Testing for Unit Roots Using Forward and Reverse Dickey-Fuller Regressions
This article suggests a simple test for the null hypothesis that a process contains a unit root against a (trend) stationary alternative. It is based on the maximum value of the standard Dickey-Fuller tests when applied to both the forward and reverse data realizations. Thus, it requires no special computation and can easily be calculated from most existing econometric software packages. The null distribution of the maximum test is tabulated using Monte Carlo simulation and it is demonstrated to have considerably more power to reject the false null of a unit root than the standard Dickey-Fuller test. The tests are also shown to share very similar robustness properties. When applied to a number of well known U.S. macroeconomics time series, the new test rejects the unit root hypothesis more frequently than does the usual Dickey-Fuller test. Copyright 1995 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
Volume (Year): 57 (1995)
Issue (Month): 4 (November)
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0305-9049Email:
More information through EDIRC
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/subs.asp?ref=0305-9049|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:obuest:v:57:y:1995:i:4:p:559-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing)or (Christopher F. Baum)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.