IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/fhecpo/v14y2011i3n12.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Which Questions in the Health and Retirement Study are Used by Researchers? Evidence from Academic Journals, 2006-2009

Author

Listed:
  • Jackson Tina

    () (Health Dialog, Inc.)

  • Balduf Mabel

    () (United States Marine Corps)

  • Yasaitis Laura

    () (Dartmouth Medical School and The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice)

  • Skinner Jonathan

    () (Dartmouth College)

Abstract

Since 2002, the average number of questions asked per respondent in the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) has risen by 39 percent, from 413 to 581. Yet there is little or no understanding of which questions, or how many in total, should be included—and more importantly, maintained—in longitudinal surveys. In this paper, we propose a simple approach to assessing the value of survey questions: journal citation counts. A sample of journal articles and book chapters published in 2006-09 (N = 206) is used to document which questions, and categories of questions, were used most and least frequently. A disproportionate number of published articles used a relatively small number of questions regarding health, wealth, income, and employment. By contrast, several categories of questions were rarely used, and many specific questions were never used. This evidence-based approach to measuring the value of survey questions can have applications for other surveys beyond the HRS.

Suggested Citation

  • Jackson Tina & Balduf Mabel & Yasaitis Laura & Skinner Jonathan, 2011. "Which Questions in the Health and Retirement Study are Used by Researchers? Evidence from Academic Journals, 2006-2009," Forum for Health Economics & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 14(3), pages 1-11, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:fhecpo:v:14:y:2011:i:3:n:12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/fhep.2011.14.issue-3/1558-9544.1269/1558-9544.1269.xml?format=INT
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:fhecpo:v:14:y:2011:i:3:n:12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Peter Golla). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.