IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecanpo/v81y2024icp576-590.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Utility of inequality sensitive measures of the gender wage gap: Evidence from South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Oyenubi, Adeola
  • Mosomi, Jacqueline

Abstract

We examine the trend in the gender wage gap in South Africa taking into consideration the high level of general inequality in the country. To do this, we utilize the information-theoretic approach of the Generalised Entropy (GE) measures of divergence supplemented by stochastic dominance analysis and tests. Under this approach, male and female wage distributions are summarized by suitable evaluation functions and then the difference between the evaluations is computed. Unlike conventional measures of the gender wage gap based on the mean and quantiles, this approach does not assume rank invariance and makes explicit the evaluation functions used. We find that the rate of convergence of the gender wage gap depends on the measure used to aggregate the gap across the entire distribution. Comparison of the aggregate measures of the gender wage gap (mean, median and the entropy measure) reveals that the convergence of the gender wage gap is faster under the entropy measure. This is because unlike the mean, the entropy measure captures the dispersion of wages across individuals. Stochastic dominance test results reveal that male wages dominate female wages mostly in the second-order sense i.e., only for evaluation functions that are increasing in wages and concave. Finally, decomposition results show that across measures, the persistent gender wage gap is attributable to wage structure effects as opposed to composition effects. Therefore, to effectively address the persistent gender wage gap in the middle of the income distribution, policies should be geared towards the returns to characteristics at the median. The implication of these findings is that measures of the gender wage gap that ignore the overall inequality are likely to skew the estimate of the gender wage gap.

Suggested Citation

  • Oyenubi, Adeola & Mosomi, Jacqueline, 2024. "Utility of inequality sensitive measures of the gender wage gap: Evidence from South Africa," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 576-590.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:81:y:2024:i:c:p:576-590
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2023.12.017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592623003363
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eap.2023.12.017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Gender wage gap; Metric entropy distance; Stochastic dominance; Wage distributions; Counterfactual analysis; Inequality; Labour markets; South Africa;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J01 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - General - - - Labor Economics: General
    • J31 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - Wage Level and Structure; Wage Differentials
    • J71 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Discrimination - - - Hiring and Firing
    • I31 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General Welfare, Well-Being
    • C43 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Index Numbers and Aggregation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:81:y:2024:i:c:p:576-590. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.