IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v316y2024i3p1044-1057.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Review-based recommendation under preference uncertainty: An asymmetric deep learning framework

Author

Listed:
  • Xiong, Yingqiu
  • Liu, Yezheng
  • Qian, Yang
  • Jiang, Yuanchun
  • Chai, Yidong
  • Ling, Haifeng

Abstract

Online reviews are one of the most trusted resources for inferring customer needs and understanding consumer decision-making behavior. This study attempts to integrate textual reviews and user-item ratings to improve recommendation performance. To achieve this goal, we propose a deep neural network model. Specifically, the proposed model applies a review-level aggregation strategy to learn user preferences while using an aspect-based document-level aggregation strategy to learn item representation. In this process, we introduce two attention modules at the review and aspect levels, respectively. The review-level attention is used to learn the user preferences that are most related to the target item. The aspect-level attention attempts to learn the item's aspect features that users are most concerned about. In addition, we design a latent stochastic attention mechanism based on the probabilistic generative mechanism, to model the user preference uncertainty. For evaluation, we conduct extensive experiments on several real-world datasets. Using several state-of-the-art methods as comparisons, we find that the proposed model can significantly improve rating predictive power in the context of the recommendation system. Based on ablation experiments, we find that the enhanced predictive power benefits from the preference uncertainty and the attention mechanism. From the qualitative analysis, we suggest that the proposed model can yield many interpretable results.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiong, Yingqiu & Liu, Yezheng & Qian, Yang & Jiang, Yuanchun & Chai, Yidong & Ling, Haifeng, 2024. "Review-based recommendation under preference uncertainty: An asymmetric deep learning framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 316(3), pages 1044-1057.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:316:y:2024:i:3:p:1044-1057
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2024.01.042
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037722172400081X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2024.01.042?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:316:y:2024:i:3:p:1044-1057. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.