IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v111y2025ics014971892500076x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An institutional analysis of performance and impact of farmer producer organizations using PLS path modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Veesam, Haripriya
  • Nikam, Vinayak
  • Ray, Mrinmoy

Abstract

Farmer Producer Organizations (FPOs) have been seen as an effective strategy by most developing countries to address the problems of small and marginal holdings, necessitating policy inputs for their enhanced performance. This paper analyses the institutional features using principles of new institutional economics and management science; evaluates their effect on the performance and impact of FPOs. Partial Least Squares Path Modeling (PLS-PM) and Ordered Probit regression analysis were used to examine the data of members of FPOs from Andhra Pradesh and the Telangana state of India. A positive and significant relationship was observed among the institutional features, rationalities, performance and overall impact, with a complementary mediation role. The study suggests improving the identified parameters of institutional features, rationalities for better performance of these institutions, and augmented impact on the farming community.

Suggested Citation

  • Veesam, Haripriya & Nikam, Vinayak & Ray, Mrinmoy, 2025. "An institutional analysis of performance and impact of farmer producer organizations using PLS path modeling," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:111:y:2025:i:c:s014971892500076x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102609
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014971892500076X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102609?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:111:y:2025:i:c:s014971892500076x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.