IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i3p579-d133311.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Optimal Strategic Business Model for Small Businesses Using Online Platforms

Author

Listed:
  • Hana Kim

    (Technology Management, Economics and Policy Program, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, Korea)

  • Daeho Lee

    (Department of Interaction Science, Sungkyunkwan University, 25-2 Sungkyunwan-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03063, Korea)

  • Min Ho Ryu

    (Graduate School of Management of Technology, Hoseo University, Asan 31499, Korea)

Abstract

As ecommerce continues to grow, small businesses are using a variety of platforms to secure potential consumers. However, it is important for small business owners to choose an efficient business model because of constraints such as technical problems. In this study, based on platform characteristics we divide online shopping platforms into different types as follows: (1) information brokerage services; (2) online malls; and (3) omni-channel platforms. The efficiency of each group is measured by stochastic frontier analysis, and the efficiency comparison between the groups is made using meta-frontier analysis. As a result of the study, it is found that the efficiency of small business owners increases as functional integration increases, satisfying utilitarian motivations. However, a platform with greater integration that has a social presence satisfying hedonic motivations improves the efficiency of all small businesses using the platform instead of just the efficiency of a marginal number of small business owners. This study, based on the dynamic capabilities viewpoint, suggests that the omni-channel platform represents the most sustainable approach for small business owners undergoing difficulties such as technological and organizational changes.

Suggested Citation

  • Hana Kim & Daeho Lee & Min Ho Ryu, 2018. "An Optimal Strategic Business Model for Small Businesses Using Online Platforms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-11, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:3:p:579-:d:133311
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/3/579/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/3/579/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jennifer J. Argo & Darren W. Dahl & Rajesh V. Manchanda, 2005. "The Influence of a Mere Social Presence in a Retail Context," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 32(2), pages 207-212, September.
    2. Lee, Changjun & Lee, Daeho & Hwang, Junseok, 2015. "Platform openness and the productivity of content providers: A meta-frontier analysis," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(7), pages 553-562.
    3. Babin, Barry J & Darden, William R & Griffin, Mitch, 1994. "Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(4), pages 644-656, March.
    4. Konuş, Umut & Neslin, Scott A. & Verhoef, Peter C., 2014. "The effect of search channel elimination on purchase incidence, order size and channel choice," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 49-64.
    5. Geuens, Stijn & Coussement, Kristof & De Bock, Koen W., 2018. "A framework for configuring collaborative filtering-based recommendations derived from purchase data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(1), pages 208-218.
    6. Kaplan, Andreas M. & Haenlein, Michael, 2010. "Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 59-68, January.
    7. Ladhari, Riadh & Souiden, Nizar & Dufour, Béatrice, 2017. "The role of emotions in utilitarian service settings: The effects of emotional satisfaction on product perception and behavioral intentions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 10-18.
    8. Godwin C. Ariguzo & Efrem G. Mallach & D. Steven White, 2006. "The first decade of e-commerce," International Journal of Business Information Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(3), pages 239-255.
    9. Michael R. Baye & John Morgan, 2001. "Information Gatekeepers on the Internet and the Competitiveness of Homogeneous Product Markets," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 91(3), pages 454-474, June.
    10. Paul A. Pavlou & David Gefen, 2004. "Building Effective Online Marketplaces with Institution-Based Trust," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 15(1), pages 37-59, March.
    11. Benjamin Edelman & Sonia Jaffe & Scott Duke Kominers, 2010. "To Groupon or Not to Groupon: The Profitability of Deep Discounts," Harvard Business School Working Papers 11-063, Harvard Business School, revised Jan 2014.
    12. Gefen, David, 2000. "E-commerce: the role of familiarity and trust," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 725-737, December.
    13. Verhoef, Peter C. & Kannan, P.K. & Inman, J. Jeffrey, 2015. "From Multi-Channel Retailing to Omni-Channel Retailing," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 91(2), pages 174-181.
    14. Kyoungsun Lee & Yuri Park & Daeho Lee, 2016. "Effect of the ICT Ecosystem Structure on the Sustainable Growth of ICT Firms: A Metafrontier Analysis on China, South Korea, the United States, and Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-9, May.
    15. Stijn Geuens & Kristof Coussement & Koen W. de Bock, 2018. "A framework for configuring collaborative filtering-based recommendations derived from purchase data," Post-Print hal-01662029, HAL.
    16. Pauwels, Koen & Neslin, Scott A., 2015. "Building With Bricks and Mortar: The Revenue Impact of Opening Physical Stores in a Multichannel Environment," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 91(2), pages 182-197.
    17. Ailawadi, Kusum L. & Farris, Paul W., 2017. "Managing Multi- and Omni-Channel Distribution: Metrics and Research Directions," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 120-135.
    18. George Battese & D. Rao & Christopher O'Donnell, 2004. "A Metafrontier Production Function for Estimation of Technical Efficiencies and Technology Gaps for Firms Operating Under Different Technologies," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 91-103, January.
    19. Ahreum Hong & Daeho Lee & Junseok Hwang, 2011. "Metafrontier Production Function Analysis of Horizontal and Vertical Integration in Korea's Cable TV Industry," Journal of Media Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 221-236, November.
    20. Yang, Anhyuk & Lee, Daeho & Hwang, Junseok & Shin, Jungwoo, 2013. "The influence of regulations on the efficiency of telecommunications operators: A meta-frontier analysis," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(11), pages 1071-1082.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qingfeng Tian & Shuo Zhang & Huimin Yu & Guangming Cao, 2019. "Exploring the Factors Influencing Business Model Innovation Using Grounded Theory: The Case of a Chinese High-End Equipment Manufacturer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Hana Stverkova & Michal Pohludka, 2018. "Business Organisational Structures of Global Companies: Use of the Territorial Model to Ensure Long-Term Growth," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-9, June.
    3. Zuzana Svobodová & Jaroslava Rajchlová, 2020. "Strategic Behavior of E-Commerce Businesses in Online Industry of Electronics from a Customer Perspective," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-24, October.
    4. Doo-Young Park & Kanghwa Choi & Dae-Han Kang, 2020. "Measuring the Meta Efficiency and Its Determinants on Efficiency in the Korean Coffee Shop Franchise," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-20, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lee, Kyoungsun & Park, Yuri & Lee, Daeho, 2018. "Measuring efficiency and ICT ecosystem impact: Hardware vs. software industry," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 107-115.
    2. Cai, Ya-Jun & Lo, Chris K.Y., 2020. "Omni-channel management in the new retailing era: A systematic review and future research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    3. Yuri Jo & Won Young Chung & Daeho Lee, 2020. "The capability‐enhancing role of government‐driven industrial districts for new technology‐based firms in South Korea," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(3), pages 306-321, September.
    4. Ravula, Prashanth & Bhatnagar, Amit & Ghose, Sanjoy, 2020. "Antecedents and consequences of cross-effects: An empirical analysis of omni-coupons," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 405-420.
    5. Reinartz, Werner & Wiegand, Nico & Imschloss, Monika, 2019. "The impact of digital transformation on the retailing value chain," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 350-366.
    6. Yini Chen & Ting Chi, 2021. "How Does Channel Integration Affect Consumers’ Selection of Omni-Channel Shopping Methods? An Empirical Study of U.S. Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-29, August.
    7. Ryu, Min Ho & Cho, Yongsun & Lee, Daeho, 2019. "Should small-scale online retailers diversify distribution channels into offline channels? Focused on the clothing and fashion industry," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 74-77.
    8. Maier, Erik & Wieringa, Jaap, 2021. "Acquiring customers through online marketplaces? The effect of marketplace sales on sales in a retailer's own channels," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 311-328.
    9. Xu, Xun & Jackson, Jonathan E., 2019. "Investigating the influential factors of return channel loyalty in omni-channel retailing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 118-132.
    10. Irene Y. L. Chen & Yi-Shun Wang & Bo-Ruei Li, 2021. "Investigating the Relative Performance of Bricks-and-Mortar, Clicks-and-Mortar, and Pure-Click Firms in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-17, March.
    11. Huré, Elodie & Picot-Coupey, Karine & Ackermann, Claire-Lise, 2017. "Understanding omni-channel shopping value: A mixed-method study," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 314-330.
    12. Ailawadi, Kusum L. & Farris, Paul W., 2017. "Managing Multi- and Omni-Channel Distribution: Metrics and Research Directions," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 120-135.
    13. Zhuang, Hejun & Popkowski Leszczyc, Peter T.L. & Lin, Yuanfang, 2018. "Why is Price Dispersion Higher Online than Offline? The Impact of Retailer Type and Shopping Risk on Price Dispersion," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 136-153.
    14. Timoumi, Ahmed & Gangwar, Manish & Mantrala, Murali K., 2022. "Cross-channel effects of omnichannel retail marketing strategies: A review of extant data-driven research," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 133-151.
    15. Liu, Huan & Lobschat, Lara & Verhoef, Peter C. & Zhao, Hong, 2019. "App Adoption: The Effect on Purchasing of Customers Who Have Used a Mobile Website Previously," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 16-34.
    16. Gauri, Dinesh K. & Jindal, Rupinder P. & Ratchford, Brian & Fox, Edward & Bhatnagar, Amit & Pandey, Aashish & Navallo, Jonathan R. & Fogarty, John & Carr, Stephen & Howerton, Eric, 2021. "Evolution of retail formats: Past, present, and future," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 97(1), pages 42-61.
    17. Wagner, Gerhard & Schramm-Klein, Hanna & Steinmann, Sascha, 2020. "Online retailing across e-channels and e-channel touchpoints: Empirical studies of consumer behavior in the multichannel e-commerce environment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 256-270.
    18. Mitxel Cotarelo & Teresa Fayos & Haydeé Calderón & Alejandro Mollá, 2021. "Omni-Channel Intensity and Shopping Value as Key Drivers of Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-17, May.
    19. Kyoungsun Lee & Yuri Park & Daeho Lee, 2016. "Effect of the ICT Ecosystem Structure on the Sustainable Growth of ICT Firms: A Metafrontier Analysis on China, South Korea, the United States, and Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-9, May.
    20. Sadaf Hafeez & Noreen Izza Arshad & Lukman Bin A B Rahim & Muhammad Farooq Shabbir & Jawad Iqbal, 2020. "Innovation in Chinese internet companies: A meta-frontier analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-15, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:3:p:579-:d:133311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.