IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jeborg/v237y2025ics0167268125003038.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hedging-based scoring rules for multiple-choice questions

Author

Listed:
  • Fu, Jingcheng
  • Zhang, Xing
  • Zhong, Songfa

Abstract

This paper proposes two novel scoring rules for multiple-choice questions based on the test-takers’ propensity to hedge across possible answers. To examine these scoring rules, we randomly assign 2,986 participants in an IQ test into three conditions. In the control condition, participants choose one option, and receive one point for a correct response. In the treatment conditions, they can explicitly hedge by choosing k options: if the correct option is among the k chosen options, they receive 1/k point in the outcome-mixing treatment, and one point with probability 1/k in the probability-mixing treatment. We find that participants in both treatments hedge pervasively, score lower compared to those in the control, but do not improve their time allocation. While scores in the three conditions exhibit similar psychometric quality, we observe a significant correlation between academic performance and IQ score measured in the probability-mixing condition. These results highlight the potential of these two hedging-based scoring rules for practical applications in multiple-choice questions.

Suggested Citation

  • Fu, Jingcheng & Zhang, Xing & Zhong, Songfa, 2025. "Hedging-based scoring rules for multiple-choice questions," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:237:y:2025:i:c:s0167268125003038
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2025.107184
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268125003038
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jebo.2025.107184?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C91 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Laboratory, Individual Behavior
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:237:y:2025:i:c:s0167268125003038. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jebo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.