IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/c/pka203.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Rainer Kattel

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Blog mentions

As found by EconAcademics.org, the blog aggregator for Economics research:
  1. Erik S. Reinert & Jayati Ghosh & Rainer Kattel (ed.), 2016. "Handbook of Alternative Theories of Economic Development," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 15311.

    Mentioned in:

    1. Ingrid Harvold Kvangraven — What Can We Learn from Alternative Theories of Economic Development?
      by contrarianmedia@hotmail.com (Mike Norman) in Mike Norman Economics on 2017-01-29 22:22:00
    2. What Can We Learn from Alternative Theories of Economic Development?
      by Ingrid Harvold Kvangraven in Development Economics on 2017-01-29 21:17:34

Working papers

  1. Rainer Kattel & Blagoy Stamenov, 2018. "RIO Country Report 2017: Estonia," JRC Research Reports JRC111256, Joint Research Centre.

    Cited by:

    1. Torkayesh, Ali Ebadi & Alizadeh, Reza & Soltanisehat, Leili & Torkayesh, Sajjad Ebadi & Lund, Peter D., 2022. "A comparative assessment of air quality across European countries using an integrated decision support model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    2. Schulz Sebastian, 2019. "Ambitious or Ambiguous? The Implications of Smart Specialisation for Core-Periphery Relations in Estonia and Slovakia," TalTech Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 9(4), pages 49-71, December.

  2. Erkki Karo & Rainer Kattel, 2016. "How to Organize for Innovation: Entrepreneurial State and Organizational Variety," The Other Canon Foundation and Tallinn University of Technology Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics 66, TUT Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance.

    Cited by:

    1. Watson, Anna, 2022. "Designing publicly funded organisations for accelerated low carbon innovation: A case study of the ETI, UK and ARPA-E, US," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).

  3. Erkki Karo & Rainer Kattel, 2016. "Innovation and the State: Towards an Evolutionary Theory of Policy Capacity," The Other Canon Foundation and Tallinn University of Technology Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics 72, TUT Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance.

    Cited by:

    1. Ferraz, João Carlos & Coutinho, Luciano, 2019. "Investment policies, development finance and economic transformation: Lessons from BNDES," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 86-102.

  4. Piret Tõnurist & Rainer Kattel & Veiko Lember, 2015. "Discovering Innovation Labs in the Public Sector," The Other Canon Foundation and Tallinn University of Technology Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics 61, TUT Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance.

    Cited by:

    1. Emmanuel Coblence & Elsa Vivant, 2017. "Le design est-il soluble dans l'administration? Trois trajectoires d'institutionnalisation de l'innovation publique," Post-Print halshs-01563840, HAL.
    2. Michael McGann & Emma Blomkamp & Jenny M. Lewis, 2018. "The rise of public sector innovation labs: experiments in design thinking for policy," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 51(3), pages 249-267, September.
    3. Ryan Anders Whitney, 2022. "FROM HERE, THERE, AND EVERYWHERE: English‐language Media Outlets and Urban Planning Best Practices in the Global South," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3), pages 466-479, May.
    4. Karo , Erkki & Kattel , Rainer, 2015. "Innovation Bureaucracy: Does the organization of government matter when promoting innovation?," Papers in Innovation Studies 2015/38, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.

  5. Karo , Erkki & Kattel , Rainer, 2015. "Innovation Bureaucracy: Does the organization of government matter when promoting innovation?," Papers in Innovation Studies 2015/38, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Pauline Debanes, 2018. "Layering the developmental state away?," Working Papers halshs-01800489, HAL.
    2. Ian Scott, 2021. "Context and innovation in traditional bureaucracies: A Hong Kong study," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(1), pages 12-22, February.

  6. Egert Juuse & Rainer Kattel, 2014. "Financial Regulation in Estonia," Working papers wpaper57, Financialisation, Economy, Society & Sustainable Development (FESSUD) Project.

    Cited by:

    1. Hansjörg HERR, 2016. "After the Financial Crisis: Reforms and Reform Options for Finance, Regulation and Institutional Structure," Journal of Economics Bibliography, KSP Journals, vol. 3(2), pages 172-202, June.
    2. Detzer, Daniel, 2019. "Financialization made in Germany: A review," IPE Working Papers 122/2019, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute for International Political Economy (IPE).
    3. Hansjörg HERR & Sina RÜDIGER & Jennifer Pédussel WU, 2016. "The Federal Reserve as Lender of Last Resort During the Subprime Crisis – Successful Stabilisation Without Structural Changes," Journal of Economics and Political Economy, KSP Journals, vol. 3(2), pages 192-210, June.
    4. Hansjorg Herr, 2016. "After the Financial Crisis; Reforms and Reform Options for Finance, Regulation and Institutional Structure," Working papers wpaper148, Financialisation, Economy, Society & Sustainable Development (FESSUD) Project.
    5. Herr, Hansjörg, 2016. "After the financial crisis: Reforms and reform options for finance, regulation and institutional structure," IPE Working Papers 63/2016, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute for International Political Economy (IPE).

  7. Egert Juuse & Rainer Kattel, 2014. "Financialisation and the Financial and Economic Crises: The Case of Estonia," FESSUD studies fstudy20, Financialisation, Economy, Society & Sustainable Development (FESSUD) Project.

    Cited by:

    1. Daniel Detzer, 2017. "Financialisation, Debt and Inequality: Export-led Mercantilist and Debt-led Private Demand Boom Economies in a Stock-flow consistent Model," Working Papers 2016-03, Universita' di Cassino, Dipartimento di Economia e Giurisprudenza.
    2. Eckhard Hein, 2015. "Causes and Consequences of the Financial Crisis and the Implications for a More Resilient Financial and Economic System: Synthesis of FESSUD Work Package 3," Working papers wpaper128, Financialisation, Economy, Society & Sustainable Development (FESSUD) Project.
    3. Dünhaupt, Petra & Hein, Eckhard, 2018. "Financialisation, distribution & the macroeconomic regimes before & after the crisis: A post-Keynesian view on Denmark, Estonia & Latvia," IPE Working Papers 104/2018, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute for International Political Economy (IPE).
    4. Nina Dodig & Eckhard Hein & Daniel Detzer, 2016. "Financialisation and the financial and economic crises: theoretical framework and empirical analysis for 15 countries," Chapters, in: Eckhard Hein & Daniel Detzer & Nina Dodig (ed.), Financialisation and the Financial and Economic Crises, chapter 1, pages 1-41, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Daniel Detzer, 2016. "Financialisation, Debt and Inequality – scenarios based on a stock flow consistent model," Working papers wpaper151, Financialisation, Economy, Society & Sustainable Development (FESSUD) Project.
    6. Hein, Eckhard, 2016. "Causes and consequences of the financial crisis and the implications for a more resilient financial and economic system," IPE Working Papers 61/2016, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute for International Political Economy (IPE).

  8. Erkki Karo & Rainer Kattel, 2013. "Public Management, Policy Capacity and Innovation," The Other Canon Foundation and Tallinn University of Technology Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics 52, TUT Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance.

    Cited by:

    1. Marek Tiits & Tarmo Kalvet & Imre Mürk, 2015. "Smart Specialisation in Cohesion Economies," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 6(2), pages 296-319, June.
    2. Pauline Debanes, 2018. "Layering the developmental state away?," Working Papers halshs-01800489, HAL.
    3. Ferraz, João Carlos & Coutinho, Luciano, 2019. "Investment policies, development finance and economic transformation: Lessons from BNDES," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 86-102.
    4. Karo , Erkki & Kattel , Rainer, 2015. "Innovation Bureaucracy: Does the organization of government matter when promoting innovation?," Papers in Innovation Studies 2015/38, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.

  9. Veiko Lember & Rainer Kattel & Tarmo Kalvet, 2013. "How Governments Support Innovation through Public Procurement. Comparing Evidence from 11 Countries," The Other Canon Foundation and Tallinn University of Technology Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics 55, TUT Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance.

    Cited by:

    1. Sergey Tsygankov & Vadim Syropyatov & Vyacheslav Volchik, 2021. "Institutional Governance of Innovations: Novel Insights of Leadership in Russian Public Procurement," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Xiaoli Wang & Yun Liu & Yanbing Ju, 2018. "Sustainable Public Procurement Policies on Promoting Scientific and Technological Innovation in China: Comparisons with the U.S., the UK, Japan, Germany, France, and South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-27, June.
    3. Andrea Bentancor & Gustavo Crespi & Virginia Robano, 2019. "Public procurement as a driver of innovation and entrepreneurship," Documentos de Investigación 120, Universidad ORT Uruguay. Facultad de Administración y Ciencias Sociales.

  10. Veiko Lember & Aleksandrs Cepilovs & Rainer Kattel, 2013. "Demand-side innovation policy in Estonia: rationales, limits and future paths," The Other Canon Foundation and Tallinn University of Technology Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics 56, TUT Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance.

    Cited by:

    1. Robinson, Douglas K.R. & Mazzucato, Mariana, 2019. "The evolution of mission-oriented policies: Exploring changing market creating policies in the US and European space sector," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 936-948.

  11. Rainer Kattel & Ringa Raudla, 2012. "Austerity that Never Was? The Baltic States and the Crisis," Economics Policy Note Archive 12-05, Levy Economics Institute.

    Cited by:

    1. Raul Eamets, 2013. "Labour market and labour market policies during great recession: the case of Estonia," IZA Journal of European Labor Studies, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 2(1), pages 1-25, December.
    2. Egert Juuse & Rainer Kattel, 2014. "Financialisation and the Financial and Economic Crises: The Case of Estonia," FESSUD studies fstudy20, Financialisation, Economy, Society & Sustainable Development (FESSUD) Project.
    3. K. B. Usha, 2014. "Social Consequences of Neoliberal Economic Crisis and Austerity Policy in the Baltic States," International Studies, , vol. 51(1-4), pages 72-100, January.

  12. Rainer Kattel & Erkki Karo, 2010. "Coordination of innovation policy in the catching-up context: Estonia and Brazil compared," The Other Canon Foundation and Tallinn University of Technology Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics 33, TUT Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance.

    Cited by:

  13. Rainer Kattel & Erkki Karo, 2010. "Is 'Open Innovation' Re-Inventing Innovation Policy for Catching-up Economies?," The Other Canon Foundation and Tallinn University of Technology Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics 30, TUT Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance.

    Cited by:

    1. MMDR Deegahawature, 2014. "The Effect of Proclivity to Open Innovation, Job Complexity and Technology Turbulence on Creativity: Evidence from Technologically Less Advanced Countries," International Journal of Business and Social Research, LAR Center Press, vol. 4(4), pages 111-122, April.
    2. A. Lasagni, 2011. "European SMEs, external relationships and innovation: some empirical evidence," Economics Department Working Papers 2011-EP04, Department of Economics, Parma University (Italy).
    3. Varblane, Urmas, 2012. "National innovation systems: Can they be copied?," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2012-02, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).

  14. Rainer Kattel & Annalisa Primi, 2010. "The periphery paradox in innovation policy: Latin America and Eastern Europe Compared," The Other Canon Foundation and Tallinn University of Technology Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics 29, TUT Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance.

    Cited by:

    1. Riccardo Crescenzi & Alexander Jaax, 2015. "Innovation in Russia: the territorial dimension," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1509, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Apr 2015.
    2. Michaela Kotkova Striteska & Viktor Prokop, 2020. "Dynamic Innovation Strategy Model in Practice of Innovation Leaders and Followers in CEE Countries—A Prerequisite for Building Innovative Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-20, May.

  15. Rainer Kattel & Veiko Lember, 2010. "Public procurement as an industrial policy tool an option for developing countries?," The Other Canon Foundation and Tallinn University of Technology Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics 31, TUT Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance.

    Cited by:

    1. Mehmet Akif Demircioglu & Roberto Vivona, 2021. "Positioning public procurement as a procedural tool for innovation: an empirical study [Creating the Conditions for Radical Public Service Innovation]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 40(3), pages 379-396.
    2. Cornelia Storz & Tobias ten Brink & Na Zou, 2022. "Innovation in emerging economies: How do university-industry linkages and public procurement matter for small businesses?," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 39(4), pages 1439-1480, December.
    3. Mwesiumo, Deodat & Glavee-Geo, Richard & Olsen, Kjetil Magnus & Svenning, Geir Arne, 2021. "Improving public purchaser attitudes towards public procurement of innovations," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    4. T. Gries & R. Grundmann & I. Palnau & M. Redlin, 2017. "Innovations, growth and participation in advanced economies - a review of major concepts and findings," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 293-351, April.
    5. Zhanguang Chen & Qiaowan Wang & Chao Dou & Tian Liang, 2020. "Government Background Customers and Private Enterprise Innovation from the Perspective of Supply Chain Risk Transmission," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-22, April.
    6. Niggli, Nicholas C. & Osei-Lah, Kodjo, 2014. "Infrastructure provision and Africa's trade and development prospects: Potential role and relevance of The WTO Agreement on Government Procurement (GPA)," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2014-20, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    7. Mazzucato, Mariana, 2023. "Transformational change in Latin America and the Caribbean: A mission-oriented approach," Sede de la CEPAL en Santiago (Estudios e Investigaciones) 48299, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    8. Tania Ghossein & Bernard Hoekman & Anirudh Shingal, 2021. "Public Procurement, Regional Integration, and the Belt and Road Initiative [How China Got Sri Lanka to Cough Up a Port]," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 36(2), pages 131-163.
    9. Bernard Hoekman & Marco Sanfilippo, 2018. "Firm performance and participation in public procurement: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa," RSCAS Working Papers 2018/16, European University Institute.
    10. Waldemiro Francisco Sorte Jr., 2016. "State intervention for industrial growth: a comparison between Brazil and Japan," International Journal of Public Policy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(1/2), pages 1-27.
    11. Bernard Hoekman & Marco Sanfilippo & Filippo Santi, 2022. "Government Demand and Domestic Firms Growth: Evidence from Uganda," RSCAS Working Papers 2022/54, European University Institute.
    12. Serenella Caravella & Francesco Crespi & Dario Guarascio & Matteo Tubiana, 2020. "Competitive strategies, heterogeneous demand sources and firms' growth trajectories," LEM Papers Series 2020/01, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    13. Karo , Erkki & Kattel , Rainer, 2015. "Innovation Bureaucracy: Does the organization of government matter when promoting innovation?," Papers in Innovation Studies 2015/38, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    14. Serenella Caravella & Francesco Crespi, 2021. "The role of public procurement as innovation lever: evidence from Italian manufacturing firms," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(7), pages 663-684, October.
    15. Murat A. Yülek & Gilberto Santos, 2022. "Why Income Gaps Persist: Productivity Gaps, (No-)Catch-up and Industrial Policies in Developing Countries," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(1), pages 158-183, January.
    16. Bernard Hoekman & Marco Sanfilippo, 2020. "Foreign participation in public procurement and firm performance: evidence from sub-Saharan Africa," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 156(1), pages 41-73, February.
    17. Bernard Hoekman, 2015. "International Cooperation on Public Procurement Regulation," RSCAS Working Papers 2015/88, European University Institute.

  16. Rainer Kattel & Erik S. Reinert, 2010. "Modernizing Russia: Round III. Russia and the other BRIC countries: forging ahead, catching up or falling behind?," The Other Canon Foundation and Tallinn University of Technology Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics 32, TUT Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance.

    Cited by:

    1. Erik S. Reinert, 2012. "Mechanisms of Financial Crises in Growth and Collapse: Hammurabi, Schumpeter, Perez, and Minsky," The Other Canon Foundation and Tallinn University of Technology Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics 39, TUT Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance.
    2. Reinert, Erik S., 2012. "Neo-classical economics: A trail of economic destruction since the 1970s," MPRA Paper 47910, University Library of Munich, Germany.

  17. Rainer Kattel & Jan A. Kregel & Erik S. Reinert, 2009. "The Relevance of Ragnar Nurkse and Classical Development Economics," The Other Canon Foundation and Tallinn University of Technology Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics 21, TUT Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance.

    Cited by:

    1. Zenonas Norkus & Jurgita Markevičiūtė, 2021. "New estimation of the gross domestic product in Baltic countries in 1913–1938," Cliometrica, Springer;Cliometric Society (Association Francaise de Cliométrie), vol. 15(3), pages 565-674, September.
    2. Aldo Caliari, 2012. "Why do Shared Societies make economic sense? Three theoretical approximations," Working Papers 2012/28, Maastricht School of Management.
    3. Erkki Karo & Rainer Kattel, 2009. "The Copying Paradox: Why Converging Policies but Diverging Capacities for Development in Eastern European Innovation Systems?," The Other Canon Foundation and Tallinn University of Technology Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics 24, TUT Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance.
    4. Nikolay Nenovsky & Pencho Penchev, 2013. "Historic View on the Protectionism in Bulgaria and Romania. Protectionism Theories of Mihail Manoilesku (1891-1950) and Konstantin Bobchev (1894-1976)," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 2, pages 3-44.
    5. Irwin, Douglas A., 2021. "The rise and fall of import substitution," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    6. Erik S. Reinert, 2009. "The Terrible Simplifers: Common Origins of Financial Crises and Persistent Poverty in Economic Theory and the new ‘1848 Moment’," Working Papers 88, United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs.
    7. Jeffery S. McMullen, 2011. "Delineating the Domain of Development Entrepreneurship: A Market–Based Approach to Facilitating Inclusive Economic Growth," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 35(1), pages 185-215, January.

  18. Erkki Karo & Rainer Kattel, 2009. "The Copying Paradox: Why Converging Policies but Diverging Capacities for Development in Eastern European Innovation Systems?," The Other Canon Foundation and Tallinn University of Technology Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics 24, TUT Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance.

    Cited by:

    1. Varblane, Urmas, 2012. "National innovation systems: Can they be copied?," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2012-02, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    2. Rainer Kattel & Leonardo Burlamaqui, 2016. "Development Theory: Convercence, Catch-Up Or Leapfrogging And Finance ?," Anais do XLII Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 42nd Brazilian Economics Meeting] 073, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].

  19. Erik S. Reinert & Rainer Kattel, 2009. "The Economics of Failed, Failing, and Fragile States: Productive Structure as the Missing Link," The Other Canon Foundation and Tallinn University of Technology Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics 18, TUT Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance.

    Cited by:

    1. Stel, Nora, 2012. "Entrepreneurship and innovation in a hybrid political order: The case of Lebanon," MERIT Working Papers 2012-078, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    2. Reinert, Erik S., 2012. "Neo-classical economics: A trail of economic destruction since the 1970s," MPRA Paper 47910, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Léonce Ndikumana, 2013. "Overcoming Low Political Equilibrium in Africa: Institutional Changes for Inclusive Development," Working Papers wp331, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
    4. Erik S. Reinert, 2009. "The Terrible Simplifers: Common Origins of Financial Crises and Persistent Poverty in Economic Theory and the new ‘1848 Moment’," Working Papers 88, United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs.
    5. Nora Stel, 2012. "Business by Generator The impact of fragility and hybridity on Lebanese entrepreneurship – A Case-Study of the Electricity Sector," Working Papers 2012/52, Maastricht School of Management.

  20. Erik S. Reinert & Rainer Kattel & Margit Suurna, 2009. "Industrial Restructuring and Innovation Policy in Central and Eastern Europe since 1990," The Other Canon Foundation and Tallinn University of Technology Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics 23, TUT Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance.

    Cited by:

    1. Lauma Muizniece & Aleksandrs Cepilovs, 2017. "Supporting University Technology Transfer - Struggles And Barriers In Latvia," Economic Thought and Practice, Department of Economics and Business, University of Dubrovnik, vol. 26(1), pages 321-342, june.
    2. Michael Wyrwich, 2013. "Ready, set, go! Why are some regions entrepreneurial jump-starters?," Jena Economics Research Papers 2013-037, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    3. Rainer Kattel & Erkki Karo, 2010. "Is 'Open Innovation' Re-Inventing Innovation Policy for Catching-up Economies?," The Other Canon Foundation and Tallinn University of Technology Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics 30, TUT Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance.
    4. Erkki Karo & Rainer Kattel, 2009. "The Copying Paradox: Why Converging Policies but Diverging Capacities for Development in Eastern European Innovation Systems?," The Other Canon Foundation and Tallinn University of Technology Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics 24, TUT Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance.
    5. Hölscher, Jens & Nulsch, Nicole & Stephan, Johannes, 2010. "State Aid in the Enlarged European Union. An Overview," IWH Discussion Papers 24/2010, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    6. Emilia Balan, 2014. "Privatization of Industry in Central and Eastern European Countries," Revista de Economie Mondiala / The Journal of Global Economics, Institute for World Economy, Romanian Academy, vol. 6(2), June.
    7. Vadim V. Krivorotov & Alexey V. Kalina & Zhanna S. Belyaeva & Sergey Ye Erypalov, 2016. "Optimisation model for industrial complex competitiveness: a path to sustainable innovation process," World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(2/3), pages 254-269.
    8. Mustafa Cem KIRANKABEŞ & Abdullah ERKUL, 2019. "Regional knowledge production in Central and East European countries: R&D factor productivity and changes in performances," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 10, pages 25-44, June.

  21. Erik S. Reinert & Rainer Kattel, 2007. "European Eastern Enlargement as Europe's Attempted Economic Suicide?," The Other Canon Foundation and Tallinn University of Technology Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics 14, TUT Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance.

    Cited by:

    1. Kaczmarczyk, Patrick, 2020. "Growth models and the footprint of transnational capital," MaxPo Discussion Paper Series 20/2, Max Planck Sciences Po Center on Coping with Instability in Market Societies (MaxPo).
    2. Patrick Kaczmarczyk, 2020. "Growth Models and the Footprint of Transnational Capital," Sciences Po publications 20/2, Sciences Po.
    3. Egert Juuse, 2015. "“Latin Americanization” of the Estonian economy: institutional analysis of financial fragility and the financialization process," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(3), pages 399-425, October.
    4. Egert Juuse & Rainer Kattel, 2014. "Financialisation and the Financial and Economic Crises: The Case of Estonia," FESSUD studies fstudy20, Financialisation, Economy, Society & Sustainable Development (FESSUD) Project.
    5. Reinert, Erik S., 2012. "Neo-classical economics: A trail of economic destruction since the 1970s," MPRA Paper 47910, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Kuc‑Czarnecka, Marta & Saltelli, Andrea & Olczyk, Magdalena & Reinert, Erik, 2021. "The opening of Central and Eastern European countries to free trade: A critical assessment," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 23-34.
    7. Kalvet, Tarmo, 2009. "Innovation Policy and Development in the ICT Paradigm: Regional and Theoretical Perspectives," MPRA Paper 19387, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Patrick Kaczmarczyk, 2020. "Growth Models and the Footprint of Transnational Capital," Working Papers hal-03471320, HAL.

  22. Reinert, Erik S. & Kattel, Rainer, 2004. "The Qualitative Shift in European Integration: Towards permanent wage pressures and a ‘Latin-Americanization’ of Europe?," MPRA Paper 47909, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Cited by:

    1. Özlem Onaran, 2008. "Jobless Growth in the Central and Eastern European Countries," Working Papers wp165, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
    2. Erik S. Reinert, 2006. "Development and Social Goals: Balancing Aid and Development to Prevent ‘Welfare Colonialism’," Working Papers 14, United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs.
    3. Onaran, Özlem, 2007. "Jobless growth in the Central and Eastern European Countries. A country specific panel data analysis for the manufacturing industry," Department of Economics Working Paper Series 103, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    4. Francesca Gambarotto & Stefano Solari, 2015. "The peripheralization of Southern European capitalism within the EMU," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 788-812, August.
    5. Kuc‑Czarnecka, Marta & Saltelli, Andrea & Olczyk, Magdalena & Reinert, Erik, 2021. "The opening of Central and Eastern European countries to free trade: A critical assessment," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 23-34.
    6. Olu Ajakaiye & Afeikhena T. Jerome & David Nabena & Olufunke A. Alaba, 2015. "Understanding the relationship between growth and employment in Nigeria," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2015-124, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).

  23. Marek Tiits & Rainer Kattel & Tarmo Kalvet & Rein Kaarli, 2003. "Competitiveness and future outlooks of the Estonian economy: R&D and innovation policy review 2002," Public Economics 0309005, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Cited by:

    1. Marek Tiits & Tarmo Kalvet & Imre Mürk, 2015. "Smart Specialisation in Cohesion Economies," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 6(2), pages 296-319, June.
    2. Princely Ifinedo, 2005. "Uncertainties and Risks in the Implementation of an E-Learning Information Systems Project in a Higher-Learning Environment: Viewpoints from Estonia," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 4(01), pages 37-46.
    3. Reinert, Erik S. & Kattel, Rainer, 2004. "The Qualitative Shift in European Integration: Towards permanent wage pressures and a ‘Latin-Americanization’ of Europe?," MPRA Paper 47909, University Library of Munich, Germany.

Articles

  1. Wolfgang Drechsler & Rainer Kattel, 2020. "Debate: The developed civil servant—providing agility and stability at the same time," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(8), pages 549-551, November.

    Cited by:

    1. Nina Tomaževič & Polonca Kovač & Dejan Ravšelj & Lan Umek & Cenay Babaoğlu & Marie Bohatá & Bernhard Hirsch & Onur Kulaç & Guliya K. Nurlybaeva & Fabienne-Sophie Schäfer & Aleksander Aristovnik, 2023. "The Role of Agile Values in Enhancing Good Governance in Public Administration during the COVID-19 Crisis: An International Survey," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-22, November.

  2. Mariana Mazzucato & Rainer Kattel & Josh Ryan-Collins, 2020. "Challenge-Driven Innovation Policy: Towards a New Policy Toolkit," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 421-437, June.

    Cited by:

    1. Geurts, Amber & Geerdink, Tara & Sprenkeling, Marit, 2022. "Accelerated innovation in crises: The role of collaboration in the development of alternative ventilators during the COVID-19 pandemic," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    2. Avdeitchikova, Sofia & Schwaag Serger, Sylvia, 2024. "Innovation policy as an instrument for driving transformation – lessons from practice," Papers in Innovation Studies 2024/1, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    3. Franz Tödtling & Michaela Trippl & Veronika Desch, 2022. "New directions for RIS studies and policies in the face of grand societal challenges," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(11), pages 2139-2156, November.
    4. Odeh Al-Jayyousi & Hira Amin & Hiba Ali Al-Saudi & Amjaad Aljassas & Evren Tok, 2023. "Mission-Oriented Innovation Policy for Sustainable Development: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-21, August.
    5. Sandström, Christian & Alm, Carl, 2023. "Why Green deals may fail – evidence from biogas, bio-ethanol and “fossil free” steel," Ratio Working Papers 365, The Ratio Institute.
    6. Ancín, María & Pindado, Emilio & Sánchez, Mercedes, 2022. "New trends in the global digital transformation process of the agri-food sector: An exploratory study based on Twitter," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    7. -, 2022. "Towards transformation of the development model in Latin America and the Caribbean: production, inclusion and sustainability," Documentos de posición del período de sesiones de la Comisión 48309, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    8. Jon Mikel Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, 2022. "Fostering regional innovation, entrepreneurship and growth through public procurement," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 1205-1222, February.
    9. Francesco Cappellano & Joanna Kurowska-Pysz, 2020. "The Mission-Oriented Approach for (Cross-Border) Regional Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-17, June.
    10. Daniel K. N. Johnson & Phoenix Wagoner, 2021. "The Chicken or the Egg: Causality Between Trade and Innovation," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 527-541, December.
    11. Ron Crawford, 2021. "Focused innovation policy: Lessons from international experience," Working Papers 2021/03, New Zealand Productivity Commission.
    12. Oier Imaz & Andoni Eizagirre, 2020. "Responsible Innovation for Sustainable Development Goals in Business: An Agenda for Cooperative Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-20, August.
    13. Dr. Betty Muthoni Njagi, 2022. "Community Service Learning as a New Discourse of Communion of Purpose for the Wellbeing of the Human Person," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(11), pages 205-210, November.
    14. -, 2022. "Towards transformation of the development model in Latin America and the Caribbean: production, inclusion and sustainability," Libros y Documentos Institucionales, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 48309 edited by Eclac.
    15. Thomas Magnusson & Viktor Werner, 2023. "Conceptualisations of incumbent firms in sustainability transitions: Insights from organisation theory and a systematic literature review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 903-919, February.
    16. Slavo Radosevic & Despina Kanellou & George Tsekouras, 2023. "The experimentation–accountability trade-off in innovation and industrial policy: are learning networks the solution?," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 50(4), pages 655-669.
    17. Mark Dean & Al Rainnie & Jim Stanford & Dan Nahum, 2021. "Industrial policy-making after COVID-19: Manufacturing, innovation and sustainability," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 32(2), pages 283-303, June.
    18. Joanna Stryjek, 2021. "Counteracting the COVID-19 Crisis with Innovation Policy Tools: A Case Study of the EU’s Supranational Innovation Policy," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 450-468.
    19. Michael Peneder & Susanne Bärenthaler-Sieber & Michael Böheim & Thomas Url, 2021. "Der Staat als langfristiger Investor," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 66819, April.
    20. Ioanna Kastelli & Lukasz Mamica & Keun Lee, 2023. "New perspectives and issues in industrial policy for sustainable development: from developmental and entrepreneurial to environmental state," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-25, April.
    21. Alänge, Sverker & Steiber, Annika & Corvello, Vincenzo, 2022. "Evaluating corporate-startup collaboration: A government perspective," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    22. Calderini, Mario & Fia, Magali & Gerli, Francesco, 2023. "Organizing for transformative innovation policies: The role of social enterprises. Theoretical insights and evidence from Italy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(7).
    23. Klerkx, Laurens & Begemann, Stephanie, 2020. "Supporting food systems transformation: The what, why, who, where and how of mission-oriented agricultural innovation systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    24. David Pastor-Escuredo & Philip Treleaven, 2021. "Multiscale Governance," Papers 2104.02752, arXiv.org.

  3. Mariana Mazzucato & Rainer Kattel, 2020. "COVID-19 and public-sector capacity," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 36(Supplemen), pages 256-269.

    Cited by:

    1. Nina Tomaževič & Polonca Kovač & Dejan Ravšelj & Lan Umek & Cenay Babaoğlu & Marie Bohatá & Bernhard Hirsch & Onur Kulaç & Guliya K. Nurlybaeva & Fabienne-Sophie Schäfer & Aleksander Aristovnik, 2023. "The Role of Agile Values in Enhancing Good Governance in Public Administration during the COVID-19 Crisis: An International Survey," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-22, November.
    2. Max Nathan, 2023. "Critical Commentary: The city and the virus," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(8), pages 1346-1364, June.
    3. Ongena, Steven & Moreno Ibáñez, Antonio & Ventula Veghazy, Alexia & Wagner, Alexander F., 2022. "“Long GFC†? The Global Financial Crisis, Health Care, and COVID-19 Deaths," CEPR Discussion Papers 15900, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    4. Okubo, Toshihiro, 2022. "Traveling and eating out during the COVID-19 pandemic: The Go To campaign policies in Japan," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    5. John R Bryson & Chloe Billing & Mark Tewdwr-Jones, 2023. "Urban infrastructure patching: Citizen-led solutions to infrastructure ruptures," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(10), pages 1932-1948, August.
    6. Yusuf Anthony Olukayode & Musa Nofiu Abiodun & Kadiri Dele Samuel & Ebunoluwa Esther Ilori & Opawole Akintayo, 2022. "Capability improvement measures of the public sector for implementation of building information modeling in construction projects," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 2710-2730, January.
    7. Ana Luíza Matos Oliveira & Magali N. Alloatti, 2022. "Gendering the crisis: austerity and the Covid-19 pandemic in Brazil," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 39(1), pages 203-224, April.
    8. Katona, Márton & Petrovics, Nándor, 2021. "Válság és együttműködés. A koronavírus-járvány okozta lehetséges intézményi változások és a kooperatív közszolgáltatások [Crisis and cooperation: possible institutional changes caused by the corona," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(1), pages 76-95.
    9. Hui Zhang & Huiying Ding & Jianying Xiao, 2023. "How Organizational Agility Promotes Digital Transformation: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-13, July.
    10. Juan Carlos Rodríguez-Cohard & Juan José Juste-Carrión & Antonio Vázquez-Barquero, 2021. "Challenges and Responses of Agri-Food Activities under COVID-19 Pandemic: The Case of the Spanish Territories Producing Wine and Olive Oil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-21, December.
    11. Linda Colley & Shelley Woods & Brian Head, 2022. "Pandemic effects on public service employment in Australia," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 33(1), pages 56-79, March.
    12. Benedykt Opalka, 2021. "Conditions for Developing and Supporting Public Sector Innovation in the Face of Economic Turbulence in Europe," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 3-20.
    13. Jorge Luis Tonetto & Adelar Fochezatto & Josep Miquel Pique, 2023. "The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Use of the Menor Preço Brasil Application," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, October.
    14. Virgil Henry Storr & Stefanie Haeffele & Jordan K. Lofthouse & Anne Hobson, 2022. "Entrepreneurship during a pandemic," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 83-105, August.
    15. Michael O’Donnell & Sue Williamson & Michael Johnson, 2022. "Introduction to the Themed collection: Public sector employment relations in turbulent times," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 33(1), pages 12-17, March.
    16. Gabriel Weber & Ignazio Cabras & Paola Ometto & Ana Maria Peredo, 2021. "Direct Management of COVID-19 at National and Subnational Level: The Case of the Western Amazon Countries," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 741-757, December.
    17. Scott Duke Kominers & Alex Tabarrok, 2022. "Vaccines and the Covid-19 pandemic: lessons from failure and success [‘Many Say They’re Confused About Whether, When to Get Second Booster’]," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 38(4), pages 719-741.
    18. Dubey, Rameshwar & Bryde, David J. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K. & Graham, Gary & Foropon, Cyril & Papadopoulos, Thanos, 2023. "Dynamic digital capabilities and supply chain resilience: The role of government effectiveness," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    19. Tünde Zita Kovács & András Nábrádi & Szabolcs Tóth & László Huzsvai & Adrián Nagy & Beáta Bittner, 2023. "Sustainable Public Transportation in a Volatile, Uncertain, Complex, and Ambiguous (VUCA) Age," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-15, October.
    20. Focacci, Chiara Natalie & Perez, Carlota, 2022. "The importance of education and training policies in supporting technological revolutions: A comparative and historical analysis of UK, US, Germany, and Sweden (1830–1970)," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    21. Dweck, Esther & Marcato, Marilia Bassetti & Torracca, Julia & Miguez, Thiago, 2022. "COVID-19 and the Brazilian manufacturing sector: Roads to reindustrialization within societal purposes," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 278-293.
    22. Aarthi Raghavan & Mehmet Akif Demircioglu & Serik Orazgaliyev, 2021. "COVID-19 and the New Normal of Organizations and Employees: An Overview," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, October.
    23. Kathya Lorena Cordova-Pozo & Hubert P. L. M. Korzilius & Etiënne A. J. A. Rouwette & Gabriela Píriz & Rolando Herrera-Gutierrez & Graciela Cordova-Pozo & Miguel Orozco, 2021. "Using Systems Dynamics for Capturing the Multicausality of Factors Affecting Health System Capacity in Latin America while Responding to the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-19, September.
    24. Seberini Andrea & Nour Magde Mohamed & Tokovska Miroslava, 2022. "From Digital Divide to Technostress during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review," Organizacija, Sciendo, vol. 55(2), pages 98-111, May.
    25. Elisabetta Reginato & Francesca Cabiddu & Patrizia Modica, 2023. "Le politiche pubbliche a sostegno della crisi da COVID-19 nel settore turistico: un?analisi esplorativa," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2023(1), pages 95-118.
    26. Mindaugas Butkus & Giovanni Schiuma & Ilona Bartuseviciene & Ona Grazina Rakauskiene & Lina Volodzkiene & Laura Dargenyte-Kacileviciene, 2023. "The impact of organizational resilience on the quality of public services: Application of structural equation modeling," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 18(2), pages 461-489, June.
    27. Kidjie Saguin & Michael Howlett, 2022. "Enhancing Policy Capacity for Better Policy Integration: Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals in a Post COVID-19 World," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-13, September.

  4. Rainer Kattel & Mariana Mazzucato & Keno Haverkamp & Josh Ryan-Collins, 2020. "Industriestrategie der nächsten Generation für Deutschland," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 100(10), pages 757-762, October.

    Cited by:

    1. Ricarda Kampmann, 2022. "Instrumente einer gestaltenden Strukturpolitik? [Measures of a Mission-Oriented Structural Policy — Considerations to the 28th Report on German Subsidies]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 102(1), pages 52-58, January.
    2. Kersten Kellermann & Carsten-Henning Schlag, 2021. "Überakkumulation oder Investitionslücke? [Over Accumulation or Investment Gap?]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 101(12), pages 964-970, December.

  5. Rainer Kattel & Mariana Mazzucato, 2018. "Mission-oriented innovation policy and dynamic capabilities in the public sector," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 27(5), pages 787-801.

    Cited by:

    1. Jessica Catalano & Francesco Giffoni & Paolo Castelnovo, 2021. "The impact of space procurement on suppliers: Evidence from Italy," Working Papers 202102, CSIL Centre for Industrial Studies.
    2. Steffen S. Bettin, 2020. "Electricity infrastructure and innovation in the next phase of energy transition—amendments to the technology innovation system framework," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 1(3), pages 371-395, November.
    3. Shufang Huang & Jin Chen & Liang Mei & Weiqiao Mo, 2019. "The Effect of Heterogeneity and Leadership on Innovation Performance: Evidence from University Research Teams in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-14, August.
    4. Watson, Anna, 2022. "Designing publicly funded organisations for accelerated low carbon innovation: A case study of the ETI, UK and ARPA-E, US," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    5. Supradeep Dutta & Jenna Rodrigues & Timothy B. Folta, 2023. "Does NIH select the right healthcare ventures through the SBIR grant program?," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 1206-1220, August.
    6. Janssen, Matthijs & Wanzenböck, Iris & Fünfschilling, Lea & Pontinakis, Dimitris, 2023. "Governance arrangements for the implementation of transformative innovation policy: Insights from a comparative case study," Papers in Innovation Studies 2023/13, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    7. Catalá-Pérez, Daniel & Rask, Mikko & de-Miguel-Molina, María, 2020. "The Demola model as a public policy tool boosting collaboration in innovation: A comparative study between Finland and Spain," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    8. Janssen, Matthijs J. & Abbasiharofteh, Milad, 2022. "Boundary spanning R&D collaboration: Key enabling technologies and missions as alleviators of proximity effects?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    9. Stefano Basilico & Uwe Cantner & Holger Graf, 2021. "Policy Influence in the Knowledge Space: a Regional Application," Jena Economics Research Papers 2021-011, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    10. Acciai, Claudia, 2021. "The politics of research and innovation: Understanding instrument choices in complex governance environments – the case of France and Italy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    11. Maria Rabadjieva & Judith Terstriep, 2020. "Ambition Meets Reality: Mission-Oriented Innovation Policy as a Driver for Participative Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-23, December.
    12. Odeh Al-Jayyousi & Hira Amin & Hiba Ali Al-Saudi & Amjaad Aljassas & Evren Tok, 2023. "Mission-Oriented Innovation Policy for Sustainable Development: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-21, August.
    13. Daniele Archibugi & Vitantonio Mariella, 2021. "Is a European Recovery possible without High-Tech Public Corporations?," Working Papers 50, Birkbeck Centre for Innovation Management Research, revised Mar 2021.
    14. Yuhan Bao & Adrian Ely & Michael M. Hopkins & Xianzhe Li & Yangmu Huang, 2021. "Exploring the Antibiotics Innovation System and R&D policies in China: Mission Oriented Innovation?," SPRU Working Paper Series 2021-04, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    15. Grashof, Nils, 2020. "Putting the watering can away Towards a targeted (problem-oriented) cluster policy framework," Papers in Innovation Studies 2020/4, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    16. Grashof, Nils, 2021. "Putting the watering can away –Towards a targeted (problem-oriented) cluster policy framework," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    17. Mariana Mazzucato, 2018. "Mission-oriented innovation policies: challenges and opportunities," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 27(5), pages 803-815.
    18. Alessandro Pollini & Alessandro Caforio, 2021. "Participation and Iterative Experiments: Designing Alternative Futures with Migrants and Service Providers," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-13, September.
    19. Hui Zhang & Huiying Ding & Jianying Xiao, 2023. "How Organizational Agility Promotes Digital Transformation: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-13, July.
    20. Christoph March & Ina Schieferdecker, 2021. "Technological Sovereignty as Ability, not Autarky," Munich Papers in Political Economy 12, Munich School of Politics and Public Policy and the School of Management at the Technical University of Munich.
    21. Ziesemer, Thomas, 2019. "The impact of mission-oriented R&D on domestic and foreign private and public R&D, total factor productivity and GDP," MERIT Working Papers 2019-047, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    22. Samford, Steven, 2022. "Decentralization and local industrial policy in Mexico," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    23. Mariana Mazzucato & Rainer Kattel & Josh Ryan-Collins, 2020. "Challenge-Driven Innovation Policy: Towards a New Policy Toolkit," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 421-437, June.
    24. Nick Clifton & Khine S. Kyaw & Zheng Liu & Gary Walpole, 2024. "An Empirical Study on Public Sector versus Third Sector Circular Economy-Oriented Innovations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-26, February.
    25. Robert Skidelsky & Simone Gasperin, 2021. "Reinstating fiscal policy for normal times: Public investment and Public Jobs Programmes," PSL Quarterly Review, Economia civile, vol. 74(296), pages 3-24.
    26. Wiarda, Martijn & Sobota, Vladimir C.M. & Janssen, Matthijs J. & van de Kaa, Geerten & Yaghmaei, Emad & Doorn, Neelke, 2023. "Public participation in mission-oriented innovation projects," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    27. Borrás, Susana & Haakonsson, Stine & Taudal Poulsen, René & Pallesen, Trine & Hendriksen, Christian & Somavilla, Lucas & Kugelberg, Susanna & Larsen, Henrik & Gerli, Francesco, 2023. "The Transformative Capacity of Public Sector Organizations in Sustainability Transitions: A Conceptualization," Papers in Innovation Studies 2023/2, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    28. Mehmet Akif Demircioglu & David B Audretsch & Timothy F Slaper, 2019. "Sources of innovation and innovation type: firm-level evidence from the United States," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 28(6), pages 1365-1379.
    29. Antonio Andreoni & Kenneth Creamer & Mariana Mazzucato & Grové Steyn, 2022. "How can South Africa advance a new energy paradigm? A mission-oriented approach to megaprojects [‘The Political Economy of Industrial Policy’]," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 38(2), pages 237-259.
    30. Harald Rohracher & Lars Coenen & Olga Kordas, 2023. "Mission incomplete: Layered practices of monitoring and evaluation in Swedish transformative innovation policy," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 50(2), pages 336-349.
    31. Mazzucato, Mariana, 2023. "Transformational change in Latin America and the Caribbean: A mission-oriented approach," Sede de la CEPAL en Santiago (Estudios e Investigaciones) 48299, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    32. Tyce, Matthew, 2020. "Beyond the neoliberal-statist divide on the drivers of innovation: A political settlements reading of Kenya’s M-Pesa success story," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    33. Klingler-Vidra, Robyn & Tran, Ba Linh & Chalmers, Adam William, 2021. "Transnational experience and high-performing entrepreneurs in emerging economies: Evidence from Vietnam," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    34. Leonard Prochaska & Daniel Schiller, 2021. "An evolutionary perspective on the emergence and implementation of mission-oriented innovation policy: the example of the change of the leitmotif from biotechnology to bioeconomy," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 141-249, April.
    35. Janssen, Matthijs J. & Abbasiharofteh, Milad, 2022. "Boundary spanning R&D collaboration: Key enabling technologies and missions as alleviators of proximity effects?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 180.
    36. Edquist, Charles & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, Jon Mikel, 2020. "Functional procurement for innovation, welfare and the environment," Papers in Innovation Studies 2020/1, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research, revised 19 Jul 2020.
    37. Klingler-Vidra, Robyn & Wade, Robert, 2020. "Science and technology policies and the middle-income trap: lessons from Vietnam," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 100712, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    38. Matteo Deleidi & Mariana Mazzucato, 2019. "Mission-Oriented Innovation Policies: A Theoretical And Empirical Assessment For The Us Economy," Departmental Working Papers of Economics - University 'Roma Tre' 0248, Department of Economics - University Roma Tre.
    39. Ilaria Mariani & Irene Bianchi, 2023. "Conceptualising Digital Transformation in Cities: A Multi-Dimensional Framework for the Analysis of Public Sector Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, May.
    40. Jackwerth, Thomas & Afghani, Nof & Daimer, Stephanie & Lindner, Ralf & Wittmann, Florian, 2023. "Public sector organisations as agents of transformations: A framework for analysing structural changes within Public Sector Organisations (PSO)," Discussion Papers "Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis" 80, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    41. Robert Wade, 2018. "Escaping the periphery: The East Asian 'mystery' solved," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2018-101, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    42. Paolo Castelnuovo & Stefano Clo & Massimo Florio, 2021. "Space policy drives innovation through technological procurement: evidence from Italy," Working Papers - Economics wp2021_08.rdf, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.
    43. Laura Zapata-Cantu & Fernando González, 2021. "Challenges for Innovation and Sustainable Development in Latin America: The Significance of Institutions and Human Capital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-21, April.
    44. Serenella Caravella & Francesco Crespi, 2021. "The role of public procurement as innovation lever: evidence from Italian manufacturing firms," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(7), pages 663-684, October.
    45. Rotondi, Claudia, 2019. "Paradigms for structural growth and development in Italy: Pasquale Saraceno’s contribution to the theory and practice of economic policy," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 361-370.
    46. Verónica Robert & Gabriel Yoguel, 2022. "Exploration of trending concepts in innovation policy," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 259-292, July.
    47. Balacescu Aniela & Zaharia Marian & Gogonea Rodica-Manuela, 2021. "Considerations Regarding The Evolution Of Covid-19 In The South-West Oltenia Region Of Romania, In The Period April - September 2020," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 2, pages 26-34, April.
    48. Sohvi Heaton & David Teece & Eugene Agronin, 2023. "Dynamic capabilities and governance: An empirical investigation of financial performance of the higher education sector," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(2), pages 520-548, February.
    49. Roth, Florian & Wittmann, Florian & Hufnagl, Miriam & Lindner, Ralf, 2022. "Putting mission-oriented innovation policies to work: A case study of the German high-tech strategy 2025," Discussion Papers "Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis" 75, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    50. Klingler-Vidra, Robyn & Tran, Ba Linh & Chalmers, Adam William, 2021. "Transnational experience and high-performing entrepreneurs in emerging economies: evidence from Vietnam," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 110756, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    51. Jordi Mazon, 2024. "5-E Levers: A New Conceptual Model for Achieving Carbon Neutrality in Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-12, February.

  6. Raudla Ringa & Cepilovs Aleksandrs & Kattel Rainer & Sutt Linda, 2018. "The European Union as a Trigger of Discursive Change: The Impact of the Structural Deficit Rule in Estonia and Latvia," Central European Journal of Public Policy, Sciendo, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, December.

    Cited by:

    1. Ringa Raudla & James W. Douglas, 2021. "Structural Budget Balance as a Fiscal Rule in the European Union—Good, Bad, or Ugly?," Public Budgeting & Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(1), pages 121-141, March.

  7. Piret Tõnurist & Rainer Kattel, 2017. "Can Research, Development, and Innovation Policies Cross Borders? The Case of Nordic–Baltic Region," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 44(3), pages 328-340.

    Cited by:

    1. Sokolov, Alexander & Shashnov, Sergey & Kotsemir, Maxim & Grebenyuk, Anna, 2019. "Quantitative analysis for a better-focused international STI collaboration policy: A case of BRICS," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 221-242.
    2. Andrei Coca & Manuela Rozalia Gabor & Irina Olimpia Susanu, 2023. "Do Innovation Metrics Reflect Sustainable Policy Making in Europe? A Comparative Study Case on the Carpathian and Alpine Mountain Regions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-31, March.

  8. Piret Tõnurist & Rainer Kattel & Veiko Lember, 2017. "Innovation labs in the public sector: what they are and what they do?," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(10), pages 1455-1479, November.

    Cited by:

    1. Santarsiero, Francesco & Schiuma, Giovanni & Carlucci, Daniela & Helander, Nina, 2023. "Digital transformation in healthcare organisations: The role of innovation labs," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    2. Schiuma, Giovanni & Santarsiero, Francesco, 2023. "Innovation labs as organisational catalysts for innovation capacity development: A systematic literature review," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    3. Ferney Osorio & Laurent Dupont & Mauricio Camargo & José Ismael Peña, 2021. "Making the strategic intent of innovation labs operational: A process perspective on the case of the Lorraine Fab Living Lab," Post-Print hal-03285670, HAL.
    4. Alfonso Unceta & Xabier Barandiaran & Natalia Restrepo, 2019. "The Role of Public Innovation Labs in Collaborative Governance—The Case of the Gipuzkoa Lab in the Basque Country, Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-16, November.
    5. Alessandro Pollini & Alessandro Caforio, 2021. "Participation and Iterative Experiments: Designing Alternative Futures with Migrants and Service Providers," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-13, September.
    6. Lars Fuglsang & Anne Vorre Hansen & Ines Mergel & Maria Taivalsaari Røhnebæk, 2021. "Living Labs for Public Sector Innovation: An Integrative Literature Review," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, June.
    7. Nathalie Haug & Ines Mergel, 2021. "Public Value Co-Creation in Living Labs—Results from Three Case Studies," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-22, July.
    8. Igor Calzada, 2018. "(Smart) Citizens from Data Providers to Decision-Makers? The Case Study of Barcelona," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-25, September.
    9. Michael McGann & Emma Blomkamp & Jenny M. Lewis, 2018. "The rise of public sector innovation labs: experiments in design thinking for policy," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 51(3), pages 249-267, September.
    10. Fuglsang, Lars & Hansen, Anne Vorre, 2022. "Framing improvements of public innovation in a living lab context: Processual learning, restrained space and democratic engagement," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(1).
    11. Urmanaviciene Audrone & Kostalova Jana & Baturina Danijel & Krzyworzeka Paweł & Budrytė Paulina & Lepik Katri-Liis, 2022. "Were Social Labs immune to COVID-19? Impacts and benefits," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 17(s1), pages 381-401, October.
    12. Sojeong Kim & Adam M. Wellstead & Tanya Heikkila, 2023. "Policy capacity and rise of data‐based policy innovation labs," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(3), pages 341-362, May.
    13. Slavo Radosevic & Despina Kanellou & George Tsekouras, 2023. "The experimentation–accountability trade-off in innovation and industrial policy: are learning networks the solution?," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 50(4), pages 655-669.
    14. Abdulrahman Habib & Victor R. Prybutok & Denise Philpot, 2022. "Assessing and building municipal open data capability," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-25, March.
    15. Grazia Concilio & Maryam Karimi & Lydia Rössl, 2021. "Complex Projects and Transition-Driven Evaluation: The Case of the easyRights European Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-30, February.
    16. Liz Price & Jane Deville & Fiona Ashmore, 2021. "A guide to developing a rural digital hub," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 36(7-8), pages 683-694, November.
    17. Diana Pamela Villa Alvarez & Valentina Auricchio & Marzia Mortati, 2022. "Mapping design activities and methods of public sector innovation units through the policy cycle model," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 55(1), pages 89-136, March.
    18. Alfonso Unceta & Xabier Barandiaran & Asier Lakidain, 2021. "Digitalisation of Creative Industries Fostered by Collaborative Governance: Public Innovation Labs in Gipuzkoa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, February.

  9. Erkki Karo & Rainer Kattel & Ringa Raudla, 2017. "Searching for Exits from the Great Recession: Coordination of Fiscal Consolidation and Growth Enhancing Innovation Policies in Central and Eastern Europe," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(7), pages 1009-1026, August.

    Cited by:

  10. Leonardo Burlamaqui & Rainer Kattel, 2016. "Development as leapfrogging, not convergence, not catch-up: towards schumpeterian theories of finance and development," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 270-288, April.

    Cited by:

    1. Bofinger, Peter & Geißendörfer, Lisa & Haas, Thomas & Mayer, Fabian, 2023. "Credit as an instrument for growth: A monetary explanation of the Chinese growth story," W.E.P. - Würzburg Economic Papers 107, University of Würzburg, Department of Economics.
    2. Rikap, Cecilia & Flacher, David, 2020. "Who collects intellectual rents from knowledge and innovation hubs? questioning the sustainability of the singapore model," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 59-73.
    3. Ehret, Michael & Olaniyan, Rotimi, 2023. "Banking the unbanked. Constitutive rules and the institutionalization of mobile payment systems in Nigeria," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).

  11. Erkki Karo & Rainer Kattel, 2015. "Economic development and evolving state capacities in Central and Eastern Europe: can “smart specialization” make a difference?," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 172-187, April.

    Cited by:

    1. Ewa Kopczynska & Joao J. Ferreira, 2020. "Smart Specialization as a New Strategic Framework: Innovative and Competitive Capacity in European Context," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 11(2), pages 530-557, June.
    2. Paul Vallance & Jiří Blažek & John Edwards & Viktor Květoň, 2018. "Smart specialisation in regions with less-developed research and innovation systems: A changing role for universities?," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(2), pages 219-238, March.
    3. Ron Boschma, 2021. "Designing Smart Specialization Policy: relatedness, unrelatedness, or what?," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2128, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Sep 2021.
    4. Opeyemi Idowu ALUKO, 2015. "Political Economy of Crony Capitalism: The Prospect and the Bane," Journal of Economics Library, KSP Journals, vol. 2(3), pages 192-197, September.
    5. Landoni, Matteo, 2020. "Knowledge creation in state-owned enterprises," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 77-85.
    6. Žana Jurjević & Stanislav Zekić & Danilo Đokić & Bojan Matkovski, 2021. "Regional Spatial Approach to Differences in Rural Economic Development: Insights from Serbia," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-14, November.
    7. Slavo Radosevic & Katerina Ciampi Stancova, 2018. "Internationalising Smart Specialisation: Assessment and Issues in the Case of EU New Member States," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 9(1), pages 263-293, March.
    8. Pierre-Alexandre Balland & Ron Boschma & Joan Crespo & David L. Rigby, 2017. "Smart Specialization policy in the EU: Relatedness, Knowledge Complexity and Regional Diversification," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1717, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jul 2017.
    9. Dyba Wojciech & Loewen Bradley & Looga Jaan & Zdražil Pavel, 2018. "Regional Development in Central-Eastern European Countries at the Beginning of the 21st Century: Path Dependence and Effects of EU Cohesion Policy," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 37(2), pages 77-92, June.
    10. Jaanus Müür, 2022. "Intermediating Smart Specialisation and Entrepreneurial Discovery: The Cases of Estonia and Helsinki-Uusimaa," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(1), pages 541-573, March.
    11. Schulz Sebastian, 2019. "Ambitious or Ambiguous? The Implications of Smart Specialisation for Core-Periphery Relations in Estonia and Slovakia," TalTech Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 9(4), pages 49-71, December.

  12. Kattel Rainer, 2015. "What would Max Weber Say about Public-Sector Innovation?," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 8(1), pages 9-19, June.

    Cited by:

    1. Gabriela - Virginia POPESCU, 2017. "Innovation Perspectives in Local Administration at the Beginning of the "Age of Cities"," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 5(2), pages 175-201, June.
    2. Nemec Juraj & Orviska Marta & Lawson Colin, 2016. "The Role of Accountability Arrangements in Social Innovations: Evidence from the UK and Slovakia," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 9(1), pages 73-96, June.

  13. Erkki Karo & Rainer Kattel, 2014. "Public management, policy capacity, innovation and development," Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, Center of Political Economy, vol. 34(1), pages 80-102.

    Cited by:

    1. Pauline Debanes, 2018. "Layering the developmental state away?," Working Papers halshs-01800489, HAL.
    2. Darryl S.L. Jarvis, 2017. "The OECD and the Reconfiguration of the State in Emerging Economies: Manufacturing ‘Regulatory Capacity’," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 48(6), pages 1386-1416, November.

  14. Rainer Kattel & Ringa Raudla, 2013. "The Baltic Republics and the Crisis of 2008–2011," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 65(3), pages 426-449.

    Cited by:

    1. Egert Juuse & Rainer Kattel, 2014. "Financial Regulation in Estonia," Working papers wpaper57, Financialisation, Economy, Society & Sustainable Development (FESSUD) Project.
    2. Jiri Mazurek, 2014. "Examination of European Union economic cohesion: A cluster analysis approach," Business and Economic Horizons (BEH), Prague Development Center, vol. 9(4), pages 8-17, January.
    3. H. Lehmann & T. Razzolini & A. Zaiceva, 2017. "Internal Devaluation and Labor Market Outcomes: Evidence from Latvia," Working Papers wp1095, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    4. Falkowski Krzysztof, 2018. "Competitiveness of the Baltic States in International High-Technology Goods Trade," Comparative Economic Research, Sciendo, vol. 21(1), pages 25-43, March.
    5. Dünhaupt, Petra & Hein, Eckhard, 2018. "Financialisation, distribution & the macroeconomic regimes before & after the crisis: A post-Keynesian view on Denmark, Estonia & Latvia," IPE Working Papers 104/2018, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute for International Political Economy (IPE).
    6. Egert Juuse & Rainer Kattel, 2014. "Financialisation and the Financial and Economic Crises: The Case of Estonia," FESSUD studies fstudy20, Financialisation, Economy, Society & Sustainable Development (FESSUD) Project.
    7. D�ra Győrffy, 2015. "Austerity and growth in Central and Eastern Europe: understanding the link through contrasting crisis management in Hungary and Latvia," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 129-152, June.
    8. Győrffy, Dóra, 2021. "Felzárkózási pályák Kelet-Közép-Európában két válság között [Convergence paths in Central and Eastern Europe between two crises]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(1), pages 47-75.
    9. Čekanavičius Linas, 2018. "On the Choice of Fiscal Adjustment to Financial Crises: Expansionary vs. Contractionary Policies," Ekonomika (Economics), Sciendo, vol. 97(2), pages 7-17, December.
    10. Mazurek, Jiri, 2013. "A Comparison of GDP growth of European countries during 2008-2012 period from regional and other perspectives," MPRA Paper 51178, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Mazurek Jiří, 2015. "A Comparison Of GDP Growth Of European Countries During 2008-2012 From The Regional And Other Perspectives / Porównanie Wzrostu Pkb W Okresie 2008-2012 W Krajach Europejskich Z Regionalnej I Innej Per," Comparative Economic Research, Sciendo, vol. 18(3), pages 5-18, August.

  15. Raudla, Ringa & Kattel, Rainer, 2011. "Why Did Estonia Choose Fiscal Retrenchment after the 2008 Crisis?," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(2), pages 163-186, August.

    Cited by:

    1. Knobel, Alexander (Кнобель, Александр), 2018. "Assessment of the Benefits, Risks and Costs of the Transition to the Regime of Preferential Trade and Economic Interaction with the People's Republic of China [Оценка Выгод, Рисков И Издержек Перех," Working Papers 061827, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    2. Liis Roosaar & Urmas Varblane & Jaan Masso, 2020. "Productivity Gains From Labour Churning In Economic Crisis: Do Foreign Firms Gain More?," University of Tartu - Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Working Paper Series 125, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Tartu (Estonia).
    3. Mathias Dolls & Clemens Fuest & Andreas Peichl & Christian Wittneben, 2020. "Fiscal Consolidation and Automatic Stabilization: New Results," EconPol Working Paper 39, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    4. Arunas Juska & Charles Woolfson, 2015. "Austerity, labour market segmentation and emigration: the case of Lithuania," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3), pages 236-253, May.
    5. Egert Juuse & Rainer Kattel, 2014. "Financialisation and the Financial and Economic Crises: The Case of Estonia," FESSUD studies fstudy20, Financialisation, Economy, Society & Sustainable Development (FESSUD) Project.
    6. Neven Valev, 2017. "Fear of floating," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 25(1), pages 77-90, January.
    7. Fabrizio Di Mascio & Alessandro Natalini, 2015. "Fiscal Retrenchment in Southern Europe: Changing patterns of public management in Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 129-148, January.
    8. Huseynov, Nijat, 2017. "The Classification of Public Expenditure in Post-Soviet Union States and OECD Member Countries," Public Finance Quarterly, Corvinus University of Budapest, vol. 62(3), pages 380-400.
    9. Raudla Ringa & Cepilovs Aleksandrs & Kattel Rainer & Sutt Linda, 2018. "The European Union as a Trigger of Discursive Change: The Impact of the Structural Deficit Rule in Estonia and Latvia," Central European Journal of Public Policy, Sciendo, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, December.
    10. Ringa Raudla & Riin Savi, 2015. "The use of performance information in cutback budgeting," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(6), pages 409-416, November.

  16. Rainer Kattel, 2010. "Financial and economic crisis in Eastern Europe," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(1), pages 41-60, October.

    Cited by:

    1. MIHUT Ioana Sorina & LUTAS Mihaela, 2014. "The Impact Of The Recent Financial Crisis Upon The Nominal Convergence Indicators Across New Eu Member States," Revista Economica, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 66(2), pages 58-74.
    2. Rehman, Naqeeb Ur, 2016. "Self-Selection and Learning-by-Exporting Hypotheses: Micro Level Evidence," MPRA Paper 71480, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Dünhaupt, Petra & Hein, Eckhard, 2018. "Financialisation, distribution & the macroeconomic regimes before & after the crisis: A post-Keynesian view on Denmark, Estonia & Latvia," IPE Working Papers 104/2018, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute for International Political Economy (IPE).
    4. Roxana Badircea & Alina Manta & Alia Duta, 2016. "The Analysis of the Real Convergence of the Countries from Central and Eastern Europe," Finante - provocarile viitorului (Finance - Challenges of the Future), University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 1(18), pages 45-50, December.
    5. Nina Dodig & Eckhard Hein & Daniel Detzer, 2016. "Financialisation and the financial and economic crises: theoretical framework and empirical analysis for 15 countries," Chapters, in: Eckhard Hein & Daniel Detzer & Nina Dodig (ed.), Financialisation and the Financial and Economic Crises, chapter 1, pages 1-41, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Slomka-Golebiowska, Agnieszka, 2011. "Are the corporate governance standard in banks in the CEE countries low hanging fruit?," MPRA Paper 42145, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 21 Nov 2012.
    7. Sébastien BOURDIN, 2018. "Géographie de la résilience des régions européennes face à la crise (2008-2013)," Region et Developpement, Region et Developpement, LEAD, Universite du Sud - Toulon Var, vol. 48, pages 53-70.
    8. Alina Cristina Nuta & Florian Marcel Nuta, 2012. "Analysis Of The Romanian Financial Stability In The Context Of The Economic Downturn," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 3, pages 174-178, September.
    9. Rainer Kattel & Leonardo Burlamaqui, 2016. "Development Theory: Convercence, Catch-Up Or Leapfrogging And Finance ?," Anais do XLII Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 42nd Brazilian Economics Meeting] 073, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    10. Rainer Kattel & Blagoy Stamenov, 2018. "RIO Country Report 2017: Estonia," JRC Research Reports JRC111256, Joint Research Centre.

  17. Erkki Karo & Rainer Kattel, 2010. "Coordination of innovation policies in the catching-up context: a historical perspective on Estonia and Brazil," International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(4), pages 293-329.

    Cited by:

    1. Kadri Ukrainski, 2016. "Fostering Innovation in Estonia: The View from the Governance Framework of the National Innovation System," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 16(04), pages 45-52, January.
    2. Figueiredo, Paulo N., 2016. "Evolution of the short-fiber technological trajectory in Brazil's pulp and paper industry: The role of firm-level innovative capability-building and indigenous institutions," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 1-14.
    3. Lakitan, Benyamin & Hidayat, Dudi & Herlinda, Siti, 2012. "Scientific productivity and the collaboration intensity of Indonesian universities and public R&D institutions: Are there dependencies on collaborative R&D with foreign institutions?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 227-238.
    4. Jaanus Müür, 2022. "Intermediating Smart Specialisation and Entrepreneurial Discovery: The Cases of Estonia and Helsinki-Uusimaa," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(1), pages 541-573, March.
    5. Serhat Sag & Bülent Sezen & Lütfihak Alpkan, 2019. "Determinants of Open Innovation and their Interrelations," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(04), pages 1-20, June.

  18. Margit Suurna & Rainer Kattel, 2010. "Europeanization of innovation policy in Central and Eastern Europe," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 37(9), pages 646-664, November.

    Cited by:

    1. Balázs Lengyel & Tamás Sebestyén & Loet Leydesdorff, 2015. "Challenges for regional innovation policies in Central and Eastern Europe: Spatial concentration and foreign control of US patenting," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 42(1), pages 1-14.
    2. Foreman-Peck, James & Zhou, Peng, 2022. "R&D subsidies and productivity in eastern European countries," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 46(2).
    3. Lengyel, Balázs & Leydesdorff, Loet, 2015. "The Effects of FDI on Innovation Systems in Hungarian Regions: Where is the Synergy Generated?," MPRA Paper 73945, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Švarc, Jadranka & Dabić, Marina, 2021. "Transformative innovation policy or how to escape peripheral policy paradox in European research peripheral countries," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    5. Lauma Muizniece, 2021. "University Autonomy and Commercialization of Publicly Funded Research: the Case of Latvia," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(3), pages 1494-1516, September.
    6. Klaus Schuch, 2014. "Participation of the ‘New’ EU Member States in the European Research Programmes — A Long Way to Go," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 8(3), pages 6-17.
    7. Margit Kirs & Veiko Lember & Erkki Karo, 2021. "Technology transfer in economic periphery: Emerging patterns and policy challenges," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 38(6), pages 677-706, November.
    8. Miloš Krstić & José António Filipe & José Chavaglia, 2020. "Higher Education as a Determinant of the Competitiveness and Sustainable Development of an Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-22, August.
    9. Zhelyu Vladimirov, 2018. "Discussing Innovation Policy Biases in the New EU Member States," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 5, pages 3-26.
    10. Katerina Ciampi Stancova, 2020. "Learning opportunities stemming from place-based transformative Smart Specialisation. Examples from Visegrad Group countries," JRC Research Reports JRC120702, Joint Research Centre.
    11. Mustafa Cem KIRANKABEŞ & Abdullah ERKUL, 2019. "Regional knowledge production in Central and East European countries: R&D factor productivity and changes in performances," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 10, pages 25-44, June.
    12. Karo , Erkki & Kattel , Rainer, 2015. "Innovation Bureaucracy: Does the organization of government matter when promoting innovation?," Papers in Innovation Studies 2015/38, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    13. Rainer Kattel & Blagoy Stamenov, 2018. "RIO Country Report 2017: Estonia," JRC Research Reports JRC111256, Joint Research Centre.
    14. Peter Howard-Jones & Jens Hölscher, 2020. "The Influence Of The Washington Consensus Programme On The Transitional Economies Of Eastern Europe – A Firm-Level Analysis," Economic Annals, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, vol. 65(226), pages 9-44, July – Se.
    15. Andrei Coca & Manuela Rozalia Gabor & Irina Olimpia Susanu, 2023. "Do Innovation Metrics Reflect Sustainable Policy Making in Europe? A Comparative Study Case on the Carpathian and Alpine Mountain Regions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-31, March.
    16. Schulz Sebastian, 2019. "Ambitious or Ambiguous? The Implications of Smart Specialisation for Core-Periphery Relations in Estonia and Slovakia," TalTech Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 9(4), pages 49-71, December.
    17. Sonja Đuričin & Isidora Beraha & Olivera Jovanović & Marija Mosurović Ružičić & Marija Lazarević-Moravčević & Mihailo Paunović, 2022. "The Efficiency of National Innovation Policy Programs: The Case of Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-14, July.

Chapters

  1. Veiko Lember & Rainer Kattel & Tarmo Kalvet, 2014. "Public Procurement and Innovation: Theory and Practice," Springer Books, in: Veiko Lember & Rainer Kattel & Tarmo Kalvet (ed.), Public Procurement, Innovation and Policy, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 13-34, Springer.

    Cited by:

    1. Willem van Winden & Iris Hagemans & Patricia van Hemert, 2019. "The Street-Wise University: The Amsterdam Knowledge Mile as an Intermediary and Place-Making Concept," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-16, July.
    2. van Winden, Willem & Carvalho, Luís, 2019. "Intermediation in public procurement of innovation: How Amsterdam’s startup-in-residence programme connects startups to urban challenges," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(9), pages 1-1.
    3. Carlos Contreras & Julio Angulo, 2022. "Innovation and Tariff-adjustment Options in Public-private Partnerships," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 243(4), pages 51-81, December.
    4. Dai, Xiaoyong & Li, Yanchao & Chen, Kaihua, 2021. "Direct demand-pull and indirect certification effects of public procurement for innovation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    5. Serenella Caravella & Francesco Crespi, 2021. "The role of public procurement as innovation lever: evidence from Italian manufacturing firms," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(7), pages 663-684, October.
    6. Elisabetta Iossa, Federico Biagi and Paola Valbonesi, 2016. "Pre-commercial Procurement, Procurement of Innovative Solutions and Innovation Partnerships in the EU: Rationale and Strategy," IEFE Working Papers 89, IEFE, Center for Research on Energy and Environmental Economics and Policy, Universita' Bocconi, Milano, Italy.

  2. Veiko Lember & Rainer Kattel & Tarmo Kalvet, 2014. "How Governments Support Innovation Through Public Procurement: Comparing Evidence from 11 Countries," Springer Books, in: Veiko Lember & Rainer Kattel & Tarmo Kalvet (ed.), Public Procurement, Innovation and Policy, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 287-309, Springer.
    See citations under working paper version above.

Books

  1. Erik S. Reinert & Jayati Ghosh & Rainer Kattel (ed.), 2016. "Handbook of Alternative Theories of Economic Development," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 15311.

    Cited by:

    1. Tan, Hao & Thurbon, Elizabeth & Kim, Sung-Young & Mathews, John A., 2021. "Overcoming incumbent resistance to the clean energy shift: How local governments act as change agents in coal power station closures in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    2. Ivo Križić, 2021. "Regulating public procurement in Brazil, India, and China: Toward the regulatory‐developmental state," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), pages 561-580, July.
    3. Rodrigo Arocena, 2019. "A Prospective Approach to Learning- and Innovation-based Development," Millennial Asia, , vol. 10(2), pages 127-147, August.
    4. Keston K. Perry, 2018. "The Dynamics of Industrial Development in a Resource-Rich Developing Society: A Political Economy Analysis," Journal of Developing Societies, , vol. 34(3), pages 264-296, September.
    5. Bach, Maria, 2020. "Journal of the History of Economic Thought Preprints – A Win-Win Model of Development: How Indian Economics Redefined Universal Development from and at the Margins," OSF Preprints gk8pw, Center for Open Science.
    6. Antonio Andreoni & Ha-Joon Chang & Isabel Estevez, 2021. "The Missing Dimensions of the Human Capabilities Approach: Collective and Productive," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 33(2), pages 179-205, April.
    7. Lengyel, Imre & Nagy, Benedek & Udvari, Beáta, 2019. "Újraiparosodás Kelet-Közép-Európában - újraéledő centrum-periféria munkamegosztás? [Reindustrialization in Central and Eastern Europe: reviving the core and periphery division of labour?]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 163-184.
    8. Justyna Bandola-Gill, 2022. "Statistical entrepreneurs: the political work of infrastructuring the SDG indicators [The legitimacy of experts in policy: navigating technocratic and political accountability in the case of global," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 41(4), pages 498-512.
    9. Palma, J. G., 2019. "Why is inequality so unequal across the world? Part 1. The diversity of inequality in disposable income: multiplicity of fundamentals, or complex interactions between political settlements and market ," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1999, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    10. Constantine, Collin & Khemraj, Tarron, 2019. "Geography, economic structures and institutions: A synthesis," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 371-379.
    11. Ebrima K. Ceesay & Phillips C. Francis & Sama Jawneh & Matarr Njie & Christopher Belford & Momodou Mustapha Fanneh, 2021. "Climate change, growth in agriculture value-added, food availability and economic growth nexus in the Gambia: a Granger causality and ARDL modeling approach," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(7), pages 1-31, July.
    12. Du, Xiuying & Xie, Zixiong, 2020. "Occurrence of turning point on environmental Kuznets curve in the process of (de)industrialization," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 359-369.

  2. Veiko Lember & Rainer Kattel & Tarmo Kalvet (ed.), 2014. "Public Procurement, Innovation and Policy," Springer Books, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-642-40258-6, December.

    Cited by:

    1. Andrea Migone & Alexander Howlett & Michael Howlett, 2023. "The politics of military megaprojects: discursive struggles in Canadian and Australian naval shipbuilding strategies," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 42(2), pages 226-244.
    2. Sergey Tsygankov & Vadim Syropyatov & Vyacheslav Volchik, 2021. "Institutional Governance of Innovations: Novel Insights of Leadership in Russian Public Procurement," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Lina Vyas & Mark Hayllar & Yan Wu, 2018. "Bridging the Gap - Contractor and Bureaucrat Conceptions of Contract Management in Outsourcing," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 413-439, December.
    4. Veiko LEMBER & Ole Helby PETERSEN & Walter SCHERRER & Robert ÅGREN, 2019. "Understanding The Relationship Between Infrastructure Public‒Private Partnerships And Innovation," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 90(2), pages 371-391, June.
    5. Willem van Winden & Iris Hagemans & Patricia van Hemert, 2019. "The Street-Wise University: The Amsterdam Knowledge Mile as an Intermediary and Place-Making Concept," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-16, July.
    6. Nadia Benomar & Joanne Castonguay & Marie-Hélène Jobin & François Lespérance, 2017. "Politiques favorables à l’innovation en santé," CIRANO Project Reports 2017rp-02, CIRANO.
    7. Xiaoli Wang & Yun Liu & Yanbing Ju, 2018. "Sustainable Public Procurement Policies on Promoting Scientific and Technological Innovation in China: Comparisons with the U.S., the UK, Japan, Germany, France, and South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-27, June.
    8. Marek Tiits & Tarmo Kalvet & Imre Mürk, 2015. "Smart Specialisation in Cohesion Economies," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 6(2), pages 296-319, June.
    9. Uyarra, Elvira & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, Jon Mikel & Flanagan, Kieron & Magro, Edurne, 2020. "Public procurement, innovation and industrial policy: Rationales, roles, capabilities and implementation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    10. Yanchao Li & Luke Georghiou, 2016. "Signaling and accrediting new technology: Use of procurement for innovation in China," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 43(3), pages 338-351.
    11. van Winden, Willem & Carvalho, Luís, 2019. "Intermediation in public procurement of innovation: How Amsterdam’s startup-in-residence programme connects startups to urban challenges," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(9), pages 1-1.
    12. Antonio Andreoni & Kenneth Creamer & Mariana Mazzucato & Grové Steyn, 2022. "How can South Africa advance a new energy paradigm? A mission-oriented approach to megaprojects [‘The Political Economy of Industrial Policy’]," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 38(2), pages 237-259.
    13. Dai, Xiaoyong & Li, Yanchao & Chen, Kaihua, 2021. "Direct demand-pull and indirect certification effects of public procurement for innovation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    14. Edquist, Charles & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, Jon Mikel, 2020. "Functional procurement for innovation, welfare and the environment," Papers in Innovation Studies 2020/1, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research, revised 19 Jul 2020.
    15. Wouter Boon & Jakob Edler, 2018. "Demand, challenges, and innovation. Making sense of new trends in innovation policy," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 45(4), pages 435-447.
    16. Kapil Patil & Saradindu Bhaduri, 2020. "‘Zero-error’ versus ‘good-enough’: towards a ‘frugality’ narrative for defence procurement policy," Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 19(1), pages 43-59, June.
    17. Xiaoke Zhang, 2020. "The institutional structuring of innovation policy coordination: theory and evidence from East Asia," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 53(1), pages 101-138, March.
    18. Babica Viktorija & Sceulovs Deniss, 2019. "Public Procurement of Innovation: Selection of the Sustainable Alternative," Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 33(1), pages 233-246, January.
    19. Andrea Bentancor & Gustavo Crespi & Virginia Robano, 2019. "Public procurement as a driver of innovation and entrepreneurship," Documentos de Investigación 120, Universidad ORT Uruguay. Facultad de Administración y Ciencias Sociales.
    20. Karo , Erkki & Kattel , Rainer, 2015. "Innovation Bureaucracy: Does the organization of government matter when promoting innovation?," Papers in Innovation Studies 2015/38, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    21. Serenella Caravella & Francesco Crespi, 2021. "The role of public procurement as innovation lever: evidence from Italian manufacturing firms," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(7), pages 663-684, October.
    22. Paula Cayolla Trindade & Paula Antunes & Paulo Partidário, 2017. "SPP Toolbox: Supporting Sustainable Public Procurement in the Context of Socio-Technical Transitions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-26, December.
    23. Elisabetta Iossa, Federico Biagi and Paola Valbonesi, 2016. "Pre-commercial Procurement, Procurement of Innovative Solutions and Innovation Partnerships in the EU: Rationale and Strategy," IEFE Working Papers 89, IEFE, Center for Research on Energy and Environmental Economics and Policy, Universita' Bocconi, Milano, Italy.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.