IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tin/wpaper/20250032.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Gender and Performance in Collaboration: Evidence from Random Student Teams

Author

Listed:
  • Max Coveney

    (Erasmus University Rotterdam and Tinbergen Institute)

  • Pilar Garcia-Gomez

    (Erasmus University Rotterdam and Tinbergen Institute)

  • Teresa Marreiros Bago d'Uva

    (Erasmus University Rotterdam and Tinbergen Institute)

Abstract

Should gender composition be taken into account when forming teams? This paper examines how the output of teams completing tasks similar to those performed in many workplaces is influenced by their gender composition. Leveraging an economics bachelor course in which students are randomly paired together, we document large differences in performance grades by the gender make-up of the team. All-male teams are significantly outperformed by both mixed and all-female teams. These differences remain even when comprehensively controlling for the individual task aptitude of each of the group members, as well as other characteristics potentially relevant for teamwork that may vary by gender. Exploring mechanisms, we find suggestive evidence that women have greater preferences for cooperation, and - even when controlling for individual ability - exert higher effort levels in teams compared to men. This asymmetry appears to lead to members of mixed-gender teams reporting the worst team experiences.

Suggested Citation

  • Max Coveney & Pilar Garcia-Gomez & Teresa Marreiros Bago d'Uva, 2025. "Gender and Performance in Collaboration: Evidence from Random Student Teams," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 25-032/V, Tinbergen Institute.
    • Handle: RePEc:tin:wpaper:20250032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://papers.tinbergen.nl/25032.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tin:wpaper:20250032. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tinbergen Office +31 (0)10-4088900 (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/tinbenl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.