IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v34y2025i1p380-401.html

Does EMA implementation promote green innovation? The mediation effects of both cross‐functional coopetition and supplier co‐creation

Author

Listed:
  • Yizhen Xu
  • Jun‐Hwa Cheah
  • Joseph F. Hair
  • Yide Liu

Abstract

The call for green innovation necessitates the creation of an ecosystem that is friendly to the environment. Certain environmental regulations and standards are put in place to foster this type of innovation. However, there are many literature debates on the impact of guidelines and management controls on green innovation. Drawing on both the resource‐based view (RBV) and dynamic capability theory (DCT), this study investigates the impact of environmental management accounting (EMA) implementation on green process and product innovation, considering the mediating effects of cross‐functional coopetition and supplier co‐creation. Multi‐wave surveys were conducted across 799 Chinese companies. The results show that EMA implementation has a positive effect on both cross‐functional coopetition and co‐creation. In addition, cross‐functional coopetition serves to mediate the relationship between EMA implementation and both green process and product innovation. However, it should be noted that supplier co‐creation only serves to mediate the relationship between EMA implementation and green process innovation, rather than green product innovation. Overall, this research adds to the RBV literature by offering a fresh perspective on the role of cross‐functional coopetition in situations where resources are shared and conflicts occur simultaneously. Furthermore, the study enhances our understanding of DCT by examining the role of supplier co‐creation. This research delves into how companies balance resource availability with environmental adaptability, striking a balance between replication and renewal.

Suggested Citation

  • Yizhen Xu & Jun‐Hwa Cheah & Joseph F. Hair & Yide Liu, 2025. "Does EMA implementation promote green innovation? The mediation effects of both cross‐functional coopetition and supplier co‐creation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 380-401, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:1:p:380-401
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.3987
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3987
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.3987?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lin, Yini & Wu, Lei-Yu, 2014. "Exploring the role of dynamic capabilities in firm performance under the resource-based view framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 407-413.
    2. Hau L. Lee & Glen Schmidt, 2017. "Using Value Chains to Enhance Innovation," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(4), pages 617-632, April.
    3. Sarstedt, Marko & Hair, Joseph F. & Cheah, Jun-Hwa & Becker, Jan-Michael & Ringle, Christian M., 2019. "How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 197-211.
    4. Roger L Burritt, 2004. "Environmental management accounting: roadblocks on the way to the green and pleasant land," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(1), pages 13-32, January.
    5. Lu Qiu & Xiaowen Jie & Yanan Wang & Minjuan Zhao, 2020. "Green product innovation, green dynamic capability, and competitive advantage: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprises," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 146-165, January.
    6. Oliver Gernsheimer & Dominik K Kanbach & Johanna Gast, 2021. "Coopetition research-A systematic literature review on recent accomplishments and trajectories," Post-Print hal-03514794, HAL.
    7. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513571011080180 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Aldónio Ferreira & Carly Moulang & Bayu Hendro, 2010. "Environmental management accounting and innovation: an exploratory analysis," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 23(7), pages 920-948, September.
    9. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-09-2017-3145 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Naveed Iqbal Chaudhry & Muhammad Amir, 2020. "From institutional pressure to the sustainable development of firm: Role of environmental management accounting implementation and environmental proactivity," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3542-3554, December.
    11. Hafezalkotob, Ashkan, 2017. "Competition, cooperation, and coopetition of green supply chains under regulations on energy saving levels," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 228-250.
    12. Zhang, Hanxin & Sun, Wenqiang & Li, Weidong & Ma, Guangyu, 2022. "A carbon flow tracing and carbon accounting method for exploring CO2 emissions of the iron and steel industry: An integrated material–energy–carbon hub," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    13. Zhang, Min & Zhao, Xiande & Voss, Chris & Zhu, Guilong, 2016. "Innovating through services, co-creation and supplier integration: Cases from China," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P2), pages 289-300.
    14. Julian Birkinshaw & Mats Lingblad, 2005. "Intrafirm Competition and Charter Evolution in the Multibusiness Firm," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(6), pages 674-686, December.
    15. de Vries, Henk J. & Verhagen, W. Pieter, 2016. "Impact of changes in regulatory performance standards on innovation: A case of energy performance standards for newly-built houses," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 48, pages 56-68.
    16. Blind, Knut & Petersen, Sören S. & Riillo, Cesare A.F., 2017. "The impact of standards and regulation on innovation in uncertain markets," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 249-264.
    17. Xie, Xuemei & Huo, Jiage & Zou, Hailiang, 2019. "Green process innovation, green product innovation, and corporate financial performance: A content analysis method," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 697-706.
    18. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    19. Kumar, Maneesh & Rodrigues, Vasco Sanchez, 2020. "Synergetic effect of lean and green on innovation: A resource-based perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 469-479.
    20. Seth Carnahan & Rajshree Agarwal & Benjamin Campbell & April Franco, 2010. "The Effect of Firm Compensation Structures on Employee Mobility and Employee Entrepreneurship of Extreme Performers," Working Papers 10-06, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    21. Stucki, Tobias & Woerter, Martin & Arvanitis, Spyros & Peneder, Michael & Rammer, Christian, 2018. "How different policy instruments affect green product innovation: A differentiated perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 245-261.
    22. Bouncken, Ricarda B. & Kraus, Sascha, 2013. "Innovation in knowledge-intensive industries: The double-edged sword of coopetition," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 2060-2070.
    23. De Marchi, Valentina, 2012. "Environmental innovation and R&D cooperation: Empirical evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 614-623.
    24. Agarwal, Atul & Giraud-Carrier, François C. & Li, Yuan, 2018. "A mediation model of green supply chain management adoption: The role of internal impetus," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 342-358.
    25. Henri, Jean-François & Wouters, Marc, 2020. "Interdependence of management control practices for product innovation: The influence of environmental unpredictability," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    26. Siaw, Christopher Agyapong & Sarpong, David, 2021. "Dynamic exchange capabilities for value co-creation in ecosystems," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 493-506.
    27. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-03-2020-4452 is not listed on IDEAS
    28. Rosa Dangelico & Devashish Pujari, 2010. "Mainstreaming Green Product Innovation: Why and How Companies Integrate Environmental Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 95(3), pages 471-486, September.
    29. Ricarda Bouncken & Johanna Gast & Sascha Kraus & Marcel Bogers, 2015. "Coopetition: a systematic review, synthesis, and future research directions," Post-Print hal-02018068, HAL.
    30. Aldónio Ferreira & Carly Moulang & Bayu Hendro, 2010. "Environmental management accounting and innovation: an exploratory analysis," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 23(7), pages 920-948, September.
    31. Arpita Joardar & Joseph Sarkis, 2021. "An examination of sustainable development of supply chain using foreignness perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 630-642, January.
    32. Mohammad Imtiaz Ferdous & Carol A. Adams & Gordon Boyce, 2019. "Institutional drivers of environmental management accounting adoption in public sector water organisations," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 32(4), pages 984-1012, May.
    33. Vanessa Oltra & Maïder Saint Jean, 2009. "Sectoral systems of environmental innovation: an application to the French automotive industry," Post-Print hal-00274413, HAL.
    34. Odysseas Pavlatos & Hara Kostakis, 2022. "Exploring the Relationship between Target Costing Functionality and Product Innovation: The Role of Information Systems," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 32(1), pages 124-140, March.
    35. Jing-Wen Huang & Yong-Hui Li, 2017. "Green Innovation and Performance: The View of Organizational Capability and Social Reciprocity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 145(2), pages 309-324, October.
    36. Earnhart, Dietrich & Mark Leonard, J., 2016. "Environmental audits and signaling: The role of firm organizational structure," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 1-22.
    37. Ricarda Bouncken & Johanna Gast & Sascha Kraus & Marcel Bogers, 2015. "Coopetition: a systematic review, synthesis, and future research directions," Post-Print hal-02945341, HAL.
    38. Yu-Shan Chen & Shyh-Bao Lai & Chao-Tung Wen, 2006. "The Influence of Green Innovation Performance on Corporate Advantage in Taiwan," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 67(4), pages 331-339, September.
    39. Usama Awan & Petter Braathen & Lea Hannola, 2023. "When and how the implementation of green human resource management and data‐driven culture to improve the firm sustainable environmental development?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(4), pages 2726-2740, August.
    40. Hu, Guoqiang & Wang, Xiaoqi & Wang, Yu, 2021. "Can the green credit policy stimulate green innovation in heavily polluting enterprises? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    41. Susan L Young & Christopher Welter & Michael Conger, 2018. "Stability vs. flexibility: The effect of regulatory institutions on opportunity type," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 49(4), pages 407-441, May.
    42. Nuwan Gunarathne & Ki-Hoon Lee & Pubudu K. Hitigala Kaluarachchilage, 2022. "Tackling the integration challenge between environmental strategy and environmental management accounting," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 36(1), pages 63-95, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tao, Zhibin, 2026. "How environmental corporate social responsibility affects green product innovation in China high-pollution industry: The mediating role of green entrepreneurial orientation," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 5(1).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pereira, Vijay & Nair, Asha KS. & Bhattacharyya, Som Sekhar, 2025. "Exploring and investigating the complementarity and multidimensionality of innovation for sustainability research: Past present and future," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    2. Pham Quang Huy & Vu Kien Phuc, 2025. "Insight into how Environmental Management Accounting Practices and Complexity of Green Innovation Management Pave the Way Toward Strategic Resilience," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(4), pages 14146-14179, October.
    3. Lu Qiu & Xiaowen Jie & Yanan Wang & Minjuan Zhao, 2020. "Green product innovation, green dynamic capability, and competitive advantage: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprises," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 146-165, January.
    4. Eduardo Duque‐Grisales & Javier Aguilera‐Caracuel & Jaime Guerrero‐Villegas & Encarnación García‐Sánchez, 2020. "Does green innovation affect the financial performance of Multilatinas? The moderating role of ISO 14001 and R&D investment," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3286-3302, December.
    5. Ranjan, Piyush & Rai, Shivam, 2026. "Coopetition, digital innovation, and sustainable performance in international digital ventures: Moderating role of institutional environment," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(2).
    6. Ying Guo, 2023. "External Knowledge Acquisition and Green Innovation in Chinese Firms: Unveiling the Impact of Green Dynamic Capabilities," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, July.
    7. Xie, Qiuhao & Gao, Ying & Xia, Nini & Zhang, Shuibo & Tao, Guowu, 2023. "Coopetition and organizational performance outcomes: A meta-analysis of the main and moderator effects," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    8. Achi, Awele & Adeola, Ogechi & Achi, Francis Chukwuedo, 2022. "CSR and green process innovation as antecedents of micro, small, and medium enterprise performance: Moderating role of perceived environmental volatility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 771-781.
    9. Arnaldo Coelho & Jorge Ferreira & Catarina Proença, 2024. "The impact of green entrepreneurial orientation on sustainability performance through the effects of green product and process innovation: The moderating role of ambidexterity," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3184-3202, May.
    10. Junaid Aftab & Nabila Abid & Huma Sarwar & Anam Amin & Mahsa Abedini & Monica Veneziani, 2024. "Does corporate social responsibility drive financial performance? Exploring the significance of green innovation, green dynamic capabilities, and perceived environmental volatility," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 1634-1653, May.
    11. Yuan, Baolong & Cao, Xueyun, 2022. "Do corporate social responsibility practices contribute to green innovation? The mediating role of green dynamic capability," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    12. Endah Rahayu Lestari & Nimas Mayang Sabrina Sunyoto, 2023. "Fostering green innovation in achieving sustainable performance," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 47(3), pages 413-434, August.
    13. Roheel Ahmed Siddiqi & Anna Paola Codini & Muhammad Ishtiaq Ishaq & Dima Rachid Jamali & Ali Raza, 2025. "Sustainable supply chain, dynamic capabilities, eco‐innovation, and environmental performance in an emerging economy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 338-350, January.
    14. Mohammed S. Y. Omran & Mohammad N. S. Yaaqbeh, 2023. "Climate change and business accountability, empirical evidence on the roles of environmental strategy and environmental accounting," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 1592-1608, October.
    15. Corbo, Leonardo & Kraus, Sascha & Vlačić, Božidar & Dabić, Marina & Caputo, Andrea & Pellegrini, Massimiliano M., 2023. "Coopetition and innovation: A review and research agenda," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    16. Triguero, A. & Córcoles, D., 2025. "Leveraging eco-innovation and market knowledge for a circular economy transition: Insights from Spanish manufacturing firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    17. Klimas, Patrycja & Kawa, Arkadiusz & Sachpazidu, Karina & Stańczyk, Sylwia & Brenk, Katharina & Kanbach, Dominik K., 2025. "Decoding coopetition performance using impactful coopetition attributes: Evidence from manufacturing companies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    18. Tariq, Adeel & Badir, Yuosre F. & Tariq, Waqas & Bhutta, Umair Saeed, 2017. "Drivers and consequences of green product and process innovation: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future outlook," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 8-23.
    19. Avni Zafer Acar & Pınar Acar & Mustafa Aslan & İpek Yaylalı & Onur Kemal Yılmaz, 2025. "The Role of Eco-Innovation and Environmental Management Accounting in Fostering Performance Effect by Green Dynamic Capabilities in the Hotel Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-19, October.
    20. Wang, Xin & Ma, Chaoqun & Yao, Zheng, 2024. "The double-edged sword effect of digital capability on green innovation: Evidence from Chinese listed industrial firms," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 321-339.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:1:p:380-401. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.