IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/aareaj/116187.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who gains from Australian generic wine promotion and R&D?

Author

Listed:
  • Zhao, Xueyan
  • Anderson, Kym
  • Wittwer, Glyn

Abstract

The present paper estimates the distributions of aggregate returns from different types of research and promotion investments by the Australian grape and wine industry among grapegrowers, winemakers, domestic and foreign consumers, and the tax office. The results show that most of the gains from cost-reducing R&D in grape and wine production go to producers and that producers get a far larger share of the benefit from export promotion than that from domestic promotion. Foreign consumers of Australian wine also enjoy a significant share of the benefits from Australian R&D. Sensitivity analysis shows that the key results hold for a wide range of parameter values.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhao, Xueyan & Anderson, Kym & Wittwer, Glyn, 2003. "Who gains from Australian generic wine promotion and R&D?," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 47(2), June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aareaj:116187
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://purl.umn.edu/116187
    Download Restriction: no

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xueyan Zhao, 2003. "Who bears the burden and who receives the gain?-The case of GWRDC R&D investments in the Australian grape and wine industry," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(3), pages 355-366.
    2. J. W. Freebairn & J. S. Davis & G. W. Edwards, 1983. "Distribution of Research Gains in Multistage Production Systems: Reply," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 65(2), pages 357-359.
    3. Zhao, Xueyan & Griffiths, William E. & Griffith, Garry R. & Mullen, John D., 2000. "Probability distributions for economic surplus changes: the case of technical change in the Australian wool industry," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 44(1), March.
    4. Wittwer, Glyn & Anderson, Kym, 2002. "Impact of the GST and Wine Tax Reform on Australia's Wine Industry: A CGE Analysis," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(1), pages 69-81, March.
    5. J. M. Alston & G. M. Scobie, 1983. "Distribution of Research Gains in Multistage Production Systems: Comment," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 65(2), pages 353-356.
    6. Zhao, Xueyan & Mullen, John D. & Griffith, Garry R. & Griffiths, William E. & Piggott, Roley R., 2000. "An Equilibrium Displacement Model of the Australian Beef Industry," Research Reports 28007, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries Research Economists.
    7. Anderson, Kym & Nielsen, Chantal, 2004. "Economic Effects of Agricultural Biotechnology Research in the Presence of Price-Distorting Policies," Journal of Economic Integration, Center for Economic Integration, Sejong University, vol. 19, pages 374-394.
    8. J. W. Freebairn & J. S. Davis & G. W. Edwards, 1982. "Distribution of Research Gains in Multistage Production Systems," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 64(1), pages 39-46.
    9. Wittwer, Glyn & Berger, Nick & Anderson, Kym, 2003. "A model of the world's wine markets," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 487-506, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Demont, Matty & Rutsaert, Pieter & Ndour, Maimouna & Verbeke, Wim, 2013. "Reversing Urban Bias in African Rice Markets: Evidence from Senegal," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 63-74.
    2. Mounter, Stuart W. & Griffith, Garry R. & Piggott, Roley R., 2004. "The Payoff from Generic Advertising by the Australian Pig Industry in the Presence of Trade," Working Papers 12946, University of New England, School of Economics.
    3. Wittwer, Glyn & McKirdy, Simon & Wilson, Ryan, 2005. "Regional economic impacts of a plant disease incursion using a general equilibrium approach," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 49(1), March.
    4. Mounter, Stuart W. & Griffith, Garry R. & Piggott, Roley R., 2005. "The Payoff from Generic Advertising by the Australian Pig Industry in the Presence of Trade," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Melbourne School of Land and Environment, vol. 13.
    5. Cook, David C., 2008. "Benefit cost analysis of an import access request," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 277-285, June.
    6. Xueyan Zhao, 2003. "Who bears the burden and who receives the gain?-The case of GWRDC R&D investments in the Australian grape and wine industry," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(3), pages 355-366.
    7. Glyn Wittwer & Simon McKirdy & Ryan Wilson, 2003. "Analysing the Economic Impacts of a Plant Disease Incursion Using a General Equilibrium Approach," Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre Working Papers op-97, Victoria University, Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre.
    8. repec:eee:wdevel:v:96:y:2017:i:c:p:578-590 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Mounter, Stuart W. & Griffith, Garry R. & Piggott, Roley R. & Mullen, John D., 2005. "The Relative Payoffs From R&D and Generic Advertising Expenditure by the Australian Pig Industry," Working Papers 12943, University of New England, School of Economics.
    10. Xayavong, Vilaphonh & Radhakrishnan, Manju & Kingwell, Ross S., 2013. "Development Strategies for a Premium Wine Region of Australia: an application of value chain modelling," 2013 Conference (57th), February 5-8, 2013, Sydney, Australia 152186, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    11. Mounter, Stuart W. & Griffith, Garry R. & Piggott, Roley R. & Fleming, Euan M. & Zhao, Xueyan, 2008. "An Equilibrium Displacement Model of the Australian Sheep and Wool Industries," Research Reports 37663, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries Research Economists.
    12. Simpson, S. & Dargusch, P., 2010. "Classifying public benefit in Australian agricultural research," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Melbourne School of Land and Environment, vol. 18.
    13. Henderson, Benjamin B. & Henry, Lynn A. & MacAulay, T. Gordon, 2006. "Investment and Change in the Coconut Industry of North Sulawesi: An Equilibrium Displacement Analysis," 2006 Conference (50th), February 8-10, 2006, Sydney, Australia 139789, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aareaj:116187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/aaresea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.