IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v146y2025ics0140988325003044.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carbon credit and credibility in lawsuit: Evidence from CCER firms in China

Author

Listed:
  • Nian, Hongyu
  • Wang, Huanhuan
  • Zhang, Zhiqiang

Abstract

This paper evaluates the China Certified Emission Reduction (CCER) program, a voluntary carbon reduction initiative, with a focus on the legal management practices of participating firms. We leverage several novel datasets, including firm-level litigation, financial, and environmental data, covering the period from 2014 to 2021. We have several main findings: First, CCER firms experience a significant reduction in legal liabilities reflected by decreased frequency of lawsuits in which firms are litigated and reduced claim points and claim amounts associated with these lawsuits. Second, firms holding CCER carbon credits significantly enhance their legal defense capabilities with a higher success rate in lawsuits and a notable reduction in both the ratio of claim points and the amounts upheld by courts. Our mechanism analysis also indicates that CCER firms achieve a significant reduction in CO2 emissions, air pollutant discharges, and environmental fees, as well as stronger financial positions, effectively reducing the risk of legal liabilities. The advantageous position of CCER firms are particularly prominent in financial defaults, contract, and labor disputes.

Suggested Citation

  • Nian, Hongyu & Wang, Huanhuan & Zhang, Zhiqiang, 2025. "Carbon credit and credibility in lawsuit: Evidence from CCER firms in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:146:y:2025:i:c:s0140988325003044
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108480
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325003044
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108480?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    CCER; Carbon credit; Carbon finance; Litigation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q48 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Government Policy
    • G38 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • K20 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:146:y:2025:i:c:s0140988325003044. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.