IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/finrev/v61y2026i1p175-200.html

Political Risk, Political Polarization, and Earnings Management

Author

Listed:
  • Ashrafee T. Hossain
  • Mostafa Monzur Hasan
  • Abdullah‐Al Masum

Abstract

We examine how exposure to firm‐level political risk (PRISK) affects corporate earnings management (EM). We present robust evidence that heightened PRISK leads to an increase in real earnings management (REM); however, we do not find consistent evidence supporting an increase in accrual earnings management (AEM). Our results remain robust when employing difference‐in‐differences (DiD), two‐stage least squares (2SLS), propensity score matching (PSM), and additional methods designed to address endogeneity concerns. Additionally, we document that firm‐level political polarization exposure (PPE) intensifies the PRISK‐REM relationship. More interestingly, the financial market is relatively forgiving to firms that engage in REM activities in the face of both high PRISK and high PPE. Our findings provide novel insights into how PRISK shapes the financial reporting quality, and the critical role PPE plays in this relationship.

Suggested Citation

  • Ashrafee T. Hossain & Mostafa Monzur Hasan & Abdullah‐Al Masum, 2026. "Political Risk, Political Polarization, and Earnings Management," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 61(1), pages 175-200, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:finrev:v:61:y:2026:i:1:p:175-200
    DOI: 10.1111/fire.70013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/fire.70013
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/fire.70013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:finrev:v:61:y:2026:i:1:p:175-200. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.