IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/apecpp/v40y2018i2p215-239..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Income Volatility of U.S. Commercial Farm Households

Author

Listed:
  • Nigel Key
  • Daniel L Prager
  • Christopher B Burns

Abstract

This study uses a newly created panel dataset drawn from the 1997 to 2013 Agricultural Resource Management Survey to provide the first national estimates of income volatility for commercial farm households in the United States. Results show that the income of commercial farm households is substantially more volatile than that of all U.S. households—though the volatility of farm income is not more volatile than income from nonfarm self-employment. Using a regression analysis, we identify operator, operation, and regional characteristics associated with higher income volatility, providing information that could improve targeting of risk-mitigating programs. We find that farm income volatility has declined for farms specializing in program crops in recent decades, supporting the hypothesis that the expansion of the federal crop insurance program helped reduce farm income risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Nigel Key & Daniel L Prager & Christopher B Burns, 2018. "The Income Volatility of U.S. Commercial Farm Households," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 40(2), pages 215-239.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:apecpp:v:40:y:2018:i:2:p:215-239.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/aepp/ppy006
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:apecpp:v:40:y:2018:i:2:p:215-239.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.