The Proximity Effect: The Role of Interitem Distance on Reverse-Item Bias
On the basis of cognitive interviews and drawing on the belief-sampling model, we introduce the proximity effect model. The model explains the correlation between two items as a function of their conceptual relationship (nonreversed same-construct items, reversed same-construct items, unrelated items) and their proximity in the questionnaire. In a quantitative study using primary data (N = 3,114), the (positive) correlation between a nonreversed item pair decreases with increasing interitem distance. In contrast, the (negative) correlation between reversed item pairs decreases (i.e., become stronger) with increasing interitem distance. This is related to the way respondents tend to minimize retrieval of additional information when answering nearby nonreversed items and maximize retrieval of new and different information when answering nearby reversed items. Using two simulated correlation matrices that represent common measurement situations, we assess the impact of the proximity effect on factor structure and reliability. The resultant key recommendations pertain to the use of reversed items that are dispersed throughout the questionnaire and the use of a confirmatory factor analysis model specification including a response style factor.
|Date of creation:||Dec 2008|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Hoveniersberg 4, B-9000 Gent|
Phone: ++ 32 (0) 9 264 34 61
Fax: ++ 32 (0) 9 264 35 92
Web page: http://www.ugent.be/eb
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Wong, Nancy & Rindfleisch, Aric & Burroughs, James E, 2003. " Do Reverse-Worded Items Confound Measures in Cross-Cultural Consumer Research? The Case of the Material Values Scale," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 30(1), pages 72-91, June.
- Steenkamp, Jan-Benedict E M & Gielens, Katrijn, 2003. " Consumer and Market Drivers of the Trial Probability of New Consumer Packaged Goods," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 30(3), pages 368-384, December.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rug:rugwps:08/546. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Nathalie Verhaeghe)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.