IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/econoa/v19y2025i1p15n1001.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Harnessing the Digital Economy for Sustainable Energy Efficiency: An Empirical Analysis of China’s Yangtze River Delta

Author

Listed:
  • Liu Fengqin

    (School of Law, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212013, China)

  • Kumar Jai

    (School of Management, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212013, China)

  • Sun Huaping

    (School of Economics and Management, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, 100083, China)

  • Edziah Bless Kofi

    (College of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, China)

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of the digital economy on energy efficiency through a combination of theoretical analysis and empirical testing. The research contributes by categorizing the energy value creation process into two stages: the energy input stage and the energy operation stage and by examining both the direct and indirect effects of the digital economy on energy efficiency. Indirect effects are explored through factors such as industrial structure, green innovation, transaction efficiency, and environmental regulation. Using panel data from 41 cities in the Yangtze River Delta region of China, covering the period from 2006 to 2020, the study empirically examines the effects of the digital economy on energy efficiency. The findings emphasize the significant role of the digital economy in enhancing energy efficiency, particularly through upgrading industrial structures, increasing transaction efficiency, and stimulating green innovation. A heterogeneity analysis reveals that the influence of the digital economy on energy efficiency is less pronounced in resource-based cities than in non-resource-based cities. Based on these findings, the study provides targeted policy recommendations to further leverage the digital economy for improving energy efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu Fengqin & Kumar Jai & Sun Huaping & Edziah Bless Kofi, 2025. "Harnessing the Digital Economy for Sustainable Energy Efficiency: An Empirical Analysis of China’s Yangtze River Delta," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 19(1), pages 1-15.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:econoa:v:19:y:2025:i:1:p:15:n:1001
    DOI: 10.1515/econ-2025-0136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/econ-2025-0136
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/econ-2025-0136?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daron Acemoglu & Pascual Restrepo, 2018. "The Race between Man and Machine: Implications of Technology for Growth, Factor Shares, and Employment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 108(6), pages 1488-1542, June.
    2. Susanto Basu & John G. Fernald, 2008. "Information and communications technology as a general purpose technology: evidence from U.S. industry data," Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, pages 1-15.
    3. Gamal Atallah, 2002. "Vertical R&D Spillovers, Cooperation, Market Structure, and Innovation," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 179-209.
    4. Perez-Trujillo, Manuel & Lacalle-Calderon, Maricruz, 2020. "The impact of knowledge diffusion on economic growth across countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    5. Sagar, Ambuj D. & van der Zwaan, Bob, 2006. "Technological innovation in the energy sector: R&D, deployment, and learning-by-doing," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(17), pages 2601-2608, November.
    6. Eric Santor, 2020. "The Impact of Digitalization on the Economy: A Review Article on the NBER Volume "Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda"," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 39, pages 81-90, Fall.
    7. Eberhardt, Markus & Presbitero, Andrea F., 2015. "Public debt and growth: Heterogeneity and non-linearity," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(1), pages 45-58.
    8. Behnam Zakeri & Katsia Paulavets & Leonardo Barreto-Gomez & Luis Gomez Echeverri & Shonali Pachauri & Benigna Boza-Kiss & Caroline Zimm & Joeri Rogelj & Felix Creutzig & Diana Ürge-Vorsatz & David G. , 2022. "Pandemic, War, and Global Energy Transitions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-23, August.
    9. Chudik, Alexander & Pesaran, M. Hashem, 2015. "Common correlated effects estimation of heterogeneous dynamic panel data models with weakly exogenous regressors," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 188(2), pages 393-420.
    10. Gong, Xu & Fu, Chengbo & Li, Huijing & Pirabi, Mansoor, 2024. "The impact of U.S. political decisions on renewable and fossil energy companies in the era of the Paris Agreement," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 69(PA).
    11. Edziah, Bless Kofi & Sun, Huaping & Adom, Philip Kofi & Wang, Feng & Agyemang, Andrew Osei, 2022. "The role of exogenous technological factors and renewable energy in carbon dioxide emission reduction in Sub-Saharan Africa," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 1418-1428.
    12. Manes, Eran & Tchetchik, Anat, 2018. "The role of electronic word of mouth in reducing information asymmetry: An empirical investigation of online hotel booking," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 185-196.
    13. Hausen, Tobias & Fritz, Melanie & Schiefer, Gerhard, 2006. "Potential of electronic trading in complex supply chains: An experimental study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 580-597, December.
    14. Ouyang, Xiaoling & Li, Qiong & Du, Kerui, 2020. "How does environmental regulation promote technological innovations in the industrial sector? Evidence from Chinese provincial panel data," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    15. Ye Tian & Qin Liu & Yiting Ye & Zhaofang Zhang & Ribesh Khanal, 2023. "How the Rural Digital Economy Drives Rural Industrial Revitalization—Case Study of China’s 30 Provinces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, April.
    16. Marcel P. Timmer & Abdul Azeez Erumban & Bart Los & Robert Stehrer & Gaaitzen J. de Vries, 2014. "Slicing Up Global Value Chains," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 28(2), pages 99-118, Spring.
    17. Usenobong F. Akpan & Godwin E. Akpan, 2012. "The Contribution of Energy Consumption to Climate Change:A Feasible Policy Direction," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 2(1), pages 21-33.
    18. De Giovanni, Pietro, 2021. "Smart Supply Chains with vendor managed inventory, coordination, and environmental performance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(2), pages 515-531.
    19. Dmitry Ivanov & Alexandre Dolgui, 2019. "Low-Certainty-Need (LCN) supply chains: a new perspective in managing disruption risks and resilience," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(15-16), pages 5119-5136, August.
    20. Sue Wing, Ian, 2008. "Explaining the declining energy intensity of the U.S. economy," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 21-49, January.
    21. David Shipworth, 2006. "Qualitative modelling of sustainable energy scenarios: an extension of the Bon qualitative input-output model," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(7), pages 695-703.
    22. Ning Qi & Ao Zhang & Qiyana Zhu & M. De Aguiar, 2023. "Evolutionary Game of Vertical Cooperation and Innovation between Civilian and Military Enterprises: A Civilian-Military Integration Supply Chain System with Chinese Characteristics," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2023, pages 1-23, November.
    23. Zhao, Xiaoli & Ma, Chunbo & Hong, Dongyue, 2010. "Why did China's energy intensity increase during 1998-2006: Decomposition and policy analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 1379-1388, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brantley Liddle & Fakhri Hasanov, 2022. "Correction to: Industry electricity price and output elasticities for high-income and middle-income countries," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 62(3), pages 1321-1322, March.
    2. Brantley Liddle & Fakhri Hasanov, 2022. "Industry electricity price and output elasticities for high-income and middle-income countries," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 62(3), pages 1293-1319, March.
    3. Wang, Di & Shao, Xuefeng, 2024. "Research on the impact of digital transformation on the production efficiency of manufacturing enterprises: Institution-based analysis of the threshold effect," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 883-897.
    4. Kyoji Fukao & Cristiano Perugini, 2021. "The Long‐Run Dynamics of the Labor Share in Japan," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 67(2), pages 445-480, June.
    5. Victor Pontines & Reza Y. Siregar, 2017. "Non-core liabilities and monetary policy transmission in Indonesia during the post-2007 global financial crisis," CAMA Working Papers 2017-78, Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    6. Antonia Arsova, 2019. "Exchange rate pass-through to import prices in Europe: A panel cointegration approach," Working Paper Series in Economics 384, University of Lüneburg, Institute of Economics.
    7. Zhang, Yanying & Zheng, Kengcheng & Xia, Fei & Cheng, Zhengtao, 2024. "Fintech, natural resource rents, renewable energy consumption and environmental quality: A perspective of green economic recovery from BRICS economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    8. Voigt, Sebastian & De Cian, Enrica & Schymura, Michael & Verdolini, Elena, 2014. "Energy intensity developments in 40 major economies: Structural change or technology improvement?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 47-62.
    9. Arturas Juodis & Simon Reese, 2018. "The Incidental Parameters Problem in Testing for Remaining Cross-section Correlation," Papers 1810.03715, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2021.
    10. Quynh Chau Pham Holland & Benjamin Liu & Eduardo Roca, 2019. "International funding cost and heterogeneous mortgage interest-rate pass-through: a bank-level analysis," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 1255-1289, October.
    11. Reed, W. Robert & Zhu, Min, 2017. "On estimating long-run effects in models with lagged dependent variables," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 302-311.
    12. Rodolphe Desbordes & Markus Eberhardt & Mario Larch, 2025. "A democratic dividend in trade? Evidence from a flexible empirical implementation," Discussion Papers 2025-02, University of Nottingham, GEP.
    13. Reshef, Ariell & Santoni, Gianluca, 2023. "Are your labor shares set in Beijing? The view through the lens of global value chains," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    14. De Vita, Glauco & Trachanas, Emmanouil & Luo, Yun, 2018. "Revisiting the bi-directional causality between debt and growth: Evidence from linear and nonlinear tests," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 55-74.
    15. Abrams M.E. Tagem, 2017. "The economics and politics of foreign aid and domestic revenue," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2017-180, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    16. Elisabet Rodriguez Llorian & Janelle Mann, 2022. "Exploring the technology–healthcare expenditure nexus: a panel error correction approach," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 62(6), pages 3061-3086, June.
    17. Guoge Yang & Feng Deng & Yifei Wang & Xianhong Xiang, 2022. "Digital Paradox: Platform Economy and High-Quality Economic Development—New Evidence from Provincial Panel Data in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-26, February.
    18. Mika, Alina & Zumer, Tina, 2017. "Indebtedness in the EU: a drag or a catalyst for growth?," Working Paper Series 2118, European Central Bank.
    19. Sequeira, Tiago Neves & Santos, Marcelo Serra, 2018. "Does country-risk influence electricity production worldwide?," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 730-746.
    20. Dong, Ziguang & Zhou, Zheng & Ananzeh, Mohammed & Hoang, Khai Nguyen & Shamansurova, Zilola & Luong, Tuan Anh, 2024. "Exploring the asymmetric association between fintech, clean energy, climate policy, natural resource conservations and environmental quality. A post-COVID perspective from Asian countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:econoa:v:19:y:2025:i:1:p:15:n:1001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyterbrill.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.