IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/yor/hectdg/18-26.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The effects of self-assessed health: Dealing with and understanding misclassification bias

Author

Listed:
  • Cheny, L.;
  • Clarke, P.M.;
  • Petrie, D.J.;
  • Staub, K.E.;

Abstract

Categories of self-assessed health (SAH) are often used as a measure of health status. However,the difficulties with measuring overall health mean that the same individual may select into different SAH categories even though their underlying health has not changed. Thus,their observed SAH may involve misclassification, and the chance of misclassification may differ across individuals. As shown in this paper,if neglected, misclassification can lead to substantial biases in not only the estimation of the effects of SAH on outcomes, but also on the effects of other variables of interest,such as education and income. This paper studies nonlinear regression models where SAH is a key explanatory variable, but where two potentially misclassified measures of SAH are available.In contrast to linear regression models, the standard approach of using one SAH measure as an instrumental variable for the other cannot produce consistent estimates. However, we show that the coefficients can be identified from the joint distribution of the outcome and the two misclassified measures without imposing additional structure on the misclassification, and we propose simple likelihood-based approaches to estimate all parameters consistently via a convenient EM algorithm. The estimator is applied to data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey, where we exploit the natural experiment that in some waves individuals were asked the same question about their health status twice, and almost 30% of respondents change their SAH response. We use the estimator to (i) obtain the first reliable estimates of the relationship between SAH and long-term mortality and morbidity, and to (ii) document how demographic and socio-economic determinants shape patterns of misclassification of SAH.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheny, L.; & Clarke, P.M.; & Petrie, D.J.; & Staub, K.E.;, 2018. "The effects of self-assessed health: Dealing with and understanding misclassification bias," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 18/26, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
  • Handle: RePEc:yor:hectdg:18/26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.york.ac.uk/media/economics/documents/hedg/workingpapers/1826.pdf
    File Function: Main text
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Battistin, Erich & De Nadai, Michele & Sianesi, Barbara, 2014. "Misreported schooling, multiple measures and returns to educational qualifications," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 181(2), pages 136-150.
    2. Terza, Joseph V. & Basu, Anirban & Rathouz, Paul J., 2008. "Two-stage residual inclusion estimation: Addressing endogeneity in health econometric modeling," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 531-543, May.
    3. Denise Doiron & Denzil G. Fiebig & Meliyanni Johar & Agne Suziedelyte, 2015. "Does self-assessed health measure health?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(2), pages 180-194, January.
    4. Anirban Basu & Norma B. Coe & Cole G. Chapman, 2018. "2SLS versus 2SRI: Appropriate methods for rare outcomes and/or rare exposures," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(6), pages 937-955, June.
    5. Au, Nicole & Johnston, David W., 2014. "Self-assessed health: What does it mean and what does it hide?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 21-28.
    6. Amanda Gosling & Eirini‚ÄźChristina Saloniki, 2014. "Correction Of Misclassification Error In Disability Rates," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(9), pages 1084-1097, September.
    7. McCallum, J. & Shadbolt, B. & Wang, D., 1994. "Self-rated health and survival: A 7-year follow-up study of Australian elderly," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 84(7), pages 1100-1105.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    misreporting; measurement error; multinomial regressor; discrete and limited dependent variables; subjective health; mortality; chronic conditions;

    JEL classification:

    • C35 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Discrete Regression and Qualitative Choice Models; Discrete Regressors; Proportions
    • I12 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Behavior

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:yor:hectdg:18/26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jane Rawlings). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/deyoruk.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.