IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/canjag/v74y2026i1p14-34.html

Stepping stone or stumbling block: Anchoring effect of crop insurance subsidies

Author

Listed:
  • Mingyu Hu
  • Fujin Yi
  • Hong Zhou

Abstract

This study examines how the anchoring effect created by long‐term high premium subsidies leads to irrational crop insurance purchasing behavior among farmers. Using a randomized controlled trial, we show that the insurance experience of low premium generates an intrinsic anchoring effect and inhibits farmers' willingness to pay for new crop insurance through two main channels: price and perception. At the same time, farmers with small crop scale, limited disaster experience, and a diverse income structure are more susceptible to intrinsic anchoring impacts. In addition, the results suggest that the anchoring effect of high premium subsidies on farmers is difficult to change. This distortion of value perceptions counteracts the potential external anchoring effect of favorable information and further inhibits farmers' willingness to pay. Cette étude examine comment l'effet d'ancrage créé par des subventions élevées et durables aux primes d'assurance entraîne un comportement irrationnel chez les agriculteurs dans leurs choix d'assurance‐récolte. À l'aide d'un essai contrôlé randomisé, nous montrons que l'expérience d'une assurance à faible prime génère un effet d'ancrage intrinsèque et freine la volonté des agriculteurs de payer pour une nouvelle assurance‐récolte par deux canaux principaux: le prix et la perception. Par ailleurs, les agriculteurs exploitant de petites superficies, ayant une expérience limitée des sinistres et disposant de sources de revenus diversifiées sont plus sensibles à ces effets d'ancrage intrinsèques. De plus, les résultats indiquent que l'effet d'ancrage des subventions élevées sur les agriculteurs est difficile à modifier. Cette distorsion dans la perception de la valeur neutralise l'effet d'ancrage externe potentiel d'une information favorable et freine encore davantage la volonté de payer des agriculteurs.

Suggested Citation

  • Mingyu Hu & Fujin Yi & Hong Zhou, 2026. "Stepping stone or stumbling block: Anchoring effect of crop insurance subsidies," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 74(1), pages 14-34, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:canjag:v:74:y:2026:i:1:p:14-34
    DOI: 10.1111/cjag.70008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/cjag.70008
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/cjag.70008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gunnsteinsson, Snaebjorn, 2020. "Experimental identification of asymmetric information: Evidence on crop insurance in the Philippines," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    2. Yingmei Tang & Huifang Cai & Rongmao Liu, 2022. "Will marketing strategies affect farmers’ preferences and willingness to pay for catastrophe insurance? Evidence from a choice experiment in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1376-1389, January.
    3. Dan Ariely & George Loewenstein & Drazen Prelec, 2003. ""Coherent Arbitrariness": Stable Demand Curves Without Stable Preferences," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 118(1), pages 73-106.
    4. Bergman, Oscar & Ellingsen, Tore & Johannesson, Magnus & Svensson, Cicek, 2010. "Anchoring and cognitive ability," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 107(1), pages 66-68, April.
    5. H. Holly Wang & Milton Boyd & Linging Hou & Dana L.K. Hoag & Yueying Mu, 2011. "Testing for adverse selection of crop insurance in northern China," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 3(4), pages 462-475, November.
    6. Xiaodong Du & Hongli Feng & David A. Hennessy, 2017. "Rationality of Choices in Subsidized Crop Insurance Markets," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 99(3), pages 732-756.
    7. Ming Wang & Tao Ye & Peijun Shi, 2016. "Factors Affecting Farmers’ Crop Insurance Participation in China," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 64(3), pages 479-492, September.
    8. Joseph W. Glauber, 2013. "The Growth Of The Federal Crop Insurance Program, 1990--2011," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 95(2), pages 482-488.
    9. Markku Kaustia & Eeva Alho & Vesa Puttonen, 2008. "How Much Does Expertise Reduce Behavioral Biases? The Case of Anchoring Effects in Stock Return Estimates," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 37(3), pages 391-412, September.
    10. Wong, Ho Lun & Wei, Xiangdong & Kahsay, Haftom Bayray & Gebreegziabher, Zenebe & Gardebroek, Cornelis & Osgood, Daniel E. & Diro, Rahel, 2020. "Effects of input vouchers and rainfall insurance on agricultural production and household welfare: Experimental evidence from northern Ethiopia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    11. Ranjan Kumar Ghosh & Shweta Gupta & Vartika Singh & Patrick S. Ward, 2021. "Demand for Crop Insurance in Developing Countries: New Evidence from India," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(1), pages 293-320, February.
    12. Nigel Key & Daniel L Prager & Christopher B Burns, 2018. "The Income Volatility of U.S. Commercial Farm Households," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 40(2), pages 215-239.
    13. H. Holly Wang & Milton Boyd & Milton Boyd & Jeffrey Pai & Qiao Zhang & H. Holly Wang & Ke Wang, 2011. "Factors affecting crop insurance purchases in China: the Inner Mongolia region," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 3(4), pages 441-450, November.
    14. Barry K. Goodwin & Vincent H. Smith, 2013. "What Harm Is Done By Subsidizing Crop Insurance?," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 95(2), pages 489-497.
    15. Xiaodong Du & Hongli Feng & David A. Hennessy, 2017. "Rationality of Choices in Subsidized Crop Insurance Markets," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 99(3), pages 732-756.
    16. Ayako Matsuda & Takashi Kurosaki, 2019. "Demand for temperature and rainfall index insurance in India," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 50(3), pages 353-366, May.
    17. Guozhu Tuo & Xian Xin & Xiuqing Wang, 2016. "How to promote agricultural insurance in China?," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(2), pages 1-1, March.
    18. Brent Hueth, 2000. "The Goals of U.S. Agricultural Policy: A Mechanism Design Approach," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 82(1), pages 14-24.
    19. Shin, Soye & Magnan, Nicholas & Mullally, Conner & Janzen, Sarah, 2022. "Demand for Weather Index Insurance among Smallholder Farmers under Prospect Theory," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 82-104.
    20. King, Michael & Singh, Anuj Pratap, 2020. "Understanding farmers’ valuation of agricultural insurance: Evidence from Vietnam," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    21. Milton Boyd & Jeffrey Pai & Qiao Zhang & H. Holly Wang & Ke Wang, 2011. "Factors affecting crop insurance purchases in China: the Inner Mongolia region," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 3(4), pages 441-450, November.
    22. Hongli Feng & Xiaodong Du & David A. Hennessy, 2020. "Depressed demand for crop insurance contracts, and a rationale based on third generation Prospect Theory," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 51(1), pages 59-73, January.
    23. Jayson L. Lusk, 2017. "Distributional Effects of Crop Insurance Subsidies," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 39(1), pages 1-15.
    24. Jing Cai & Alain De Janvry & Elisabeth Sadoulet, 2015. "Social Networks and the Decision to Insure," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 7(2), pages 81-108, April.
    25. Temesgen Belissa & Robert Lensink & Anne Winkel, 2020. "Effects of Index Insurance on Demand and Supply of Credit: Evidence from Ethiopia," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 102(5), pages 1511-1531, October.
    26. Guozhu Tuo, 2016. "How to promote agricultural insurance in China?," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 8(2), pages 194-205, May.
    27. Jing Cai & Alain de Janvry & Elisabeth Sadoulet, 2020. "Subsidy Policies and Insurance Demand," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 110(8), pages 2422-2453, August.
    28. Linging Hou & Dana L.K. Hoag & Yueying Mu, 2011. "Testing for adverse selection of crop insurance in northern China," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 3(4), pages 462-475, November.
    29. Erik J. O’Donoghue & Michael J. Roberts & Nigel Key, 2009. "Did the Federal Crop Insurance Reform Act Alter Farm Enterprise Diversification?," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(1), pages 80-104, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Feier Yan & Fujin Yi & Huang Chen, 2024. "Effect of education on crop insurance knowledge: evidence from a RCT in China," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 17(1), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Ella Kirchner & Oliver Musshoff, 2024. "Digital opportunities for the distribution of index‐based microinsurance: Evidence from a discrete choice experiment in Mali," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(2), pages 794-815, June.
    3. Chen, I-Chun & Du, Xiaodong & Mitchell, Paul D., "undated". "Policy Implications of Joint versus Separate Estimation of Crop Insurance Demand," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 273878, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. Nordmeyer, Eike Florenz & Danne, Michael & Musshoff, Oliver, 2023. "Can satellite-retrieved data increase farmers' willingness to insure against drought? – Insights from Germany," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    5. Tim Philippi & Jörg Schiller, 2024. "Abandoning disaster relief and stimulating insurance demand through premium subsidies," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 91(2), pages 339-382, June.
    6. Matthew Stuart & Cindy Yu & David A. Hennessy, 2023. "The Impact of Stocks on Correlations between Crop Yields and Prices and on Revenue Insurance Premiums using Semiparametric Quantile Regression," Papers 2308.11805, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2024.
    7. Kuhn, Lena & Bobojonov, Ihtiyor, 2024. "How sustainable is premium subsidization for index insurance? - A quantitative impact analysis along a global program database," GEWISOLA 64th Annual Conference, Giessen, Germany, September 25–27, 2024 364721, GEWISOLA.
    8. Yuyuan Che & Hongli Feng & David A. Hennessy, 2020. "Recency effects and participation at the extensive and intensive margins in the U.S. Federal Crop Insurance Program," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 45(1), pages 52-85, January.
    9. Linwei Wang & Yixin Hu & Rong Kong, 2023. "The Impact of Bancassurance Interaction on the Adoption Behavior of Green Production Technology in Family Farms: Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-26, April.
    10. Jisang Yu & Edward D. Perry, 2024. "Premium subsidies and selection in the federal crop insurance program," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(1), pages 280-297, February.
    11. Prasenjit N. Ghosh & Ruiqing Miao & Emir Malikov, 2023. "Crop insurance premium subsidy and irrigation water withdrawals in the western United States," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 48(4), pages 968-992, October.
    12. Vigani, Mauro & Khafagy, Amr & Berry, Robert, 2024. "Public spending for agricultural risk management: Land use, regional welfare and intra-subsidy substitution," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    13. Sk. Faijan Bin Halim & Tasnim Murad Mamun & Jannatul Naim, 2026. "Economics of Farmers’ Willingness to Participate in Weather-Risk-Induced Crop Insurance in the Southwest Region of Bangladesh," Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, April.
    14. Alexandre Gohin, 2019. "General Equilibrium Modelling of the Insurance Industry: U.S. Crop Insurance," Journal of Global Economic Analysis, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, vol. 4(2), pages 108-145, December.
    15. Jetter, Michael & Walker, Jay K., 2017. "Anchoring in financial decision-making: Evidence from Jeopardy!," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 164-176.
    16. Douadia Bougherara & Laurent Piet, 2018. "On the role of probability weighting on WTP for crop insurance with and without yield skewness," Working Papers hal-02790605, HAL.
    17. Li, Fangfang & He, Dongwei & Liu, Jianghui & Hong, Na, 2025. "Does crop insurance increase farmers’ income? Evidence from the pilot program of agricultural catastrophe insurance in China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1002-1019.
    18. Yilan Xu & Kuan Zhang, 2025. "The Impact of Social Security on Farmers’ Green Agricultural Technology Adoption: Empirical Evidence from Rural China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-22, February.
    19. Feng, Shuaizhang & Han, Yujie & Qiu, Huanguang, 2021. "Does crop insurance reduce pesticide usage? Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    20. Tsiboe, Francis & Turner, Dylan, 2023. "The crop insurance demand response to premium subsidies: Evidence from U.S. Agriculture," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:canjag:v:74:y:2026:i:1:p:14-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/caefmea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.