IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infsem/v20y2022i1d10.1007_s10257-021-00539-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing and building municipal open data capability

Author

Listed:
  • Abdulrahman Habib

    (National Center for Artificial Intelligence (NCAI), Saudi Data and Artificial Intelligence Authority (SDAIA))

  • Victor R. Prybutok

    (University of North Texas)

  • Denise Philpot

    (University of North Texas)

Abstract

In the past decade, cities around the world have published their open data as a new service. Some have used this service innovatively, as a vehicle to improve service quality, efficiency, accountability, and transparency. While some studies highlight open data success stories, others show a lack of supporting evidence. In either case, cities currently face such challenges as: How can cities and organizations measure their open data capability? How does assessment allow enhancement of open data capability? The purpose of our study is to demonstrate applied open government data evaluation using the theoretical lens of dynamic capability. An assessment based on a framework called Open Data Roadmap (ODR) is performed on Denton, TX, a mid-sized U.S. city. Data is then integrated through a mixed-method analysis involving two publicly available OD models (CODC and Thorsby, respectively) and a crowdsourced resident evaluation, and the results are presented of the effects of this assessment in relation to dynamic capabilities involving a third model (Chong et al. 2018). We conclude that ODR has the potential to assist governments and other organizations in boosting community engagement, introducing innovative services, and presenting OD as one component of their organization’s competitiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdulrahman Habib & Victor R. Prybutok & Denise Philpot, 2022. "Assessing and building municipal open data capability," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-25, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:infsem:v:20:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10257-021-00539-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s10257-021-00539-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10257-021-00539-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10257-021-00539-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fariborz Damanpour & Shanthi Gopalakrishnan, 2001. "The Dynamics of the Adoption of Product and Process Innovations in Organizations," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 45-65, January.
    2. Piret Tõnurist & Rainer Kattel & Veiko Lember, 2017. "Innovation labs in the public sector: what they are and what they do?," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(10), pages 1455-1479, November.
    3. Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Marijn Janssen & Emma L. Slade & Nripendra P. Rana & Vishanth Weerakkody & Jeremy Millard & Jan Hidders & Dhoya Snijders, 2017. "Driving innovation through big open linked data (BOLD): Exploring antecedents using interpretive structural modelling," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 197-212, April.
    4. Jakob Edler & Jan Fagerberg, 2017. "Innovation policy: what, why, and how," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 33(1), pages 2-23.
    5. Albert Meijer & Josta de Hoog & Mark Twist & Martijn Steen & Jorren Scherpenisse, 2014. "Understanding the Dynamics of Open Data: From Sweeping Statements to Complex Contextual Interactions," Public Administration and Information Technology, in: Mila Gascó-Hernández (ed.), Open Government, edition 127, pages 101-114, Springer.
    6. Gabriela Viale Pereira & Marie Anne Macadar & Edimara M. Luciano & Maurício Gregianin Testa, 2017. "Delivering public value through open government data initiatives in a Smart City context," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 213-229, April.
    7. Mahmud Akhter Shareef & Vinod Kumar & Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Uma Kumar, 2016. "Service delivery through mobile-government (mGov): Driving factors and cultural impacts," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 315-332, April.
    8. Vishanth Weerakkody & Zahir Irani & Kawal Kapoor & Uthayasankar Sivarajah & Yogesh K. Dwivedi, 2017. "Open data and its usability: an empirical view from the Citizen’s perspective," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 285-300, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nripendra P. Rana & Sunil Luthra & Sachin Kumar Mangla & Rubina Islam & Sian Roderick & Yogesh K. Dwivedi, 2019. "Barriers to the Development of Smart Cities in Indian Context," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 503-525, June.
    2. Federico Cabitza & Angela Locoro & Carlo Batini, 2020. "Making Open Data more Personal Through a Social Value Perspective: a Methodological Approach," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 131-148, February.
    3. Marijn Janssen & David Konopnicki & Jane L. Snowdon & Adegboyega Ojo, 2017. "Driving public sector innovation using big and open linked data (BOLD)," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 189-195, April.
    4. Marijn Janssen & David Konopnicki & Jane L. Snowdon & Adegboyega Ojo, 0. "Driving public sector innovation using big and open linked data (BOLD)," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-7.
    5. Anders Haug & Aleksandra Magdalena Staskiewicz & Lars Hvam, 2023. "Strategies for Master Data Management: A Case Study of an International Hearing Healthcare Company," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 1903-1923, October.
    6. Maciej Grzenda & Jaroslaw Legierski, 2021. "Towards Increased Understanding of Open Data Use for Software Development," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 495-513, April.
    7. Abdullah Mohammed Baabdullah, 2020. "Factors Influencing Adoption of Mobile Social Network Games (M-SNGs): The Role of Awareness," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 411-427, April.
    8. Alfonso Unceta & Xabier Barandiaran & Asier Lakidain, 2021. "Digitalisation of Creative Industries Fostered by Collaborative Governance: Public Innovation Labs in Gipuzkoa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, February.
    9. Olivia Benfeldt & John Stouby Persson & Sabine Madsen, 2020. "Data Governance as a Collective Action Problem," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 299-313, April.
    10. Olivia Benfeldt & John Stouby Persson & Sabine Madsen, 0. "Data Governance as a Collective Action Problem," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-15.
    11. Hu, Hui & Qi, Shaozhou & Chen, Yuanzhi, 2023. "Using green technology for a better tomorrow: How enterprises and government utilize the carbon trading system and incentive policies," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    12. Kibaek Lee & Jaeheung Yoo & Munkee Choi & Hangjung Zo & Andrew P Ciganek, 2016. "Does External Knowledge Sourcing Enhance Market Performance? Evidence from the Korean Manufacturing Industry," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, December.
    13. Dwibedy, Punyashlok, 2022. "Informal competition and product innovation decisions of new ventures and incumbents across developing and transitioning countries," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 17(C).
    14. Liotard, Isabelle & Revest, Valérie, 2018. "Contests as innovation policy instruments: Lessons from the US federal agencies' experience," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 57-69.
    15. Davcik, Nebojsa S. & Cardinali, Silvio & Sharma, Piyush & Cedrola, Elena, 2021. "Exploring the role of international R&D activities in the impact of technological and marketing capabilities on SMEs’ performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 650-660.
    16. Serhat Burmaoglu & Ozcan Saritas, 2019. "An evolutionary analysis of the innovation policy domain: Is there a paradigm shift?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(3), pages 823-847, March.
    17. Alejandro García-Pozo & Juan Antonio Campos-Soria & J. Aníbal Núñez-Carrasco, 2021. "Technological innovation and productivity across Spanish regions," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 67(1), pages 167-187, August.
    18. Chang, Yuan-Chieh & Chen, Min-Nan, 2016. "Service regime and innovation clusters: An empirical study from service firms in Taiwan," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(9), pages 1845-1857.
    19. Elenkov, Detelin S. & Manev, Ivan M., 2009. "Senior expatriate leadership's effects on innovation and the role of cultural intelligence," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 357-369, October.
    20. de Camargo Fiorini, Paula & Roman Pais Seles, Bruno Michel & Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel Jose & Barberio Mariano, Enzo & de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz Lopes, 2018. "Management theory and big data literature: From a review to a research agenda," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 112-129.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infsem:v:20:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10257-021-00539-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.