IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/abacus/v62y2026i2p601-646.html

Does Investors’ Information‐acquisition Ability Affect IPO Underpricing? Evidence from a Quasi‐natural Experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Haipeng Yu
  • Xiaoke Cheng
  • Caiyue Ouyang
  • Wenxia Ge

Abstract

Initial public offering (IPO) underpricing, driven by information asymmetry, is a prevalent and serious global phenomenon. In addition to the influence of information providers such as IPO firms, investors’ ability to acquire information may also significantly affect IPO underpricing. We investigate the impact of investors’ information‐acquisition ability on IPO underpricing, using Google's withdrawal as an exogenous shock. On 23 March 2010, Google unexpectedly announced the withdrawal of its search business from mainland China. As Google was the primary search engine used by investors in mainland China to access foreign information, its withdrawal significantly impaired investors’ ability to search for and acquire such information. Our findings show that firms engaged in foreign trade experience a significant increase in IPO underpricing following Google's withdrawal, compared to firms not engaged in foreign trade. This effect is more pronounced for firms with lower information‐disclosure quality in their IPO prospectuses, those exhibiting higher complexity, those hiring lower‐reputation intermediaries, those with lower institutional ownership, those with a greater need for investors to acquire foreign information, and those where investors have less alternative access to foreign information. Our findings suggest that investors’ information‐acquisition ability significantly affects IPO underpricing, thus contributing to the literature on the determinants of IPO underpricing and extending the literature on the economic consequences of internet information acquisition to the IPO field.

Suggested Citation

  • Haipeng Yu & Xiaoke Cheng & Caiyue Ouyang & Wenxia Ge, 2026. "Does Investors’ Information‐acquisition Ability Affect IPO Underpricing? Evidence from a Quasi‐natural Experiment," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 62(2), pages 601-646, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:abacus:v:62:y:2026:i:2:p:601-646
    DOI: 10.1111/abac.70005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.70005
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/abac.70005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:abacus:v:62:y:2026:i:2:p:601-646. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0001-3072 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.