IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v134y2024ics0140988324002585.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The policy gap between finance and economy: Evidence from China's green finance policy

Author

Listed:
  • Fu, Tong
  • Li, Zijun
  • Qiu, Zhaoxuan
  • Tong, Xinle

Abstract

By exploiting the quasi-natural experiment of China's pilot zone for green finance reform and innovation (PZGFRI) policy, this paper investigates how the green finance policy affects corporate total factor productivity (TFP). The multi-period difference-in-differences method shows that the policy significantly reduces enterprise TFP. Moreover, this study finds that the policy promotes the control of credit by local governments but worsens credit supply to firms and then reduces TFP. This study further adopts moderation effect estimates to show that the intensity of financial regulation mitigates the negative impact of the policy on TFP. Ultimately, we warn that a green finance policy in a developing country cannot inherently guarantee economic performance. In addition, financial regulation is critical to lessening the problem of economic inefficiency due to the green finance policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Fu, Tong & Li, Zijun & Qiu, Zhaoxuan & Tong, Xinle, 2024. "The policy gap between finance and economy: Evidence from China's green finance policy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:134:y:2024:i:c:s0140988324002585
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107550
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324002585
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107550?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:134:y:2024:i:c:s0140988324002585. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.