IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/aea/jecper/v26y2012i3p203-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

The Relationship between Unit Cost and Cumulative Quantity and the Evidence for Organizational Learning-by-Doing

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Francine Lafontaine & Kathryn Shaw, 2016. "Serial Entrepreneurship: Learning by Doing?," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 34(S2), pages 217-254.
  2. John Baffoe-Bonnie, 2016. "Productivity Growth and Input Demand: The Effect of Learning by Doing in a Gold Mining Firm in a Developing Economy," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(4), pages 550-570, October.
  3. Achyuta Adhvaryu & Anant Nyshadham & Jorge A. Tamayo, 2019. "Managerial Quality and Productivity Dynamics," NBER Working Papers 25852, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  4. Qi, Danyi & Roe, Brian E. & Apolzan, John W. & Martin, Corby K., 2023. "Learning about Our Vices from Devices: A Model of Individual Learning with an Application to Consumer Food Waste," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 48(2), May.
  5. Richard Harris & John Moffat, 2020. "The impact of product subsidies on plant‐level total factor productivity in Britain, 1997–2014," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 67(4), pages 387-403, September.
  6. Farmer, J. Doyne & Lafond, François, 2016. "How predictable is technological progress?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 647-665.
  7. Way, Rupert & Lafond, François & Lillo, Fabrizio & Panchenko, Valentyn & Farmer, J. Doyne, 2019. "Wright meets Markowitz: How standard portfolio theory changes when assets are technologies following experience curves," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 211-238.
  8. Magee, C.L. & Basnet, S. & Funk, J.L. & Benson, C.L., 2016. "Quantitative empirical trends in technical performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 237-246.
  9. Nemet, Gregory F. & O’Shaughnessy, Eric & Wiser, Ryan & Darghouth, Naïm & Barbose, Galen & Gillingham, Ken & Rai, Varun, 2017. "Characteristics of low-priced solar PV systems in the U.S," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 501-513.
  10. Lafond, François & Greenwald, Diana & Farmer, J. Doyne, 2022. "Can Stimulating Demand Drive Costs Down? World War II as a Natural Experiment," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 82(3), pages 727-764, September.
  11. Avdic, Daniel & Lundborg, Petter & Vikström, Johan, 2014. "Learning-by-Doing in a Highly Skilled Profession When Stakes Are High: Evidence from Advanced Cancer Surgery," IZA Discussion Papers 8099, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
  12. Hvide, Hans K. & Meling, Tom G., 2019. "Do Temporary Demand Shocks have Long-Term Effects for Startups?," Working Papers in Economics 6/19, University of Bergen, Department of Economics.
  13. Dahlin, Kristina & Chuang, You-Ta & Roulet, Thomas J, 2018. "Opportunity, Motivation, and Ability to Learn from Failures and Errors: Review, Synthesis, and Ways to Move Forward," SocArXiv 4qwzh, Center for Open Science.
  14. Lafond, François & Bailey, Aimee Gotway & Bakker, Jan David & Rebois, Dylan & Zadourian, Rubina & McSharry, Patrick & Farmer, J. Doyne, 2018. "How well do experience curves predict technological progress? A method for making distributional forecasts," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 104-117.
  15. David Popp, 2019. "Environmental Policy and Innovation: A Decade of Research," NBER Working Papers 25631, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  16. Wei, Max & Smith, Sarah J. & Sohn, Michael D., 2017. "Experience curve development and cost reduction disaggregation for fuel cell markets in Japan and the US," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 346-357.
  17. Daniel G. Arce, 2014. "Experience, Learning, and Returns to Scale," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 80(4), pages 938-947, April.
  18. Jeffrey Funk, 2018. "Technology change, economic feasibility, and creative destruction: the case of new electronic products and services," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 27(1), pages 65-82.
  19. Kerstin Hötte, 2021. "Skill transferability and the stability of transition pathways- A learning-based explanation for patterns of diffusion," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 959-993, July.
  20. Kathryn L. Shaw & Anders Sørensen, 2017. "The Productivity Advantage of Serial Entrepreneurs," NBER Working Papers 23320, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  21. Kerstin Hotte, 2021. "Demand-pull, technology-push, and the direction of technological change," Papers 2104.04813, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2023.
  22. Wesley M. Cohen & You-Na Lee & John P. Walsh, 2019. "How Innovative Are Innovations? A Multidimensional, Survey-Based Approach," NBER Chapters, in: Measuring and Accounting for Innovation in the Twenty-First Century, pages 139-182, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  23. Hötte, Kerstin, 2020. "How to accelerate green technology diffusion? Directed technological change in the presence of coevolving absorptive capacity," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
  24. David C. Chan, Jr, 2016. "Informational Frictions and Practice Variation: Evidence from Physicians in Training," NBER Working Papers 21855, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  25. Patel, Pankaj C. & Tsionas, Mike & Oghazi, Pejvak & Izquierdo, Vanessa, 2022. "No entrepreneur steps in the same river twice: Limited learning advantage for serial entrepreneurs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 1038-1052.
  26. David Popp, 2019. "Environmental policy and innovation: a decade of research," CESifo Working Paper Series 7544, CESifo.
  27. Ryo Horii, 2023. "Non-Exponential Growth Theory," ISER Discussion Paper 1212, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
  28. Kareem Haggag & Brian McManus & Giovanni Paci, 2017. "Learning by Driving: Productivity Improvements by New York City Taxi Drivers," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 9(1), pages 70-95, January.
  29. Yoshinori Shiozawa, 2020. "A new framework for analyzing technological change," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 989-1034, September.
  30. Ilzetzki, Ethan, 2023. "Learning by Necessity: Government Demand, Capacity Constraints, and Productivity Growth," CEPR Discussion Papers 17803, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  31. Avdic, Daniel & Lundborg, Petter & Vikström, Johan, 2019. "Estimating returns to hospital volume: Evidence from advanced cancer surgery," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 81-99.
  32. Funk, Jeffrey L. & Magee, Christopher L., 2015. "Rapid improvements with no commercial production: How do the improvements occur?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 777-788.
  33. David Maslach & Oana Branzei & Claus Rerup & Mark J. Zbaracki, 2018. "Noise as Signal in Learning from Rare Events," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 225-246, April.
  34. Joshua Graff Zivin & Lisa B. Kahn & Matthew Neidell, 2021. "Incentivizing Learning-by-Doing: The Role of Compensation Schemes," Research in Labor Economics, in: Workplace Productivity and Management Practices, volume 49, pages 139-178, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  35. Mei Lin & Xiajun Amy Pan & Quan Zheng, 2020. "Platform Pricing with Strategic Buyers: The Impact of Future Production Cost," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(5), pages 1122-1144, May.
  36. Lee, You-Na & Walsh, John P., 2016. "Inventing while you work: Knowledge, non-R&D learning and innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 345-359.
  37. Megan Lawrence, 2018. "Taking Stock of the Ability to Change: The Effect of Prior Experience," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 489-506, June.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.