IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/c/pho698.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Nicolas Houy

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Nicolas Houy & Izabela Jelovac, 2019. "Comparing approval procedures for new drugs," Post-Print halshs-01937219, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Laura Birg, 2023. "Pharmaceutical regulation under market integration through parallel trade," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(4), pages 1322-1346, November.

  2. Nicolas Houy & François Le Grand, 2019. "Optimizing immune cell therapies with artificial intelligence," Post-Print halshs-01949619, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Nicolas Houy & François Le Grand, 2019. "Optimizing treatment combination for lymphoma using an optimization heuristic," Post-Print halshs-02386445, HAL.
    2. Nicolas Houy & Julien Flaig, 2021. "Hospital-wide surveillance-based antimicrobial treatments: A Monte-Carlo look-ahead method," Post-Print halshs-03506952, HAL.

  3. Nicolas Houy & François Le Grand, 2018. "Optimal dynamic regimens with artificial intelligence: The case of temozolomide," Post-Print halshs-01949651, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Nicolas Houy & François Le Grand, 2019. "Optimizing treatment combination for lymphoma using an optimization heuristic," Post-Print halshs-02386445, HAL.
    2. Hope Murphy & Gabriel McCarthy & Hana M Dobrovolny, 2020. "Understanding the effect of measurement time on drug characterization," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-15, May.
    3. Nicolas Houy & François Le Grand, 2019. "Personalized oncology with artificial intelligence: The case of temozolomide," Post-Print halshs-02386458, HAL.
    4. Nicolas Houy & Julien Flaig, 2021. "Hospital-wide surveillance-based antimicrobial treatments: A Monte-Carlo look-ahead method," Post-Print halshs-03506952, HAL.

  4. Nicolas Houy & Jean-Philippe Nicolaï & Marie Claire Villeval, 2017. "Always doing your best? Effort and performance in dynamic settings," Working Papers halshs-01686501, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Klockmann, Victor & von Schenk, Alicia & Villeval, Marie Claire, 2022. "Artificial intelligence, ethics, and intergenerational responsibility," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 284-317.
    2. Klockmann, Victor & von Schenk, Alicia & Villeval, Marie-Claire, 2022. "Artificial intelligence, ethics, and diffused pivotality," SAFE Working Paper Series 336, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.

  5. Houy, Nicolas & Nicolaï, Jean-Philippe & Villeval, Marie Claire, 2016. "Doing Your Best When Stakes Are High? Theory and Experimental Evidence," IZA Discussion Papers 9766, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    Cited by:

    1. Charness, Gary & Gneezy, Uri & Henderson, Austin, 2018. "Experimental methods: Measuring effort in economics experiments," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 74-87.

  6. Izabela Jelovac & Nicolas Houy, 2015. "Drug approval decision times, international reference pricing and strategic launches of new drugs," Post-Print halshs-01261578, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Anna-Maria Fontrier & Jennifer Gill & Panos Kanavos, 2019. "International impact of external reference pricing: should national policy-makers care?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 20(8), pages 1147-1164, November.
    2. Fontrier, Anna-Maria & Gill, Jennifer & Kanavos, Panos, 2019. "International impact of external reference pricing: should national policy makers care?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 100929, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Jennifer Gill & Anna-Maria Fontrier & Dionysis Kyriopoulos & Panos Kanavos, 2019. "Variations in external reference pricing implementation: does it matter for public policy?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 20(9), pages 1375-1397, December.

  7. Nicolas Houy & William S. Zwicker, 2014. "The geometry of voting power: weighted voting and hyper-ellipsoids," Post-Print halshs-00926969, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Artyom Jelnov & Yair Tauman, 2014. "Voting power and proportional representation of voters," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 43(4), pages 747-766, November.
    2. Sam Jones, 2022. "Extending multidimensional poverty identification: from additive weights to minimal bundles," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 20(2), pages 421-438, June.
    3. Sascha Kurz & Nicola Maaser & Stefan Napel & Matthias Weber, 2014. "Mostly Sunny: A Forecast of Tomorrow's Power Index Research," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 14-058/I, Tinbergen Institute.
    4. Serguei Kaniovski & Sascha Kurz, 2018. "Representation-compatible power indices," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 264(1), pages 235-265, May.
    5. Bertrand Mbama Engoulou & Lawrence Diffo Lambo, 2019. "Amplitude of weighted representation of voting games with several levels of approval," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 48(4), pages 1111-1137, December.
    6. Josep Freixas & Marc Freixas & Sascha Kurz, 2017. "On the characterization of weighted simple games," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 83(4), pages 469-498, December.
    7. Kurz, Sascha & Mayer, Alexander & Napel, Stefan, 2020. "Weighted committee games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(3), pages 972-979.

  8. Nicolas Houy, 2014. "The economics of Bitcoin transaction fees," Working Papers halshs-00951358, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Yulin Liu & Yuxuan Lu & Kartik Nayak & Fan Zhang & Luyao Zhang & Yinhong Zhao, 2022. "Empirical Analysis of EIP-1559: Transaction Fees, Waiting Time, and Consensus Security," Papers 2201.05574, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2023.
    2. Parthajit Kayal & Purnima Rohilla, 2021. "Bitcoin in the economics and finance literature: a survey," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(7), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Pavel Ciaian & Miroslava Rajcaniova & d’Artis Kancs, 2016. "The digital agenda of virtual currencies: Can BitCoin become a global currency?," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 883-919, November.
    4. Silvia Bartolucci & Andrei Kirilenko, 2019. "A Model of the Optimal Selection of Crypto Assets," Papers 1906.09632, arXiv.org.
    5. Tim Roughgarden, 2020. "Transaction Fee Mechanism Design for the Ethereum Blockchain: An Economic Analysis of EIP-1559," Papers 2012.00854, arXiv.org.
    6. Natkamon Tovanich & Nicolas Soulié & Nicolas Heulot & Petra Isenberg, 2022. "MiningVis: visual analytics of the Bitcoin mining economy," Post-Print hal-03348145, HAL.
    7. Bonaparte, Yosef, 2022. "Time horizon and cryptocurrency ownership: Is crypto not speculative?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    8. Korniotis, George & Bhambhwani, Siddharth & Delikouras, Stefanos, 2019. "Blockchain Characteristics and the Cross-Section of Cryptocurrency Returns," CEPR Discussion Papers 13724, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    9. Andreas Hanl, 2018. "Some Insights into the Development of Cryptocurrencies," MAGKS Papers on Economics 201804, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    10. Juanjuan Li & Yong Yuan & Fei-Yue Wang, 2022. "Analyzing Bitcoin transaction fees using a queueing game model," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 135-155, March.
    11. Lambrecht, Maxime & Larue, Louis, 2018. "After the (virtual) gold rush: is Bitcoin more than a speculative bubble?," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 7(4), pages 1-22.
    12. Bonaparte, Yosef & Bernile, Gennaro, 2023. "A new “Wall Street Darling?” effects of regulation sentiment in cryptocurrency markets," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    13. Yan, Guanghui & Wang, Shan & Li, Shikui & Lu, Binwei, 2022. "Multi-player dynamic game model for Bitcoin transaction bidding prediction," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    14. Luca Marchiori, 2018. "Monetary theory reversed: Virtual currency issuance and miners’ remuneration," BCL working papers 115, Central Bank of Luxembourg.
    15. Silvia Bartolucci & Fabio Caccioli & Pierpaolo Vivo, 2019. "A percolation model for the emergence of the Bitcoin Lightning Network," Papers 1912.03556, arXiv.org.
    16. Rainer Böhme & Nicolas Christin & Benjamin Edelman & Tyler Moore, 2015. "Bitcoin: Economics, Technology, and Governance," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 29(2), pages 213-238, Spring.
    17. Dulani Jayasuriya Daluwathumullagamage & Alexandra Sims, 2020. "Blockchain-Enabled Corporate Governance and Regulation," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-41, June.

  9. Nicolas Houy, 2014. "It will cost you nothing to "kill" a Proof-of-Stake crypto-currency," Working Papers halshs-00945053, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Corbet, Shaen & Lucey, Brian & Urquhart, Andrew & Yarovaya, Larisa, 2019. "Cryptocurrencies as a financial asset: A systematic analysis," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 182-199.
    2. Nicolas Houy, 2014. "The economics of Bitcoin transaction fees," Working Papers halshs-00951358, HAL.
    3. Baocheng Wang & Zetao Li & Haibin Li, 2020. "Hybrid Consensus Algorithm Based on Modified Proof-of-Probability and DPoS," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, July.
    4. Zura Kakushadze & Jim Kyung-Soo Liew, 2018. "CryptoRuble: From Russia with Love," Papers 1801.05760, arXiv.org.
    5. Nicola Dimitri, 2022. "The Economics of Consensus in Algorand," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 1(2), pages 1-16, May.
    6. Hermann Elendner & Simon Trimborn & Bobby Ong & Teik Ming Lee, 2016. "The Cross-Section of Crypto-Currencies as Financial Assets: An Overview," SFB 649 Discussion Papers SFB649DP2016-038, Sonderforschungsbereich 649, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.
    7. Jyotir Moy Chatterjee & Le Hoang Son & Srijani Ghatak & Raghvendra Kumar & Manju Khari, 2018. "BitCoin exclusively informational money: a valuable review from 2010 to 2017," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(5), pages 2037-2054, September.
    8. Jian Wang & Qianggang Wang & Niancheng Zhou & Yuan Chi, 2017. "A Novel Electricity Transaction Mode of Microgrids Based on Blockchain and Continuous Double Auction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, November.
    9. Russ, Meir, 2016. "The probable foundations of sustainabilism: Information, energy and entropy based definition of capital, Homo Sustainabiliticus and the need for a “new gold”," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 328-338.
    10. Tarun Chitra, 2019. "Competitive equilibria between staking and on-chain lending," Papers 2001.00919, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2020.

  10. Nicolas Houy, 2014. "The Bitcoin mining games," Working Papers 1412, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.

    Cited by:

    1. Romi Kher & Siri Terjesen & Chen Liu, 2021. "Blockchain, Bitcoin, and ICOs: a review and research agenda," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1699-1720, April.
    2. Easley, David & O'Hara, Maureen & Basu, Soumya, 2019. "From mining to markets: The evolution of bitcoin transaction fees," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 91-109.
    3. Julien Prat & Walter Benjamin, 2017. "An Equilibrium Model of the Market for Bitcoin Mining," Working Papers 2017-15, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
    4. Zura Kakushadze & Jim Kyung-Soo Liew, 2018. "CryptoRuble: From Russia with Love," Papers 1801.05760, arXiv.org.
    5. Sergio Luis Náñez Alonso & Javier Jorge-Vázquez & Miguel Ángel Echarte Fernández & Ricardo Francisco Reier Forradellas, 2021. "Cryptocurrency Mining from an Economic and Environmental Perspective. Analysis of the Most and Least Sustainable Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-22, July.
    6. Kim, Daehan & Ryu, Doojin & Webb, Robert I., 2023. "Determination of equilibrium transaction fees in the Bitcoin network: A rank-order contest," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    7. Rainer Böhme & Nicolas Christin & Benjamin Edelman & Tyler Moore, 2015. "Bitcoin: Economics, Technology, and Governance," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 29(2), pages 213-238, Spring.

  11. Nicolas Houy & Izabela Jelovac, 2013. "Drug launch timing and international reference pricing," Post-Print halshs-00955848, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Anna-Maria Fontrier & Jennifer Gill & Panos Kanavos, 2019. "International impact of external reference pricing: should national policy-makers care?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 20(8), pages 1147-1164, November.
    2. Nicolas Houy & Izabela Jelovac, 2014. "Drug approval decision times, international reference pricing and strategic launches of new drugs," Working Papers halshs-01072741, HAL.
    3. Toon van der Gronde & Carin A Uyl-de Groot & Toine Pieters, 2017. "Addressing the challenge of high-priced prescription drugs in the era of precision medicine: A systematic review of drug life cycles, therapeutic drug markets and regulatory frameworks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-34, August.
    4. Fontrier, Anna-Maria & Gill, Jennifer & Kanavos, Panos, 2019. "International impact of external reference pricing: should national policy makers care?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 100929, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Foad Iravani & Hamed Mamani & Emisa Nategh, 2020. "External Reference Pricing and Parallel Imports of Pharmaceuticals: A Policy Comparison," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(12), pages 2716-2735, December.
    6. Nicolas Houy & Izabela Jelovac, 2019. "Comparing approval procedures for new drugs," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(5), pages 1598-1619, May.
    7. Jennifer Gill & Anna-Maria Fontrier & Dionysis Kyriopoulos & Panos Kanavos, 2019. "Variations in external reference pricing implementation: does it matter for public policy?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 20(9), pages 1375-1397, December.

  12. Nicolas Houy, 2013. "Are better vaccines really better? The case of a simple stochastic epidemic SIR model," Post-Print halshs-00927441, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Sabine Liebenehm & Bernard Bett & Cristobal Verdugo & Mohamed Said, 2016. "Optimal Drug Control under Risk of Drug Resistance – The Case of African Animal Trypanosomosis," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(2), pages 510-533, June.

  13. Francis Bloch & Nicolas Houy, 2009. "Optimal Assignment of Durable Objects to Successive Agents," Working Papers hal-00435385, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Atal, Vidya & Bar, Talia & Gordon, Sidartha, 2016. "Project selection: Commitment and competition," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 30-48.
    2. Francis Bloch & David Cantala, 2014. "Dynamic Allocation of Objects to Queuing Agents: The Discrete Model," Post-Print halshs-01109667, HAL.
    3. Julien Combe & Vladyslav Nora & Olivier Tercieux, 2021. "Dynamic assignment without money: Optimality of spot mechanisms," Working Papers 2021-11, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
    4. Panayotis Mertikopoulos & Heinrich H. Nax & Bary S. R. Pradelski, 2019. "Quick or cheap? Breaking points in dynamic markets," ECON - Working Papers 338, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
    5. Vidya Atal & Talia Bar & Sidartha Gordon, 2013. "Search, Project Adoption and the Fear of Commitment," Sciences Po Economics Discussion Papers 2013-12, Sciences Po Departement of Economics.
    6. Dimakopoulos, Philipp D. & Heller, C.-Philipp, 2015. "Matching with Waiting Times: The German Entry-Level Labour Market for Lawyers," VfS Annual Conference 2015 (Muenster): Economic Development - Theory and Policy 113153, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    7. Philipp D. Dimakopoulos & Christian-Philipp Heller, "undated". "Matching with Waiting Times: The German Entry-Level Labour Market for Lawyers," BDPEMS Working Papers 2014005, Berlin School of Economics.
    8. Hinnosaar, Toomas, 2017. "Calendar mechanisms," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 252-270.
    9. Takashi Kamihigashi, 2014. "An order-theoretic approach to dynamic programming: an exposition," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 2(1), pages 13-21, April.
    10. Panayotis Mertikopoulos & Heinrich H. Nax & Bary S. R. Pradelski, 2019. "Quick or Cheap? Breaking Points in Dynamic Markets," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2217, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    11. Takashi Kamihigashi, 2014. "Elementary results on solutions to the bellman equation of dynamic programming: existence, uniqueness, and convergence," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 56(2), pages 251-273, June.
    12. Jhan-Jia Lin & Yu-Tse Lee & Ja-Ling Wu, 2021. "The Effect of Thickness-Based Dynamic Matching Mechanism on a Hyperledger Fabric-Based TimeBank System," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-21, March.
    13. Dimakopoulos, Philipp D. & Heller, C.-Philipp, 2018. "Matching with Waiting Times: The German Entry-Level Labor Market for Lawyers," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 68, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    14. Francis Bloch & David Cantala, 2017. "Dynamic Assignment of Objects to Queuing Agents," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 9(1), pages 88-122, February.
    15. Dimakopoulos, Philipp D. & Heller, C.-Philipp, 2019. "Matching with waiting times: The German entry-level labor market for lawyers," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 289-313.
    16. Francis Bloch & Nicolas Houy, 2012. "Optimal assignment of durable objects to successive agents," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 51(1), pages 13-33, September.
    17. Irene Lo & Vahideh Manshadi & Scott Rodilitz & Ali Shameli, 2020. "Commitment on Volunteer Crowdsourcing Platforms: Implications for Growth and Engagement," Papers 2005.10731, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2021.

  14. Nicolas Houy, 2008. "Progressive knowledge revealed preferences and sequential rationalizability," Working Papers hal-00360546, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. HORAN, Sean, 2016. "A simple model of two-stage choice," Cahiers de recherche 2016-01, Universite de Montreal, Departement de sciences economiques.
    2. Özgür Kıbrıs & Yusufcan Masatlioglu & Elchin Suleymanov, 2023. "A theory of reference point formation," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 75(1), pages 137-166, January.
    3. Horan, Sean & Sprumont, Yves, 2022. "Two-stage majoritarian choice," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 17(2), May.
    4. Rohan Dutta & Sean Horan, 2013. "Inferring Rationales from Choice : Identification for Rational Shortlist Methods," Cahiers de recherche 09-2013, Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en économie quantitative, CIREQ.

  15. Houy, Nicolas & Tadenuma, Koichi & 蓼沼, 宏一, 2007. "Lexicographic Compositions of Two Criteria for Decision Making," Discussion Papers 2007-08, Graduate School of Economics, Hitotsubashi University.

    Cited by:

    1. Houy, Nicolas, 2011. "A refinement of prudent choices," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 61(3), pages 166-169, May.
    2. Nicolas Houy, 2008. "Prudent choices and rationality," Working Papers hal-00360518, HAL.
    3. Nicolas Houy, 2010. "A characterization of prudent choices," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 34(2), pages 181-192, February.
    4. Nicolas Houy, 2008. "Progressive knowledge revealed preferences and sequential rationalizability," Working Papers hal-00360546, HAL.

  16. Houy, Nicolas & Tadenuma, Koichi & 蓼沼, 宏一, 2007. "Lexicographic Compositions of Multiple Criteria for Decision Making," Discussion Papers 2007-13, Graduate School of Economics, Hitotsubashi University.

    Cited by:

    1. Mandler, Michael, 2015. "Rational agents are the quickest," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 206-233.
    2. Yu‐Lin Hsu & Gavin C. Reid, 2021. "Two‐stage decision‐making within the firm: Analysis and case studies," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(6), pages 1355-1373, September.
    3. Christopher Kops, 2018. "(F)Lexicographic shortlist method," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 65(1), pages 79-97, January.
    4. Michael Mandler & Paola Manzini & Marco Mariotti, 2008. "A Million Answers to Twenty Questions: Choosing by Checklist," Working Papers 622, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
    5. Salvador Barberà & Alejandro Neme, 2015. "Ordinal Relative Satisficing Behavior: Theory and Experiments," Working Papers 790, Barcelona School of Economics.
    6. Battal Doğan & Kemal Yildiz, 2023. "Choice with Affirmative Action," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(4), pages 2284-2296, April.
    7. Lleras, Juan Sebastián & Masatlioglu, Yusufcan & Nakajima, Daisuke & Ozbay, Erkut Y., 2017. "When more is less: Limited consideration," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 70-85.
    8. Yu-Lin Hsu & Gavin C. Reid, 2021. "A Two-Stage Model of Decision-Making over Financial Reporting Regimes and Techniques: Analysis and UK Case Studies," Working Papers wp529, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    9. Matsuki, Jun & Tadenuma, Koichi & 蓼沼, 宏一, 2013. "Choice via Grouping Procedures," Discussion Papers 2013-08, Graduate School of Economics, Hitotsubashi University.
    10. Battal Dogan & Serhat Dogan & Kemal Yildiz, 2019. "Lexicographic Choice Under Variable Capacity Constraints," Papers 1910.13237, arXiv.org.
    11. Debasis Mishra & Kolagani Paramahamsa, 2018. "Selling to a naive agent with two rationales," Discussion Papers 18-03, Indian Statistical Institute, Delhi.
    12. C. Binder, 2014. "Plural identities and preference formation," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 42(4), pages 959-976, April.
    13. Bleile, Jörg, 2016. "Limited Attention in Case-Based Belief Formation," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 518, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    14. Knoblauch, Vicki, 2023. "Lexicographic preference representation: Intrinsic length of linear orders on infinite sets," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    15. Renou, Ludovic & Schlag, Karl H., 2014. "Ordients: Optimization and comparative statics without utility functions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 612-632.
    16. Yusufcan Masatlioglu & Daisuke Nakajima & Erkut Ozbay, 2009. "Revealed Attention," NajEcon Working Paper Reviews 814577000000000409, www.najecon.org.
    17. Ludovic Renou & Karl H. Schlag, 2009. "From Ordients to Optimization: Substitution Effects without Differentiability," Discussion Papers in Economics 09/6, Division of Economics, School of Business, University of Leicester.
    18. Cherepanov, Vadim & Feddersen, Timothy & ,, 2013. "Rationalization," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 8(3), September.
    19. Rohan Dutta & Sean Horan, 2013. "Inferring Rationales from Choice : Identification for Rational Shortlist Methods," Cahiers de recherche 09-2013, Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en économie quantitative, CIREQ.
    20. Sakamoto, Norihito, 2020. "Equity Principles and Interpersonal Comparison of Well-being: Old and New Joint Characterizations of Generalized Leximin, Rank-dependent Utilitarian, and Leximin Rules," RCNE Discussion Paper Series 7, Research Center for Normative Economics, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    21. García-Sanz, María D. & Alcantud, José Carlos R., 2015. "Sequential rationalization of multivalued choice," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 29-33.
    22. Nikolai Hoberg & Stefan Baumgärtner, 2014. "Value pluralism, trade-offs and efficiencies," Working Paper Series in Economics 311, University of Lüneburg, Institute of Economics.
    23. Michael Mandler, 2021. "The lexicographic method in preference theory," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 71(2), pages 553-577, March.

  17. Nicolas Houy & Lucie Ménager, 2005. "Communication, consensus and order. Who wants to speak first?," Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiques v05030, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), revised Jan 2006.

    Cited by:

    1. Tsakas, E. & voorneveld, M., 2010. "On consensus through communication without a commonly known protocol," Research Memorandum 016, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    2. Huihui Ding & Marcus Pivato, 2021. "Deliberation and epistemic democracy," Post-Print hal-03637874, HAL.

  18. Nicolas Houy, 2004. "A note on the impossibility of a set of constitutions stable at different levels," Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiques v04039, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1).

    Cited by:

    1. Diss, Mostapha & Louichi, Ahmed & Merlin, Vincent & Smaoui, Hatem, 2012. "An example of probability computations under the IAC assumption: The stability of scoring rules," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 57-66.
    2. Mostapha Diss, 2013. "Strategic manipulability of self-selective social choice rules," Working Papers 1302, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.
    3. Mostapha Diss & Vincent Merlin, 2010. "On the stability of a triplet of scoring rules," Post-Print halshs-00443854, HAL.
    4. SLINKO, Arkadii & KORAY, Semih, 2006. "Self-Selective Social Choice Functions," Cahiers de recherche 2006-21, Universite de Montreal, Departement de sciences economiques.

Articles

  1. Nicolas Houy & Izabela Jelovac, 2015. "Drug Launch Timing and International Reference Pricing," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(8), pages 978-989, August.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  2. Houy, Nicolas & Zwicker, William S., 2014. "The geometry of voting power: Weighted voting and hyper-ellipsoids," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 7-16.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  3. Nicolas Houy, 2014. "It will cost you nothing to "kill" a proof-of-stake crypto-currency," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 34(2), pages 1038-1044.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  4. Nicolas Houy, 2013. "Are better vaccines really better? The case of a simple stochastic epidemic SIR model," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 33(1), pages 207-216.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  5. Francis Bloch & Nicolas Houy, 2012. "Optimal assignment of durable objects to successive agents," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 51(1), pages 13-33, September.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  6. Nicolas Houy, 2011. "Common characterizations of the untrapped set and the top cycle," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 70(4), pages 501-509, April.

    Cited by:

    1. Brandt, Felix & Lederer, Patrick, 2023. "Characterizing the top cycle via strategyproofness," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 18(2), May.
    2. Felix Brandt & Patrick Lederer, 2021. "Characterizing the Top Cycle via Strategyproofness," Papers 2108.04622, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2023.

  7. Nicolas Houy, 2010. "A characterization of prudent choices," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 34(2), pages 181-192, February.

    Cited by:

    1. Houy, Nicolas, 2011. "A refinement of prudent choices," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 61(3), pages 166-169, May.
    2. Bleile, Jörg, 2016. "Limited Attention in Case-Based Belief Formation," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 518, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    3. Nicolas Houy, 2008. "Prudent choices and rationality," Working Papers hal-00360518, HAL.

  8. Houy, Nicolas & Tadenuma, Koichi, 2009. "Lexicographic compositions of multiple criteria for decision making," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 144(4), pages 1770-1782, July.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  9. Houy, Nicolas, 2009. "Structural holes in social networks: A remark," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 422-431, January.

    Cited by:

    1. Hommes, C.H. & in 't Veld, D. & van der Leij, M., 2014. "The formation of a core periphery structure in heterogeneous financial networks," CeNDEF Working Papers 14-04, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Center for Nonlinear Dynamics in Economics and Finance.

  10. Houy Nicolas, 2009. "More on the stable, generalized stable, absorbing and admissible sets," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 33(4), pages 691-698, November.

    Cited by:

    1. Han, Weibin & van Deemen, Adrian, 2021. "The solution of generalized stable sets and its refinement," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 60-67.
    2. Weibin Han & Adrian Deemen & D. Ary A. Samsura, 2016. "A note on extended stable sets," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 47(2), pages 265-275, August.

  11. Nicolas Houy, 2009. "Still more on the Tournament Equilibrium Set," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 32(1), pages 93-99, January.

    Cited by:

    1. Scott Moser, 2013. "A note on contestation-based tournament solutions," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 41(1), pages 133-143, June.
    2. Rudolf Berghammer & Agnieszka Rusinowska & Harrie de Swart, 2013. "Computing tournament solutions using relation algebra and RelView," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) hal-00756696, HAL.
    3. Felix Brandt & Maria Chudnovsky & Ilhee Kim & Gaku Liu & Sergey Norin & Alex Scott & Paul Seymour & Stephan Thomassé, 2013. "A counterexample to a conjecture of Schwartz," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 40(3), pages 739-743, March.
    4. Brandt, Felix, 2011. "Minimal stable sets in tournaments," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 146(4), pages 1481-1499, July.
    5. Felix Brandt & Felix Fischer & Paul Harrenstein & Maximilian Mair, 2010. "A computational analysis of the tournament equilibrium set," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 34(4), pages 597-609, April.
    6. Felix Brandt & Markus Brill & Hans Georg Seedig & Warut Suksompong, 2018. "On the structure of stable tournament solutions," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 65(2), pages 483-507, March.
    7. Felix Brandt & Markus Brill & Felix Fischer & Paul Harrenstein, 2014. "Minimal retentive sets in tournaments," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 42(3), pages 551-574, March.

  12. Nicolas Houy, 2009. "A characterization of majority voting rules with quorums," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 67(3), pages 295-301, September.

    Cited by:

    1. Núñez, Matías & Sanver, M. Remzi, 2017. "Revisiting the connection between the no-show paradox and monotonicity," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 9-17.
    2. Saïd Souam & Patricia Charléty & Marie-Cécile Fagart, 2019. "Quorum Rules and Shareholder Power," Post-Print hal-02271905, HAL.
    3. Umut Keskin & M. Remzi Sanver & H. Berkay Tosunlu, 2022. "Monotonicity violations under plurality with a runoff: the case of French presidential elections," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 59(2), pages 305-333, August.
    4. Hyewon Jeong & Biung-Ghi Ju, 2017. "Resolute majority rules," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 82(1), pages 31-39, January.
    5. Marc Pauly, 2013. "Characterizing referenda with quorums via strategy-proofness," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 75(4), pages 581-597, October.
    6. Patricia Charléty & Marie-Cécile Fagart & Saïd Souam, 2017. "Quorum Rules and Shareholder Power," Working Papers hal-04141634, HAL.
    7. Sabine Flamand & Orestis Troumpounis, 2014. "Participation quorums in costly meetings," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 159(1), pages 53-62, April.
    8. Andreas Wendemuth & Italo Simonelli, 2016. "Counting votes in coupled decisions," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 81(2), pages 213-253, August.

  13. Houy, Nicolas, 2008. "A note on the Suzumura-consistency," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 90-95, January.

    Cited by:

    1. Cato, Susumu, 2013. "Remarks on Suzumura consistent collective choice rules," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 40-47.

  14. Houy Nicolas, 2008. "Choice Functions with States of Mind," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 65(1), pages 1-26, August.

    Cited by:

    1. Dean, Mark & Kıbrıs, Özgür & Masatlioglu, Yusufcan, 2017. "Limited attention and status quo bias," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 93-127.
    2. Li, Boyao, 2023. "Random utility models with status quo bias," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    3. Masatlioglu, Yusufcan & Uler, Neslihan, 2013. "Understanding the reference effect," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 403-423.
    4. Maniquet, François & Nosratabadi, Hassan, 2022. "Welfare analysis when choice is status-quo biased," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).

  15. Houy, Nicolas & Ménager, Lucie, 2008. "Communication, consensus and order. Who wants to speak first?," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 140-152, November.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  16. Houy, Nicolas, 2007. "A characterization for qualified majority voting rules," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 17-24, July.

    Cited by:

    1. Matías Núñez & Giacomo Valletta, 2015. "The informational basis of scoring rules," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 19(4), pages 279-297, December.
    2. Federica Ceron & Stéphane Gonzalez, 2019. "A characterization of Approval Voting without the approval balloting assumption," Working Papers 1938, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.
    3. Susumu Cato & Stéphane Gonzalez & Eric Rémila & Philippe Solal, 2022. "Approval voting versus proportional threshold methods: so far and yet so near," Working Papers halshs-03858356, HAL.
    4. Ali Ihsan Ozkes & Remzi Sanver, 2017. "Absolute qualified majoritarianism: how does the threshold matter?," Post-Print hal-01498509, HAL.
    5. Hoots, Lucas & Powers, Robert C., 2015. "Anonymous and positively responsive aggregation rules," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 9-14.
    6. Nuñez, M. & Valletta, G., 2012. "The information simplicity of scoring rules," Research Memorandum 011, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).

  17. Houy, Nicolas, 2007. "Some further characterizations for the forgotten voting rules," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 111-121, January.

    Cited by:

    1. Richard Baron & Mostapha Diss & Eric Rémila & Philippe Solal, 2015. "A geometric examination of majorities based on difference in support," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 45(1), pages 123-153, June.
    2. Mostapha Diss & Patrizia Pérez-Asurmendi, 2015. "Consistent collective decisions under majorities based on difference of votes," Working Papers 1533, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.
    3. Llamazares, Bonifacio & Pérez-Asurmendi, Patrizia, 2013. "Triple-acyclicity in majorities based on difference in support," MPRA Paper 52218, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Hyewon Jeong & Biung-Ghi Ju, 2017. "Resolute majority rules," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 82(1), pages 31-39, January.
    5. José Luis Garcí a-Lapresta & Bonifacio Llamazares, 2010. "Preference Intensities and Majority Decisions Based on Difference of Support Between Alternatives," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 19(6), pages 527-542, November.
    6. Marc Pauly, 2013. "Characterizing referenda with quorums via strategy-proofness," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 75(4), pages 581-597, October.
    7. Mostapha Diss & Patrizia Pérez-Asurmendi, 2016. "Probabilities of Consistent Election Outcomes with Majorities Based on Difference in Support," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 967-994, September.
    8. Mostapha Diss & Patrizia Pérez-Asurmendi, 2015. "Consistent collective decisions under majorities based on difference of votes," Working Papers halshs-01241996, HAL.
    9. Bonifacio Llamazares, 2013. "On the structure of voting systems between two alternatives," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 17(3), pages 239-248, September.
    10. Nicolas Houy, 2007. "A new characterization of absolute qualified majority voting," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 4(4), pages 1-8.
    11. King, Sarah Schulz & Powers, Robert C., 2018. "Beyond neutrality: Extended difference of votes rules," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 146-152.
    12. Nicolas Houy, 2009. "A characterization of majority voting rules with quorums," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 67(3), pages 295-301, September.
    13. Terzopoulou, Zoi, 2020. "Quota rules for incomplete judgments," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 23-36.
    14. Rodríguez Alcantud, José Carlos & Laruelle, Annick, 2016. "To disqualify or not to qualify: This is the other question," IKERLANAK info:eu-repo/grantAgreeme, Universidad del País Vasco - Departamento de Fundamentos del Análisis Económico I.

  18. Nicolas Houy, 2007. "Endogenously Weighted Voting," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 9(6), pages 1079-1102, December.

    Cited by:

    1. Johann Caro‐Burnett, 2022. "Optimal voting rules for international organizations, with an application to the United Nations," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 24(6), pages 1463-1501, December.

  19. Nicolas Houy, 2007. "A new characterization of absolute qualified majority voting," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 4(4), pages 1-8.

    Cited by:

    1. Matías Núñez & Giacomo Valletta, 2015. "The informational basis of scoring rules," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 19(4), pages 279-297, December.
    2. Quesada, Antonio, 2009. "Parallel axiomatizations of majority and unanimity," MPRA Paper 19401, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Federica Ceron & Stéphane Gonzalez, 2019. "A characterization of Approval Voting without the approval balloting assumption," Working Papers 1938, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.
    4. Susumu Cato & Stéphane Gonzalez & Eric Rémila & Philippe Solal, 2022. "Approval voting versus proportional threshold methods: so far and yet so near," Working Papers halshs-03858356, HAL.
    5. Ali Ihsan Ozkes & Remzi Sanver, 2017. "Absolute qualified majoritarianism: how does the threshold matter?," Post-Print hal-01498509, HAL.
    6. Quesada, Antonio, 2010. "Monotonicity + efficiency + continuity = majority," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 60(2), pages 149-153, September.
    7. Hoots, Lucas & Powers, Robert C., 2015. "Anonymous and positively responsive aggregation rules," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 9-14.
    8. Quesada, Antonio, 2009. "A short step between democracy and dictatorship," MPRA Paper 19455, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Bonifacio Llamazares, 2013. "On the structure of voting systems between two alternatives," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 17(3), pages 239-248, September.

  20. Nicolas, Houy, 2007. ""I want to be a J!": Liberalism in group identification problems," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 59-70, July.

    Cited by:

    1. Murat Çengelci & M. Sanver, 2010. "Simple Collective Identity Functions," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 68(4), pages 417-443, April.
    2. Cho, Wonki Jo & Park, Chang Woo, 2018. "Fractional group identification," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 66-75.
    3. Cho, Wonki Jo & Ju, Biung-Ghi, 2020. "Group identification: An integrated approach," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 171-181.
    4. Dimitrov, Dinko & Puppe, Clemens, 2009. "Non-bossy Social Classification," Sustainable Development Papers 55328, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    5. Dinko Dimitrov & Thierry Marchant & Debasis Mishra, 2012. "Separability and aggregation of equivalence relations," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 51(1), pages 191-212, September.
    6. Stefano Vannucci, 2008. "The Libertarian Identification Rule in Finite Atomistic Lattices," Department of Economics University of Siena 526, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    7. Cho, Wonki Jo & Ju, Biung-Ghi, 2017. "Multinary group identification," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 12(2), May.
    8. Dimitrov, D.A. & Sung, S.C. & Xu, Y., 2003. "Procedural Group Identification," Other publications TiSEM 4679f50d-350f-4c56-b228-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    9. Miguel A. Ballester & José Luis García-Lapresta, 2008. "A Model of Elitist Qualification," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 17(6), pages 497-513, November.
    10. Alcantud, José Carlos R. & Laruelle, Annick, 2018. "Collective identity functions with status quo," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 159-166.
    11. Federico Fioravanti & Fernando Tohmé, 2021. "Alternative Axioms in Group Identification Problems," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 38(2), pages 353-362, July.
    12. John Craven, 2023. "Self-designation and group allocation," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 94(1), pages 121-133, January.
    13. Federico Fioravanti & Fernando Tohm'e, 2019. "Alternative Axioms in Group Identification Problems," Papers 1912.05961, arXiv.org.
    14. Wonki Jo Cho & Alejandro Saporiti, 2015. "Incentives, Fairness, and Efficiency in Group Identification," Economics Discussion Paper Series 1501, Economics, The University of Manchester.

  21. Nicolas Houy, 2007. "When inertia generates political cycles: a remark," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 4(16), pages 1-5.

    Cited by:

    1. Raphaël Soubeyran & Pascal Gautier, 2008. "Political Cycles: Issue Ownership and the Opposition Advantage," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 10(4), pages 685-716, August.

  22. Houy Nicolas, 2007. "Rationality and Order-Dependent Sequential Rationality," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 62(2), pages 119-134, March.

    Cited by:

    1. Houy, Nicolas, 2011. "A refinement of prudent choices," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 61(3), pages 166-169, May.
    2. Houy Nicolas, 2008. "Choice Functions with States of Mind," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 65(1), pages 1-26, August.
    3. Thomas Demuynck, 2014. "The computational complexity of rationalizing Pareto optimal choice behavior," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 42(3), pages 529-549, March.
    4. Matsuki, Jun & Tadenuma, Koichi & 蓼沼, 宏一, 2013. "Choice via Grouping Procedures," Discussion Papers 2013-08, Graduate School of Economics, Hitotsubashi University.
    5. Demuynck, Thomas, 2011. "The computational complexity of rationalizing boundedly rational choice behavior," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(4-5), pages 425-433.
    6. Bleile, Jörg, 2016. "Limited Attention in Case-Based Belief Formation," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 518, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    7. Houy, Nicolas & Tadenuma, Koichi & 蓼沼, 宏一, 2007. "Lexicographic Compositions of Multiple Criteria for Decision Making," Discussion Papers 2007-13, Graduate School of Economics, Hitotsubashi University.
    8. Alvaro Sandroni & Leo Katz, 2024. "The leveling axiom," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 96(1), pages 135-152, February.
    9. Nicolas Houy, 2008. "Prudent choices and rationality," Working Papers hal-00360518, HAL.
    10. Yusufcan Masatlioglu & Daisuke Nakajima & Erkut Ozbay, 2009. "Revealed Attention," NajEcon Working Paper Reviews 814577000000000409, www.najecon.org.
    11. Cherepanov, Vadim & Feddersen, Timothy & ,, 2013. "Rationalization," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 8(3), September.
    12. García-Sanz, María D. & Alcantud, José Carlos R., 2015. "Sequential rationalization of multivalued choice," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 29-33.
    13. Nicolas Houy, 2008. "Progressive knowledge revealed preferences and sequential rationalizability," Working Papers hal-00360546, HAL.

  23. Nicolas Houy, 2006. "He said that he said that I am a J," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 4(4), pages 1-6.

    Cited by:

    1. Nicolas, Houy, 2007. ""I want to be a J!": Liberalism in group identification problems," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 59-70, July.
    2. José Carlos R. Alcantud & Annick Laruelle, 2020. "Independent collective identity functions as voting rules," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 89(1), pages 107-119, July.
    3. Dimitrov, D.A. & Sung, S.C. & Xu, Y., 2003. "Procedural Group Identification," Other publications TiSEM 4679f50d-350f-4c56-b228-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    4. Miller, Alan D., 2008. "Group identification," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 188-202, May.
    5. Miguel A. Ballester & José Luis García-Lapresta, 2008. "A Model of Elitist Qualification," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 17(6), pages 497-513, November.

  24. Houy Nicolas, 2006. "Positional Independence in Preference Aggregation: A Remark," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 27(2), pages 341-345, October.

    Cited by:

    1. Antonio Quesada, 2009. "Up/Downward Preference Aggregation," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 11(5), pages 857-873, October.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.