Is the Feldstein-Horioka Puzzle History?
A country's intertemporal budget constraint implies current account stationarity or that its saving and investment rates should cointegrate. However, such behaviour may not pertain in finite sample spans where the current account could be subject to persistent shocks. Accordingly, this paper reconsiders the Feldstein-Horioka puzzle for a panel of 12 OECD economies 1980I-2000IV using a mean group regression approach that is robust to persistent innovations and accounts for country heterogeneity and cross-sectional dependence. The mean group estimates are notably smaller than that from the conventional cross-section estimator and are statistically insignificant. Our findings support the view that capital is highly mobile in the long run for OECD economies despite persistence in the current account. Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd and The Victoria University of Manchester, 2004..
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 72 (2004)
Issue (Month): 5 (09)
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Phone: (0)161 275 4868
Fax: (0)161 275 4812
Web page: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1463-6786
More information through EDIRC
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/subs.asp?ref=1463-6786|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:manchs:v:72:y:2004:i:5:p:569-590. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing)or (Christopher F. Baum)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.