IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rnp/wpaper/021707.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Testing the Hypothesis of a Unit Root for Independent Panels
[Тестирование Гипотезы О Наличии Единичного Корня Для Независимых Панелей]

Author

Listed:
  • Skrobotov, Anton (Скроботов, Антон)

    () (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA))

  • Turuntseva, Marina (Турунцева, Марина)

    () (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA))

Abstract

Testing of a unit root in the data is of great importance for the empirical analysis. Almost one or macroeconomic study is not without testing whether a particular stationary time series against the trend (trend stationary, TS) or It is stationary in first differences (difference stationary, DS). In the first If the number is stationary relative to the trend, the number of simulated necessary levels. Otherwise, you need to go to the first difference time series if it is modeled by this specific number separately,or proceed to the cointegration analysis of multiple time series, each which is non-stationary. The presence of cointegration allows us to give feasibility study of long-term and short-term dependency adjustments to long-term equilibrium.

Suggested Citation

  • Skrobotov, Anton (Скроботов, Антон) & Turuntseva, Marina (Турунцева, Марина), 2017. "Testing the Hypothesis of a Unit Root for Independent Panels
    [Тестирование Гипотезы О Наличии Единичного Корня Для Независимых Панелей]
    ," Working Papers 021707, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
  • Handle: RePEc:rnp:wpaper:021707
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: ftp://w82.ranepa.ru/rnp/wpaper/021707.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Harmon, Oskar R., 1988. "The income elasticity of demand for single-family owner-occupied housing: An empirical reconciliation," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 173-185, September.
    2. repec:spr:waterr:v:31:y:2017:i:13:d:10.1007_s11269-017-1732-4 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Michele Cavallo & Cedric Tille, 2006. "Could capital gains smooth a current account rebalancing?," Staff Reports 237, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
    4. Emanuele Bracco & Francesco Porcelli & Michela Redoano, 2013. "Political Competition, Tax Salience and Accountability: Theory and Some Evidence from Italy," CESifo Working Paper Series 4167, CESifo Group Munich.
    5. Krishna, Kala & Ozyildirim, Ataman & Swanson, Norman R., 2003. "Trade, investment and growth: nexus, analysis and prognosis," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(2), pages 479-499, April.
    6. Luis Fernando Gamboa & Darwin Cortes & Jorge Ivan Gonzalez, 2001. "An approximation to the standard of living index: the colombian case," BORRADORES DE INVESTIGACIÓN 001972, UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO.
    7. Westerlund, Joakim & Larsson, Rolf, 2015. "New tools for understanding the local asymptotic power of panel unit root tests," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 188(1), pages 59-93.
    8. Jinyong Hahn & Guido Kuersteiner, 2002. "Asymptotically Unbiased Inference for a Dynamic Panel Model with Fixed Effects when Both "n" and "T" Are Large," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 70(4), pages 1639-1657, July.
    9. Cox, Thomas L. & Chavas, Jean-Paul, 1998. "Interregional Analysis Of The Impacts Of Deregulation On U.S. Dairy Sector," 1998 Annual meeting, August 2-5, Salt Lake City, UT 20900, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    10. Beatriz Armendáriz & Ariane Szafarz, 2011. "On Mission Drift in Microfinance Institutions," World Scientific Book Chapters,in: The Handbook Of Microfinance, chapter 16, pages 341-366 World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    11. Westerlund, Joakim & Larsson, Rolf, 2012. "Testing for a unit root in a random coefficient panel data model," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 167(1), pages 254-273.
    12. Donald W. K. Andrews & Patrik Guggenberger, 2008. "Asymptotics for stationary very nearly unit root processes," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 203-212, January.
    13. Bonett, Douglas G., 2006. "Confidence interval for a coefficient of quartile variation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(11), pages 2953-2957, July.
    14. World Bank Group, 2016. "Nepal," World Bank Other Operational Studies 28333, The World Bank.
    15. Hansen, Benjamin & Sabia, Joseph J. & Rees, Daniel I., 2015. "Cigarette Taxes and Youth Smoking: Updated Estimates Using YRBS Data," IZA Discussion Papers 9144, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
    16. Jürgen Schuldt, 2008. "Segunda parte: Los modelos keynesianos. Cruzonia," Chapters of Books,in: Jürgen Schuldt (ed.), Modelos macroeconómicos computarizados (una introducción), edition 1, volume 1, chapter 5, pages 95-122 Fondo Editorial, Universidad del Pacífico.
    17. Peter Farkas & Laszlo Matyas, 2015. "Testing for Unit Roots in Panel Data with Boundary Crossing Counts," CEU Working Papers 2015_5, Department of Economics, Central European University, revised 03 Nov 2015.
    18. repec:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2012.300835_1 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Zhang, Jianhua & Lin, Mingming & Fang, Fang & Xu, Jinliang & Li, Kang, 2016. "Gain scheduling control of waste heat energy conversion systems based on an LPV (linear parameter varying) model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 773-783.
    20. Davydov, Yu., 2012. "On convex hull of d-dimensional fractional Brownian motion," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 37-39.
    21. repec:cup:apsrev:v:80:y:1986:i:02:p:669-671_18 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Japheth Osotsi Awiti & John Mutua & Robert Nyaga & David Muthaka, 2013. "Institutions and Performance of Services Funded by the Constituencies Development Fund in Kenya," Journal of African Development, African Finance and Economic Association, vol. 15(1), pages 271-286.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:wpaper:021707. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (RANEPA maintainer). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.