IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/diceop/96.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Big Data aus wettbewerbs- und ordnungspolitischer Perspektive

Author

Listed:
  • Haucap, Justus

Abstract

Der vorliegende Beitrag untersucht die Rolle von Daten als Wettbewerbsfaktor und analysiert Anpassungsbedarf in den ordnungspolitischen Rahmenbedingungen. Zunächst wird dazu die momentane kartellrechtliche Behandlung des Sammelns und der Verarbeitung von Daten sowie möglicher kartellrechtlicher Anpassungsbedarf erörtert, bevor Implikationen einer datengetriebenen Preisbildung diskutiert werden. Dies betrifft die dynamische als auch die personalisierte, datengetriebene Preissetzung sowie die Preissetzung mit Hilfe von Algorithmen. Behandelt werden zudem Chancen und Herausforderungen der Sharing Economy als ein Beispiel für neue datengetriebene Geschäftsmodelle, bevor die Themen Breitbandausbau und digitales Unternehmertum adressiert werden. Der Beitrag geht zudem exemplarisch auf Veränderungen bei Mobilität, Literaturbetrieb und in der Medienbranche ein.

Suggested Citation

  • Haucap, Justus, 2018. "Big Data aus wettbewerbs- und ordnungspolitischer Perspektive," DICE Ordnungspolitische Perspektiven 96, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:diceop:96
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/176553/1/096_OP_Haucap.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lars-Hendrik Roller & Leonard Waverman, 2001. "Telecommunications Infrastructure and Economic Development: A Simultaneous Approach," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 91(4), pages 909-923, September.
    2. Ralf Dewenter & Hendrik Lüth, 2016. "Big Data aus wettbewerblicher Sicht
      [Big Data from a Competitive Perspective]
      ," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;German National Library of Economics, vol. 96(9), pages 648-654, September.
    3. Cédric Argenton & Jens Prüfer, 2012. "Search Engine Competition With Network Externalities," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 8(1), pages 73-105.
    4. repec:spr:wirtsc:v:97:y:2017:i:10:d:10.1007_s10273-017-2204-4 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Vulkan, Nir & Shem-Tov, Yotam, 2015. "A note on fairness and personalised pricing," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 179-183.
    6. Richards, Timothy & Liaukonyte, Jura & Nadia, Streletskya, 2016. "Personalized Pricing and Price Fairness," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235809, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. Haucap, Justus, 2016. "Warum erlahmt die Innovationsdynamik in Deutschland? Was ist zu tun?," DICE Ordnungspolitische Perspektiven 87, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    8. repec:bpj:ordojb:v:67:y:2016:i:1:p:269-298:n:12 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Kolko, Jed, 2012. "Broadband and local growth," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 100-113.
    10. Haucap, Justus & Kehder, Christiane, 2018. "Welchen Ordnungsrahmen braucht die Sharing Economy?," DICE Ordnungspolitische Perspektiven 94, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    11. Budzinski Oliver & Köhler Karoline Henrike, 2015. "Is Amazon The Next Google?," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 66(1), pages 263-288, January.
    12. Haucap, Justus & Pavel, Ferdinand & Aigner, Rafael & Arnold, Michael & Hottenrott, Moritz & Kehder, Christiane, 2015. "Chancen der Digitalisierung auf Märkten für urbane Mobilität: Das Beispiel Uber," DICE Ordnungspolitische Perspektiven 73, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    13. Gary Bolton & Ben Greiner & Axel Ockenfels, 2013. "Engineering Trust: Reciprocity in the Production of Reputation Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(2), pages 265-285, January.
    14. Alessandro Acquisti & Hal R. Varian, 2005. "Conditioning Prices on Purchase History," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 367-381, May.
    15. Bräuninger, Michael & Haucap, Justus & Stepping, Katharina & Stühmeier, Torben, 2012. "Cloud Computing als Instrument für effiziente IT-Lösungen," HWWI Policy Papers 71, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWI).
    16. Judd Cramer & Alan B. Krueger, 2016. "Disruptive Change in the Taxi Business: The Case of Uber," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(5), pages 177-182, May.
    17. Richards, Timothy J. & Liaukonyte, Jura & Streletskaya, Nadia A., 2016. "Personalized pricing and price fairness," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 138-153.
    18. Haucap, Justus, 2015. "Ökonomie des Teilens - nachhaltig und innovativ? Die Chancen der Sharing Economy und ihre möglichen Risiken und Nebenwirkungen," DICE Ordnungspolitische Perspektiven 69, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    19. Pollock, Rufus, 2008. "Is Google the next Microsoft? Competition, Welfare and Regulation in Internet Search," MPRA Paper 8885, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Nina Czernich & Oliver Falck & Tobias Kretschmer & Ludger Woessmann, 2011. "Broadband Infrastructure and Economic Growth," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 121(552), pages 505-532, May.
    21. Alessandro Acquisti & Curtis Taylor & Liad Wagman, 2016. "The Economics of Privacy," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 54(2), pages 442-492, June.
    22. Haucap, Justus & Kehder, Christiane & Loebert, Ina, 2015. "Eine liberale Rundfunkordnung für die Zukunft," DICE Ordnungspolitische Perspektiven 79, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    23. Belk, Russell, 2014. "You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(8), pages 1595-1600.
    24. Demary, Vera, 2015. "Competition in the sharing economy," IW policy papers 19/2015, Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft Köln (IW) / Cologne Institute for Economic Research.
    25. Haucap, Justus & Kehder, Christiane, 2013. "Suchmaschinen zwischen Wettbewerb und Monopol: Der Fall Google," DICE Ordnungspolitische Perspektiven 44, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    26. Demsetz, Harold, 1969. "Information and Efficiency: Another Viewpoint," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 12(1), pages 1-22, April.
    27. repec:bpj:ordojb:v:67:y:2016:i:1:p:385-410:n:16 is not listed on IDEAS
    28. Dewenter, Ralf & Haucap, Justus, 2013. "Ökonomische Auswirkungen der Einführung eines Leistungsschutzrechts für Presseinhalte im Internet (Leistungsschutzrecht für Presseverleger)," DICE Ordnungspolitische Perspektiven 36, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    29. Koutroumpis, Pantelis, 2009. "The economic impact of broadband on growth: A simultaneous approach," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(9), pages 471-485, October.
    30. Justus Haucap & Torben Stühmeier, 2016. "Competition and antitrust in Internet markets," Chapters,in: Handbook on the Economics of the Internet, chapter 9, pages 183-210 Edward Elgar Publishing.
    31. Justus Haucap & Ulrich Heimeshoff, 2014. "Google, Facebook, Amazon, eBay: Is the Internet driving competition or market monopolization?," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 49-61, February.
    32. J. Yannis Bakos, 1997. "Reducing Buyer Search Costs: Implications for Electronic Marketplaces," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(12), pages 1676-1692, December.
    33. Budzinski, Oliver & Schneider, Sonja, 2017. "Smart Fitness: Ökonomische Effekte einer Digitalisierung der Selbstvermessung," Ilmenau Economics Discussion Papers 105, Ilmenau University of Technology, Institute of Economics.
    34. Pape Annika & Wein Thomas, 2015. "Der deutsche Taximarkt – das letzte (Kollektiv-)Monopol im Sturm der „neuen Zeit“," Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 64(3), pages 362-392, December.
    35. Peitz, Martin & Schwalbe, Ulrich, 2016. "Zwischen Sozialromantik und Neoliberalismus: Zur Ökonomie der Sharing-Economy," ZEW Discussion Papers 16-033, ZEW - Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung / Center for European Economic Research.
    36. Steven Tadelis, 2016. "Reputation and Feedback Systems in Online Platform Markets," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 8(1), pages 321-340, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:diceop:96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (ZBW - German National Library of Economics). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/diduede.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.