IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rug/rugwps/08-546.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Proximity Effect: The Role of Interitem Distance on Reverse-Item Bias

Author

Listed:
  • B. WEIJTERS
  • M. GEUENS

    ()

  • N. SCHILLEWAERT

Abstract

On the basis of cognitive interviews and drawing on the belief-sampling model, we introduce the proximity effect model. The model explains the correlation between two items as a function of their conceptual relationship (nonreversed same-construct items, reversed same-construct items, unrelated items) and their proximity in the questionnaire. In a quantitative study using primary data (N = 3,114), the (positive) correlation between a nonreversed item pair decreases with increasing interitem distance. In contrast, the (negative) correlation between reversed item pairs decreases (i.e., become stronger) with increasing interitem distance. This is related to the way respondents tend to minimize retrieval of additional information when answering nearby nonreversed items and maximize retrieval of new and different information when answering nearby reversed items. Using two simulated correlation matrices that represent common measurement situations, we assess the impact of the proximity effect on factor structure and reliability. The resultant key recommendations pertain to the use of reversed items that are dispersed throughout the questionnaire and the use of a confirmatory factor analysis model specification including a response style factor.

Suggested Citation

  • B. Weijters & M. Geuens & N. Schillewaert, 2008. "The Proximity Effect: The Role of Interitem Distance on Reverse-Item Bias," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 08/546, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
  • Handle: RePEc:rug:rugwps:08/546
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://wps-feb.ugent.be/Papers/wp_08_546.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steenkamp, Jan-Benedict E M & Gielens, Katrijn, 2003. " Consumer and Market Drivers of the Trial Probability of New Consumer Packaged Goods," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 30(3), pages 368-384, December.
    2. Wong, Nancy & Rindfleisch, Aric & Burroughs, James E, 2003. " Do Reverse-Worded Items Confound Measures in Cross-Cultural Consumer Research? The Case of the Material Values Scale," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 30(1), pages 72-91, June.
    3. repec:aph:ajpbhl:1989:79:8:1053-1055_8 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Larson, Ronald B., 2016. "Profiling Private-Label Avoiders," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, 2016, Boston, Massachusetts 235823, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Martijn G. de Jong & Donald R. Lehmann & Oded Netzer, 2012. "State-Dependence Effects in Surveys," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(5), pages 838-854, September.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rug:rugwps:08/546. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Nathalie Verhaeghe). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/ferugbe.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.