retailer brand familiarity and product categories," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 182-189.
    10. Kateryna Lysenko-Ryba & Dominik Zimon, 2021. "Customer Behavioral Reactions to Negative Experiences during the Product Return," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-14, January.
    11. Gianfranco Walsh & Michael Möhring, 2017. "Effectiveness of product return-prevention instruments: Empirical evidence," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 27(4), pages 341-350, November.
    12. Gianfranco Walsh & Daniel Brylla, 2017. "Do product returns hurt relational outcomes? some evidence from online retailing," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 27(4), pages 329-339, November.
    13. Rezaei Kalantary, Mina & Hejazi, Seyed Reza & Khosroshahi, Hossein, 2023. "Pricing for different return policies in an online marketplace considering appeasement during a post-return out-of-stock," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    14. Liyanaarachchi, Gajendra, 2021. "Managing privacy paradox through national culture: Reshaping online retailing strategy," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    15. Oghazi, Pejvak & Karlsson, Stefan & Hellström, Daniel & Hjort, Klas, 2018. "Online purchase return policy leniency and purchase decision: Mediating role of consumer trust," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 190-200.
    16. Mansur Khamitov & Yany Grégoire & Anshu Suri, 2020. "A systematic review of brand transgression, service failure recovery and product-harm crisis: integration and guiding insights," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 519-542, May.
    17. Dailey, Lynn C. & Ülkü, M. Ali, 2018. "Retailers beware: On denied product returns and consumer behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 202-209.
    18. Assarzadegan, Parisa & Rasti-Barzoki, Morteza, 2020. "A game theoretic approach for pricing under a return policy and a money back guarantee in a closed loop supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    19. Minnema, Alec & Bijmolt, Tammo H.A. & Gensler, Sonja & Wiesel, Thorsten, 2016. "To Keep or Not to Keep: Effects of Online Customer Reviews on Product Returns," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 92(3), pages 253-267.
    20. José L. Vilar-Zanón & Eduardo Vilar & Antonio Heras, 2017. "Online product returns risk assessment and management," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 25(3), pages 445-466, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:68:y:2022:i:c:s0969698922001606. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing-and-consumer-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.