IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ememar/v57y2023ics1566014123000651.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing systemic risk through credit network reconstruction

Author

Listed:
  • Chao, Wang
  • Jing, Ma
  • Xiaoxing, Liu

Abstract

Capital buffers can improve the stability of the banking system, but they come at a cost. This study explores the efficient macro-prudential regulation of systemic risk from the perspective of capital network reconstruction. A model of option pricing is proposed to determine the market value of sector credits. Consequently, systemic risk is measured by both credit and interbank contagion risks. Credit network reconstruction is then optimized to minimize systemic risks. Our analysis was based on data from China's banking systems between 2008 and 2020. In different stress tests, the credit network reconstruction generally optimizes systemic risk to the lowest level. At the same time, it may save about 20% to 140% of the cost of capital. The optimization mechanism analysis shows that large banks with stability advantages share more shocks than small banks by reconstructing their sector credit network. As a result, the contagion process of systemic risk is prevented, and bankruptcy cascades are eliminated. These results imply that credit network reconstruction holds great potential for preventing systemic risks.

Suggested Citation

  • Chao, Wang & Jing, Ma & Xiaoxing, Liu, 2023. "Optimizing systemic risk through credit network reconstruction," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ememar:v:57:y:2023:i:c:s1566014123000651
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ememar.2023.101060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1566014123000651
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ememar.2023.101060?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ememar:v:57:y:2023:i:c:s1566014123000651. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620356 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.