IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ccsesa/230365.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Determining the Profitability of Catfish Production in Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Oluwasola, O.
  • Ige, A. O.

Abstract

This study evaluated the socioeconomic factors influencing the profitability of catfish production in the city of Ibadan. Multistage sampling method was used to collect data from 120 fish farmers. Descriptive statistics, budgetary analysis and the multiple regression model were used to analyse the data obtained. The results showed that catfish production in Ibadan was male dominated as 80% of the fish farmers were men. The mean age of fish farmers was 44.3±12.0 years while as many as 78.3% of the farmers had post-secondary education. The mean family size was 5.2±1.9 while fish farmers were small operators with a mean farm size of 0.3±0.2 hectares. Fish farming is very recent as farmers had a mean farm experience of 6.9±6.5 years. Eighty per cent of the fish farmers got involved in fish farming for commercial reasons. The gross margin to catfish farming was N197,520.25 (US$ 987.60)/ha with a net income of N182, 573.04 (US$912.87)/ha. The budgetary analysis revealed that fish feed which constituted 79.18% of the total operating cost was the major cost item in catfish production. The regression analysis showed that fish farming experience, amount of labour used and quantity of feed used were significant determinants of net income in catfish production. The study concluded that there is the need to access fish farmers to substantially cheaper feed inputs to ensure the use of adequate quantity and quality of feed in catfish production. This will enhance output, productivity and net income in catfish enterprises.

Suggested Citation

  • Oluwasola, O. & Ige, A. O., 2015. "Factors Determining the Profitability of Catfish Production in Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria," Sustainable Agriculture Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 4(4).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ccsesa:230365
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.230365
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/230365/files/P6-p57-65.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.230365?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Feder, Gershon & Just, Richard E & Zilberman, David, 1985. "Adoption of Agricultural Innovations in Developing Countries: A Survey," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 33(2), pages 255-298, January.
    2. Joshi, P.K. & Jha, Dayanatha, 1992. "An Economic Enquiry into the Impact of Soil Alkalinity," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 47(2).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Benin, Samuel & Mogues, Tewodaj & Cudjoe, Godsway & Randriamamonjy, Josee, 2009. "Public expenditures and agricultural productivity growth in Ghana," 2009 Conference, August 16-22, 2009, Beijing, China 51634, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Dercon, Stefan & Christiaensen, Luc, 2011. "Consumption risk, technology adoption and poverty traps: Evidence from Ethiopia," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 159-173, November.
    3. Appleton, Simon, "undated". "User Fees, Expenditure Restructuring and Voucher Systems in Education," WIDER Working Papers 295459, United Nations University, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    4. Moser, Christine M. & Barrett, Christopher B., 2002. "Labor, Liquidity, Learning, Conformity And Smallholder Technology Adoption: The Case Of Sri In Madagascar," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19680, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    5. Sébastien Desbureaux & Eric Nazindigouba Kere & Pascale Combes Motel, 2016. "Impact Evaluation in a Landscape: Protected Natural Forests, Anthropized Forested Lands and Deforestation Leakages in Madagascar's Rainforests," Working Papers halshs-01342182, HAL.
    6. Fishelson, Gideon & Rymon, Dan, 1986. "Adoption of Agricultural Innovations: The Case of Drip Irrigation of Cotton in Isreal," Foerder Institute for Economic Research Working Papers 275417, Tel-Aviv University > Foerder Institute for Economic Research.
    7. Julius Manda & Cornelis Gardebroek & Makaiko Khonje & Arega Alene & Munyaradzi Mutenje & Menale Kassie, 2016. "Determinants of child nutritional status in the eastern province of Zambia: the role of improved maize varieties," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 8(1), pages 239-253, February.
    8. Thuo, Mary & Bravo-Ureta, Boris E. & Hathie, Ibrahima & Obeng-Asiedu, Patrick, 2011. "Adoption of chemical fertilizer by smallholder farmers in the peanut basin of Senegal," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 6(01), pages 1-17, March.
    9. Awel Y. & Azomahou T.T., 2015. "Risk preference or financial literacy? Behavioural experiment on index insurance demand," MERIT Working Papers 2015-005, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    10. Kamrath, Carolin & Rajendran, Srinivasulu & Nenguwo, Ngoni & Afari-Sefa, Victor & Broring, Stefanie, 2018. "Adoption behavior of market traders: an analysis based on Technology Acceptance Model and Theory of Planned Behavior," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 21(6), July.
    11. Micheels, Eric T. & Nolan, James F., 2016. "Examining the effects of absorptive capacity and social capital on the adoption of agricultural innovations: A Canadian Prairie case study," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 127-138.
    12. Mekonnen, Daniel Ayalew & Gerber, Nicolas & Matz, Julia Anna, 2016. "Social networks, agricultural innovations, and farm productivity in Ethiopia," 2016 Fifth International Conference, September 23-26, 2016, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 246436, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    13. Gizachew Kebede Biratu & Eyasu Elias & Pheneas Ntawuruhunga & Nhamo Nhamo, 2018. "Effect of Chicken Manure Application on Cassava Biomass and Root Yields in Two Agro-Ecologies of Zambia," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-15, March.
    14. Alpizar, Francisco & Carlsson, Fredrik & Naranjo, Maria, 2009. "The effect of risk, ambiguity, and coordination on farmers’ adaptation to climate change: A framed field experiment," Working Papers in Economics 382, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.
    15. Zhang, Biao & Fu, Zetian & Wang, Jieqiong & Zhang, Lingxian, 2019. "Farmers’ adoption of water-saving irrigation technology alleviates water scarcity in metropolis suburbs: A case study of Beijing, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 349-357.
    16. Norris, Patricia E. & Batie, Sandra S., 1987. "Virginia Farmers' Soil Conservation Decisions: An Application Of Tobit Analysis," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 19(01), pages 1-12, July.
    17. Rana, Muhammad & Spielman, David J. & Zaidi, Fatima, 2015. "The Architecture of the Pakistani Seed System: A Case of Market-Regulation Dissonance," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 211560, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    18. Luseno, Winnie K. & McPeak, John G. & Barrett, Christopher B. & Little, Peter D. & Gebru, Getachew, 2003. "Assessing the Value of Climate Forecast Information for Pastoralists: Evidence from Southern Ethiopia and Northern Kenya," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 31(9), pages 1477-1494, September.
    19. Linda Steinhübel & Johannes Wegmann & Oliver Mußhoff, 2020. "Digging deep and running dry—the adoption of borewell technology in the face of climate change and urbanization," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 51(5), pages 685-706, September.
    20. Oude Lansink, Alfons & van den Berg, Mirella & Huirne, Ruud, 2003. "Analysis of strategic planning of Dutch pig farmers using a multivariate probit model," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 78(1), pages 73-84, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Industrial Organization;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ccsesa:230365. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ccsenet.org/sar .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.