IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/unp/wpaper/201904.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Inequality and Political Trust in Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Eldes Natalya Hutagalung

    (Master of Applied Economics, Padjadjaran University)

  • Takahiro Akita

    (Graduate School of International Relations International University of Japan)

  • Mohamad Fahmi

    (Department of Economics, Padjadjaran University)

Abstract

Inequality persists across the world. Numerous social and political consequences emerge due to the wide gap between the rich and the poor. For politics, previous empirical studies confirm that higher inequality is associated with a decline of political trust, which may hurt a country’s democratic legitimacy. In a highly unequal society, poor citizens feel worse off and are likely to blame the government for their situation. They judge the government as unfair for giving special treatment to the rich, as its policies mostly reflect the preferences of upper-income groups. This pattern should be particularly accentuated in Indonesia. Given the country’s large income inequality, the issue of political trust has been attracting public concern. This study therefore aims to verify the negative effect of inequality on political trust at the district level. We look at five different governmental entities–the presidency, the house of representatives, governors, police, and the court system–to analyze political trust. Unexpectedly, our results do not agree with previous studies. They show that there is no evidence that inequality dampens political trust in Indonesia. The coefficients of inequality measurements are positive, implying that households in unequal districts on average exhibit more trust in government. The change in inequality shows, however, the negative effect on political trust because as inequality decreases or increases, households’ level of trust in government will increase or decrease in turn.

Suggested Citation

  • Eldes Natalya Hutagalung & Takahiro Akita & Mohamad Fahmi, 2019. "Inequality and Political Trust in Indonesia," Working Papers in Economics and Development Studies (WoPEDS) 201904, Department of Economics, Padjadjaran University, revised Nov 2019.
  • Handle: RePEc:unp:wpaper:201904
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ceds.feb.unpad.ac.id/wopeds/201904.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2019
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew Leigh, 2006. "Trust, Inequality and Ethnic Heterogeneity," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 82(258), pages 268-280, September.
    2. Perdamen Sagala & Takahiro Akita & Arief Yusuf, 2014. "Urbanization and expenditure inequality in Indonesia: testing the Kuznets hypothesis with provincial panel data," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 133-147, October.
    3. Alesina, Alberto & La Ferrara, Eliana, 2002. "Who trusts others?," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 207-234, August.
    4. Frederick Solt, 2008. "Economic Inequality and Democratic Political Engagement," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(1), pages 48-60, January.
    5. Easton, David, 1975. "A Re-assessment of the Concept of Political Support," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(4), pages 435-457, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lourdes ROJAS RUBIO, 2022. "Inequality, Corruption and Support for Democracy," THEMA Working Papers 2022-20, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
    2. Karl McShane, 2017. "Getting Used to Diversity? Immigration and Trust in Sweden," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 37(3), pages 1895-1910.
    3. Tesei, Andrea, 2015. "Trust and racial income inequality: evidence from the U.S," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 61029, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Lisa R. Anderson & Jennifer M. Mellor & Jeffrey Milyo, 2005. "An Experimental Study of the Effects of Inequality and Relative Deprivation on Trusting Behavior," Working Papers 14, Department of Economics, College of William and Mary.
    5. Mavridis, Dimitris, 2015. "Ethnic Diversity and Social Capital in Indonesia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 376-395.
    6. Leigh, Andrew, 2006. "Does equality lead to fraternity?," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 121-125, October.
    7. Samuelson Appau & Sefa Awaworyi Churchill & Russell Smyth & Quanda Zhang, 2022. "Social Capital Inequality and Subjective Wellbeing of Older Chinese," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 160(2), pages 541-563, April.
    8. Gustavsson, Magnus & Jordahl, Henrik, 2008. "Inequality and trust in Sweden: Some inequalities are more harmful than others," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(1-2), pages 348-365, February.
    9. D'ANGELO Emanuela & LILLA Marco, 2007. "Is there more than one linkage between Social Network and Inequality?," IRISS Working Paper Series 2007-12, IRISS at CEPS/INSTEAD.
    10. Nazmun N. Ratna & Quentin Grafton & Ian A. MacDonald, 2012. "Does Multiculturalism Pay? Empirical Evidence from the United States and Canada," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 31(4), pages 401-417, December.
    11. Zheng Wu & Feng Hou & Christoph Schimmele & Adam Carmichael, 2018. "Co-ethnic concentration and trust in Canada’s urban neighbourhoods," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(10), pages 2159-2178, August.
    12. Labonne, Julien & Chase, Robert S., 2010. "A road to trust," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 74(3), pages 253-261, June.
    13. Monica Langella & Alan Manning, 2019. "Diversity and Neighbourhood Satisfaction," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 129(624), pages 3219-3255.
    14. Guglielmo Barone & Sauro Mocetti, 2016. "Inequality And Trust: New Evidence From Panel Data," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 54(2), pages 794-809, April.
    15. Ho-Kong Chan & Kit-Chun Lam & Pak-Wai Liu, 2011. "The Structure of Trust in China and the U.S," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 100(4), pages 553-566, June.
    16. Fabian Stephany, 2017. "Who are Your Joneses? Socio-Specific Income Inequality and Trust," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 134(3), pages 877-898, December.
    17. Sander Steijn & Bram Lancee, 2011. "GINI DP 20: Does Income Inequality Negatively Affect General Trust? Examining three potential problems with the inequality-trust hypothesis," GINI Discussion Papers 20, AIAS, Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies.
    18. Huang, Jian & Maassen van den Brink, Henriëtte & Groot, Wim, 2009. "A meta-analysis of the effect of education on social capital," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 454-464, August.
    19. repec:hig:wpaper:63/soc/2015 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Clark Jeremy & Kim Bonggeun, 2012. "The Effect of Neighborhood Diversity on Volunteering: Evidence From New Zealand," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 1-49, March.
    21. Fischer, Justina A.V., 2012. "Globalization and Political Trust," Papers 285, World Trade Institute.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Political Trust; Inequality; Change of Inequality;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I3 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:unp:wpaper:201904. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Arief Anshory Yusuf (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lppadid.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.