IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v319y2024i3p983-998.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interactive preference analysis: A reinforcement learning framework

Author

Listed:
  • Hu, Xiao
  • Kang, Siqin
  • Ren, Long
  • Zhu, Shaokeng

Abstract

Automated investment managers are increasingly popular in personal wealth management due to their cost effectiveness, objectivity, and accessibility. However, it still suffers from several dilemmas, e.g., cold start, over-specialization, and black boxes. To solve these issues, we develop an online reinforcement learning framework based on the multi-armed bandit algorithm to offer personalized investment advice. We provide a comprehensive theoretical procedure for developing this framework. This framework not only enables us to capture the evolving preferences of investors effectively but also has a strong explainability power to provide more implications regarding why one financial product is preferred. We further evaluate our basic model through a large-scale, real-world data set from a leading wealth management platform. The results show a stronger effectiveness of the proposed framework compared to other well-recognized benchmark models. Furthermore, we extend our basic model to address the potential agency problem between the robo-advisor and the investors. Another extension is also provided through an optimization scheme to account for the investors’ demands for diversification in multiple aspects.

Suggested Citation

  • Hu, Xiao & Kang, Siqin & Ren, Long & Zhu, Shaokeng, 2024. "Interactive preference analysis: A reinforcement learning framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 319(3), pages 983-998.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:319:y:2024:i:3:p:983-998
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2024.06.033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221724005125
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2024.06.033?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:319:y:2024:i:3:p:983-998. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.