IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/cpr/ceprdp/13541.html

Brave Boys and Play-it-Safe Girls: Gender Differences in Willingness to Guess in a Large Scale Natural Field Experiment

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Aparicio Fenoll, Ainoa & Zaccagni, Sarah, 2022. "Gender mix and team performance: Differences between exogenously and endogenously formed teams," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
  2. Owen, Stephanie, 2023. "College major choice and beliefs about relative performance: An experimental intervention to understand gender gaps in STEM," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
  3. Enriqueta Aragones, 2024. "Family Restrictions at Work," Economies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-18, April.
  4. Nguyen, Ha Trong & Brinkman, Sally & Le, Huong Thu & Zubrick, Stephen R. & Mitrou, Francis, 2022. "Gender differences in time allocation contribute to differences in developmental outcomes in children and adolescents," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
  5. Espinosa Maria Paz & Gardeazabal Javier, 2020. "The Gender-bias Effect of Test Scoring and Framing: A Concern for Personnel Selection and College Admission," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 20(3), pages 1-23, July.
  6. Nguyen, Ha & Chapman, Bruce & Le, Huong & Royer, Heather & Dearden, Lorraine & Mitrou, Francis, 2026. "Socioeconomic status and gender gaps in educational outcomes across the life course: New distributional evidence from linked census-administrative data," MPRA Paper 129344, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  7. Maddalena Davoli, 2023. "A, B, or C? Question Format and the Gender Gap in Financial Literacy," Economics of Education Working Paper Series 0206, University of Zurich, Department of Business Administration (IBW).
  8. Oriana Bandiera & Nidhi Parekh & Barbara Petrongolo & Michelle Rao, 2022. "Men are from Mars, and Women Too: A Bayesian Meta‐analysis of Overconfidence Experiments," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 89(S1), pages 38-70, June.
  9. Pau Balart & Lara Ezquerra & Iñigo Hernandez-Arenaz, 2022. "Framing effects on risk-taking behavior: evidence from a field experiment in multiple-choice tests," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 25(4), pages 1268-1297, September.
  10. J. Ignacio Conde-Ruiz & Juan José Ganuza & Manuel García, 2020. "Gender Gap and Multiple Choice Exams in Public Selection Processes," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 235(4), pages 11-28, December.
  11. Enriqueta Aragonès, 2024. "Family Restrictions at Work," Working Papers 1429, Barcelona School of Economics.
  12. Paweł Kuśmierczyk & Radosław Kurach & Marek Kośny, 2025. "On methodological problems with measuring knowledge: Are women truly less financially literate than men?," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 52(4), pages 519-544, December.
  13. Griselda, Silvia, 2024. "Gender gap in standardized tests: What are we measuring?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 191-229.
  14. Gomez-Ruiz, Marcela & Cervini-Plá, María & Ramos, Xavier, 2024. "Do Women Fare Worse When Men Are Around? Quasi-Experimental Evidence," IZA Discussion Papers 16782, IZA Network @ LISER.
  15. Santiago Pereda-Fernandez, 2026. "Assessing the effectiveness of workers' selection exams: the case of Banca d'Italia," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 1515, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
  16. Delaney, Judith M. & Devereux, Paul J., 2021. "Gender and Educational Achievement: Stylized Facts and Causal Evidence," IZA Discussion Papers 14074, IZA Network @ LISER.
  17. Fu, Jingcheng & Zhang, Xing & Zhong, Songfa, 2025. "Hedging-based scoring rules for multiple-choice questions," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
  18. Saygin, Perihan O. & Atwater, Ann, 2021. "Gender differences in leaving questions blank on high-stakes standardized tests," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
  19. Perihan O. Saygin & Garrison Pollard & Thomas Knight & Mark Rush, 2026. "Gender Biased Resistance to Harsh Feedback," Working Papers wpdea2510, Department of Applied Economics at Universitat Autonoma of Barcelona.
  20. Ballis, Briana & Lusher, Lester & Martorell, Paco, 2022. "The effects of exam frames on student effort and performance," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
  21. Anaya, Lina & Iriberri, Nagore & Rey-Biel, Pedro & Zamarro, Gema, 2022. "Understanding performance in test taking: The role of question difficulty order," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
  22. Hospido, Laura & Iriberri, Nagore & Machelett, Margarita, 2023. "Gender gaps in financial literacy: a multi-arm RCT to break the response bias in surveys," CEPR Discussion Papers 18646, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
  23. Haucap, Justus & Heldman, Christina & Rau, Holger A., 2024. "Gender and cooperation in the presence of negative externalities," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 148-169.
  24. Grundmann, Susanna & Rockenbach, Bettina & Werner, Katharina, 2025. "First Names and Ascribed Characteristics," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
  25. Di Tommaso, Maria Laura & Contini, Dalit & De Rosa, Dalila & Ferrara, Francesca & Piazzalunga, Daniela & Robutti, Ornella, 2024. "Tackling the gender gap in mathematics with active learning methodologies," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
  26. Aragones, Enriqueta, 2026. "Gender choice at work," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 490-504.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.