Are Sunk Costs Irrelevant? Evidence from Playing Time in the National Basketball Association
The importance of sunk costs in economic decision making is a major source of disagreement between neoclassical and behavioral economists. We provide a direct test of the role played by sunk costs using evidence from the National Basketball Association. Because teams have a greater financial and psychic stake in players chosen in the lottery portion of the draft and in the draftâ€™s first round, behavioral economists predict that teams are more committed to them than to players selected later in the draft and give these players more playing time. Neoclassical economists would assert that current performance should be all that matters when allocating playing time. Our study builds on previous studies in two ways. First, we use a more appropriate data set than earlier studies, one that captures total available playing time more accurately than previous studies by accounting for time lost due to injury, suspension, and other exogenous factors. Second and more importantly, we use a more appropriate estimation technique --- regression discontinuity (RD) --- to show how behavior changes when a player's draft position crosses the threshold between lottery and non-lottery or first- and second-round status. Our RD estimates provide little evidence that teams allocate more playing time to more highly-drafted players than to otherwise identical teammates. We conclude that the neoclassical model more appropriately captures behavior.
|Date of creation:||Nov 2013|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Ritter Annex 877, Philadelphia, PA 19122|
Web page: http://www.cla.temple.edu/economics/
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tem:wpaper:1304. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dimitrios Diamantaras)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.